A Brücke–Bartley effect for contrast

Accurate derivation of the psychophysical (a.k.a. transducer) function from just-notable differences requires accurate knowledge of the relationship between the mean and variance of apparent intensities. Alternatively, a psychophysical function can be derived from estimates of the average between ea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Royal Society open science 2018-08, Vol.5 (8), p.180171
Hauptverfasser: Solomon, Joshua A., Tyler, Christopher W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 180171
container_title Royal Society open science
container_volume 5
creator Solomon, Joshua A.
Tyler, Christopher W.
description Accurate derivation of the psychophysical (a.k.a. transducer) function from just-notable differences requires accurate knowledge of the relationship between the mean and variance of apparent intensities. Alternatively, a psychophysical function can be derived from estimates of the average between easily discriminable intensities. Such estimates are unlikely to be biased by the aforementioned variance, but they are notoriously variable and may stem from decisional processes that are more cognitive than sensory. In this paper, to minimize cognitive pollution, we used amplitude-modulated contrast. As the spatial or temporal (carrier) frequency increased, estimates of average intensity became less variable across observers, converging on values that were closer to mean power (i.e. contrast2) than mean contrast. Simply put, apparent contrast increases when physical contrast flickers. This result is analogous to Brücke's finding that brightness increases when luminance flickers. It implies an expansive transduction of contrast in the same way that Brücke's finding implies an expansive transduction of luminance.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsos.180171
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_180171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_091cd01365df4633add573406e17b96b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2109334768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-6c570e997eef00310be1aea98f28047260bbedda6da5bc18d1b9ea61e643eb993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtuFDEUhi0EIlFIRY-2AwltOLbH9rhBSiIukSJFIlBRWL6cCV5m14s9E2mpeAdeh4434UnwMiHKFlAdX35_PvZHyGMKRxR0-yKXVI5oC1TRe2SfgWjmQgG_f2e8Rw5LWQAAFcCVVA_JHgfGBFDYJ0-PZyf55w__GX99-35i89DjZoZdh36YdSnPfFoN2ZbhEXnQ2b7g4U09IB9ev3p_-nZ-fvHm7PT4fO6FYsNc1gKotULsADgFh9Si1W3HWmgUk-AchmBlsMJ52gbqNFpJUTYcndb8gJxN3JDswqxzXNq8MclG82ch5StTm4y-RwOa-gCUSxG6RnJuQxCKNyCRKqelq6yXE2s9uiUGj9un9DvQ3Z1V_GSu0rWRlDWUyQp4dgPI6cuIZTDLWDz2vV1hGothVQHnjZJtjT6foj6nUjJ2t9dQMFtTZmvKTKZq-sndzm6zf73UAEyBnDb1u5OPOGzMIo15Vaf_YH7835F3lxeX1yK2BtqqRVQd0nyN6wkhTCxlRLND3KH_Bg3bv70</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2109334768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Brücke–Bartley effect for contrast</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Royal Society Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Solomon, Joshua A. ; Tyler, Christopher W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Joshua A. ; Tyler, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate derivation of the psychophysical (a.k.a. transducer) function from just-notable differences requires accurate knowledge of the relationship between the mean and variance of apparent intensities. Alternatively, a psychophysical function can be derived from estimates of the average between easily discriminable intensities. Such estimates are unlikely to be biased by the aforementioned variance, but they are notoriously variable and may stem from decisional processes that are more cognitive than sensory. In this paper, to minimize cognitive pollution, we used amplitude-modulated contrast. As the spatial or temporal (carrier) frequency increased, estimates of average intensity became less variable across observers, converging on values that were closer to mean power (i.e. contrast2) than mean contrast. Simply put, apparent contrast increases when physical contrast flickers. This result is analogous to Brücke's finding that brightness increases when luminance flickers. It implies an expansive transduction of contrast in the same way that Brücke's finding implies an expansive transduction of luminance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2054-5703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-5703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180171</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30225010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society Publishing</publisher><subject>Apparent Contrast ; Brightness ; Flicker ; Psychology And Cognitive Neuroscience ; Psychophysical Function ; Transducer Function</subject><ispartof>Royal Society open science, 2018-08, Vol.5 (8), p.180171</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors.</rights><rights>2018 The Authors. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-6c570e997eef00310be1aea98f28047260bbedda6da5bc18d1b9ea61e643eb993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-6c570e997eef00310be1aea98f28047260bbedda6da5bc18d1b9ea61e643eb993</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1512-4626 ; 0000-0001-9976-4788</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124126/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124126/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,3322,27147,27924,27925,53791,53793,55555,55565</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Brücke–Bartley effect for contrast</title><title>Royal Society open science</title><addtitle>R. Soc. open sci</addtitle><addtitle>R Soc Open Sci</addtitle><description>Accurate derivation of the psychophysical (a.k.a. transducer) function from just-notable differences requires accurate knowledge of the relationship between the mean and variance of apparent intensities. Alternatively, a psychophysical function can be derived from estimates of the average between easily discriminable intensities. Such estimates are unlikely to be biased by the aforementioned variance, but they are notoriously variable and may stem from decisional processes that are more cognitive than sensory. In this paper, to minimize cognitive pollution, we used amplitude-modulated contrast. As the spatial or temporal (carrier) frequency increased, estimates of average intensity became less variable across observers, converging on values that were closer to mean power (i.e. contrast2) than mean contrast. Simply put, apparent contrast increases when physical contrast flickers. This result is analogous to Brücke's finding that brightness increases when luminance flickers. It implies an expansive transduction of contrast in the same way that Brücke's finding implies an expansive transduction of luminance.</description><subject>Apparent Contrast</subject><subject>Brightness</subject><subject>Flicker</subject><subject>Psychology And Cognitive Neuroscience</subject><subject>Psychophysical Function</subject><subject>Transducer Function</subject><issn>2054-5703</issn><issn>2054-5703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbtuFDEUhi0EIlFIRY-2AwltOLbH9rhBSiIukSJFIlBRWL6cCV5m14s9E2mpeAdeh4434UnwMiHKFlAdX35_PvZHyGMKRxR0-yKXVI5oC1TRe2SfgWjmQgG_f2e8Rw5LWQAAFcCVVA_JHgfGBFDYJ0-PZyf55w__GX99-35i89DjZoZdh36YdSnPfFoN2ZbhEXnQ2b7g4U09IB9ev3p_-nZ-fvHm7PT4fO6FYsNc1gKotULsADgFh9Si1W3HWmgUk-AchmBlsMJ52gbqNFpJUTYcndb8gJxN3JDswqxzXNq8MclG82ch5StTm4y-RwOa-gCUSxG6RnJuQxCKNyCRKqelq6yXE2s9uiUGj9un9DvQ3Z1V_GSu0rWRlDWUyQp4dgPI6cuIZTDLWDz2vV1hGothVQHnjZJtjT6foj6nUjJ2t9dQMFtTZmvKTKZq-sndzm6zf73UAEyBnDb1u5OPOGzMIo15Vaf_YH7835F3lxeX1yK2BtqqRVQd0nyN6wkhTCxlRLND3KH_Bg3bv70</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Solomon, Joshua A.</creator><creator>Tyler, Christopher W.</creator><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1512-4626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9976-4788</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>A Brücke–Bartley effect for contrast</title><author>Solomon, Joshua A. ; Tyler, Christopher W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-6c570e997eef00310be1aea98f28047260bbedda6da5bc18d1b9ea61e643eb993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Apparent Contrast</topic><topic>Brightness</topic><topic>Flicker</topic><topic>Psychology And Cognitive Neuroscience</topic><topic>Psychophysical Function</topic><topic>Transducer Function</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Royal Society open science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solomon, Joshua A.</au><au>Tyler, Christopher W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Brücke–Bartley effect for contrast</atitle><jtitle>Royal Society open science</jtitle><stitle>R. Soc. open sci</stitle><addtitle>R Soc Open Sci</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>180171</spage><pages>180171-</pages><issn>2054-5703</issn><eissn>2054-5703</eissn><abstract>Accurate derivation of the psychophysical (a.k.a. transducer) function from just-notable differences requires accurate knowledge of the relationship between the mean and variance of apparent intensities. Alternatively, a psychophysical function can be derived from estimates of the average between easily discriminable intensities. Such estimates are unlikely to be biased by the aforementioned variance, but they are notoriously variable and may stem from decisional processes that are more cognitive than sensory. In this paper, to minimize cognitive pollution, we used amplitude-modulated contrast. As the spatial or temporal (carrier) frequency increased, estimates of average intensity became less variable across observers, converging on values that were closer to mean power (i.e. contrast2) than mean contrast. Simply put, apparent contrast increases when physical contrast flickers. This result is analogous to Brücke's finding that brightness increases when luminance flickers. It implies an expansive transduction of contrast in the same way that Brücke's finding implies an expansive transduction of luminance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society Publishing</pub><pmid>30225010</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsos.180171</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1512-4626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9976-4788</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2054-5703
ispartof Royal Society open science, 2018-08, Vol.5 (8), p.180171
issn 2054-5703
2054-5703
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_180171
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Royal Society Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Apparent Contrast
Brightness
Flicker
Psychology And Cognitive Neuroscience
Psychophysical Function
Transducer Function
title A Brücke–Bartley effect for contrast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A36%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Br%C3%BCcke%E2%80%93Bartley%20effect%20for%20contrast&rft.jtitle=Royal%20Society%20open%20science&rft.au=Solomon,%20Joshua%20A.&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=180171&rft.pages=180171-&rft.issn=2054-5703&rft.eissn=2054-5703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsos.180171&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2109334768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2109334768&rft_id=info:pmid/30225010&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_091cd01365df4633add573406e17b96b&rfr_iscdi=true