Some Remarks on Electric-Discharge Shock-Tube Diagnostics

An investigation was made to determine whether there is a basic version of discharge tube which can serve to produce a quasi-uniform block of plasma. Operating conditions are described for a diaphragm type device with a Mach-25 shock proceeding into room-temperature argon at 1-mm pressure. The basic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reviews of modern physics 1960-10, Vol.32 (4), p.780-784
1. Verfasser: Bershader, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 784
container_issue 4
container_start_page 780
container_title Reviews of modern physics
container_volume 32
creator Bershader, Daniel
description An investigation was made to determine whether there is a basic version of discharge tube which can serve to produce a quasi-uniform block of plasma. Operating conditions are described for a diaphragm type device with a Mach-25 shock proceeding into room-temperature argon at 1-mm pressure. The basic difference between the diaphragm type tube and the discharge type tube is that the latter makes use of a current flow as part of the energy addition process, which permits magnetic forces to aid in the acceleration of the gas. No simple conclusions can be drawn from previous results, but the results may be related to a basic requirement for a general-purpose electricdischarge shock tube, namely, the uniform-flow regime behind the advancing shock. Possible mechanisms in the rather constant wave and flow speeds are: energy-transfer time, vaporization of material in the electrode region, and electrode geometry. The uniformity of the plasma behind the shock is limited in any strict sense but may be adequate for the order of microseconds for aerodynamic and other applications. The use of a maintained piston-like drive all along the tube may be superior to controlled energy feed-in. (B.O.G.)
doi_str_mv 10.1103/RevModPhys.32.780
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_RevModPhys_32_780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1103_RevModPhys_32_780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-e51eace2f4479be61a6d52cb071f07dfcf43f0f5dbae3db98e790283f05cf583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1OwzAQhH0AiVJ4AG4R95S1ncTJEbXlRyoCtblbzmbdhLYxsgNS3x5XReK0mtVodudj7I7DjHOQD2v6eXPtR3cMMylmqoQLNgGQWVqUBb9i1yF8QtSQqwmrNu5AyZoOxu9C4oZkuSccfY_pog_YGb-lZNM53KX1d0PJojfbwYWxx3DDLq3ZB7r9m1NWPy3r-Uu6en9-nT-uUhRKjCnlnAySsFmmqoYKboo2F9iA4hZUa9Fm0oLN28aQbJuqJFWBKOMuR5uXcsruz7GnqzpgPxJ26IYhvqkzKAvBq2jiZxN6F4Inq798HysdNQd9YqL_mWgpdGQifwFaD1mh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some Remarks on Electric-Discharge Shock-Tube Diagnostics</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Bershader, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Bershader, Daniel ; Lockheed Aircraft Corp., Calif ; and Stanford Univ., Calif</creatorcontrib><description>An investigation was made to determine whether there is a basic version of discharge tube which can serve to produce a quasi-uniform block of plasma. Operating conditions are described for a diaphragm type device with a Mach-25 shock proceeding into room-temperature argon at 1-mm pressure. The basic difference between the diaphragm type tube and the discharge type tube is that the latter makes use of a current flow as part of the energy addition process, which permits magnetic forces to aid in the acceleration of the gas. No simple conclusions can be drawn from previous results, but the results may be related to a basic requirement for a general-purpose electricdischarge shock tube, namely, the uniform-flow regime behind the advancing shock. Possible mechanisms in the rather constant wave and flow speeds are: energy-transfer time, vaporization of material in the electrode region, and electrode geometry. The uniformity of the plasma behind the shock is limited in any strict sense but may be adequate for the order of microseconds for aerodynamic and other applications. The use of a maintained piston-like drive all along the tube may be superior to controlled energy feed-in. (B.O.G.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.32.780</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>AERODYNAMICS ; ARGON ; CONFIGURATION ; CURRENTS ; ELECTRIC DISCHARGES ; ELECTRODES ; ENERGY ; EVAPORATION ; GAS FLOW ; MAGNETIC FIELDS ; MEMBRANES ; OPERATION ; PHYSICS ; PLASMA ; PRESSURE ; SHOCK WAVES ; TEMPERATURE ; TUBES ; VELOCITY</subject><ispartof>Reviews of modern physics, 1960-10, Vol.32 (4), p.780-784</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-e51eace2f4479be61a6d52cb071f07dfcf43f0f5dbae3db98e790283f05cf583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-e51eace2f4479be61a6d52cb071f07dfcf43f0f5dbae3db98e790283f05cf583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,885,2876,2877,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/4086219$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bershader, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockheed Aircraft Corp., Calif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and Stanford Univ., Calif</creatorcontrib><title>Some Remarks on Electric-Discharge Shock-Tube Diagnostics</title><title>Reviews of modern physics</title><description>An investigation was made to determine whether there is a basic version of discharge tube which can serve to produce a quasi-uniform block of plasma. Operating conditions are described for a diaphragm type device with a Mach-25 shock proceeding into room-temperature argon at 1-mm pressure. The basic difference between the diaphragm type tube and the discharge type tube is that the latter makes use of a current flow as part of the energy addition process, which permits magnetic forces to aid in the acceleration of the gas. No simple conclusions can be drawn from previous results, but the results may be related to a basic requirement for a general-purpose electricdischarge shock tube, namely, the uniform-flow regime behind the advancing shock. Possible mechanisms in the rather constant wave and flow speeds are: energy-transfer time, vaporization of material in the electrode region, and electrode geometry. The uniformity of the plasma behind the shock is limited in any strict sense but may be adequate for the order of microseconds for aerodynamic and other applications. The use of a maintained piston-like drive all along the tube may be superior to controlled energy feed-in. (B.O.G.)</description><subject>AERODYNAMICS</subject><subject>ARGON</subject><subject>CONFIGURATION</subject><subject>CURRENTS</subject><subject>ELECTRIC DISCHARGES</subject><subject>ELECTRODES</subject><subject>ENERGY</subject><subject>EVAPORATION</subject><subject>GAS FLOW</subject><subject>MAGNETIC FIELDS</subject><subject>MEMBRANES</subject><subject>OPERATION</subject><subject>PHYSICS</subject><subject>PLASMA</subject><subject>PRESSURE</subject><subject>SHOCK WAVES</subject><subject>TEMPERATURE</subject><subject>TUBES</subject><subject>VELOCITY</subject><issn>0034-6861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1960</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkM1OwzAQhH0AiVJ4AG4R95S1ncTJEbXlRyoCtblbzmbdhLYxsgNS3x5XReK0mtVodudj7I7DjHOQD2v6eXPtR3cMMylmqoQLNgGQWVqUBb9i1yF8QtSQqwmrNu5AyZoOxu9C4oZkuSccfY_pog_YGb-lZNM53KX1d0PJojfbwYWxx3DDLq3ZB7r9m1NWPy3r-Uu6en9-nT-uUhRKjCnlnAySsFmmqoYKboo2F9iA4hZUa9Fm0oLN28aQbJuqJFWBKOMuR5uXcsruz7GnqzpgPxJ26IYhvqkzKAvBq2jiZxN6F4Inq798HysdNQd9YqL_mWgpdGQifwFaD1mh</recordid><startdate>19601001</startdate><enddate>19601001</enddate><creator>Bershader, Daniel</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19601001</creationdate><title>Some Remarks on Electric-Discharge Shock-Tube Diagnostics</title><author>Bershader, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-e51eace2f4479be61a6d52cb071f07dfcf43f0f5dbae3db98e790283f05cf583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1960</creationdate><topic>AERODYNAMICS</topic><topic>ARGON</topic><topic>CONFIGURATION</topic><topic>CURRENTS</topic><topic>ELECTRIC DISCHARGES</topic><topic>ELECTRODES</topic><topic>ENERGY</topic><topic>EVAPORATION</topic><topic>GAS FLOW</topic><topic>MAGNETIC FIELDS</topic><topic>MEMBRANES</topic><topic>OPERATION</topic><topic>PHYSICS</topic><topic>PLASMA</topic><topic>PRESSURE</topic><topic>SHOCK WAVES</topic><topic>TEMPERATURE</topic><topic>TUBES</topic><topic>VELOCITY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bershader, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockheed Aircraft Corp., Calif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and Stanford Univ., Calif</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Reviews of modern physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bershader, Daniel</au><aucorp>Lockheed Aircraft Corp., Calif</aucorp><aucorp>and Stanford Univ., Calif</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some Remarks on Electric-Discharge Shock-Tube Diagnostics</atitle><jtitle>Reviews of modern physics</jtitle><date>1960-10-01</date><risdate>1960</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>780</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>780-784</pages><issn>0034-6861</issn><abstract>An investigation was made to determine whether there is a basic version of discharge tube which can serve to produce a quasi-uniform block of plasma. Operating conditions are described for a diaphragm type device with a Mach-25 shock proceeding into room-temperature argon at 1-mm pressure. The basic difference between the diaphragm type tube and the discharge type tube is that the latter makes use of a current flow as part of the energy addition process, which permits magnetic forces to aid in the acceleration of the gas. No simple conclusions can be drawn from previous results, but the results may be related to a basic requirement for a general-purpose electricdischarge shock tube, namely, the uniform-flow regime behind the advancing shock. Possible mechanisms in the rather constant wave and flow speeds are: energy-transfer time, vaporization of material in the electrode region, and electrode geometry. The uniformity of the plasma behind the shock is limited in any strict sense but may be adequate for the order of microseconds for aerodynamic and other applications. The use of a maintained piston-like drive all along the tube may be superior to controlled energy feed-in. (B.O.G.)</abstract><doi>10.1103/RevModPhys.32.780</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6861
ispartof Reviews of modern physics, 1960-10, Vol.32 (4), p.780-784
issn 0034-6861
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_RevModPhys_32_780
source American Physical Society Journals
subjects AERODYNAMICS
ARGON
CONFIGURATION
CURRENTS
ELECTRIC DISCHARGES
ELECTRODES
ENERGY
EVAPORATION
GAS FLOW
MAGNETIC FIELDS
MEMBRANES
OPERATION
PHYSICS
PLASMA
PRESSURE
SHOCK WAVES
TEMPERATURE
TUBES
VELOCITY
title Some Remarks on Electric-Discharge Shock-Tube Diagnostics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A13%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20Remarks%20on%20Electric-Discharge%20Shock-Tube%20Diagnostics&rft.jtitle=Reviews%20of%20modern%20physics&rft.au=Bershader,%20Daniel&rft.aucorp=Lockheed%20Aircraft%20Corp.,%20Calif&rft.date=1960-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=780&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=780-784&rft.issn=0034-6861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.32.780&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_osti_%3E10_1103_RevModPhys_32_780%3C/crossref_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true