Preincubation of endotoxin with monoclonal anti-lipid A (E5), but not in vivo treatment, inhibits circulatory dysfunction

Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) directed against the toxic lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) have been shown to bind lipid A in vitro, but clinical trials of such mAbs have yielded mixed results. In 53 rats instrumented for macrocirculatory and cremaster muscle microcirculatory measurements, w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Shock (Augusta, Ga.) Ga.), 1995-08, Vol.4 (2), p.131-138
Hauptverfasser: Arden, W A, Strodel, W E, Gross, D R, Anderson, K W, Oremus, R, Derbin, M, Schwartz, R W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) directed against the toxic lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) have been shown to bind lipid A in vitro, but clinical trials of such mAbs have yielded mixed results. In 53 rats instrumented for macrocirculatory and cremaster muscle microcirculatory measurements, we examined whether E5, a murine-derived anti-lipid A mAb, could inhibit LPS-induced circulatory dysfunction when incubated with LPS in vitro or given separately in vivo prior to LPS administration. Compared with Control rats (Group I), rats infused with 10 mg/kg Escherichia coli LPS (Group II) displayed marked decreases in arterial pressure and cardiac output and marked decreases in erythrocyte velocity in second, third, and fourth order skeletal muscle arterioles. Infusion of 2 mg/kg E5 90 min prior to LPS infusion (Group III) did not improve cardiovascular performance. In contrast, incubation of LPS with either 2 mg/kg (Group IV) or 10 mg/kg (Group V) E5 prior to infusion significantly attenuated LPS-induced changes in both macrocirculatory and microcirculatory function. Further investigation of the disparity between the in vitro and in vivo neutralizing capacity of anti-lipid A mAbs may aid interpretation of the variable clinical results achieved with these preparations.
ISSN:1073-2322
DOI:10.1097/00024382-199508000-00009