Limits to the validity of the Glauber approximation for heavy-ion scattering, and a possible assessment of in-medium NN Pauli blocking

A feature universally employed in the application of the Glauber approximation to the scattering of a projectile by a many-particle target is the assumption that the complex phase shift {chi}(b)/2={delta}(scr(l)) itself carries a phase which is independent of the impact parameter b. The most common...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical Review, C C, 1997-03, Vol.55 (3), p.1353-1361
Hauptverfasser: Brandan, M. E., Chehime, H., McVoy, K. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1361
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1353
container_title Physical Review, C
container_volume 55
creator Brandan, M. E.
Chehime, H.
McVoy, K. W.
description A feature universally employed in the application of the Glauber approximation to the scattering of a projectile by a many-particle target is the assumption that the complex phase shift {chi}(b)/2={delta}(scr(l)) itself carries a phase which is independent of the impact parameter b. The most common assumption is that {chi}(b)=({alpha}+i)g(b), where g(b) is real and {alpha}=Re[f(0{degree})]/Im[f(0{degree})] is the real-to-imaginary ratio of the forward amplitude for elastic scattering of the projectile (or one of its constituents) on the constituents of the target. Since g(b) is proportional to an eikonal integral through an effective potential V+iW, this form also assumes that V(r)={alpha}W(r), i.e., that the real and imaginary parts of this potential have the same radial shapes. In recent years this approximation has been applied to heavy-ion elastic scattering in the relatively low-energy range below 100 MeV/nucleon. Phenomenological optical potentials for these same nuclei and energies strongly violate the above condition, although they do approximate it in the surface region responsible for scattering to angles dominated by Fraunhofer oscillations. The Glauber approximation provides a qualitative fit to these oscillations, indicating that it is at least employing the correct nuclear radii. However, it grossly overestimates the absorption at larger angles in cases where these angles are sensitive to the interior of the potential. This failure may provide a sensitive means of assessing the effects of Pauli blocking on in-medium NN scattering. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}
doi_str_mv 10.1103/PhysRevC.55.1353
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevC_55_1353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1103_PhysRevC_55_1353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-2b8ed4a3c4295ac3774f9fbfe09629fc9dee21e631d25e5803c4cbb7af05bc883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKfvPsZ3O5Om6ZpHGTqFMYco-BaS9MZG22Y02bB_wN9t6_S-XA5858A5CF1SMqOUsJtN1Ydn2C9mnM8o4-wITSgpRJIJ8naMJoTzPEkLyk7RWQgfZDjG8gn6XrnGxYCjx7ECvFe1K13ssbe_elmrnYYOq-2281-uUdH5Flvf4QrUvk9GFYyKETrXvl9j1ZZY4a0PwekasAoBQmigjWOga5MGSrdr8HqNN2pXO6xrbz4H5zk6saoOcPH3p-j1_u5l8ZCsnpaPi9tVYqgQMUl1AWWmmMlSwZVh83lmhdUWiMhTYY0oAVIKOaNlyoEXZCCN1nNlCdemKNgUXR1yfYhOBuMimMr4tgUTJacsK9KBIQfGdEOPDqzcdkPzrpeUyHFr-b-15FyOW7Mf5CZ25Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limits to the validity of the Glauber approximation for heavy-ion scattering, and a possible assessment of in-medium NN Pauli blocking</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Brandan, M. E. ; Chehime, H. ; McVoy, K. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brandan, M. E. ; Chehime, H. ; McVoy, K. W.</creatorcontrib><description>A feature universally employed in the application of the Glauber approximation to the scattering of a projectile by a many-particle target is the assumption that the complex phase shift {chi}(b)/2={delta}(scr(l)) itself carries a phase which is independent of the impact parameter b. The most common assumption is that {chi}(b)=({alpha}+i)g(b), where g(b) is real and {alpha}=Re[f(0{degree})]/Im[f(0{degree})] is the real-to-imaginary ratio of the forward amplitude for elastic scattering of the projectile (or one of its constituents) on the constituents of the target. Since g(b) is proportional to an eikonal integral through an effective potential V+iW, this form also assumes that V(r)={alpha}W(r), i.e., that the real and imaginary parts of this potential have the same radial shapes. In recent years this approximation has been applied to heavy-ion elastic scattering in the relatively low-energy range below 100 MeV/nucleon. Phenomenological optical potentials for these same nuclei and energies strongly violate the above condition, although they do approximate it in the surface region responsible for scattering to angles dominated by Fraunhofer oscillations. The Glauber approximation provides a qualitative fit to these oscillations, indicating that it is at least employing the correct nuclear radii. However, it grossly overestimates the absorption at larger angles in cases where these angles are sensitive to the interior of the potential. This failure may provide a sensitive means of assessing the effects of Pauli blocking on in-medium NN scattering. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}</description><identifier>ISSN: 0556-2813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-490X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.55.1353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>ELASTIC SCATTERING ; GLAUBER THEORY ; HEAVY ION REACTIONS ; IMPACT PARAMETER ; NUCLEAR FORCES ; NUCLEON-NUCLEON INTERACTIONS ; OPTICAL MODELS ; OSCILLATORS ; PHASE SHIFT ; PHYSICS</subject><ispartof>Physical Review, C, 1997-03, Vol.55 (3), p.1353-1361</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-2b8ed4a3c4295ac3774f9fbfe09629fc9dee21e631d25e5803c4cbb7af05bc883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-2b8ed4a3c4295ac3774f9fbfe09629fc9dee21e631d25e5803c4cbb7af05bc883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,881,2863,2864,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/513482$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brandan, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chehime, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McVoy, K. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Limits to the validity of the Glauber approximation for heavy-ion scattering, and a possible assessment of in-medium NN Pauli blocking</title><title>Physical Review, C</title><description>A feature universally employed in the application of the Glauber approximation to the scattering of a projectile by a many-particle target is the assumption that the complex phase shift {chi}(b)/2={delta}(scr(l)) itself carries a phase which is independent of the impact parameter b. The most common assumption is that {chi}(b)=({alpha}+i)g(b), where g(b) is real and {alpha}=Re[f(0{degree})]/Im[f(0{degree})] is the real-to-imaginary ratio of the forward amplitude for elastic scattering of the projectile (or one of its constituents) on the constituents of the target. Since g(b) is proportional to an eikonal integral through an effective potential V+iW, this form also assumes that V(r)={alpha}W(r), i.e., that the real and imaginary parts of this potential have the same radial shapes. In recent years this approximation has been applied to heavy-ion elastic scattering in the relatively low-energy range below 100 MeV/nucleon. Phenomenological optical potentials for these same nuclei and energies strongly violate the above condition, although they do approximate it in the surface region responsible for scattering to angles dominated by Fraunhofer oscillations. The Glauber approximation provides a qualitative fit to these oscillations, indicating that it is at least employing the correct nuclear radii. However, it grossly overestimates the absorption at larger angles in cases where these angles are sensitive to the interior of the potential. This failure may provide a sensitive means of assessing the effects of Pauli blocking on in-medium NN scattering. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}</description><subject>ELASTIC SCATTERING</subject><subject>GLAUBER THEORY</subject><subject>HEAVY ION REACTIONS</subject><subject>IMPACT PARAMETER</subject><subject>NUCLEAR FORCES</subject><subject>NUCLEON-NUCLEON INTERACTIONS</subject><subject>OPTICAL MODELS</subject><subject>OSCILLATORS</subject><subject>PHASE SHIFT</subject><subject>PHYSICS</subject><issn>0556-2813</issn><issn>1089-490X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKfvPsZ3O5Om6ZpHGTqFMYco-BaS9MZG22Y02bB_wN9t6_S-XA5858A5CF1SMqOUsJtN1Ydn2C9mnM8o4-wITSgpRJIJ8naMJoTzPEkLyk7RWQgfZDjG8gn6XrnGxYCjx7ECvFe1K13ssbe_elmrnYYOq-2281-uUdH5Flvf4QrUvk9GFYyKETrXvl9j1ZZY4a0PwekasAoBQmigjWOga5MGSrdr8HqNN2pXO6xrbz4H5zk6saoOcPH3p-j1_u5l8ZCsnpaPi9tVYqgQMUl1AWWmmMlSwZVh83lmhdUWiMhTYY0oAVIKOaNlyoEXZCCN1nNlCdemKNgUXR1yfYhOBuMimMr4tgUTJacsK9KBIQfGdEOPDqzcdkPzrpeUyHFr-b-15FyOW7Mf5CZ25Q</recordid><startdate>199703</startdate><enddate>199703</enddate><creator>Brandan, M. E.</creator><creator>Chehime, H.</creator><creator>McVoy, K. W.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199703</creationdate><title>Limits to the validity of the Glauber approximation for heavy-ion scattering, and a possible assessment of in-medium NN Pauli blocking</title><author>Brandan, M. E. ; Chehime, H. ; McVoy, K. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-2b8ed4a3c4295ac3774f9fbfe09629fc9dee21e631d25e5803c4cbb7af05bc883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>ELASTIC SCATTERING</topic><topic>GLAUBER THEORY</topic><topic>HEAVY ION REACTIONS</topic><topic>IMPACT PARAMETER</topic><topic>NUCLEAR FORCES</topic><topic>NUCLEON-NUCLEON INTERACTIONS</topic><topic>OPTICAL MODELS</topic><topic>OSCILLATORS</topic><topic>PHASE SHIFT</topic><topic>PHYSICS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brandan, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chehime, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McVoy, K. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Physical Review, C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brandan, M. E.</au><au>Chehime, H.</au><au>McVoy, K. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limits to the validity of the Glauber approximation for heavy-ion scattering, and a possible assessment of in-medium NN Pauli blocking</atitle><jtitle>Physical Review, C</jtitle><date>1997-03</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1353</spage><epage>1361</epage><pages>1353-1361</pages><issn>0556-2813</issn><eissn>1089-490X</eissn><abstract>A feature universally employed in the application of the Glauber approximation to the scattering of a projectile by a many-particle target is the assumption that the complex phase shift {chi}(b)/2={delta}(scr(l)) itself carries a phase which is independent of the impact parameter b. The most common assumption is that {chi}(b)=({alpha}+i)g(b), where g(b) is real and {alpha}=Re[f(0{degree})]/Im[f(0{degree})] is the real-to-imaginary ratio of the forward amplitude for elastic scattering of the projectile (or one of its constituents) on the constituents of the target. Since g(b) is proportional to an eikonal integral through an effective potential V+iW, this form also assumes that V(r)={alpha}W(r), i.e., that the real and imaginary parts of this potential have the same radial shapes. In recent years this approximation has been applied to heavy-ion elastic scattering in the relatively low-energy range below 100 MeV/nucleon. Phenomenological optical potentials for these same nuclei and energies strongly violate the above condition, although they do approximate it in the surface region responsible for scattering to angles dominated by Fraunhofer oscillations. The Glauber approximation provides a qualitative fit to these oscillations, indicating that it is at least employing the correct nuclear radii. However, it grossly overestimates the absorption at larger angles in cases where these angles are sensitive to the interior of the potential. This failure may provide a sensitive means of assessing the effects of Pauli blocking on in-medium NN scattering. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}</abstract><cop>United States</cop><doi>10.1103/PhysRevC.55.1353</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0556-2813
ispartof Physical Review, C, 1997-03, Vol.55 (3), p.1353-1361
issn 0556-2813
1089-490X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevC_55_1353
source American Physical Society Journals
subjects ELASTIC SCATTERING
GLAUBER THEORY
HEAVY ION REACTIONS
IMPACT PARAMETER
NUCLEAR FORCES
NUCLEON-NUCLEON INTERACTIONS
OPTICAL MODELS
OSCILLATORS
PHASE SHIFT
PHYSICS
title Limits to the validity of the Glauber approximation for heavy-ion scattering, and a possible assessment of in-medium NN Pauli blocking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A18%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limits%20to%20the%20validity%20of%20the%20Glauber%20approximation%20for%20heavy-ion%20scattering,%20and%20a%20possible%20assessment%20of%20in-medium%20NN%20Pauli%20blocking&rft.jtitle=Physical%20Review,%20C&rft.au=Brandan,%20M.%20E.&rft.date=1997-03&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1353&rft.epage=1361&rft.pages=1353-1361&rft.issn=0556-2813&rft.eissn=1089-490X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.55.1353&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_osti_%3E10_1103_PhysRevC_55_1353%3C/crossref_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true