Quality indicators in higher education - comparing Hong Kong and China's students
There is growing concern in college management about the quality of education in tertiary institutions. For related studies, people normally encounter the problems of developing measurement indicators and identifying components of quality education. Some people use SERVQUAL, a technique making use o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Managerial auditing journal 1999-02, Vol.14 (1/2), p.20-27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 27 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1/2 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Managerial auditing journal |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Kwan, Paula Y.K Ng, Paul W.K |
description | There is growing concern in college management about the quality of education in tertiary institutions. For related studies, people normally encounter the problems of developing measurement indicators and identifying components of quality education. Some people use SERVQUAL, a technique making use of the gap between customers' expectations and perceived experience as indicators of service quality, to measure quality of services offered by professionals such as physicians. Hampton applied the technique to identify and measure the significance of different components of quality education, by using the questionnaire designed by Betz, Klingensmith and Menne. Hampton's findings sound reasonable but seem to be too simplified and confined to the characteristics of students in the USA. The expectations and perceptions of the students are often shaped and influenced by their cultural orientation and environments. Hong Kong students who are more pragmatic and instrumental may value less the significance of campus life on quality education but put more stress on assessment. This study is designed to apply the modified SERVQUAL skill to examine Hampton's findings with reference to the students in a different social and cultural context. It is hoped that a list of quality indicators can be identified against which the performance of the higher educational institutes can be measured. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/02686909910245964 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_02686909910245964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31006328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4b0aadbfc0717f6043f33f532aac96fa9f375e7d2f41372cfd107ff289267ddc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewiFrAh4FfsZIkq2gJFqBKIpeX60bqkSbETif49joq64CE2M5bn3DseDwCnCF4hBPNriFnOClgUCGKaFYzugR7iWZ5yTrJ90OvqaQTwITgKYQkhwhTRHphOW1m6ZpO4Sjslm9qHeEwWbr4wPjG6jXeurpI0UfVqLb2r5sm4juGhC7LSyWDhKnkRktC02lRNOAYHVpbBnHzlPngZ3j4PxunkaXQ3uJmkirCsSekMSqlnVkGOuGWQEkuIzQiWUhXMysISnhmusaWIcKysRpBbi_MCM661In1wvvVd-_q9NaERKxeUKUtZmboNguCcE0zY_yCCkEU6gmffwGXd-ioOITCn8X9JdOwDtIWUr0Pwxoq1dyvpNwJB0a1C_FhF1KRbjQuN-dgJpH8TjMcxBX3FYjiidJDdP4qux-WWNyvjZal3ih_WYq1txOHv-N8v-gRw16UY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>274686387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality indicators in higher education - comparing Hong Kong and China's students</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Kwan, Paula Y.K ; Ng, Paul W.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Paula Y.K ; Ng, Paul W.K</creatorcontrib><description>There is growing concern in college management about the quality of education in tertiary institutions. For related studies, people normally encounter the problems of developing measurement indicators and identifying components of quality education. Some people use SERVQUAL, a technique making use of the gap between customers' expectations and perceived experience as indicators of service quality, to measure quality of services offered by professionals such as physicians. Hampton applied the technique to identify and measure the significance of different components of quality education, by using the questionnaire designed by Betz, Klingensmith and Menne. Hampton's findings sound reasonable but seem to be too simplified and confined to the characteristics of students in the USA. The expectations and perceptions of the students are often shaped and influenced by their cultural orientation and environments. Hong Kong students who are more pragmatic and instrumental may value less the significance of campus life on quality education but put more stress on assessment. This study is designed to apply the modified SERVQUAL skill to examine Hampton's findings with reference to the students in a different social and cultural context. It is hoped that a list of quality indicators can be identified against which the performance of the higher educational institutes can be measured.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-6902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/02686909910245964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>China ; Comparative analysis ; Confucianism ; Economic development ; Higher education ; Hong Kong ; Learning ; Philosophy ; Professionals ; Questionnaires ; Society ; Students ; Studies ; Teaching methods ; Total quality ; Total quality management ; University graduates</subject><ispartof>Managerial auditing journal, 1999-02, Vol.14 (1/2), p.20-27</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>Copyright MCB UP Limited (MCB) 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4b0aadbfc0717f6043f33f532aac96fa9f375e7d2f41372cfd107ff289267ddc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4b0aadbfc0717f6043f33f532aac96fa9f375e7d2f41372cfd107ff289267ddc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686909910245964/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686909910245964/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,27901,27902,52661,52664</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Paula Y.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Paul W.K</creatorcontrib><title>Quality indicators in higher education - comparing Hong Kong and China's students</title><title>Managerial auditing journal</title><description>There is growing concern in college management about the quality of education in tertiary institutions. For related studies, people normally encounter the problems of developing measurement indicators and identifying components of quality education. Some people use SERVQUAL, a technique making use of the gap between customers' expectations and perceived experience as indicators of service quality, to measure quality of services offered by professionals such as physicians. Hampton applied the technique to identify and measure the significance of different components of quality education, by using the questionnaire designed by Betz, Klingensmith and Menne. Hampton's findings sound reasonable but seem to be too simplified and confined to the characteristics of students in the USA. The expectations and perceptions of the students are often shaped and influenced by their cultural orientation and environments. Hong Kong students who are more pragmatic and instrumental may value less the significance of campus life on quality education but put more stress on assessment. This study is designed to apply the modified SERVQUAL skill to examine Hampton's findings with reference to the students in a different social and cultural context. It is hoped that a list of quality indicators can be identified against which the performance of the higher educational institutes can be measured.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Total quality</subject><subject>Total quality management</subject><subject>University graduates</subject><issn>0268-6902</issn><issn>1758-7735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewiFrAh4FfsZIkq2gJFqBKIpeX60bqkSbETif49joq64CE2M5bn3DseDwCnCF4hBPNriFnOClgUCGKaFYzugR7iWZ5yTrJ90OvqaQTwITgKYQkhwhTRHphOW1m6ZpO4Sjslm9qHeEwWbr4wPjG6jXeurpI0UfVqLb2r5sm4juGhC7LSyWDhKnkRktC02lRNOAYHVpbBnHzlPngZ3j4PxunkaXQ3uJmkirCsSekMSqlnVkGOuGWQEkuIzQiWUhXMysISnhmusaWIcKysRpBbi_MCM661In1wvvVd-_q9NaERKxeUKUtZmboNguCcE0zY_yCCkEU6gmffwGXd-ioOITCn8X9JdOwDtIWUr0Pwxoq1dyvpNwJB0a1C_FhF1KRbjQuN-dgJpH8TjMcxBX3FYjiidJDdP4qux-WWNyvjZal3ih_WYq1txOHv-N8v-gRw16UY</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Kwan, Paula Y.K</creator><creator>Ng, Paul W.K</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Quality indicators in higher education - comparing Hong Kong and China's students</title><author>Kwan, Paula Y.K ; Ng, Paul W.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4b0aadbfc0717f6043f33f532aac96fa9f375e7d2f41372cfd107ff289267ddc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Total quality</topic><topic>Total quality management</topic><topic>University graduates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Paula Y.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Paul W.K</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kwan, Paula Y.K</au><au>Ng, Paul W.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality indicators in higher education - comparing Hong Kong and China's students</atitle><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>20-27</pages><issn>0268-6902</issn><eissn>1758-7735</eissn><abstract>There is growing concern in college management about the quality of education in tertiary institutions. For related studies, people normally encounter the problems of developing measurement indicators and identifying components of quality education. Some people use SERVQUAL, a technique making use of the gap between customers' expectations and perceived experience as indicators of service quality, to measure quality of services offered by professionals such as physicians. Hampton applied the technique to identify and measure the significance of different components of quality education, by using the questionnaire designed by Betz, Klingensmith and Menne. Hampton's findings sound reasonable but seem to be too simplified and confined to the characteristics of students in the USA. The expectations and perceptions of the students are often shaped and influenced by their cultural orientation and environments. Hong Kong students who are more pragmatic and instrumental may value less the significance of campus life on quality education but put more stress on assessment. This study is designed to apply the modified SERVQUAL skill to examine Hampton's findings with reference to the students in a different social and cultural context. It is hoped that a list of quality indicators can be identified against which the performance of the higher educational institutes can be measured.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/02686909910245964</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-6902 |
ispartof | Managerial auditing journal, 1999-02, Vol.14 (1/2), p.20-27 |
issn | 0268-6902 1758-7735 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_02686909910245964 |
source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
subjects | China Comparative analysis Confucianism Economic development Higher education Hong Kong Learning Philosophy Professionals Questionnaires Society Students Studies Teaching methods Total quality Total quality management University graduates |
title | Quality indicators in higher education - comparing Hong Kong and China's students |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A32%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20indicators%20in%20higher%20education%20-%20comparing%20Hong%20Kong%20and%20China's%20students&rft.jtitle=Managerial%20auditing%20journal&rft.au=Kwan,%20Paula%20Y.K&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=20-27&rft.issn=0268-6902&rft.eissn=1758-7735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/02686909910245964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E31006328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=274686387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |