Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy and Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy as Initial Induction Therapy for Subsequent Conversion Surgery in Patients With Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: Short-term Results

OBJECTIVE:We conducted a multicenter randomized prospective phase 2 trial of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) as initial induction therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in clinical T4b esophageal cancer. We compared treatment effects and adverse events. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Although...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2021-12, Vol.274 (6), p.e465-e472
Hauptverfasser: Sugimura, Keijiro, Miyata, Hiroshi, Tanaka, Koji, Makino, Tomoki, Takeno, Atsushi, Shiraishi, Osamu, Motoori, Masaaki, Yamasaki, Makoto, Kimura, Yutaka, Hirao, Motohiro, Fujitani, Kazumasa, Yasuda, Takushi, Mori, Masaki, Eguchi, Hidetoshi, Yano, Masahiko, Doki, Yuichiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e472
container_issue 6
container_start_page e465
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 274
creator Sugimura, Keijiro
Miyata, Hiroshi
Tanaka, Koji
Makino, Tomoki
Takeno, Atsushi
Shiraishi, Osamu
Motoori, Masaaki
Yamasaki, Makoto
Kimura, Yutaka
Hirao, Motohiro
Fujitani, Kazumasa
Yasuda, Takushi
Mori, Masaki
Eguchi, Hidetoshi
Yano, Masahiko
Doki, Yuichiro
description OBJECTIVE:We conducted a multicenter randomized prospective phase 2 trial of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) as initial induction therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in clinical T4b esophageal cancer. We compared treatment effects and adverse events. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Although induction followed by CS is potentially curative for T4b esophageal cancer, the optimal initial induction treatment is unclear. METHODS:Ninety-nine patients with T4b esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to chemoradiotherapy (Group A, n = 49) or CT (Group B, n = 50) as initial induction treatment. CRT consisted of radiation (50.4 Gy) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. CT consisted of 2 cycles of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). CRT or CT was followed by CS if resectable. If unresectable, the patient received the other treatment as secondary treatment. CS was performed if resectable after secondary treatment. The primary end point was 2-year overall survival. RESULTS:In Group A, CS was performed in 34 (69%) and 7 patients (14%) after initial and secondary treatment. In Group B, CS was performed in 25 (50%) and 17 patients (34%) after initial and secondary treatment. The R0 resection rate after initial and secondary treatment was similar (78% vs 76%, P = 1.000). Adverse events including leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in Group B. Group A had better histological complete response of the primary tumor (40% vs 17%, P = 0.028) and histological nodal status (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS:Upfront CRT was superior to upfront CT in terms of pathological effects and adverse events. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004564
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wolterskluwer_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10.1097/SLA.0000000000004564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-215e198e9c0d6f62e0188c3eae5d476b6f9725df04ee858597132fbecdf9a4a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUlGP1CAYRKOJ6-k_8IE_0BMobalvl3qnm6xxc7vGx4alX7cohQrUc_310tuLMT4oLwS-mWEmA0KvKLmkpK5e7zZXl-SPxYuSP0YrWjCRUcrJE7RKt3nG65w9Q89D-EII5YJUq0fow2yiVmAjeHwrbedG_RM6vB1kAMzw3mtpcOPGSXptj7gZYHRedtrFAbycTjhx8FunIMofYPDWzAEX2Y2ZnXezl0qbe0Sjw2Rk1Pas8Jsc8NrquLyxtt2sonYW7x-GvfN4Nx8CfJuTv2TCfgcfFsRu9kfwJ5zktkk0TQP-rOOAG6OtVkltzw_4OrhpkEdYAkirwL_Bu8H5mKWsI76FkKKHF-hpL02Alw_7Bfp0c71v3mebj-_WzdUmU3kleMZoAbQWUCvSlX3JgFAhVA4Sio5X5aHs64oVXU84gChEUVc0Z_0BVNfXkkuSXyB-1lXeheChbyevR-lPLSXt0mKbWmz_bjHRxJl250yyHb6a-Q58O6RQcfgflf-Deo8rC5Exwihl6ZAtf4TnvwCW0raZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy and Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy as Initial Induction Therapy for Subsequent Conversion Surgery in Patients With Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: Short-term Results</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sugimura, Keijiro ; Miyata, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Koji ; Makino, Tomoki ; Takeno, Atsushi ; Shiraishi, Osamu ; Motoori, Masaaki ; Yamasaki, Makoto ; Kimura, Yutaka ; Hirao, Motohiro ; Fujitani, Kazumasa ; Yasuda, Takushi ; Mori, Masaki ; Eguchi, Hidetoshi ; Yano, Masahiko ; Doki, Yuichiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Sugimura, Keijiro ; Miyata, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Koji ; Makino, Tomoki ; Takeno, Atsushi ; Shiraishi, Osamu ; Motoori, Masaaki ; Yamasaki, Makoto ; Kimura, Yutaka ; Hirao, Motohiro ; Fujitani, Kazumasa ; Yasuda, Takushi ; Mori, Masaki ; Eguchi, Hidetoshi ; Yano, Masahiko ; Doki, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:We conducted a multicenter randomized prospective phase 2 trial of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) as initial induction therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in clinical T4b esophageal cancer. We compared treatment effects and adverse events. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Although induction followed by CS is potentially curative for T4b esophageal cancer, the optimal initial induction treatment is unclear. METHODS:Ninety-nine patients with T4b esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to chemoradiotherapy (Group A, n = 49) or CT (Group B, n = 50) as initial induction treatment. CRT consisted of radiation (50.4 Gy) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. CT consisted of 2 cycles of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). CRT or CT was followed by CS if resectable. If unresectable, the patient received the other treatment as secondary treatment. CS was performed if resectable after secondary treatment. The primary end point was 2-year overall survival. RESULTS:In Group A, CS was performed in 34 (69%) and 7 patients (14%) after initial and secondary treatment. In Group B, CS was performed in 25 (50%) and 17 patients (34%) after initial and secondary treatment. The R0 resection rate after initial and secondary treatment was similar (78% vs 76%, P = 1.000). Adverse events including leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in Group B. Group A had better histological complete response of the primary tumor (40% vs 17%, P = 0.028) and histological nodal status (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS:Upfront CRT was superior to upfront CT in terms of pathological effects and adverse events. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2021-12, Vol.274 (6), p.e465-e472</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-215e198e9c0d6f62e0188c3eae5d476b6f9725df04ee858597132fbecdf9a4a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-215e198e9c0d6f62e0188c3eae5d476b6f9725df04ee858597132fbecdf9a4a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sugimura, Keijiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makino, Tomoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeno, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiraishi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motoori, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamasaki, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirao, Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujitani, Kazumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Takushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguchi, Hidetoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doki, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy and Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy as Initial Induction Therapy for Subsequent Conversion Surgery in Patients With Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: Short-term Results</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><description>OBJECTIVE:We conducted a multicenter randomized prospective phase 2 trial of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) as initial induction therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in clinical T4b esophageal cancer. We compared treatment effects and adverse events. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Although induction followed by CS is potentially curative for T4b esophageal cancer, the optimal initial induction treatment is unclear. METHODS:Ninety-nine patients with T4b esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to chemoradiotherapy (Group A, n = 49) or CT (Group B, n = 50) as initial induction treatment. CRT consisted of radiation (50.4 Gy) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. CT consisted of 2 cycles of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). CRT or CT was followed by CS if resectable. If unresectable, the patient received the other treatment as secondary treatment. CS was performed if resectable after secondary treatment. The primary end point was 2-year overall survival. RESULTS:In Group A, CS was performed in 34 (69%) and 7 patients (14%) after initial and secondary treatment. In Group B, CS was performed in 25 (50%) and 17 patients (34%) after initial and secondary treatment. The R0 resection rate after initial and secondary treatment was similar (78% vs 76%, P = 1.000). Adverse events including leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in Group B. Group A had better histological complete response of the primary tumor (40% vs 17%, P = 0.028) and histological nodal status (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS:Upfront CRT was superior to upfront CT in terms of pathological effects and adverse events. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).</description><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUlGP1CAYRKOJ6-k_8IE_0BMobalvl3qnm6xxc7vGx4alX7cohQrUc_310tuLMT4oLwS-mWEmA0KvKLmkpK5e7zZXl-SPxYuSP0YrWjCRUcrJE7RKt3nG65w9Q89D-EII5YJUq0fow2yiVmAjeHwrbedG_RM6vB1kAMzw3mtpcOPGSXptj7gZYHRedtrFAbycTjhx8FunIMofYPDWzAEX2Y2ZnXezl0qbe0Sjw2Rk1Pas8Jsc8NrquLyxtt2sonYW7x-GvfN4Nx8CfJuTv2TCfgcfFsRu9kfwJ5zktkk0TQP-rOOAG6OtVkltzw_4OrhpkEdYAkirwL_Bu8H5mKWsI76FkKKHF-hpL02Alw_7Bfp0c71v3mebj-_WzdUmU3kleMZoAbQWUCvSlX3JgFAhVA4Sio5X5aHs64oVXU84gChEUVc0Z_0BVNfXkkuSXyB-1lXeheChbyevR-lPLSXt0mKbWmz_bjHRxJl250yyHb6a-Q58O6RQcfgflf-Deo8rC5Exwihl6ZAtf4TnvwCW0raZ</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Sugimura, Keijiro</creator><creator>Miyata, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Tanaka, Koji</creator><creator>Makino, Tomoki</creator><creator>Takeno, Atsushi</creator><creator>Shiraishi, Osamu</creator><creator>Motoori, Masaaki</creator><creator>Yamasaki, Makoto</creator><creator>Kimura, Yutaka</creator><creator>Hirao, Motohiro</creator><creator>Fujitani, Kazumasa</creator><creator>Yasuda, Takushi</creator><creator>Mori, Masaki</creator><creator>Eguchi, Hidetoshi</creator><creator>Yano, Masahiko</creator><creator>Doki, Yuichiro</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy and Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy as Initial Induction Therapy for Subsequent Conversion Surgery in Patients With Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: Short-term Results</title><author>Sugimura, Keijiro ; Miyata, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Koji ; Makino, Tomoki ; Takeno, Atsushi ; Shiraishi, Osamu ; Motoori, Masaaki ; Yamasaki, Makoto ; Kimura, Yutaka ; Hirao, Motohiro ; Fujitani, Kazumasa ; Yasuda, Takushi ; Mori, Masaki ; Eguchi, Hidetoshi ; Yano, Masahiko ; Doki, Yuichiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-215e198e9c0d6f62e0188c3eae5d476b6f9725df04ee858597132fbecdf9a4a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sugimura, Keijiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makino, Tomoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeno, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiraishi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motoori, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamasaki, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirao, Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujitani, Kazumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Takushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguchi, Hidetoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doki, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sugimura, Keijiro</au><au>Miyata, Hiroshi</au><au>Tanaka, Koji</au><au>Makino, Tomoki</au><au>Takeno, Atsushi</au><au>Shiraishi, Osamu</au><au>Motoori, Masaaki</au><au>Yamasaki, Makoto</au><au>Kimura, Yutaka</au><au>Hirao, Motohiro</au><au>Fujitani, Kazumasa</au><au>Yasuda, Takushi</au><au>Mori, Masaki</au><au>Eguchi, Hidetoshi</au><au>Yano, Masahiko</au><au>Doki, Yuichiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy and Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy as Initial Induction Therapy for Subsequent Conversion Surgery in Patients With Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: Short-term Results</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>274</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e465</spage><epage>e472</epage><pages>e465-e472</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:We conducted a multicenter randomized prospective phase 2 trial of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) as initial induction therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in clinical T4b esophageal cancer. We compared treatment effects and adverse events. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Although induction followed by CS is potentially curative for T4b esophageal cancer, the optimal initial induction treatment is unclear. METHODS:Ninety-nine patients with T4b esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to chemoradiotherapy (Group A, n = 49) or CT (Group B, n = 50) as initial induction treatment. CRT consisted of radiation (50.4 Gy) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. CT consisted of 2 cycles of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). CRT or CT was followed by CS if resectable. If unresectable, the patient received the other treatment as secondary treatment. CS was performed if resectable after secondary treatment. The primary end point was 2-year overall survival. RESULTS:In Group A, CS was performed in 34 (69%) and 7 patients (14%) after initial and secondary treatment. In Group B, CS was performed in 25 (50%) and 17 patients (34%) after initial and secondary treatment. The R0 resection rate after initial and secondary treatment was similar (78% vs 76%, P = 1.000). Adverse events including leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in Group B. Group A had better histological complete response of the primary tumor (40% vs 17%, P = 0.028) and histological nodal status (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS:Upfront CRT was superior to upfront CT in terms of pathological effects and adverse events. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).</abstract><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000004564</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2021-12, Vol.274 (6), p.e465-e472
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004564
source PubMed Central; Journals@Ovid Complete
title Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy and Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy as Initial Induction Therapy for Subsequent Conversion Surgery in Patients With Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: Short-term Results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T23%3A56%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wolterskluwer_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20Randomized%20Phase%202%20Trial%20Comparing%20Chemoradiotherapy%20and%20Docetaxel%20Plus%205-Fluorouracil%20and%20Cisplatin%20Chemotherapy%20as%20Initial%20Induction%20Therapy%20for%20Subsequent%20Conversion%20Surgery%20in%20Patients%20With%20Clinical%20T4b%20Esophageal%20Cancer:%20Short-term%20Results&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Sugimura,%20Keijiro&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=274&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e465&rft.epage=e472&rft.pages=e465-e472&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004564&rft_dat=%3Cwolterskluwer_cross%3E10.1097/SLA.0000000000004564%3C/wolterskluwer_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true