Explaining the effectiveness of performance-based logistics: a quantitative examination
Purpose - Performance-based logistics (PBL) strategies are providing governments and for-profit organizations with a contractual mechanism that reduces the life cycle costs of their systems. PBL accomplishes this by establishing contracts that focus on the delivery of performance not parts. PBL esta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of logistics management 2011-01, Vol.22 (3), p.324-348 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 348 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 324 |
container_title | The international journal of logistics management |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Randall, Wesley S. Nowicki, David R. Hawkins, Timothy G. |
description | Purpose - Performance-based logistics (PBL) strategies are providing governments and for-profit organizations with a contractual mechanism that reduces the life cycle costs of their systems. PBL accomplishes this by establishing contracts that focus on the delivery of performance not parts. PBL establishes a metric based governance structure where suppliers make more profit when they invest in logistics process improvements, or system redesign, that reduces total cost of ownership. While work has been done to outline an overall PBL theoretical framework, the underlying theory explaining the enablers that lead to organizational and team-level, team-goal alignment associated with the PBL governance structure requires testing. The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively test previously posited relationships between enablers of PBL and PBL effectiveness. An additional objective is to explore any differences in PBL effectiveness between different business sectors.Design methodology approach - A multiple regression model was developed, tested and validated to explain the effectiveness of PBL. The model was externally validated with exploratory cross-sectional survey data of 61 practitioners.Findings - This study strongly supports recent PBL theory explaining PBL effectiveness. Key antecedents include investment climate, relational exchange, PBL leadership, and business sector. Further, government organizations lag behind their commercial counterparts in PBL effectiveness and PBL leadership.Practical implications - PBL business arrangements are more effective in more favorable investment climates. Thus, leaders should welcome new ideas, empower employees, and encourage entrepreneurship. Since PBL effectiveness increases with relational exchange, building trust and communicating with suppliers is key. Leadership is also important to PBL effectiveness. Leaders should accept risk, focus on long-term affordability and performance, and align activities to achieve end-user goals.Originality value - This research is the first quantitative test of previously posited factors affecting PBL effectiveness. Additionally, this research unveils key differences in business sectors' use of PBL strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/09574091111181354 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_09574091111181354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2515179121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-c724b705a80659f4ab01aa8177efe96da8ec07060f7ac04c6a5b87d8ff8e8a983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG_FkwerE5s0iTdZ_IIFL4rHMptONEub1qQr-u_tsuLBj7nMwDzvO8PL2CGHU85Bn4GRSoDh69K8kGKLTbiSOi-lhG02We_zESh22V5KSwDQwPWEPV299w364MNzNrxQRs6RHfwbBUop61zWU3RdbDFYyheYqM6a7tmnwdt0kWH2usIw-AHXkozesfVhnLuwz3YcNokOvvqUPV5fPcxu8_n9zd3scp5bwcWQW3UuFgokaiilcQIXwBE1V4ocmbJGTRYUlOAUWhC2RLnQqtbOadJodDFlxxvfPnavK0pD1fpkqWkwULdKFYdCn5vCaDGiRz_QZbeKYfyuMiCMlAXIEeIbyMYupUiu6qNvMX6MTtU66epX0qPmZKOhliI29bfkF1r1tRtx-Bv__8In7auM3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904955305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining the effectiveness of performance-based logistics: a quantitative examination</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Randall, Wesley S. ; Nowicki, David R. ; Hawkins, Timothy G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Randall, Wesley S. ; Nowicki, David R. ; Hawkins, Timothy G.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - Performance-based logistics (PBL) strategies are providing governments and for-profit organizations with a contractual mechanism that reduces the life cycle costs of their systems. PBL accomplishes this by establishing contracts that focus on the delivery of performance not parts. PBL establishes a metric based governance structure where suppliers make more profit when they invest in logistics process improvements, or system redesign, that reduces total cost of ownership. While work has been done to outline an overall PBL theoretical framework, the underlying theory explaining the enablers that lead to organizational and team-level, team-goal alignment associated with the PBL governance structure requires testing. The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively test previously posited relationships between enablers of PBL and PBL effectiveness. An additional objective is to explore any differences in PBL effectiveness between different business sectors.Design methodology approach - A multiple regression model was developed, tested and validated to explain the effectiveness of PBL. The model was externally validated with exploratory cross-sectional survey data of 61 practitioners.Findings - This study strongly supports recent PBL theory explaining PBL effectiveness. Key antecedents include investment climate, relational exchange, PBL leadership, and business sector. Further, government organizations lag behind their commercial counterparts in PBL effectiveness and PBL leadership.Practical implications - PBL business arrangements are more effective in more favorable investment climates. Thus, leaders should welcome new ideas, empower employees, and encourage entrepreneurship. Since PBL effectiveness increases with relational exchange, building trust and communicating with suppliers is key. Leadership is also important to PBL effectiveness. Leaders should accept risk, focus on long-term affordability and performance, and align activities to achieve end-user goals.Originality value - This research is the first quantitative test of previously posited factors affecting PBL effectiveness. Additionally, this research unveils key differences in business sectors' use of PBL strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-4093</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/09574091111181354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ponte Vedra Beach: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Airlines ; Alignment ; Business ; Business models ; Cost control ; Costs ; Customer services ; Defense industry ; Financing ; Health services ; Hypotheses ; Innovations ; Leadership ; Logistics ; OEM ; Organizations ; Profit margins ; R&D ; Research & development ; Strategy ; Studies ; Suppliers ; Supply chains ; Technological change ; Theory</subject><ispartof>The international journal of logistics management, 2011-01, Vol.22 (3), p.324-348</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-c724b705a80659f4ab01aa8177efe96da8ec07060f7ac04c6a5b87d8ff8e8a983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-c724b705a80659f4ab01aa8177efe96da8ec07060f7ac04c6a5b87d8ff8e8a983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09574091111181354/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09574091111181354/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21695,27924,27925,53244,53372</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Randall, Wesley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowicki, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Timothy G.</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining the effectiveness of performance-based logistics: a quantitative examination</title><title>The international journal of logistics management</title><description>Purpose - Performance-based logistics (PBL) strategies are providing governments and for-profit organizations with a contractual mechanism that reduces the life cycle costs of their systems. PBL accomplishes this by establishing contracts that focus on the delivery of performance not parts. PBL establishes a metric based governance structure where suppliers make more profit when they invest in logistics process improvements, or system redesign, that reduces total cost of ownership. While work has been done to outline an overall PBL theoretical framework, the underlying theory explaining the enablers that lead to organizational and team-level, team-goal alignment associated with the PBL governance structure requires testing. The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively test previously posited relationships between enablers of PBL and PBL effectiveness. An additional objective is to explore any differences in PBL effectiveness between different business sectors.Design methodology approach - A multiple regression model was developed, tested and validated to explain the effectiveness of PBL. The model was externally validated with exploratory cross-sectional survey data of 61 practitioners.Findings - This study strongly supports recent PBL theory explaining PBL effectiveness. Key antecedents include investment climate, relational exchange, PBL leadership, and business sector. Further, government organizations lag behind their commercial counterparts in PBL effectiveness and PBL leadership.Practical implications - PBL business arrangements are more effective in more favorable investment climates. Thus, leaders should welcome new ideas, empower employees, and encourage entrepreneurship. Since PBL effectiveness increases with relational exchange, building trust and communicating with suppliers is key. Leadership is also important to PBL effectiveness. Leaders should accept risk, focus on long-term affordability and performance, and align activities to achieve end-user goals.Originality value - This research is the first quantitative test of previously posited factors affecting PBL effectiveness. Additionally, this research unveils key differences in business sectors' use of PBL strategies.</description><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business models</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Defense industry</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>OEM</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Profit margins</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0957-4093</issn><issn>1758-6550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG_FkwerE5s0iTdZ_IIFL4rHMptONEub1qQr-u_tsuLBj7nMwDzvO8PL2CGHU85Bn4GRSoDh69K8kGKLTbiSOi-lhG02We_zESh22V5KSwDQwPWEPV299w364MNzNrxQRs6RHfwbBUop61zWU3RdbDFYyheYqM6a7tmnwdt0kWH2usIw-AHXkozesfVhnLuwz3YcNokOvvqUPV5fPcxu8_n9zd3scp5bwcWQW3UuFgokaiilcQIXwBE1V4ocmbJGTRYUlOAUWhC2RLnQqtbOadJodDFlxxvfPnavK0pD1fpkqWkwULdKFYdCn5vCaDGiRz_QZbeKYfyuMiCMlAXIEeIbyMYupUiu6qNvMX6MTtU66epX0qPmZKOhliI29bfkF1r1tRtx-Bv__8In7auM3A</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Randall, Wesley S.</creator><creator>Nowicki, David R.</creator><creator>Hawkins, Timothy G.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Explaining the effectiveness of performance-based logistics: a quantitative examination</title><author>Randall, Wesley S. ; Nowicki, David R. ; Hawkins, Timothy G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-c724b705a80659f4ab01aa8177efe96da8ec07060f7ac04c6a5b87d8ff8e8a983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business models</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Defense industry</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>OEM</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Profit margins</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Randall, Wesley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowicki, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Timothy G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The international journal of logistics management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Randall, Wesley S.</au><au>Nowicki, David R.</au><au>Hawkins, Timothy G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining the effectiveness of performance-based logistics: a quantitative examination</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of logistics management</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>324</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>324-348</pages><issn>0957-4093</issn><eissn>1758-6550</eissn><abstract>Purpose - Performance-based logistics (PBL) strategies are providing governments and for-profit organizations with a contractual mechanism that reduces the life cycle costs of their systems. PBL accomplishes this by establishing contracts that focus on the delivery of performance not parts. PBL establishes a metric based governance structure where suppliers make more profit when they invest in logistics process improvements, or system redesign, that reduces total cost of ownership. While work has been done to outline an overall PBL theoretical framework, the underlying theory explaining the enablers that lead to organizational and team-level, team-goal alignment associated with the PBL governance structure requires testing. The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively test previously posited relationships between enablers of PBL and PBL effectiveness. An additional objective is to explore any differences in PBL effectiveness between different business sectors.Design methodology approach - A multiple regression model was developed, tested and validated to explain the effectiveness of PBL. The model was externally validated with exploratory cross-sectional survey data of 61 practitioners.Findings - This study strongly supports recent PBL theory explaining PBL effectiveness. Key antecedents include investment climate, relational exchange, PBL leadership, and business sector. Further, government organizations lag behind their commercial counterparts in PBL effectiveness and PBL leadership.Practical implications - PBL business arrangements are more effective in more favorable investment climates. Thus, leaders should welcome new ideas, empower employees, and encourage entrepreneurship. Since PBL effectiveness increases with relational exchange, building trust and communicating with suppliers is key. Leadership is also important to PBL effectiveness. Leaders should accept risk, focus on long-term affordability and performance, and align activities to achieve end-user goals.Originality value - This research is the first quantitative test of previously posited factors affecting PBL effectiveness. Additionally, this research unveils key differences in business sectors' use of PBL strategies.</abstract><cop>Ponte Vedra Beach</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/09574091111181354</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0957-4093 |
ispartof | The international journal of logistics management, 2011-01, Vol.22 (3), p.324-348 |
issn | 0957-4093 1758-6550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_09574091111181354 |
source | Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Airlines Alignment Business Business models Cost control Costs Customer services Defense industry Financing Health services Hypotheses Innovations Leadership Logistics OEM Organizations Profit margins R&D Research & development Strategy Studies Suppliers Supply chains Technological change Theory |
title | Explaining the effectiveness of performance-based logistics: a quantitative examination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A40%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20performance-based%20logistics:%20a%20quantitative%20examination&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20logistics%20management&rft.au=Randall,%20Wesley%20S.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=324&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=324-348&rft.issn=0957-4093&rft.eissn=1758-6550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/09574091111181354&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2515179121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904955305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |