Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations

Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.MS97-MS115
Hauptverfasser: Carman, Kristin L., Short, Pamela Farley, Farley, Donna O., Schnaier, Jenny A., Elliott, Diana B., Gallagher, Patricia M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page MS115
container_issue 3
container_start_page MS97
container_title Medical care
container_volume 37
creator Carman, Kristin L.
Short, Pamela Farley
Farley, Donna O.
Schnaier, Jenny A.
Elliott, Diana B.
Gallagher, Patricia M.
description Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS™ (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS™ on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS™. Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. Methods. A similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. Results. There are 4 early results from the CAHPS™ demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS™ survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS™ ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS™ that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS™ require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. Conclusion. The first round CAHPS™ demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005650_199903001_00011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3767395</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3767395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2001-ac2b0c57e76038659cea7e2f87336e60fd2b841efe89e8bc4ffab82729b6c7ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOAzEMhiMEEqVwAxa5wEAekxe7qh0oUiWQgHWUmTq0ZdqpkilV95yEo3ESUga6wxvLv_3b1ocQpuSKEqOuSQohBcmoMYZwQmiWFEqPUI8KrpKc62PUI4SJTBFlTtFZjIs0obhgPTQq1vO6ed3ADS5cqHd4AjE2q4h9aJZ4OBg_Pn19fOIRLJPYBtfO9023muLi3dWbrj5HJ97VES5-cx-93BbPw3E2ebi7Hw4mWcX2f7mKlaQSCpQkXEthKnAKmNeKcwmS-CkrdU7Bgzagyyr33pWaKWZKWSk35X2ku71VaGIM4O06zJcu7Cwldk_D_tGwBxr2h0ay5p1129QthPhWb7YQ7Axc3c7sfxCT7bKzLWLbhMM5rqTiRvBvQ25sgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Carman, Kristin L. ; Short, Pamela Farley ; Farley, Donna O. ; Schnaier, Jenny A. ; Elliott, Diana B. ; Gallagher, Patricia M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carman, Kristin L. ; Short, Pamela Farley ; Farley, Donna O. ; Schnaier, Jenny A. ; Elliott, Diana B. ; Gallagher, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS™ (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS™ on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS™. Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. Methods. A similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. Results. There are 4 early results from the CAHPS™ demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS™ survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS™ ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS™ that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS™ require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. Conclusion. The first round CAHPS™ demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</publisher><subject>Consumer surveys ; Federal health insurance plans ; Health care surveys ; Health insurance ; Health maintenance organizations ; Health surveys ; Medicaid ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; State employees</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.MS97-MS115</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>1999 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3767395$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3767395$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carman, Kristin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Pamela Farley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farley, Donna O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaier, Jenny A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Diana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><title>Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations</title><title>Medical care</title><description>Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS™ (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS™ on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS™. Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. Methods. A similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. Results. There are 4 early results from the CAHPS™ demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS™ survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS™ ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS™ that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS™ require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. Conclusion. The first round CAHPS™ demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process.</description><subject>Consumer surveys</subject><subject>Federal health insurance plans</subject><subject>Health care surveys</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>State employees</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOAzEMhiMEEqVwAxa5wEAekxe7qh0oUiWQgHWUmTq0ZdqpkilV95yEo3ESUga6wxvLv_3b1ocQpuSKEqOuSQohBcmoMYZwQmiWFEqPUI8KrpKc62PUI4SJTBFlTtFZjIs0obhgPTQq1vO6ed3ADS5cqHd4AjE2q4h9aJZ4OBg_Pn19fOIRLJPYBtfO9023muLi3dWbrj5HJ97VES5-cx-93BbPw3E2ebi7Hw4mWcX2f7mKlaQSCpQkXEthKnAKmNeKcwmS-CkrdU7Bgzagyyr33pWaKWZKWSk35X2ku71VaGIM4O06zJcu7Cwldk_D_tGwBxr2h0ay5p1129QthPhWb7YQ7Axc3c7sfxCT7bKzLWLbhMM5rqTiRvBvQ25sgQ</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Carman, Kristin L.</creator><creator>Short, Pamela Farley</creator><creator>Farley, Donna O.</creator><creator>Schnaier, Jenny A.</creator><creator>Elliott, Diana B.</creator><creator>Gallagher, Patricia M.</creator><general>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations</title><author>Carman, Kristin L. ; Short, Pamela Farley ; Farley, Donna O. ; Schnaier, Jenny A. ; Elliott, Diana B. ; Gallagher, Patricia M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2001-ac2b0c57e76038659cea7e2f87336e60fd2b841efe89e8bc4ffab82729b6c7ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Consumer surveys</topic><topic>Federal health insurance plans</topic><topic>Health care surveys</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>State employees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carman, Kristin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Pamela Farley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farley, Donna O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaier, Jenny A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Diana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carman, Kristin L.</au><au>Short, Pamela Farley</au><au>Farley, Donna O.</au><au>Schnaier, Jenny A.</au><au>Elliott, Diana B.</au><au>Gallagher, Patricia M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>MS97</spage><epage>MS115</epage><pages>MS97-MS115</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><abstract>Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS™ in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS™ (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS™ on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS™. Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. Methods. A similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. Results. There are 4 early results from the CAHPS™ demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS™ survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS™ ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS™ that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS™ require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. Conclusion. The first round CAHPS™ demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process.</abstract><pub>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</pub><doi>10.1097/00005650-199903001-00011</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7079
ispartof Medical care, 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.MS97-MS115
issn 0025-7079
1537-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005650_199903001_00011
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Consumer surveys
Federal health insurance plans
Health care surveys
Health insurance
Health maintenance organizations
Health surveys
Medicaid
Medical personnel
Nurses
State employees
title Epilogue: Early Lessons from CAHPS™ Demonstrations and Evaluations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A03%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epilogue:%20Early%20Lessons%20from%20CAHPS%E2%84%A2%20Demonstrations%20and%20Evaluations&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Carman,%20Kristin%20L.&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=MS97&rft.epage=MS115&rft.pages=MS97-MS115&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005650-199903001-00011&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3767395%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3767395&rfr_iscdi=true