Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model
We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical review. D 2024-06, Vol.109 (11), Article 116014 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Physical review. D |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Christensen, Neil |
description | We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or allow a four-point vertex for
Z
,
Z
,
W
¯
,
W
,
W
,
W
,
W
¯
,
W
¯
,
γ
,
Z
,
W
,
W
¯
or
γ
,
γ
,
W
,
W
¯
, in addition to the already known absence of the four-gluon vertex. We show that with this set of four-point vertices, perturbative unitarity is satisfied in the CSM. Additionally, we show that many constructive diagrams are not Feynman diagrams rewritten in spinor form. In fact, we show that there is a significant rearrangement of contributions from the diagrams in constructive calculations relative to Feynman diagrams for some processes. In addition to the already known or expected rearrangement in diagrams involving external photons, we also find that diagrams involving four-vector bosons are also significantly different from their Feynman counterparts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_109_116014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1103_PhysRevD_109_116014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-f71280bc78f5a155df17010d9ac14ae228f13fab39bff4c76c2d451a3f56ce183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNE_SiF3CqlWTLOpb0LxBoKM3ZyPohKokdJNngt6-atD3tMLuzDB9C90CWAIQ9bPdT_LDj0xKIzE5FgF-hGeWCFIRQef2vgdyiRYxfJMuKSAEwQ7utDWkIrUp-tHjofFLBpwmrzuC0t9j1QyhOve8SHvOl1zZi351Xuu9iCoM-J2PKCRUMPvbGHu7QjVOHaBe_c452L8-fq7di8_66Xj1uCg2Cp8IJoDVptahdqaAsjQORWxqpNHBlKa0dMKdaJlvnuBaVpoaXoJgrK22hZnPELn916GMM1jWn4I8qTA2Q5gdO8wcnG7K5wGHfm85bkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Christensen, Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or allow a four-point vertex for
Z
,
Z
,
W
¯
,
W
,
W
,
W
,
W
¯
,
W
¯
,
γ
,
Z
,
W
,
W
¯
or
γ
,
γ
,
W
,
W
¯
, in addition to the already known absence of the four-gluon vertex. We show that with this set of four-point vertices, perturbative unitarity is satisfied in the CSM. Additionally, we show that many constructive diagrams are not Feynman diagrams rewritten in spinor form. In fact, we show that there is a significant rearrangement of contributions from the diagrams in constructive calculations relative to Feynman diagrams for some processes. In addition to the already known or expected rearrangement in diagrams involving external photons, we also find that diagrams involving four-vector bosons are also significantly different from their Feynman counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116014</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Physical review. D, 2024-06, Vol.109 (11), Article 116014</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-f71280bc78f5a155df17010d9ac14ae228f13fab39bff4c76c2d451a3f56ce183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2733-0857</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2863,2864,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model</title><title>Physical review. D</title><description>We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or allow a four-point vertex for
Z
,
Z
,
W
¯
,
W
,
W
,
W
,
W
¯
,
W
¯
,
γ
,
Z
,
W
,
W
¯
or
γ
,
γ
,
W
,
W
¯
, in addition to the already known absence of the four-gluon vertex. We show that with this set of four-point vertices, perturbative unitarity is satisfied in the CSM. Additionally, we show that many constructive diagrams are not Feynman diagrams rewritten in spinor form. In fact, we show that there is a significant rearrangement of contributions from the diagrams in constructive calculations relative to Feynman diagrams for some processes. In addition to the already known or expected rearrangement in diagrams involving external photons, we also find that diagrams involving four-vector bosons are also significantly different from their Feynman counterparts.</description><issn>2470-0010</issn><issn>2470-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNE_SiF3CqlWTLOpb0LxBoKM3ZyPohKokdJNngt6-atD3tMLuzDB9C90CWAIQ9bPdT_LDj0xKIzE5FgF-hGeWCFIRQef2vgdyiRYxfJMuKSAEwQ7utDWkIrUp-tHjofFLBpwmrzuC0t9j1QyhOve8SHvOl1zZi351Xuu9iCoM-J2PKCRUMPvbGHu7QjVOHaBe_c452L8-fq7di8_66Xj1uCg2Cp8IJoDVptahdqaAsjQORWxqpNHBlKa0dMKdaJlvnuBaVpoaXoJgrK22hZnPELn916GMM1jWn4I8qTA2Q5gdO8wcnG7K5wGHfm85bkg</recordid><startdate>20240612</startdate><enddate>20240612</enddate><creator>Christensen, Neil</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-0857</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240612</creationdate><title>Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model</title><author>Christensen, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-f71280bc78f5a155df17010d9ac14ae228f13fab39bff4c76c2d451a3f56ce183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christensen, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle><date>2024-06-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>11</issue><artnum>116014</artnum><issn>2470-0010</issn><eissn>2470-0029</eissn><abstract>We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or allow a four-point vertex for
Z
,
Z
,
W
¯
,
W
,
W
,
W
,
W
¯
,
W
¯
,
γ
,
Z
,
W
,
W
¯
or
γ
,
γ
,
W
,
W
¯
, in addition to the already known absence of the four-gluon vertex. We show that with this set of four-point vertices, perturbative unitarity is satisfied in the CSM. Additionally, we show that many constructive diagrams are not Feynman diagrams rewritten in spinor form. In fact, we show that there is a significant rearrangement of contributions from the diagrams in constructive calculations relative to Feynman diagrams for some processes. In addition to the already known or expected rearrangement in diagrams involving external photons, we also find that diagrams involving four-vector bosons are also significantly different from their Feynman counterparts.</abstract><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116014</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-0857</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2470-0010 |
ispartof | Physical review. D, 2024-06, Vol.109 (11), Article 116014 |
issn | 2470-0010 2470-0029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_109_116014 |
source | American Physical Society Journals |
title | Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perturbative%20unitarity%20and%20the%20four-point%20vertices%20in%20the%20constructive%20standard%20model&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20D&rft.au=Christensen,%20Neil&rft.date=2024-06-12&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=11&rft.artnum=116014&rft.issn=2470-0010&rft.eissn=2470-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116014&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1103_PhysRevD_109_116014%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |