Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model

We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review. D 2024-06, Vol.109 (11), Article 116014
1. Verfasser: Christensen, Neil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Physical review. D
container_volume 109
creator Christensen, Neil
description We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or allow a four-point vertex for Z , Z , W ¯ , W , W , W , W ¯ , W ¯ , γ , Z , W , W ¯ or γ , γ , W , W ¯ , in addition to the already known absence of the four-gluon vertex. We show that with this set of four-point vertices, perturbative unitarity is satisfied in the CSM. Additionally, we show that many constructive diagrams are not Feynman diagrams rewritten in spinor form. In fact, we show that there is a significant rearrangement of contributions from the diagrams in constructive calculations relative to Feynman diagrams for some processes. In addition to the already known or expected rearrangement in diagrams involving external photons, we also find that diagrams involving four-vector bosons are also significantly different from their Feynman counterparts.
doi_str_mv 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_109_116014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1103_PhysRevD_109_116014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-f71280bc78f5a155df17010d9ac14ae228f13fab39bff4c76c2d451a3f56ce183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNE_SiF3CqlWTLOpb0LxBoKM3ZyPohKokdJNngt6-atD3tMLuzDB9C90CWAIQ9bPdT_LDj0xKIzE5FgF-hGeWCFIRQef2vgdyiRYxfJMuKSAEwQ7utDWkIrUp-tHjofFLBpwmrzuC0t9j1QyhOve8SHvOl1zZi351Xuu9iCoM-J2PKCRUMPvbGHu7QjVOHaBe_c452L8-fq7di8_66Xj1uCg2Cp8IJoDVptahdqaAsjQORWxqpNHBlKa0dMKdaJlvnuBaVpoaXoJgrK22hZnPELn916GMM1jWn4I8qTA2Q5gdO8wcnG7K5wGHfm85bkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Christensen, Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or allow a four-point vertex for Z , Z , W ¯ , W , W , W , W ¯ , W ¯ , γ , Z , W , W ¯ or γ , γ , W , W ¯ , in addition to the already known absence of the four-gluon vertex. We show that with this set of four-point vertices, perturbative unitarity is satisfied in the CSM. Additionally, we show that many constructive diagrams are not Feynman diagrams rewritten in spinor form. In fact, we show that there is a significant rearrangement of contributions from the diagrams in constructive calculations relative to Feynman diagrams for some processes. In addition to the already known or expected rearrangement in diagrams involving external photons, we also find that diagrams involving four-vector bosons are also significantly different from their Feynman counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116014</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Physical review. D, 2024-06, Vol.109 (11), Article 116014</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-f71280bc78f5a155df17010d9ac14ae228f13fab39bff4c76c2d451a3f56ce183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2733-0857</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2863,2864,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model</title><title>Physical review. D</title><description>We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or allow a four-point vertex for Z , Z , W ¯ , W , W , W , W ¯ , W ¯ , γ , Z , W , W ¯ or γ , γ , W , W ¯ , in addition to the already known absence of the four-gluon vertex. We show that with this set of four-point vertices, perturbative unitarity is satisfied in the CSM. Additionally, we show that many constructive diagrams are not Feynman diagrams rewritten in spinor form. In fact, we show that there is a significant rearrangement of contributions from the diagrams in constructive calculations relative to Feynman diagrams for some processes. In addition to the already known or expected rearrangement in diagrams involving external photons, we also find that diagrams involving four-vector bosons are also significantly different from their Feynman counterparts.</description><issn>2470-0010</issn><issn>2470-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNE_SiF3CqlWTLOpb0LxBoKM3ZyPohKokdJNngt6-atD3tMLuzDB9C90CWAIQ9bPdT_LDj0xKIzE5FgF-hGeWCFIRQef2vgdyiRYxfJMuKSAEwQ7utDWkIrUp-tHjofFLBpwmrzuC0t9j1QyhOve8SHvOl1zZi351Xuu9iCoM-J2PKCRUMPvbGHu7QjVOHaBe_c452L8-fq7di8_66Xj1uCg2Cp8IJoDVptahdqaAsjQORWxqpNHBlKa0dMKdaJlvnuBaVpoaXoJgrK22hZnPELn916GMM1jWn4I8qTA2Q5gdO8wcnG7K5wGHfm85bkg</recordid><startdate>20240612</startdate><enddate>20240612</enddate><creator>Christensen, Neil</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-0857</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240612</creationdate><title>Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model</title><author>Christensen, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-f71280bc78f5a155df17010d9ac14ae228f13fab39bff4c76c2d451a3f56ce183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christensen, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle><date>2024-06-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>11</issue><artnum>116014</artnum><issn>2470-0010</issn><eissn>2470-0029</eissn><abstract>We find a complete set of four-point vertices in the constructive Standard Model (CSM). This set is smaller than in Feynman diagrams as the CSM does not need or allow any additional four-point vertices (or “contact” terms) beyond what is present in Feynman diagrams and, furthermore, it does need or allow a four-point vertex for Z , Z , W ¯ , W , W , W , W ¯ , W ¯ , γ , Z , W , W ¯ or γ , γ , W , W ¯ , in addition to the already known absence of the four-gluon vertex. We show that with this set of four-point vertices, perturbative unitarity is satisfied in the CSM. Additionally, we show that many constructive diagrams are not Feynman diagrams rewritten in spinor form. In fact, we show that there is a significant rearrangement of contributions from the diagrams in constructive calculations relative to Feynman diagrams for some processes. In addition to the already known or expected rearrangement in diagrams involving external photons, we also find that diagrams involving four-vector bosons are also significantly different from their Feynman counterparts.</abstract><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116014</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-0857</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2470-0010
ispartof Physical review. D, 2024-06, Vol.109 (11), Article 116014
issn 2470-0010
2470-0029
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_109_116014
source American Physical Society Journals
title Perturbative unitarity and the four-point vertices in the constructive standard model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perturbative%20unitarity%20and%20the%20four-point%20vertices%20in%20the%20constructive%20standard%20model&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20D&rft.au=Christensen,%20Neil&rft.date=2024-06-12&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=11&rft.artnum=116014&rft.issn=2470-0010&rft.eissn=2470-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116014&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1103_PhysRevD_109_116014%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true