Preventable Death Evaluation of the Appropriateness of the On-Site Trauma Care Provided by Urgences-Sante Physicians
The study is based on 44 preventable deaths occurring in a cohort of 360 patients with major trauma. These cases were reviewed by a committee of nine experts. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 28, and most cases had injuries to the head/neck (68%) and chest (64%). The mean (+/-SD) observed pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care Infection, and Critical Care, 1995-12, Vol.39 (6), p.1029-1035 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1035 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1029 |
container_title | The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Sampalis, John S. Boukas, Stella Lavoie, Andre Nikolis, Andreas Frechette, Pierre Brown, Rea Fleiszer, David Mulder, David |
description | The study is based on 44 preventable deaths occurring in a cohort of 360 patients with major trauma. These cases were reviewed by a committee of nine experts. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 28, and most cases had injuries to the head/neck (68%) and chest (64%). The mean (+/-SD) observed prehospital times, and those considered the maximum allowable by the committee, were 40.6 +/- 12.0 minutes for head/neck injuries and 23.9 +/- 12.2 minutes for chest injuries (p < 0.05). Intravenous (IV) lines were started in 38 (86%) of the patients. The committee classified this procedure as harmful for 16 (42%) and neutral for 19 (50%). Among the 18 (46%) that were intubated, this intervention was considered harmful for 17% and neutral for 39%. In two of the three patients for whom a pneumatic antishock garment was applied, this procedure was considered harmful. Of the 34 patients that required direct transport at a level I trauma center, 50% were transferred to such a hospital. These results show significant prehospital delays and high rates of inappropriate IV line initiation and intubation in trauma patients receiving on-site care by physicians. We conclude that prehospital care protocols for trauma patients should emphasize prompt transport and specific on-site care algorithms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00005373-199512000-00002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005373_199512000_00002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7500388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4502-7a1c20635ddc2b35fe25092a254b8d6f158359408afcea89fa6579c3ed50b9c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UdtuwjAMjaZNDDE-YVJ-IFuaEJo8IsYuEhJIwHPltu5arbQoSUH8_cK4vM0vls_Fko8JoRF_ibiJX3koJWPJImNUJMLETpC4I_1ICcO05uae9AMimBJaPJKhc1V6kqjYCN0jvVhxLrXuE7-0uMfGQ1ojfUPwJZ3toe7AV21D24L6Eulkt7PtzlbgsUHnrvCiYavKI11b6LZAp2CRLm27r3LMaXqkG_uNTYaOraAJsmV5dFVWQeOeyEMBtcPhpQ_I5n22nn6y-eLjazqZs2ykuGAxRJngY6nyPBOpVAUKxY0AoUapzsdFpLRUZsQ1FBmCNgWMw32ZxFzxNHQ5IPq8N7OtcxaLJByxBXtMIp6cokyuUSa3KP8gEazPZ-uuS7eY34yX4AI_OvOHtvZo3U_dHdAmJULty-S_D8lfkLN_Cg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preventable Death Evaluation of the Appropriateness of the On-Site Trauma Care Provided by Urgences-Sante Physicians</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sampalis, John S. ; Boukas, Stella ; Lavoie, Andre ; Nikolis, Andreas ; Frechette, Pierre ; Brown, Rea ; Fleiszer, David ; Mulder, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Sampalis, John S. ; Boukas, Stella ; Lavoie, Andre ; Nikolis, Andreas ; Frechette, Pierre ; Brown, Rea ; Fleiszer, David ; Mulder, David</creatorcontrib><description>The study is based on 44 preventable deaths occurring in a cohort of 360 patients with major trauma. These cases were reviewed by a committee of nine experts. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 28, and most cases had injuries to the head/neck (68%) and chest (64%). The mean (+/-SD) observed prehospital times, and those considered the maximum allowable by the committee, were 40.6 +/- 12.0 minutes for head/neck injuries and 23.9 +/- 12.2 minutes for chest injuries (p < 0.05). Intravenous (IV) lines were started in 38 (86%) of the patients. The committee classified this procedure as harmful for 16 (42%) and neutral for 19 (50%). Among the 18 (46%) that were intubated, this intervention was considered harmful for 17% and neutral for 39%. In two of the three patients for whom a pneumatic antishock garment was applied, this procedure was considered harmful. Of the 34 patients that required direct transport at a level I trauma center, 50% were transferred to such a hospital. These results show significant prehospital delays and high rates of inappropriate IV line initiation and intubation in trauma patients receiving on-site care by physicians. We conclude that prehospital care protocols for trauma patients should emphasize prompt transport and specific on-site care algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199512000-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7500388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency Medical Technicians ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Gravity Suits - adverse effects ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous - adverse effects ; Injury Severity Score ; Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects ; Life Support Care ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Transfer ; Physicians ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors ; Trauma Centers ; Wounds and Injuries - mortality ; Wounds and Injuries - therapy</subject><ispartof>The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995-12, Vol.39 (6), p.1029-1035</ispartof><rights>Williams & Wilkins 1995. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4502-7a1c20635ddc2b35fe25092a254b8d6f158359408afcea89fa6579c3ed50b9c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4502-7a1c20635ddc2b35fe25092a254b8d6f158359408afcea89fa6579c3ed50b9c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7500388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sampalis, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boukas, Stella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavoie, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolis, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frechette, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Rea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleiszer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, David</creatorcontrib><title>Preventable Death Evaluation of the Appropriateness of the On-Site Trauma Care Provided by Urgences-Sante Physicians</title><title>The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care</title><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><description>The study is based on 44 preventable deaths occurring in a cohort of 360 patients with major trauma. These cases were reviewed by a committee of nine experts. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 28, and most cases had injuries to the head/neck (68%) and chest (64%). The mean (+/-SD) observed prehospital times, and those considered the maximum allowable by the committee, were 40.6 +/- 12.0 minutes for head/neck injuries and 23.9 +/- 12.2 minutes for chest injuries (p < 0.05). Intravenous (IV) lines were started in 38 (86%) of the patients. The committee classified this procedure as harmful for 16 (42%) and neutral for 19 (50%). Among the 18 (46%) that were intubated, this intervention was considered harmful for 17% and neutral for 39%. In two of the three patients for whom a pneumatic antishock garment was applied, this procedure was considered harmful. Of the 34 patients that required direct transport at a level I trauma center, 50% were transferred to such a hospital. These results show significant prehospital delays and high rates of inappropriate IV line initiation and intubation in trauma patients receiving on-site care by physicians. We conclude that prehospital care protocols for trauma patients should emphasize prompt transport and specific on-site care algorithms.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Technicians</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gravity Suits - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Life Support Care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Transfer</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Trauma Centers</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - mortality</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - therapy</subject><issn>0022-5282</issn><issn>1529-8809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UdtuwjAMjaZNDDE-YVJ-IFuaEJo8IsYuEhJIwHPltu5arbQoSUH8_cK4vM0vls_Fko8JoRF_ibiJX3koJWPJImNUJMLETpC4I_1ICcO05uae9AMimBJaPJKhc1V6kqjYCN0jvVhxLrXuE7-0uMfGQ1ojfUPwJZ3toe7AV21D24L6Eulkt7PtzlbgsUHnrvCiYavKI11b6LZAp2CRLm27r3LMaXqkG_uNTYaOraAJsmV5dFVWQeOeyEMBtcPhpQ_I5n22nn6y-eLjazqZs2ykuGAxRJngY6nyPBOpVAUKxY0AoUapzsdFpLRUZsQ1FBmCNgWMw32ZxFzxNHQ5IPq8N7OtcxaLJByxBXtMIp6cokyuUSa3KP8gEazPZ-uuS7eY34yX4AI_OvOHtvZo3U_dHdAmJULty-S_D8lfkLN_Cg</recordid><startdate>199512</startdate><enddate>199512</enddate><creator>Sampalis, John S.</creator><creator>Boukas, Stella</creator><creator>Lavoie, Andre</creator><creator>Nikolis, Andreas</creator><creator>Frechette, Pierre</creator><creator>Brown, Rea</creator><creator>Fleiszer, David</creator><creator>Mulder, David</creator><general>Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199512</creationdate><title>Preventable Death Evaluation of the Appropriateness of the On-Site Trauma Care Provided by Urgences-Sante Physicians</title><author>Sampalis, John S. ; Boukas, Stella ; Lavoie, Andre ; Nikolis, Andreas ; Frechette, Pierre ; Brown, Rea ; Fleiszer, David ; Mulder, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4502-7a1c20635ddc2b35fe25092a254b8d6f158359408afcea89fa6579c3ed50b9c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Technicians</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gravity Suits - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Life Support Care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Transfer</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Trauma Centers</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - mortality</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - therapy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sampalis, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boukas, Stella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavoie, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolis, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frechette, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Rea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleiszer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sampalis, John S.</au><au>Boukas, Stella</au><au>Lavoie, Andre</au><au>Nikolis, Andreas</au><au>Frechette, Pierre</au><au>Brown, Rea</au><au>Fleiszer, David</au><au>Mulder, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preventable Death Evaluation of the Appropriateness of the On-Site Trauma Care Provided by Urgences-Sante Physicians</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care</jtitle><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><date>1995-12</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1029</spage><epage>1035</epage><pages>1029-1035</pages><issn>0022-5282</issn><eissn>1529-8809</eissn><abstract>The study is based on 44 preventable deaths occurring in a cohort of 360 patients with major trauma. These cases were reviewed by a committee of nine experts. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 28, and most cases had injuries to the head/neck (68%) and chest (64%). The mean (+/-SD) observed prehospital times, and those considered the maximum allowable by the committee, were 40.6 +/- 12.0 minutes for head/neck injuries and 23.9 +/- 12.2 minutes for chest injuries (p < 0.05). Intravenous (IV) lines were started in 38 (86%) of the patients. The committee classified this procedure as harmful for 16 (42%) and neutral for 19 (50%). Among the 18 (46%) that were intubated, this intervention was considered harmful for 17% and neutral for 39%. In two of the three patients for whom a pneumatic antishock garment was applied, this procedure was considered harmful. Of the 34 patients that required direct transport at a level I trauma center, 50% were transferred to such a hospital. These results show significant prehospital delays and high rates of inappropriate IV line initiation and intubation in trauma patients receiving on-site care by physicians. We conclude that prehospital care protocols for trauma patients should emphasize prompt transport and specific on-site care algorithms.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>7500388</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005373-199512000-00002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5282 |
ispartof | The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995-12, Vol.39 (6), p.1029-1035 |
issn | 0022-5282 1529-8809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005373_199512000_00002 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Emergency Medical Services Emergency Medical Technicians Emergency Service, Hospital Female Gravity Suits - adverse effects Humans Infusions, Intravenous - adverse effects Injury Severity Score Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects Life Support Care Male Middle Aged Patient Transfer Physicians Survival Rate Time Factors Trauma Centers Wounds and Injuries - mortality Wounds and Injuries - therapy |
title | Preventable Death Evaluation of the Appropriateness of the On-Site Trauma Care Provided by Urgences-Sante Physicians |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preventable%20Death%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20Appropriateness%20of%20the%20On-Site%20Trauma%20Care%20Provided%20by%20Urgences-Sante%20Physicians&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20Trauma:%20Injury,%20Infection,%20and%20Critical%20Care&rft.au=Sampalis,%20John%20S.&rft.date=1995-12&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1029&rft.epage=1035&rft.pages=1029-1035&rft.issn=0022-5282&rft.eissn=1529-8809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005373-199512000-00002&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E7500388%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/7500388&rfr_iscdi=true |