Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample

Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Royal Society open science 2017-11, Vol.4 (11), p.170730-170730
Hauptverfasser: Morgan-Richards, Mary, Bulgarella, Mariana, Sivyer, Louisa, Dowle, Edwina J., Hale, Marie, McKean, Natasha E., Trewick, Steven A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 170730
container_issue 11
container_start_page 170730
container_title Royal Society open science
container_volume 4
creator Morgan-Richards, Mary
Bulgarella, Mariana
Sivyer, Louisa
Dowle, Edwina J.
Hale, Marie
McKean, Natasha E.
Trewick, Steven A.
description Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters that might be mistaken for evidence of multiple species. There are four distinct processes that can explain high levels of mtDNA sequence difference within a single sample. Here, we examine one case in detail as an exemplar to distinguish among competing hypotheses. Within our sample of tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens; Orthoptera), we found multiple mtDNA haplotypes for a protein-coding region (cytb/ND1) that differed by a maximum of 7.9%. From sequencing the whole mitochondrial genome of two representative individuals, we found evidence of constraining selection. Heterozygotes were as common as expected under random mating at five nuclear loci. Morphological traits and nuclear markers did not resolve the mtDNA groupings of individuals. We concluded that the large differences found among our sample of mtDNA sequences were simply owing to a large population size over an extended period of time allowing an equilibrium between mutation and drift to retain a great deal of genetic diversity within a single species.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsos.170730
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_170730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7152cc47feea4b2e87f3471f7a8e18e3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1983256334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-50decc0a9963f438005463d368d5e133840eb96b704b6a6f7003b5b7f78d92bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxSMEolXpiTvKEQltGcefuSChqkClikoUjshynMmuV04c7KSw_PV4Sam2CHHyeObpN0_ziuI5gTMCtXodU0hnRIKk8Kg4roCzFZdAHx_UR8VpSlsAIByoFPJpcVTVVU1A0OPi48WP0Rs3uGFdehPXWPZuCnYThjY648uE32YcLJat6zqM-zKV3920cUNpyjGMszeTC0OZTD96fFY86YxPeHr3nhRf3l18Pv-wurp-f3n-9mpluWTTikOL1oKpa0E7RhVkr4K2VKiWI6FUMcCmFo0E1ggjOglAG97ITqq2rhpLT4rLhdsGs9VjdL2JOx2M078bIa61iZOzHrUkvLKWyQ7RsKZCJTvKJOmkUUgU0sx6s7DGuemxtThM0fgH0IeTwW30OtxqLokUVGbAyztADPlaadK9Sxa9NwOGOWlSK1pxQSnL0leL1MaQUsTufg0BvQ9U7wPVS6BZ_eLQ2b32T3xZ8HURxLDL5w7W4bTT2zDHIX_1p5vrm1vmCNGgKMlIzmr9043LEqZdSjPqPD5Y-pcB-B__X55_AZMzzdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983256334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Royal Society Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Morgan-Richards, Mary ; Bulgarella, Mariana ; Sivyer, Louisa ; Dowle, Edwina J. ; Hale, Marie ; McKean, Natasha E. ; Trewick, Steven A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan-Richards, Mary ; Bulgarella, Mariana ; Sivyer, Louisa ; Dowle, Edwina J. ; Hale, Marie ; McKean, Natasha E. ; Trewick, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><description>Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters that might be mistaken for evidence of multiple species. There are four distinct processes that can explain high levels of mtDNA sequence difference within a single sample. Here, we examine one case in detail as an exemplar to distinguish among competing hypotheses. Within our sample of tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens; Orthoptera), we found multiple mtDNA haplotypes for a protein-coding region (cytb/ND1) that differed by a maximum of 7.9%. From sequencing the whole mitochondrial genome of two representative individuals, we found evidence of constraining selection. Heterozygotes were as common as expected under random mating at five nuclear loci. Morphological traits and nuclear markers did not resolve the mtDNA groupings of individuals. We concluded that the large differences found among our sample of mtDNA sequences were simply owing to a large population size over an extended period of time allowing an equilibrium between mutation and drift to retain a great deal of genetic diversity within a single species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2054-5703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-5703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170730</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29291063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society Publishing</publisher><subject>Biology (whole Organism) ; Constraining Selection ; Dna Barcoding ; Genetic Drift ; hemideina ; Mtdna Divergence ; Population Size</subject><ispartof>Royal Society open science, 2017-11, Vol.4 (11), p.170730-170730</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors.</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-50decc0a9963f438005463d368d5e133840eb96b704b6a6f7003b5b7f78d92bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-50decc0a9963f438005463d368d5e133840eb96b704b6a6f7003b5b7f78d92bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3913-9814</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717637/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717637/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,3309,27124,27901,27902,53766,53768,55530,55540</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29291063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan-Richards, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulgarella, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivyer, Louisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowle, Edwina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hale, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKean, Natasha E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trewick, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample</title><title>Royal Society open science</title><addtitle>R. Soc. open sci</addtitle><addtitle>R Soc Open Sci</addtitle><description>Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters that might be mistaken for evidence of multiple species. There are four distinct processes that can explain high levels of mtDNA sequence difference within a single sample. Here, we examine one case in detail as an exemplar to distinguish among competing hypotheses. Within our sample of tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens; Orthoptera), we found multiple mtDNA haplotypes for a protein-coding region (cytb/ND1) that differed by a maximum of 7.9%. From sequencing the whole mitochondrial genome of two representative individuals, we found evidence of constraining selection. Heterozygotes were as common as expected under random mating at five nuclear loci. Morphological traits and nuclear markers did not resolve the mtDNA groupings of individuals. We concluded that the large differences found among our sample of mtDNA sequences were simply owing to a large population size over an extended period of time allowing an equilibrium between mutation and drift to retain a great deal of genetic diversity within a single species.</description><subject>Biology (whole Organism)</subject><subject>Constraining Selection</subject><subject>Dna Barcoding</subject><subject>Genetic Drift</subject><subject>hemideina</subject><subject>Mtdna Divergence</subject><subject>Population Size</subject><issn>2054-5703</issn><issn>2054-5703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxSMEolXpiTvKEQltGcefuSChqkClikoUjshynMmuV04c7KSw_PV4Sam2CHHyeObpN0_ziuI5gTMCtXodU0hnRIKk8Kg4roCzFZdAHx_UR8VpSlsAIByoFPJpcVTVVU1A0OPi48WP0Rs3uGFdehPXWPZuCnYThjY648uE32YcLJat6zqM-zKV3920cUNpyjGMszeTC0OZTD96fFY86YxPeHr3nhRf3l18Pv-wurp-f3n-9mpluWTTikOL1oKpa0E7RhVkr4K2VKiWI6FUMcCmFo0E1ggjOglAG97ITqq2rhpLT4rLhdsGs9VjdL2JOx2M078bIa61iZOzHrUkvLKWyQ7RsKZCJTvKJOmkUUgU0sx6s7DGuemxtThM0fgH0IeTwW30OtxqLokUVGbAyztADPlaadK9Sxa9NwOGOWlSK1pxQSnL0leL1MaQUsTufg0BvQ9U7wPVS6BZ_eLQ2b32T3xZ8HURxLDL5w7W4bTT2zDHIX_1p5vrm1vmCNGgKMlIzmr9043LEqZdSjPqPD5Y-pcB-B__X55_AZMzzdw</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Morgan-Richards, Mary</creator><creator>Bulgarella, Mariana</creator><creator>Sivyer, Louisa</creator><creator>Dowle, Edwina J.</creator><creator>Hale, Marie</creator><creator>McKean, Natasha E.</creator><creator>Trewick, Steven A.</creator><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-9814</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample</title><author>Morgan-Richards, Mary ; Bulgarella, Mariana ; Sivyer, Louisa ; Dowle, Edwina J. ; Hale, Marie ; McKean, Natasha E. ; Trewick, Steven A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-50decc0a9963f438005463d368d5e133840eb96b704b6a6f7003b5b7f78d92bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biology (whole Organism)</topic><topic>Constraining Selection</topic><topic>Dna Barcoding</topic><topic>Genetic Drift</topic><topic>hemideina</topic><topic>Mtdna Divergence</topic><topic>Population Size</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan-Richards, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulgarella, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivyer, Louisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowle, Edwina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hale, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKean, Natasha E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trewick, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Royal Society open science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan-Richards, Mary</au><au>Bulgarella, Mariana</au><au>Sivyer, Louisa</au><au>Dowle, Edwina J.</au><au>Hale, Marie</au><au>McKean, Natasha E.</au><au>Trewick, Steven A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample</atitle><jtitle>Royal Society open science</jtitle><stitle>R. Soc. open sci</stitle><addtitle>R Soc Open Sci</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>170730</spage><epage>170730</epage><pages>170730-170730</pages><issn>2054-5703</issn><eissn>2054-5703</eissn><abstract>Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters that might be mistaken for evidence of multiple species. There are four distinct processes that can explain high levels of mtDNA sequence difference within a single sample. Here, we examine one case in detail as an exemplar to distinguish among competing hypotheses. Within our sample of tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens; Orthoptera), we found multiple mtDNA haplotypes for a protein-coding region (cytb/ND1) that differed by a maximum of 7.9%. From sequencing the whole mitochondrial genome of two representative individuals, we found evidence of constraining selection. Heterozygotes were as common as expected under random mating at five nuclear loci. Morphological traits and nuclear markers did not resolve the mtDNA groupings of individuals. We concluded that the large differences found among our sample of mtDNA sequences were simply owing to a large population size over an extended period of time allowing an equilibrium between mutation and drift to retain a great deal of genetic diversity within a single species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society Publishing</pub><pmid>29291063</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsos.170730</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-9814</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2054-5703
ispartof Royal Society open science, 2017-11, Vol.4 (11), p.170730-170730
issn 2054-5703
2054-5703
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_170730
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Royal Society Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Biology (whole Organism)
Constraining Selection
Dna Barcoding
Genetic Drift
hemideina
Mtdna Divergence
Population Size
title Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A13%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20large%20mitochondrial%20sequence%20differences%20within%20a%20population%20sample&rft.jtitle=Royal%20Society%20open%20science&rft.au=Morgan-Richards,%20Mary&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=170730&rft.epage=170730&rft.pages=170730-170730&rft.issn=2054-5703&rft.eissn=2054-5703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsos.170730&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1983256334%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983256334&rft_id=info:pmid/29291063&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7152cc47feea4b2e87f3471f7a8e18e3&rfr_iscdi=true