Fluoxetine is ineffective for treatment of cocaine dependence or concurrent opiate and cocaine dependence : two placebo-controlled, double-blind trials

Cocaine dependence has proved difficult to treat, whether occurring alone or in combination with opiate dependence. No medication has been demonstrated to be uniquely effective. Fluoxetine was examined as a candidate in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, one with cocaine-depend...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 1995-06, Vol.15 (3), p.163-174
Hauptverfasser: GRABOWSKI, J, RHOADES, H, ELK, R, SCHMITZ, J, DAVIS, C, CRESON, D, KIRBY, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 3
container_start_page 163
container_title Journal of clinical psychopharmacology
container_volume 15
creator GRABOWSKI, J
RHOADES, H
ELK, R
SCHMITZ, J
DAVIS, C
CRESON, D
KIRBY, K
description Cocaine dependence has proved difficult to treat, whether occurring alone or in combination with opiate dependence. No medication has been demonstrated to be uniquely effective. Fluoxetine was examined as a candidate in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, one with cocaine-dependent patients (study 1) and the other with patients both cocaine and opiate dependent (study 2). It was selected for known specific action, antidepressant effects, minimum side effects, and data showing reduced cocaine effect and self-administration. Clinic visit frequency requirement, a variable with implications for treatment and cost, was also examined in study 1. A total of 228 patients in study 1 and 21 patients in study 2 completed consent and intake procedures. Patients with serious medical or DSM-III-R diagnoses other than cocaine dependence (study 1) or opiate and cocaine dependence (study 2) were excluded. Study 1 patients were assigned to one of two visit frequency schedules (2 or 5 days/week) and one of three medication doses (0, 20, or 40 mg of fluoxetine/day). Study 2 patients received placebo or 20 mg of fluoxetine and 65 to 80 mg of methadone and attended the clinic 5 days/week. All patients participated in individual therapy sessions. Urine screens were conducted twice weekly. A fluoxetine dose response relationship emerged in study 1 for retention with groups from best to worst being placebo, 20 mg, and 40 mg. Dose effect order was the same for both visit conditions. Cocaine use persisted in all groups. The two visits/week condition was correlated with better retention than the five visits/week condition. A significant interaction emerged between intake urine and visit frequency; patients with benzoylecognine screens at intake used cocaine significantly less in the 5 days/week condition, while exhibiting no reduction in the 2 days/week condition. Patients cocaine positive at intake were better retained with infrequent visits. In study 2, a transient reduction in benzoylecognine-positive drug screens emerged for the fluoxetine group. These complementary studies demonstrate that fluoxetine is ineffective in reducing cocaine use or craving. Study 1 also points to setting conditions modulating treatment outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00004714-199506000-00004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00004714_199506000_00004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7635993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-c13367b6b77e5344a04cba7b45888b4418bd661ea1d5c8bdafcea4f8822b6e353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1KAzEUhYMotVYfQcjCpaPJ5G_GnRSrQsGNgrshydzASDoZMqk_T-LrGtvalVnk5N77ncA9CGFKriip1TXJhyvKC1rXgshcFZvWAZpSwVihaPl6iKakVLQgitfH6GQc3wihXJVigiZKMlHXbIq-F34dPiF1PeBuxFmcA5u6d8AuRJwi6LSCPuHgsA1W_3ItDNC30FvAGbGht-sYN8zQ6QRY9-1_7A1OHwEPXlswoci2FIP30F7iNqyNh8L4LjtT7LQfT9GRywJnO52hl8Xd8_yhWD7dP85vl4XNm6d8MyaVkUYpEIxzTbg1WhkuqqoynNPKtFJS0LQVNr-1s6C5q6qyNBKYYDNUbf-1MYxjBNcMsVvp-NVQ0vxG3fxF3eyj3ray9XxrHdZmBe3euMs2zy92cz1a7V3Uve3GPcaEKmVVsx8dkIod</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluoxetine is ineffective for treatment of cocaine dependence or concurrent opiate and cocaine dependence : two placebo-controlled, double-blind trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>GRABOWSKI, J ; RHOADES, H ; ELK, R ; SCHMITZ, J ; DAVIS, C ; CRESON, D ; KIRBY, K</creator><creatorcontrib>GRABOWSKI, J ; RHOADES, H ; ELK, R ; SCHMITZ, J ; DAVIS, C ; CRESON, D ; KIRBY, K</creatorcontrib><description>Cocaine dependence has proved difficult to treat, whether occurring alone or in combination with opiate dependence. No medication has been demonstrated to be uniquely effective. Fluoxetine was examined as a candidate in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, one with cocaine-dependent patients (study 1) and the other with patients both cocaine and opiate dependent (study 2). It was selected for known specific action, antidepressant effects, minimum side effects, and data showing reduced cocaine effect and self-administration. Clinic visit frequency requirement, a variable with implications for treatment and cost, was also examined in study 1. A total of 228 patients in study 1 and 21 patients in study 2 completed consent and intake procedures. Patients with serious medical or DSM-III-R diagnoses other than cocaine dependence (study 1) or opiate and cocaine dependence (study 2) were excluded. Study 1 patients were assigned to one of two visit frequency schedules (2 or 5 days/week) and one of three medication doses (0, 20, or 40 mg of fluoxetine/day). Study 2 patients received placebo or 20 mg of fluoxetine and 65 to 80 mg of methadone and attended the clinic 5 days/week. All patients participated in individual therapy sessions. Urine screens were conducted twice weekly. A fluoxetine dose response relationship emerged in study 1 for retention with groups from best to worst being placebo, 20 mg, and 40 mg. Dose effect order was the same for both visit conditions. Cocaine use persisted in all groups. The two visits/week condition was correlated with better retention than the five visits/week condition. A significant interaction emerged between intake urine and visit frequency; patients with benzoylecognine screens at intake used cocaine significantly less in the 5 days/week condition, while exhibiting no reduction in the 2 days/week condition. Patients cocaine positive at intake were better retained with infrequent visits. In study 2, a transient reduction in benzoylecognine-positive drug screens emerged for the fluoxetine group. These complementary studies demonstrate that fluoxetine is ineffective in reducing cocaine use or craving. Study 1 also points to setting conditions modulating treatment outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-0749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-712X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00004714-199506000-00004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7635993</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPYDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cocaine ; Demography ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug addictions ; Female ; Fluoxetine - adverse effects ; Fluoxetine - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methadone - therapeutic use ; Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy ; Opioid-Related Disorders - psychology ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 1995-06, Vol.15 (3), p.163-174</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-c13367b6b77e5344a04cba7b45888b4418bd661ea1d5c8bdafcea4f8822b6e353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3572689$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7635993$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GRABOWSKI, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RHOADES, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELK, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHMITZ, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRESON, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRBY, K</creatorcontrib><title>Fluoxetine is ineffective for treatment of cocaine dependence or concurrent opiate and cocaine dependence : two placebo-controlled, double-blind trials</title><title>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology</title><addtitle>J Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><description>Cocaine dependence has proved difficult to treat, whether occurring alone or in combination with opiate dependence. No medication has been demonstrated to be uniquely effective. Fluoxetine was examined as a candidate in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, one with cocaine-dependent patients (study 1) and the other with patients both cocaine and opiate dependent (study 2). It was selected for known specific action, antidepressant effects, minimum side effects, and data showing reduced cocaine effect and self-administration. Clinic visit frequency requirement, a variable with implications for treatment and cost, was also examined in study 1. A total of 228 patients in study 1 and 21 patients in study 2 completed consent and intake procedures. Patients with serious medical or DSM-III-R diagnoses other than cocaine dependence (study 1) or opiate and cocaine dependence (study 2) were excluded. Study 1 patients were assigned to one of two visit frequency schedules (2 or 5 days/week) and one of three medication doses (0, 20, or 40 mg of fluoxetine/day). Study 2 patients received placebo or 20 mg of fluoxetine and 65 to 80 mg of methadone and attended the clinic 5 days/week. All patients participated in individual therapy sessions. Urine screens were conducted twice weekly. A fluoxetine dose response relationship emerged in study 1 for retention with groups from best to worst being placebo, 20 mg, and 40 mg. Dose effect order was the same for both visit conditions. Cocaine use persisted in all groups. The two visits/week condition was correlated with better retention than the five visits/week condition. A significant interaction emerged between intake urine and visit frequency; patients with benzoylecognine screens at intake used cocaine significantly less in the 5 days/week condition, while exhibiting no reduction in the 2 days/week condition. Patients cocaine positive at intake were better retained with infrequent visits. In study 2, a transient reduction in benzoylecognine-positive drug screens emerged for the fluoxetine group. These complementary studies demonstrate that fluoxetine is ineffective in reducing cocaine use or craving. Study 1 also points to setting conditions modulating treatment outcome.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cocaine</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug addictions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoxetine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fluoxetine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methadone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy</subject><subject>Opioid-Related Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0271-0749</issn><issn>1533-712X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1KAzEUhYMotVYfQcjCpaPJ5G_GnRSrQsGNgrshydzASDoZMqk_T-LrGtvalVnk5N77ncA9CGFKriip1TXJhyvKC1rXgshcFZvWAZpSwVihaPl6iKakVLQgitfH6GQc3wihXJVigiZKMlHXbIq-F34dPiF1PeBuxFmcA5u6d8AuRJwi6LSCPuHgsA1W_3ItDNC30FvAGbGht-sYN8zQ6QRY9-1_7A1OHwEPXlswoci2FIP30F7iNqyNh8L4LjtT7LQfT9GRywJnO52hl8Xd8_yhWD7dP85vl4XNm6d8MyaVkUYpEIxzTbg1WhkuqqoynNPKtFJS0LQVNr-1s6C5q6qyNBKYYDNUbf-1MYxjBNcMsVvp-NVQ0vxG3fxF3eyj3ray9XxrHdZmBe3euMs2zy92cz1a7V3Uve3GPcaEKmVVsx8dkIod</recordid><startdate>199506</startdate><enddate>199506</enddate><creator>GRABOWSKI, J</creator><creator>RHOADES, H</creator><creator>ELK, R</creator><creator>SCHMITZ, J</creator><creator>DAVIS, C</creator><creator>CRESON, D</creator><creator>KIRBY, K</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199506</creationdate><title>Fluoxetine is ineffective for treatment of cocaine dependence or concurrent opiate and cocaine dependence : two placebo-controlled, double-blind trials</title><author>GRABOWSKI, J ; RHOADES, H ; ELK, R ; SCHMITZ, J ; DAVIS, C ; CRESON, D ; KIRBY, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-c13367b6b77e5344a04cba7b45888b4418bd661ea1d5c8bdafcea4f8822b6e353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cocaine</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug addictions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoxetine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fluoxetine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methadone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy</topic><topic>Opioid-Related Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GRABOWSKI, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RHOADES, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELK, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHMITZ, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRESON, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRBY, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GRABOWSKI, J</au><au>RHOADES, H</au><au>ELK, R</au><au>SCHMITZ, J</au><au>DAVIS, C</au><au>CRESON, D</au><au>KIRBY, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluoxetine is ineffective for treatment of cocaine dependence or concurrent opiate and cocaine dependence : two placebo-controlled, double-blind trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><date>1995-06</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>163-174</pages><issn>0271-0749</issn><eissn>1533-712X</eissn><coden>JCPYDR</coden><abstract>Cocaine dependence has proved difficult to treat, whether occurring alone or in combination with opiate dependence. No medication has been demonstrated to be uniquely effective. Fluoxetine was examined as a candidate in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, one with cocaine-dependent patients (study 1) and the other with patients both cocaine and opiate dependent (study 2). It was selected for known specific action, antidepressant effects, minimum side effects, and data showing reduced cocaine effect and self-administration. Clinic visit frequency requirement, a variable with implications for treatment and cost, was also examined in study 1. A total of 228 patients in study 1 and 21 patients in study 2 completed consent and intake procedures. Patients with serious medical or DSM-III-R diagnoses other than cocaine dependence (study 1) or opiate and cocaine dependence (study 2) were excluded. Study 1 patients were assigned to one of two visit frequency schedules (2 or 5 days/week) and one of three medication doses (0, 20, or 40 mg of fluoxetine/day). Study 2 patients received placebo or 20 mg of fluoxetine and 65 to 80 mg of methadone and attended the clinic 5 days/week. All patients participated in individual therapy sessions. Urine screens were conducted twice weekly. A fluoxetine dose response relationship emerged in study 1 for retention with groups from best to worst being placebo, 20 mg, and 40 mg. Dose effect order was the same for both visit conditions. Cocaine use persisted in all groups. The two visits/week condition was correlated with better retention than the five visits/week condition. A significant interaction emerged between intake urine and visit frequency; patients with benzoylecognine screens at intake used cocaine significantly less in the 5 days/week condition, while exhibiting no reduction in the 2 days/week condition. Patients cocaine positive at intake were better retained with infrequent visits. In study 2, a transient reduction in benzoylecognine-positive drug screens emerged for the fluoxetine group. These complementary studies demonstrate that fluoxetine is ineffective in reducing cocaine use or craving. Study 1 also points to setting conditions modulating treatment outcome.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>7635993</pmid><doi>10.1097/00004714-199506000-00004</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-0749
ispartof Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 1995-06, Vol.15 (3), p.163-174
issn 0271-0749
1533-712X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00004714_199506000_00004
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cocaine
Demography
Double-Blind Method
Drug addictions
Female
Fluoxetine - adverse effects
Fluoxetine - therapeutic use
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Methadone - therapeutic use
Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy
Opioid-Related Disorders - psychology
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Toxicology
title Fluoxetine is ineffective for treatment of cocaine dependence or concurrent opiate and cocaine dependence : two placebo-controlled, double-blind trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A02%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluoxetine%20is%20ineffective%20for%20treatment%20of%20cocaine%20dependence%20or%20concurrent%20opiate%20and%20cocaine%20dependence%20:%20two%20placebo-controlled,%20double-blind%20trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20psychopharmacology&rft.au=GRABOWSKI,%20J&rft.date=1995-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=163-174&rft.issn=0271-0749&rft.eissn=1533-712X&rft.coden=JCPYDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00004714-199506000-00004&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E7635993%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/7635993&rfr_iscdi=true