Implicit and explicit prior information in near-infrared spectral imaging: accuracy, quantification and diagnostic value
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) of tissue provides quantification of absorbers, scattering and luminescent agents in bulk tissue through the use of measurement data and assumptions. Prior knowledge can be critical about things such as (i) the tissue shape and/or structure, (ii) spectral constituen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences physical, and engineering sciences, 2011-11, Vol.369 (1955), p.4531-4557 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4557 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1955 |
container_start_page | 4531 |
container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences |
container_volume | 369 |
creator | Pogue, Brian W. Davis, Scott C. Leblond, Frederic Mastanduno, Michael A. Dehghani, Hamid Paulsen, Keith D. |
description | Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) of tissue provides quantification of absorbers, scattering and luminescent agents in bulk tissue through the use of measurement data and assumptions. Prior knowledge can be critical about things such as (i) the tissue shape and/or structure, (ii) spectral constituents, (iii) limits on parameters, (iv) demographic or biomarker data, and (v) biophysical models of the temporal signal shapes. A general framework of NIRS imaging with prior information is presented, showing that prior information datasets could be incorporated at any step in the NIRS process, with the general workflow being: (i) data acquisition, (ii) pre-processing, (iii) forward model, (iv) inversion/reconstruction, (v) post-processing, and (vi) interpretation/diagnosis. Most of the development in NIRS has used ad hoc or empirical implementations of prior information such as pre-measured absorber or fluorophore spectra, or tissue shapes as estimated by additional imaging tools. A comprehensive analysis would examine what prior information maximizes the accuracy in recovery and value for medical diagnosis, when implemented at separate stages of the NIRS sequence. Individual applications of prior information can show increases in accuracy or improved ability to estimate biochemical features of tissue, while other approaches may not. Most beneficial inclusion of prior information has been in the inversion/reconstruction process, because it solves the mathematical intractability. However, it is not clear that this is always the most beneficial stage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rsta.2011.0228 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rsta_2011_0228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23057201</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23057201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c621t-30c517498276d05ca59a6eaa8528f91268cb3c3710671ef98edc4ba46496bf653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQjhCIlsKVGyg3LmTxI3ZsDpWqikelSkhQJG7WrOMsXhI7tZ1Vl1-PQ5ZCheDksed7zPgriqcYrTCS4lWICVYEYbxChIh7xTGuG1wRycn9XFNeVwzRL0fFoxi3KMM4Iw-LI0IQ4hKx4-LmYhh7q20qwbWluTlcxmB9KK3rfBggWe9yXToDocpvAYJpyzganQL0pR1gY93mdQlaTwH0_mV5PYFLtrN64c7SrYWN8zFZXe6gn8zj4kEHfTRPDudJ8fntm6vz99Xlh3cX52eXleYEp4oizXBTS0Ea3iKmgUngBkAwIjqJCRd6TTVtMOINNp0UptX1GmpeS77uOKMnxemiO07rITeNm4dWecEBwl55sOpux9mvauN3ihJOG1FngRcHgeCvJxOTGmzUpu_BGT9FJaTEFJMaZeRqQergYwymu3XBSM1pqTktNael5rQy4fmfs93Cf8WTAd8WQPD7_EleW5P2auun4PJVffx0dbajXFosGVNIUJw5Atfqux0Xr9xUNsbJqJ-Qu_5_j0P_5_bPJZ4trG1MPvzegSLWZBT9Adjs0ho</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>899131240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit and explicit prior information in near-infrared spectral imaging: accuracy, quantification and diagnostic value</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><creator>Pogue, Brian W. ; Davis, Scott C. ; Leblond, Frederic ; Mastanduno, Michael A. ; Dehghani, Hamid ; Paulsen, Keith D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pogue, Brian W. ; Davis, Scott C. ; Leblond, Frederic ; Mastanduno, Michael A. ; Dehghani, Hamid ; Paulsen, Keith D.</creatorcontrib><description>Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) of tissue provides quantification of absorbers, scattering and luminescent agents in bulk tissue through the use of measurement data and assumptions. Prior knowledge can be critical about things such as (i) the tissue shape and/or structure, (ii) spectral constituents, (iii) limits on parameters, (iv) demographic or biomarker data, and (v) biophysical models of the temporal signal shapes. A general framework of NIRS imaging with prior information is presented, showing that prior information datasets could be incorporated at any step in the NIRS process, with the general workflow being: (i) data acquisition, (ii) pre-processing, (iii) forward model, (iv) inversion/reconstruction, (v) post-processing, and (vi) interpretation/diagnosis. Most of the development in NIRS has used ad hoc or empirical implementations of prior information such as pre-measured absorber or fluorophore spectra, or tissue shapes as estimated by additional imaging tools. A comprehensive analysis would examine what prior information maximizes the accuracy in recovery and value for medical diagnosis, when implemented at separate stages of the NIRS sequence. Individual applications of prior information can show increases in accuracy or improved ability to estimate biochemical features of tissue, while other approaches may not. Most beneficial inclusion of prior information has been in the inversion/reconstruction process, because it solves the mathematical intractability. However, it is not clear that this is always the most beneficial stage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-503X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2962</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0228</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22006905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Biophysics - methods ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Diagnostic Imaging - methods ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescent Dyes - chemistry ; Humans ; Imaging ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Models, Theoretical ; Molecular ; Near-Infrared ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Optical ; Optical tomography ; Optics and Photonics ; Oxygen ; Quantification ; Reconstruction ; Reproducibility of Results ; Review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spectroscopy ; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods ; Tissue samples ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Wavelengths</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2011-11, Vol.369 (1955), p.4531-4557</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT © 2011 The Royal Society</rights><rights>This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society</rights><rights>This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c621t-30c517498276d05ca59a6eaa8528f91268cb3c3710671ef98edc4ba46496bf653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c621t-30c517498276d05ca59a6eaa8528f91268cb3c3710671ef98edc4ba46496bf653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23057201$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23057201$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,828,881,27901,27902,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22006905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pogue, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Scott C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leblond, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastanduno, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghani, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Keith D.</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit and explicit prior information in near-infrared spectral imaging: accuracy, quantification and diagnostic value</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci</addtitle><description>Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) of tissue provides quantification of absorbers, scattering and luminescent agents in bulk tissue through the use of measurement data and assumptions. Prior knowledge can be critical about things such as (i) the tissue shape and/or structure, (ii) spectral constituents, (iii) limits on parameters, (iv) demographic or biomarker data, and (v) biophysical models of the temporal signal shapes. A general framework of NIRS imaging with prior information is presented, showing that prior information datasets could be incorporated at any step in the NIRS process, with the general workflow being: (i) data acquisition, (ii) pre-processing, (iii) forward model, (iv) inversion/reconstruction, (v) post-processing, and (vi) interpretation/diagnosis. Most of the development in NIRS has used ad hoc or empirical implementations of prior information such as pre-measured absorber or fluorophore spectra, or tissue shapes as estimated by additional imaging tools. A comprehensive analysis would examine what prior information maximizes the accuracy in recovery and value for medical diagnosis, when implemented at separate stages of the NIRS sequence. Individual applications of prior information can show increases in accuracy or improved ability to estimate biochemical features of tissue, while other approaches may not. Most beneficial inclusion of prior information has been in the inversion/reconstruction process, because it solves the mathematical intractability. However, it is not clear that this is always the most beneficial stage.</description><subject>Biophysics - methods</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging - methods</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescent Dyes - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Molecular</subject><subject>Near-Infrared</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Optical</subject><subject>Optical tomography</subject><subject>Optics and Photonics</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Quantification</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</subject><subject>Tissue samples</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><issn>1364-503X</issn><issn>1471-2962</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQjhCIlsKVGyg3LmTxI3ZsDpWqikelSkhQJG7WrOMsXhI7tZ1Vl1-PQ5ZCheDksed7zPgriqcYrTCS4lWICVYEYbxChIh7xTGuG1wRycn9XFNeVwzRL0fFoxi3KMM4Iw-LI0IQ4hKx4-LmYhh7q20qwbWluTlcxmB9KK3rfBggWe9yXToDocpvAYJpyzganQL0pR1gY93mdQlaTwH0_mV5PYFLtrN64c7SrYWN8zFZXe6gn8zj4kEHfTRPDudJ8fntm6vz99Xlh3cX52eXleYEp4oizXBTS0Ea3iKmgUngBkAwIjqJCRd6TTVtMOINNp0UptX1GmpeS77uOKMnxemiO07rITeNm4dWecEBwl55sOpux9mvauN3ihJOG1FngRcHgeCvJxOTGmzUpu_BGT9FJaTEFJMaZeRqQergYwymu3XBSM1pqTktNael5rQy4fmfs93Cf8WTAd8WQPD7_EleW5P2auun4PJVffx0dbajXFosGVNIUJw5Atfqux0Xr9xUNsbJqJ-Qu_5_j0P_5_bPJZ4trG1MPvzegSLWZBT9Adjs0ho</recordid><startdate>20111128</startdate><enddate>20111128</enddate><creator>Pogue, Brian W.</creator><creator>Davis, Scott C.</creator><creator>Leblond, Frederic</creator><creator>Mastanduno, Michael A.</creator><creator>Dehghani, Hamid</creator><creator>Paulsen, Keith D.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111128</creationdate><title>Implicit and explicit prior information in near-infrared spectral imaging: accuracy, quantification and diagnostic value</title><author>Pogue, Brian W. ; Davis, Scott C. ; Leblond, Frederic ; Mastanduno, Michael A. ; Dehghani, Hamid ; Paulsen, Keith D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c621t-30c517498276d05ca59a6eaa8528f91268cb3c3710671ef98edc4ba46496bf653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biophysics - methods</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging - methods</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescent Dyes - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Molecular</topic><topic>Near-Infrared</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Optical</topic><topic>Optical tomography</topic><topic>Optics and Photonics</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Quantification</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</topic><topic>Tissue samples</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pogue, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Scott C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leblond, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastanduno, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghani, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Keith D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pogue, Brian W.</au><au>Davis, Scott C.</au><au>Leblond, Frederic</au><au>Mastanduno, Michael A.</au><au>Dehghani, Hamid</au><au>Paulsen, Keith D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit and explicit prior information in near-infrared spectral imaging: accuracy, quantification and diagnostic value</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</stitle><addtitle>Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci</addtitle><date>2011-11-28</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>369</volume><issue>1955</issue><spage>4531</spage><epage>4557</epage><pages>4531-4557</pages><issn>1364-503X</issn><eissn>1471-2962</eissn><abstract>Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) of tissue provides quantification of absorbers, scattering and luminescent agents in bulk tissue through the use of measurement data and assumptions. Prior knowledge can be critical about things such as (i) the tissue shape and/or structure, (ii) spectral constituents, (iii) limits on parameters, (iv) demographic or biomarker data, and (v) biophysical models of the temporal signal shapes. A general framework of NIRS imaging with prior information is presented, showing that prior information datasets could be incorporated at any step in the NIRS process, with the general workflow being: (i) data acquisition, (ii) pre-processing, (iii) forward model, (iv) inversion/reconstruction, (v) post-processing, and (vi) interpretation/diagnosis. Most of the development in NIRS has used ad hoc or empirical implementations of prior information such as pre-measured absorber or fluorophore spectra, or tissue shapes as estimated by additional imaging tools. A comprehensive analysis would examine what prior information maximizes the accuracy in recovery and value for medical diagnosis, when implemented at separate stages of the NIRS sequence. Individual applications of prior information can show increases in accuracy or improved ability to estimate biochemical features of tissue, while other approaches may not. Most beneficial inclusion of prior information has been in the inversion/reconstruction process, because it solves the mathematical intractability. However, it is not clear that this is always the most beneficial stage.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>22006905</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsta.2011.0228</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-503X |
ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2011-11, Vol.369 (1955), p.4531-4557 |
issn | 1364-503X 1471-2962 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rsta_2011_0228 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics |
subjects | Biophysics - methods Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - pathology Diagnostic Imaging - methods False Positive Reactions Female Fluorescence Fluorescent Dyes - chemistry Humans Imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Models, Theoretical Molecular Near-Infrared Neoplasms - pathology Optical Optical tomography Optics and Photonics Oxygen Quantification Reconstruction Reproducibility of Results Review Sensitivity and Specificity Spectroscopy Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods Tissue samples Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Wavelengths |
title | Implicit and explicit prior information in near-infrared spectral imaging: accuracy, quantification and diagnostic value |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T02%3A42%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20and%20explicit%20prior%20information%20in%20near-infrared%20spectral%20imaging:%20accuracy,%20quantification%20and%20diagnostic%20value&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20A:%20Mathematical,%20physical,%20and%20engineering%20sciences&rft.au=Pogue,%20Brian%20W.&rft.date=2011-11-28&rft.volume=369&rft.issue=1955&rft.spage=4531&rft.epage=4557&rft.pages=4531-4557&rft.issn=1364-503X&rft.eissn=1471-2962&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsta.2011.0228&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E23057201%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=899131240&rft_id=info:pmid/22006905&rft_jstor_id=23057201&rfr_iscdi=true |