Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations
Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical care 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.MS97-MS115 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | MS115 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | MS97 |
container_title | Medical care |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Carman, Kristin L. Short, Pamela Farley Farley, Donna O. Schnaier, Jenny A. Elliott, Diana B. Gallagher, Patricia M. |
description | Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS™ (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS™ on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS™. Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. Methods. A similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. Results. There are 4 early results from the CAHPS™ demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS™ survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS™ ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS™ that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS™ require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. Conclusion. The first round CAHPS™ demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005650_199903001_00011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3767395</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3767395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2001-ac2b0c57e76038659cea7e2f87336e60fd2b841efe89e8bc4ffab82729b6c7ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOAzEMhiMEEqVwAxa5wEAekxe7qh0oUiWQgHWUmTq0ZdqpkilV95yEo3ESUga6wxvLv_3b1ocQpuSKEqOuSQohBcmoMYZwQmiWFEqPUI8KrpKc62PUI4SJTBFlTtFZjIs0obhgPTQq1vO6ed3ADS5cqHd4AjE2q4h9aJZ4OBg_Pn19fOIRLJPYBtfO9023muLi3dWbrj5HJ97VES5-cx-93BbPw3E2ebi7Hw4mWcX2f7mKlaQSCpQkXEthKnAKmNeKcwmS-CkrdU7Bgzagyyr33pWaKWZKWSk35X2ku71VaGIM4O06zJcu7Cwldk_D_tGwBxr2h0ay5p1129QthPhWb7YQ7Axc3c7sfxCT7bKzLWLbhMM5rqTiRvBvQ25sgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Carman, Kristin L. ; Short, Pamela Farley ; Farley, Donna O. ; Schnaier, Jenny A. ; Elliott, Diana B. ; Gallagher, Patricia M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carman, Kristin L. ; Short, Pamela Farley ; Farley, Donna O. ; Schnaier, Jenny A. ; Elliott, Diana B. ; Gallagher, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS™ (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS™ on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS™. Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. Methods. A similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. Results. There are 4 early results from the CAHPS™ demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS™ survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS™ ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS™ that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS™ require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. Conclusion. The first round CAHPS™ demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</publisher><subject>Consumer surveys ; Federal health insurance plans ; Health care surveys ; Health insurance ; Health maintenance organizations ; Health surveys ; Medicaid ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; State employees</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.MS97-MS115</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3767395$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3767395$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carman, Kristin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Pamela Farley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farley, Donna O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaier, Jenny A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Diana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><title>Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations</title><title>Medical care</title><description>Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS™ (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS™ on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS™. Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. Methods. A similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. Results. There are 4 early results from the CAHPS™ demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS™ survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS™ ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS™ that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS™ require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. Conclusion. The first round CAHPS™ demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process.</description><subject>Consumer surveys</subject><subject>Federal health insurance plans</subject><subject>Health care surveys</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>State employees</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOAzEMhiMEEqVwAxa5wEAekxe7qh0oUiWQgHWUmTq0ZdqpkilV95yEo3ESUga6wxvLv_3b1ocQpuSKEqOuSQohBcmoMYZwQmiWFEqPUI8KrpKc62PUI4SJTBFlTtFZjIs0obhgPTQq1vO6ed3ADS5cqHd4AjE2q4h9aJZ4OBg_Pn19fOIRLJPYBtfO9023muLi3dWbrj5HJ97VES5-cx-93BbPw3E2ebi7Hw4mWcX2f7mKlaQSCpQkXEthKnAKmNeKcwmS-CkrdU7Bgzagyyr33pWaKWZKWSk35X2ku71VaGIM4O06zJcu7Cwldk_D_tGwBxr2h0ay5p1129QthPhWb7YQ7Axc3c7sfxCT7bKzLWLbhMM5rqTiRvBvQ25sgQ</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Carman, Kristin L.</creator><creator>Short, Pamela Farley</creator><creator>Farley, Donna O.</creator><creator>Schnaier, Jenny A.</creator><creator>Elliott, Diana B.</creator><creator>Gallagher, Patricia M.</creator><general>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations</title><author>Carman, Kristin L. ; Short, Pamela Farley ; Farley, Donna O. ; Schnaier, Jenny A. ; Elliott, Diana B. ; Gallagher, Patricia M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2001-ac2b0c57e76038659cea7e2f87336e60fd2b841efe89e8bc4ffab82729b6c7ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Consumer surveys</topic><topic>Federal health insurance plans</topic><topic>Health care surveys</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>State employees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carman, Kristin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Pamela Farley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farley, Donna O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaier, Jenny A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Diana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carman, Kristin L.</au><au>Short, Pamela Farley</au><au>Farley, Donna O.</au><au>Schnaier, Jenny A.</au><au>Elliott, Diana B.</au><au>Gallagher, Patricia M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>MS97</spage><epage>MS115</epage><pages>MS97-MS115</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><abstract>Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS™ (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS™ on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS™. Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. Methods. A similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. Results. There are 4 early results from the CAHPS™ demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS™ survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS™ ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS™ that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS™ require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. Conclusion. The first round CAHPS™ demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process.</abstract><pub>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</pub><doi>10.1097/00005650-199903001-00011</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7079 |
ispartof | Medical care, 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.MS97-MS115 |
issn | 0025-7079 1537-1948 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005650_199903001_00011 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Consumer surveys Federal health insurance plans Health care surveys Health insurance Health maintenance organizations Health surveys Medicaid Medical personnel Nurses State employees |
title | Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A03%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epilogue:%20Early%20Lessons%20from%20CAHPS%E2%84%A2%20Demonstrations%20and%20Evaluations&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Carman,%20Kristin%20L.&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=MS97&rft.epage=MS115&rft.pages=MS97-MS115&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005650-199903001-00011&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3767395%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3767395&rfr_iscdi=true |