The social selection alternative to sexual selection
Social selection offers an alternative to sexual selection by reversing its logic. Social selection starts with offspring production and works back to mating, and starts with behavioural dynamics and works up to gene pool dynamics. In social selection, courtship can potentially be deduced as a negot...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2012-08, Vol.367 (1600), p.2294-2303 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2303 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1600 |
| container_start_page | 2294 |
| container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences |
| container_volume | 367 |
| creator | Roughgarden, Joan |
| description | Social selection offers an alternative to sexual selection by reversing its logic. Social selection starts with offspring production and works back to mating, and starts with behavioural dynamics and works up to gene pool dynamics. In social selection, courtship can potentially be deduced as a negotiation, leading to an optimal allocation of tasks during offspring rearing. Ornaments facilitate this negotiation and also comprise ‘admission tickets’ to cliques. Mating pairs may form ‘teams’ based on the reciprocal sharing of pleasure. The parent–offspring relation can be managed by the parent considered as the owner of a ‘family firm’ whose product is offspring. The cooperation in reproductive social behaviour evolves as a mutual direct benefit through individual selection rather than as some form of altruism requiring kin or multi-level selection. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rstb.2011.0282 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2011_0282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41621954</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41621954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-1aa8837077ef79a6e0c7e75a1e1a8651bdf66d859dee5b312cb0a28da7b35c9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9v0zAUxyMEYmVw5QbqkUvKe7ZjOxckGAyQKpCg9PrkJC5zl8ad7VQrfz0pGdUmBJx8-H7eL3-y7CnCDKHUL0NM1YwB4gyYZveyCQqFOSsV3M8mUEqWa8HlSfYoxjUAlIUSD7MTxpRSgGqSicWFnUZfO9NOo21tnZzvpqZNNnQmuZ2dJj8E1_3t_HH2YGXaaJ_cvKfZt_N3i7MP-fzz-49nr-d5LZlKORqjNVeglF2p0kgLtbKqMGjRaFlg1aykbHRRNtYWFUdWV2CYboyqeFGXFT_NXo19t321sU1tuxRMS9vgNibsyRtHd5POXdB3vyPOSxSMDw1e3DQI_qq3MdHGxdq2rems7yNhUaAUXCP-HwUmhJKgYUBnI1oHH2Owq-NGCHSwQgcrdLBCBytDwfPbdxzx3xoG4HIEgt8PHzrosGlPa98PEtpIX74u3uy4VA4lAIHmCAq5KOmH246zhpBcjL2lX8jd-X-uw_817a9HPBur1jH5cLxBoGRYFmLI8zF3MdnrY27CJUnFVUFLLejT_C0uz_WSlvwn_U7WTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024476080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The social selection alternative to sexual selection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Roughgarden, Joan</creator><creatorcontrib>Roughgarden, Joan</creatorcontrib><description>Social selection offers an alternative to sexual selection by reversing its logic. Social selection starts with offspring production and works back to mating, and starts with behavioural dynamics and works up to gene pool dynamics. In social selection, courtship can potentially be deduced as a negotiation, leading to an optimal allocation of tasks during offspring rearing. Ornaments facilitate this negotiation and also comprise ‘admission tickets’ to cliques. Mating pairs may form ‘teams’ based on the reciprocal sharing of pleasure. The parent–offspring relation can be managed by the parent considered as the owner of a ‘family firm’ whose product is offspring. The cooperation in reproductive social behaviour evolves as a mutual direct benefit through individual selection rather than as some form of altruism requiring kin or multi-level selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0282</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22777017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Cooperation ; Cooperative Behavior ; Courtship - psychology ; Courtship Semantics ; Ecological competition ; Evolution ; Family Firm ; Female ; Female animals ; Food demand ; Foraging ; Genetic Fitness - physiology ; Male ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Mating Preference, Animal - physiology ; Motivation ; Nest Production Function ; Nesting Behavior ; Parents ; Pleasure ; Review ; Selection, Genetic ; Sex Characteristics ; Sexual selection ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2012-08, Vol.367 (1600), p.2294-2303</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Royal Society</rights><rights>This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society</rights><rights>This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-1aa8837077ef79a6e0c7e75a1e1a8651bdf66d859dee5b312cb0a28da7b35c9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-1aa8837077ef79a6e0c7e75a1e1a8651bdf66d859dee5b312cb0a28da7b35c9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41621954$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41621954$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27903,27904,53770,53772,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22777017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roughgarden, Joan</creatorcontrib><title>The social selection alternative to sexual selection</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</addtitle><description>Social selection offers an alternative to sexual selection by reversing its logic. Social selection starts with offspring production and works back to mating, and starts with behavioural dynamics and works up to gene pool dynamics. In social selection, courtship can potentially be deduced as a negotiation, leading to an optimal allocation of tasks during offspring rearing. Ornaments facilitate this negotiation and also comprise ‘admission tickets’ to cliques. Mating pairs may form ‘teams’ based on the reciprocal sharing of pleasure. The parent–offspring relation can be managed by the parent considered as the owner of a ‘family firm’ whose product is offspring. The cooperation in reproductive social behaviour evolves as a mutual direct benefit through individual selection rather than as some form of altruism requiring kin or multi-level selection.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Courtship - psychology</subject><subject>Courtship Semantics</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Family Firm</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Food demand</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Genetic Fitness - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Mating Preference, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Nest Production Function</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Pleasure</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9v0zAUxyMEYmVw5QbqkUvKe7ZjOxckGAyQKpCg9PrkJC5zl8ad7VQrfz0pGdUmBJx8-H7eL3-y7CnCDKHUL0NM1YwB4gyYZveyCQqFOSsV3M8mUEqWa8HlSfYoxjUAlIUSD7MTxpRSgGqSicWFnUZfO9NOo21tnZzvpqZNNnQmuZ2dJj8E1_3t_HH2YGXaaJ_cvKfZt_N3i7MP-fzz-49nr-d5LZlKORqjNVeglF2p0kgLtbKqMGjRaFlg1aykbHRRNtYWFUdWV2CYboyqeFGXFT_NXo19t321sU1tuxRMS9vgNibsyRtHd5POXdB3vyPOSxSMDw1e3DQI_qq3MdHGxdq2rems7yNhUaAUXCP-HwUmhJKgYUBnI1oHH2Owq-NGCHSwQgcrdLBCBytDwfPbdxzx3xoG4HIEgt8PHzrosGlPa98PEtpIX74u3uy4VA4lAIHmCAq5KOmH246zhpBcjL2lX8jd-X-uw_817a9HPBur1jH5cLxBoGRYFmLI8zF3MdnrY27CJUnFVUFLLejT_C0uz_WSlvwn_U7WTw</recordid><startdate>20120819</startdate><enddate>20120819</enddate><creator>Roughgarden, Joan</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120819</creationdate><title>The social selection alternative to sexual selection</title><author>Roughgarden, Joan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-1aa8837077ef79a6e0c7e75a1e1a8651bdf66d859dee5b312cb0a28da7b35c9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Courtship - psychology</topic><topic>Courtship Semantics</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Family Firm</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Food demand</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Genetic Fitness - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Mating Preference, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Nest Production Function</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Pleasure</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roughgarden, Joan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roughgarden, Joan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The social selection alternative to sexual selection</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</addtitle><date>2012-08-19</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>367</volume><issue>1600</issue><spage>2294</spage><epage>2303</epage><pages>2294-2303</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Social selection offers an alternative to sexual selection by reversing its logic. Social selection starts with offspring production and works back to mating, and starts with behavioural dynamics and works up to gene pool dynamics. In social selection, courtship can potentially be deduced as a negotiation, leading to an optimal allocation of tasks during offspring rearing. Ornaments facilitate this negotiation and also comprise ‘admission tickets’ to cliques. Mating pairs may form ‘teams’ based on the reciprocal sharing of pleasure. The parent–offspring relation can be managed by the parent considered as the owner of a ‘family firm’ whose product is offspring. The cooperation in reproductive social behaviour evolves as a mutual direct benefit through individual selection rather than as some form of altruism requiring kin or multi-level selection.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>22777017</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2011.0282</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0962-8436 |
| ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2012-08, Vol.367 (1600), p.2294-2303 |
| issn | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2011_0282 |
| source | MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Animals Biological Evolution Cooperation Cooperative Behavior Courtship - psychology Courtship Semantics Ecological competition Evolution Family Firm Female Female animals Food demand Foraging Genetic Fitness - physiology Male Male animals Mating behavior Mating Preference, Animal - physiology Motivation Nest Production Function Nesting Behavior Parents Pleasure Review Selection, Genetic Sex Characteristics Sexual selection Teamwork |
| title | The social selection alternative to sexual selection |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A12%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20social%20selection%20alternative%20to%20sexual%20selection&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Roughgarden,%20Joan&rft.date=2012-08-19&rft.volume=367&rft.issue=1600&rft.spage=2294&rft.epage=2303&rft.pages=2294-2303&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2011.0282&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E41621954%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024476080&rft_id=info:pmid/22777017&rft_jstor_id=41621954&rfr_iscdi=true |