Using toolkits to achieve STEM enterprise learning outcomes
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of using several commercial tools in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) subjects for enterprise education at Newcastle University, UK.Design methodology approach - The paper provides an overview of existing toolkit u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Education & training (London) 2012-05, Vol.54 (4), p.259-277 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 277 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | Education & training (London) |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Watts, Carys A Wray, Katie |
description | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of using several commercial tools in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) subjects for enterprise education at Newcastle University, UK.Design methodology approach - The paper provides an overview of existing toolkit use in higher education, before reviewing where and how tools are used across science and engineering disciplines. Feedback was collated from Newcastle educators and students to determine whether the projected enterprise learning outcomes were achieved. STEM learning outcomes were also mapped to the NCEE entrepreneurship learning outcomes framework.Findings - The paper investigated the use of three key enterprise toolkits across the Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering and the Faculty of Medical Sciences, where the focus is on innovation and product service development, rather than on the desire to "be an entrepreneur". This reflection on practice evaluates the benefits and student perceptions of workshop tools for enterprise, decision making and teamwork. It makes comparison between the perceived employability needs of these students, and addresses the intended and actual outcomes of these tools.Research limitations implications - Evaluating toolkit use within a single university is constrained by common internal workings, however as exemplars of good practice this is of value to other UK higher education institutions.Practical implications - Consideration is given to entrepreneurial support and development, and whether using existing tools should be used for summative or for formative assessment. It also questions whether tools are fit for purpose.Originality value - This paper reveals patterns of tool use and their effectiveness across science and engineering. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/00400911211236118 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_00400911211236118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ966364</ericid><sourcerecordid>2664855421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-89d5ee054dd17460ff797b3d75416144238942e68fec3efcbe528ff077e6076e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQPCw4NXVmSSb7OJJpP6j4sH2vGyzE9263dRkK_jtTWnxUg_CwAy835sZHmOnCJeIkF8BSIACkccSCjHfYwPUWZ4q5HqfDdZ6GgF-yI5CmANEl-ADdj0NTfeW9M61H00f4pBU5r2hL0peJ6PnhLqe_NI3gZKWKt-tYbfqjVtQOGYHtmoDnWz7kE3vRpPbh3T8cv94ezNOjdC8T_Oizoggk3WNWiqwVhd6JmqdSVQoJRd5ITmp3JIRZM2MMp5bC1qTAq1IDNn5Zu_Su88Vhb6cu5Xv4skSASWXGlBFCjeU8S4ET7aMby8q_x2hcp1RuZNR9JxtPOQb88uPngqlhJJRhq28IF-19b82Xvxt2UHLZW3FDw1GfA8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1014247016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using toolkits to achieve STEM enterprise learning outcomes</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Watts, Carys A ; Wray, Katie</creator><contributor>Harte, Victoria</contributor><creatorcontrib>Watts, Carys A ; Wray, Katie ; Harte, Victoria</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of using several commercial tools in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) subjects for enterprise education at Newcastle University, UK.Design methodology approach - The paper provides an overview of existing toolkit use in higher education, before reviewing where and how tools are used across science and engineering disciplines. Feedback was collated from Newcastle educators and students to determine whether the projected enterprise learning outcomes were achieved. STEM learning outcomes were also mapped to the NCEE entrepreneurship learning outcomes framework.Findings - The paper investigated the use of three key enterprise toolkits across the Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering and the Faculty of Medical Sciences, where the focus is on innovation and product service development, rather than on the desire to "be an entrepreneur". This reflection on practice evaluates the benefits and student perceptions of workshop tools for enterprise, decision making and teamwork. It makes comparison between the perceived employability needs of these students, and addresses the intended and actual outcomes of these tools.Research limitations implications - Evaluating toolkit use within a single university is constrained by common internal workings, however as exemplars of good practice this is of value to other UK higher education institutions.Practical implications - Consideration is given to entrepreneurial support and development, and whether using existing tools should be used for summative or for formative assessment. It also questions whether tools are fit for purpose.Originality value - This paper reveals patterns of tool use and their effectiveness across science and engineering.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/00400911211236118</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDUTAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Business education ; Citizenship education ; Colleges ; Curricula ; Decision Making ; Educational Environment ; Educational objectives ; Employment Potential ; Engineering ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; Experiential learning ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; Foreign Countries ; Formative Evaluation ; Games ; Higher Education ; Mathematics ; Outcomes of Education ; School environment ; Science ; Sciences ; Simulation ; STEM Education ; Students ; Studies ; Summative Evaluation ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Teamwork ; Technological change ; Technology ; United Kingdom ; Universities ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Education & training (London), 2012-05, Vol.54 (4), p.259-277</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-89d5ee054dd17460ff797b3d75416144238942e68fec3efcbe528ff077e6076e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-89d5ee054dd17460ff797b3d75416144238942e68fec3efcbe528ff077e6076e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00400911211236118/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00400911211236118/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52686,52689</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ966364$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Harte, Victoria</contributor><creatorcontrib>Watts, Carys A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wray, Katie</creatorcontrib><title>Using toolkits to achieve STEM enterprise learning outcomes</title><title>Education & training (London)</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of using several commercial tools in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) subjects for enterprise education at Newcastle University, UK.Design methodology approach - The paper provides an overview of existing toolkit use in higher education, before reviewing where and how tools are used across science and engineering disciplines. Feedback was collated from Newcastle educators and students to determine whether the projected enterprise learning outcomes were achieved. STEM learning outcomes were also mapped to the NCEE entrepreneurship learning outcomes framework.Findings - The paper investigated the use of three key enterprise toolkits across the Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering and the Faculty of Medical Sciences, where the focus is on innovation and product service development, rather than on the desire to "be an entrepreneur". This reflection on practice evaluates the benefits and student perceptions of workshop tools for enterprise, decision making and teamwork. It makes comparison between the perceived employability needs of these students, and addresses the intended and actual outcomes of these tools.Research limitations implications - Evaluating toolkit use within a single university is constrained by common internal workings, however as exemplars of good practice this is of value to other UK higher education institutions.Practical implications - Consideration is given to entrepreneurial support and development, and whether using existing tools should be used for summative or for formative assessment. It also questions whether tools are fit for purpose.Originality value - This paper reveals patterns of tool use and their effectiveness across science and engineering.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Business education</subject><subject>Citizenship education</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational objectives</subject><subject>Employment Potential</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Experiential learning</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>School environment</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Sciences</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Summative Evaluation</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0040-0912</issn><issn>1758-6127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQPCw4NXVmSSb7OJJpP6j4sH2vGyzE9263dRkK_jtTWnxUg_CwAy835sZHmOnCJeIkF8BSIACkccSCjHfYwPUWZ4q5HqfDdZ6GgF-yI5CmANEl-ADdj0NTfeW9M61H00f4pBU5r2hL0peJ6PnhLqe_NI3gZKWKt-tYbfqjVtQOGYHtmoDnWz7kE3vRpPbh3T8cv94ezNOjdC8T_Oizoggk3WNWiqwVhd6JmqdSVQoJRd5ITmp3JIRZM2MMp5bC1qTAq1IDNn5Zu_Su88Vhb6cu5Xv4skSASWXGlBFCjeU8S4ET7aMby8q_x2hcp1RuZNR9JxtPOQb88uPngqlhJJRhq28IF-19b82Xvxt2UHLZW3FDw1GfA8</recordid><startdate>20120525</startdate><enddate>20120525</enddate><creator>Watts, Carys A</creator><creator>Wray, Katie</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120525</creationdate><title>Using toolkits to achieve STEM enterprise learning outcomes</title><author>Watts, Carys A ; Wray, Katie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-89d5ee054dd17460ff797b3d75416144238942e68fec3efcbe528ff077e6076e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Business education</topic><topic>Citizenship education</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational objectives</topic><topic>Employment Potential</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Experiential learning</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>School environment</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Sciences</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Summative Evaluation</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watts, Carys A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wray, Katie</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Education & training (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watts, Carys A</au><au>Wray, Katie</au><au>Harte, Victoria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ966364</ericid><atitle>Using toolkits to achieve STEM enterprise learning outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Education & training (London)</jtitle><date>2012-05-25</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>259-277</pages><issn>0040-0912</issn><eissn>1758-6127</eissn><coden>EDUTAK</coden><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of using several commercial tools in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) subjects for enterprise education at Newcastle University, UK.Design methodology approach - The paper provides an overview of existing toolkit use in higher education, before reviewing where and how tools are used across science and engineering disciplines. Feedback was collated from Newcastle educators and students to determine whether the projected enterprise learning outcomes were achieved. STEM learning outcomes were also mapped to the NCEE entrepreneurship learning outcomes framework.Findings - The paper investigated the use of three key enterprise toolkits across the Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering and the Faculty of Medical Sciences, where the focus is on innovation and product service development, rather than on the desire to "be an entrepreneur". This reflection on practice evaluates the benefits and student perceptions of workshop tools for enterprise, decision making and teamwork. It makes comparison between the perceived employability needs of these students, and addresses the intended and actual outcomes of these tools.Research limitations implications - Evaluating toolkit use within a single university is constrained by common internal workings, however as exemplars of good practice this is of value to other UK higher education institutions.Practical implications - Consideration is given to entrepreneurial support and development, and whether using existing tools should be used for summative or for formative assessment. It also questions whether tools are fit for purpose.Originality value - This paper reveals patterns of tool use and their effectiveness across science and engineering.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/00400911211236118</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-0912 |
ispartof | Education & training (London), 2012-05, Vol.54 (4), p.259-277 |
issn | 0040-0912 1758-6127 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_00400911211236118 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Academic Achievement Business education Citizenship education Colleges Curricula Decision Making Educational Environment Educational objectives Employment Potential Engineering Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship Experiential learning Feedback Feedback (Response) Foreign Countries Formative Evaluation Games Higher Education Mathematics Outcomes of Education School environment Science Sciences Simulation STEM Education Students Studies Summative Evaluation Teachers Teaching Methods Teamwork Technological change Technology United Kingdom Universities Workshops |
title | Using toolkits to achieve STEM enterprise learning outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A50%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20toolkits%20to%20achieve%20STEM%20enterprise%20learning%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Education%20&%20training%20(London)&rft.au=Watts,%20Carys%20A&rft.date=2012-05-25&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=259-277&rft.issn=0040-0912&rft.eissn=1758-6127&rft.coden=EDUTAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/00400911211236118&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2664855421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1014247016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ966364&rfr_iscdi=true |