INFLUENCE OF DISTRACTION ON THE REPRODUCTION OF SPOKEN WORDS BY SCHIZOPHRENICS
Twenty-six schizophrenic and 26 nonschizophrenic patients with normal hearing acuity were presented with 140 words with instructions to repeat each word as rapidly as possible. Twenty words were presented in each of seven treatment conditionstwo with no extraneous distraction, two with no sound dist...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of nervous and mental disease 1969-12, Vol.149 (6), p.504-509 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 509 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 504 |
container_title | The journal of nervous and mental disease |
container_volume | 149 |
creator | MEFFERD, ROY B LESTER, JERRY W WIELAND, BETTY A FALCONER, GEORGE A POKORNY, ALEX D |
description | Twenty-six schizophrenic and 26 nonschizophrenic patients with normal hearing acuity were presented with 140 words with instructions to repeat each word as rapidly as possible. Twenty words were presented in each of seven treatment conditionstwo with no extraneous distraction, two with no sound distraction but instructions for selective performance, and three with sound distractionwhite noise, alternating paired tones, backward speech. In each treatment, the volume of the distracting sound was increased from 50 to 80 db SPL in increments of 10 db each five words. The responses were scored independently by four judges who did not know whether a subject was schizophrenic or not. A reproduction that was clearly a different word from the stimulus was considered a failure. Schizophrenics failed to reproduce stimulus words at a significantly higher rate than did nonschizophrenics under every condition, and, with the exception of backward speech, neither the nature nor the level of distraction caused significant changes in performance in either group. There was no evidence of drifting attention by the schizophrenics; they followed instructions requiring selective performance as well as nonschizophrenics, and their short term recall was also just as good. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00005053-196912000-00006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005053_196912000_00006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>5354997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-75c597204f77caea3f20e88970bc2346781c542299455457c5e014858ea0101b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLw0AQhRdRaq3-BGH_QHT2MtnsY83FBEtSkhQvLyGNG6qmtCQtxX9vamvfHAaGOYdzHj5CKIM7BlrdQz8IKCymbc14_1l7yT4jQ4ZCW0rYL-dkCMC5JYA5l-Sq6z4BmBISBmSAAqXWakjiKA4mMz92fZoE1IuyPB27eZTEtN889GnqT9PEmx21gGbT5MmP6XOSehl9eKWZG0ZvyTRM_Thys2tyUZdNZ26Od0RmgZ-7oTVJHiN3PLEqgWhbCivUioOslapKU4qag3EcrWBecSFt5bAKJedaS0SJqkIDTDromBIYsLkYEefQW7WrrmtNXazbj2XZfhcMij2h4o9QcSL0K9l99PYQXW_nS_N-Ch6R9L48-LtVszFt99Vsd6YtFqZsNoviP_DiBwIEZ7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>INFLUENCE OF DISTRACTION ON THE REPRODUCTION OF SPOKEN WORDS BY SCHIZOPHRENICS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>MEFFERD, ROY B ; LESTER, JERRY W ; WIELAND, BETTY A ; FALCONER, GEORGE A ; POKORNY, ALEX D</creator><creatorcontrib>MEFFERD, ROY B ; LESTER, JERRY W ; WIELAND, BETTY A ; FALCONER, GEORGE A ; POKORNY, ALEX D</creatorcontrib><description>Twenty-six schizophrenic and 26 nonschizophrenic patients with normal hearing acuity were presented with 140 words with instructions to repeat each word as rapidly as possible. Twenty words were presented in each of seven treatment conditionstwo with no extraneous distraction, two with no sound distraction but instructions for selective performance, and three with sound distractionwhite noise, alternating paired tones, backward speech. In each treatment, the volume of the distracting sound was increased from 50 to 80 db SPL in increments of 10 db each five words. The responses were scored independently by four judges who did not know whether a subject was schizophrenic or not. A reproduction that was clearly a different word from the stimulus was considered a failure. Schizophrenics failed to reproduce stimulus words at a significantly higher rate than did nonschizophrenics under every condition, and, with the exception of backward speech, neither the nature nor the level of distraction caused significant changes in performance in either group. There was no evidence of drifting attention by the schizophrenics; they followed instructions requiring selective performance as well as nonschizophrenics, and their short term recall was also just as good.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-736X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005053-196912000-00006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 5354997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Association ; Attention ; Auditory Perception ; Environment ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Intelligence Tests ; Noise ; Reaction Time ; Schizophrenia - diagnosis ; Schizophrenic Language ; Sound ; Word Association Tests</subject><ispartof>The journal of nervous and mental disease, 1969-12, Vol.149 (6), p.504-509</ispartof><rights>Williams & Wilkins 1969. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-75c597204f77caea3f20e88970bc2346781c542299455457c5e014858ea0101b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5354997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MEFFERD, ROY B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LESTER, JERRY W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WIELAND, BETTY A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FALCONER, GEORGE A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POKORNY, ALEX D</creatorcontrib><title>INFLUENCE OF DISTRACTION ON THE REPRODUCTION OF SPOKEN WORDS BY SCHIZOPHRENICS</title><title>The journal of nervous and mental disease</title><addtitle>J Nerv Ment Dis</addtitle><description>Twenty-six schizophrenic and 26 nonschizophrenic patients with normal hearing acuity were presented with 140 words with instructions to repeat each word as rapidly as possible. Twenty words were presented in each of seven treatment conditionstwo with no extraneous distraction, two with no sound distraction but instructions for selective performance, and three with sound distractionwhite noise, alternating paired tones, backward speech. In each treatment, the volume of the distracting sound was increased from 50 to 80 db SPL in increments of 10 db each five words. The responses were scored independently by four judges who did not know whether a subject was schizophrenic or not. A reproduction that was clearly a different word from the stimulus was considered a failure. Schizophrenics failed to reproduce stimulus words at a significantly higher rate than did nonschizophrenics under every condition, and, with the exception of backward speech, neither the nature nor the level of distraction caused significant changes in performance in either group. There was no evidence of drifting attention by the schizophrenics; they followed instructions requiring selective performance as well as nonschizophrenics, and their short term recall was also just as good.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Association</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Language</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Word Association Tests</subject><issn>0022-3018</issn><issn>1539-736X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1969</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtLw0AQhRdRaq3-BGH_QHT2MtnsY83FBEtSkhQvLyGNG6qmtCQtxX9vamvfHAaGOYdzHj5CKIM7BlrdQz8IKCymbc14_1l7yT4jQ4ZCW0rYL-dkCMC5JYA5l-Sq6z4BmBISBmSAAqXWakjiKA4mMz92fZoE1IuyPB27eZTEtN889GnqT9PEmx21gGbT5MmP6XOSehl9eKWZG0ZvyTRM_Thys2tyUZdNZ26Od0RmgZ-7oTVJHiN3PLEqgWhbCivUioOslapKU4qag3EcrWBecSFt5bAKJedaS0SJqkIDTDromBIYsLkYEefQW7WrrmtNXazbj2XZfhcMij2h4o9QcSL0K9l99PYQXW_nS_N-Ch6R9L48-LtVszFt99Vsd6YtFqZsNoviP_DiBwIEZ7c</recordid><startdate>196912</startdate><enddate>196912</enddate><creator>MEFFERD, ROY B</creator><creator>LESTER, JERRY W</creator><creator>WIELAND, BETTY A</creator><creator>FALCONER, GEORGE A</creator><creator>POKORNY, ALEX D</creator><general>Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196912</creationdate><title>INFLUENCE OF DISTRACTION ON THE REPRODUCTION OF SPOKEN WORDS BY SCHIZOPHRENICS</title><author>MEFFERD, ROY B ; LESTER, JERRY W ; WIELAND, BETTY A ; FALCONER, GEORGE A ; POKORNY, ALEX D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-75c597204f77caea3f20e88970bc2346781c542299455457c5e014858ea0101b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1969</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Association</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Language</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Word Association Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MEFFERD, ROY B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LESTER, JERRY W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WIELAND, BETTY A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FALCONER, GEORGE A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POKORNY, ALEX D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of nervous and mental disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MEFFERD, ROY B</au><au>LESTER, JERRY W</au><au>WIELAND, BETTY A</au><au>FALCONER, GEORGE A</au><au>POKORNY, ALEX D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INFLUENCE OF DISTRACTION ON THE REPRODUCTION OF SPOKEN WORDS BY SCHIZOPHRENICS</atitle><jtitle>The journal of nervous and mental disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Nerv Ment Dis</addtitle><date>1969-12</date><risdate>1969</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>504</spage><epage>509</epage><pages>504-509</pages><issn>0022-3018</issn><eissn>1539-736X</eissn><abstract>Twenty-six schizophrenic and 26 nonschizophrenic patients with normal hearing acuity were presented with 140 words with instructions to repeat each word as rapidly as possible. Twenty words were presented in each of seven treatment conditionstwo with no extraneous distraction, two with no sound distraction but instructions for selective performance, and three with sound distractionwhite noise, alternating paired tones, backward speech. In each treatment, the volume of the distracting sound was increased from 50 to 80 db SPL in increments of 10 db each five words. The responses were scored independently by four judges who did not know whether a subject was schizophrenic or not. A reproduction that was clearly a different word from the stimulus was considered a failure. Schizophrenics failed to reproduce stimulus words at a significantly higher rate than did nonschizophrenics under every condition, and, with the exception of backward speech, neither the nature nor the level of distraction caused significant changes in performance in either group. There was no evidence of drifting attention by the schizophrenics; they followed instructions requiring selective performance as well as nonschizophrenics, and their short term recall was also just as good.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>5354997</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005053-196912000-00006</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3018 |
ispartof | The journal of nervous and mental disease, 1969-12, Vol.149 (6), p.504-509 |
issn | 0022-3018 1539-736X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005053_196912000_00006 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Association Attention Auditory Perception Environment Hearing Tests Humans Intelligence Tests Noise Reaction Time Schizophrenia - diagnosis Schizophrenic Language Sound Word Association Tests |
title | INFLUENCE OF DISTRACTION ON THE REPRODUCTION OF SPOKEN WORDS BY SCHIZOPHRENICS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T17%3A05%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INFLUENCE%20OF%20DISTRACTION%20ON%20THE%20REPRODUCTION%20OF%20SPOKEN%20WORDS%20BY%20SCHIZOPHRENICS&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20nervous%20and%20mental%20disease&rft.au=MEFFERD,%20ROY%20B&rft.date=1969-12&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=504&rft.epage=509&rft.pages=504-509&rft.issn=0022-3018&rft.eissn=1539-736X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005053-196912000-00006&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E5354997%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/5354997&rfr_iscdi=true |