Higher order top squark decays
Within the minimal supersymmetric standard model we study the three body decay of the lighter top squark {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}bW{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0} and compare this decay with the flavor-changing two body decay {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}c{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0}. Here {tilde {chi}}{sub...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical Review, D D, 1997-03, Vol.55 (5), p.2907-2917 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2917 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2907 |
container_title | Physical Review, D |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Porod, W. Wöhrmann, T. |
description | Within the minimal supersymmetric standard model we study the three body decay of the lighter top squark {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}bW{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0} and compare this decay with the flavor-changing two body decay {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}c{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0}. Here {tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0} is the lightest neutralino which we assume to be the lightest supersymmetric particle. We do this for scenarios where two body decays at the tree level are forbidden for the light top squark. We give the complete analysis for the three body decay and compare it with the mentioned two body decay. We discuss our numerical results in view of the upgraded Fermilab Tevatron, the CERN LHC, and a 500 GeV e{sup +}e{sup {minus}} Linear Collider. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society} |
doi_str_mv | 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.2907 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_55_2907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1103_PhysRevD_55_2907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-c45609a62f771fe2c40f3d9bd2faabcbd18f4468468e0d3086ee90c61cd042133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LxDAYhIMoWFfvnmT9Aa1vPpscZXVdYUERPYf0TWLrx3ZNqtB_b5fVYZi5DHN4CDmnUFEK_OqxHfNT-LmppKyYgfqAFBS0KYWh-pAUIKUqmWb0mJzk_AaTmOIFuVh1r21I8z75KYd-O89f3y69z31AN-ZTchTdRw5nfz0jL8vb58WqXD_c3S-u1yVyMEOJQiowTrFY1zQGhgIi96bxLDrXYOOpjkIoPTmA56BVCAZQUfQgGOV8Ri73v30eOpuxGwK22G82AQcrVC0FnTaw32Dqc04h2m3qPl0aLQW7Y2D_GVgp7Y4B_wXlmE-u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Higher order top squark decays</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Porod, W. ; Wöhrmann, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Porod, W. ; Wöhrmann, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Within the minimal supersymmetric standard model we study the three body decay of the lighter top squark {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}bW{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0} and compare this decay with the flavor-changing two body decay {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}c{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0}. Here {tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0} is the lightest neutralino which we assume to be the lightest supersymmetric particle. We do this for scenarios where two body decays at the tree level are forbidden for the light top squark. We give the complete analysis for the three body decay and compare it with the mentioned two body decay. We discuss our numerical results in view of the upgraded Fermilab Tevatron, the CERN LHC, and a 500 GeV e{sup +}e{sup {minus}} Linear Collider. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}</description><identifier>ISSN: 0556-2821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-4918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.2907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>CERN ; ELECTRON-POSITRON INTERACTIONS ; FERMILAB TEVATRON ; FLAVOR MODEL ; LINEAR COLLIDERS ; NEUTRAL PARTICLES ; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS ; PARTICLE DECAY ; PHYSICS ; SPARTICLES ; STANDARD MODEL ; SUPERSYMMETRY ; T QUARKS</subject><ispartof>Physical Review, D, 1997-03, Vol.55 (5), p.2907-2917</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-c45609a62f771fe2c40f3d9bd2faabcbd18f4468468e0d3086ee90c61cd042133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-c45609a62f771fe2c40f3d9bd2faabcbd18f4468468e0d3086ee90c61cd042133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,881,2862,2863,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/467541$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Porod, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wöhrmann, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Higher order top squark decays</title><title>Physical Review, D</title><description>Within the minimal supersymmetric standard model we study the three body decay of the lighter top squark {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}bW{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0} and compare this decay with the flavor-changing two body decay {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}c{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0}. Here {tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0} is the lightest neutralino which we assume to be the lightest supersymmetric particle. We do this for scenarios where two body decays at the tree level are forbidden for the light top squark. We give the complete analysis for the three body decay and compare it with the mentioned two body decay. We discuss our numerical results in view of the upgraded Fermilab Tevatron, the CERN LHC, and a 500 GeV e{sup +}e{sup {minus}} Linear Collider. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}</description><subject>CERN</subject><subject>ELECTRON-POSITRON INTERACTIONS</subject><subject>FERMILAB TEVATRON</subject><subject>FLAVOR MODEL</subject><subject>LINEAR COLLIDERS</subject><subject>NEUTRAL PARTICLES</subject><subject>NUMERICAL ANALYSIS</subject><subject>PARTICLE DECAY</subject><subject>PHYSICS</subject><subject>SPARTICLES</subject><subject>STANDARD MODEL</subject><subject>SUPERSYMMETRY</subject><subject>T QUARKS</subject><issn>0556-2821</issn><issn>1089-4918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE1LxDAYhIMoWFfvnmT9Aa1vPpscZXVdYUERPYf0TWLrx3ZNqtB_b5fVYZi5DHN4CDmnUFEK_OqxHfNT-LmppKyYgfqAFBS0KYWh-pAUIKUqmWb0mJzk_AaTmOIFuVh1r21I8z75KYd-O89f3y69z31AN-ZTchTdRw5nfz0jL8vb58WqXD_c3S-u1yVyMEOJQiowTrFY1zQGhgIi96bxLDrXYOOpjkIoPTmA56BVCAZQUfQgGOV8Ri73v30eOpuxGwK22G82AQcrVC0FnTaw32Dqc04h2m3qPl0aLQW7Y2D_GVgp7Y4B_wXlmE-u</recordid><startdate>19970301</startdate><enddate>19970301</enddate><creator>Porod, W.</creator><creator>Wöhrmann, T.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970301</creationdate><title>Higher order top squark decays</title><author>Porod, W. ; Wöhrmann, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-c45609a62f771fe2c40f3d9bd2faabcbd18f4468468e0d3086ee90c61cd042133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>CERN</topic><topic>ELECTRON-POSITRON INTERACTIONS</topic><topic>FERMILAB TEVATRON</topic><topic>FLAVOR MODEL</topic><topic>LINEAR COLLIDERS</topic><topic>NEUTRAL PARTICLES</topic><topic>NUMERICAL ANALYSIS</topic><topic>PARTICLE DECAY</topic><topic>PHYSICS</topic><topic>SPARTICLES</topic><topic>STANDARD MODEL</topic><topic>SUPERSYMMETRY</topic><topic>T QUARKS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porod, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wöhrmann, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Physical Review, D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porod, W.</au><au>Wöhrmann, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Higher order top squark decays</atitle><jtitle>Physical Review, D</jtitle><date>1997-03-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2907</spage><epage>2917</epage><pages>2907-2917</pages><issn>0556-2821</issn><eissn>1089-4918</eissn><abstract>Within the minimal supersymmetric standard model we study the three body decay of the lighter top squark {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}bW{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0} and compare this decay with the flavor-changing two body decay {tilde t}{sub 1}{r_arrow}c{tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0}. Here {tilde {chi}}{sub 1}{sup 0} is the lightest neutralino which we assume to be the lightest supersymmetric particle. We do this for scenarios where two body decays at the tree level are forbidden for the light top squark. We give the complete analysis for the three body decay and compare it with the mentioned two body decay. We discuss our numerical results in view of the upgraded Fermilab Tevatron, the CERN LHC, and a 500 GeV e{sup +}e{sup {minus}} Linear Collider. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}</abstract><cop>United States</cop><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.55.2907</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0556-2821 |
ispartof | Physical Review, D, 1997-03, Vol.55 (5), p.2907-2917 |
issn | 0556-2821 1089-4918 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_55_2907 |
source | American Physical Society Journals |
subjects | CERN ELECTRON-POSITRON INTERACTIONS FERMILAB TEVATRON FLAVOR MODEL LINEAR COLLIDERS NEUTRAL PARTICLES NUMERICAL ANALYSIS PARTICLE DECAY PHYSICS SPARTICLES STANDARD MODEL SUPERSYMMETRY T QUARKS |
title | Higher order top squark decays |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A28%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Higher%20order%20top%20squark%20decays&rft.jtitle=Physical%20Review,%20D&rft.au=Porod,%20W.&rft.date=1997-03-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2907&rft.epage=2917&rft.pages=2907-2917&rft.issn=0556-2821&rft.eissn=1089-4918&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.2907&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_osti_%3E10_1103_PhysRevD_55_2907%3C/crossref_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |