A double-blind comparison of paroxetine with imipramine in the long-term treatment of depression

The chronic and recurrent nature of major depression is well recognized, and recent data suggest that maintenance therapy with full-dose pharmacotherapy (i.e., the dose used to treat the index episode) is effective in preventing relapse and recurrence. We present results from a 1-year, double-blind...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 1993-12, Vol.13 (6 Suppl 2), p.23S-27S
Hauptverfasser: Claghorn, J L, Feighner, J P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27S
container_issue 6 Suppl 2
container_start_page 23S
container_title Journal of clinical psychopharmacology
container_volume 13
creator Claghorn, J L
Feighner, J P
description The chronic and recurrent nature of major depression is well recognized, and recent data suggest that maintenance therapy with full-dose pharmacotherapy (i.e., the dose used to treat the index episode) is effective in preventing relapse and recurrence. We present results from a 1-year, double-blind trial of paroxetine and imipramine in patients who successfully completed a 6-week acute course of therapy. A total of 717 outpatients were included in the 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study of paroxetine and imipramine conducted at six centers. At the end of the acute treatment phase, patients showing a therapeutic response were eligible to enter a long-term extension of the study in which they would continue to receive the same drug (or placebo) in double-blind fashion for up to 1 year. Of the 219 patients who entered the long-term phase, 94 received paroxetine, 79 received imipramine, and 46 received placebo. During the 1-year maintenance study, both paroxetine and imipramine were more effective than placebo in maintaining euthymia among patients who had responded to short-term treatment. However, approximately twice as many imipramine-treated patients dropped out of the study prematurely because of adverse experiences compared to paroxetine-treated patients, suggesting that paroxetine is more readily tolerated than imipramine during long-term treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00004714-199312002-00004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00004714_199312002_00004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8106652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-ad79689d37ae582f7f68e48547d4c22a40065f15a06fb808046958d4871691d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRb0AlVL4BCT_gGHs-LmsKl5SJTawDk7sUKMkjmxXwN_T0tLZzNwrnVkchDCFWwpG3cFuuKKcUGMqygAY-avO0ByYogQUNxfoMudPAMoVEzM00xSkFGyO3pfYxW3Te9L0YXS4jcNkU8hxxLHDuzN--xJGj79C2eAwhCnZYZ_DiMvG4z6OH6T4NOCSvC2DH8sedH5KPucQxyt03tk---vjXqC3h_vX1RNZvzw-r5Zr0lYUCrFOGamNq5T1QrNOdVJ7rgVXjreMWQ4gRUeFBdk1GjRwaYR2XCsqDXVQLZA-_G1TzDn5rp5SGGz6qSnUe0_1v6f65OlQ7dCbAzptm8G7E3iUVP0CawVlXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A double-blind comparison of paroxetine with imipramine in the long-term treatment of depression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Claghorn, J L ; Feighner, J P</creator><creatorcontrib>Claghorn, J L ; Feighner, J P</creatorcontrib><description>The chronic and recurrent nature of major depression is well recognized, and recent data suggest that maintenance therapy with full-dose pharmacotherapy (i.e., the dose used to treat the index episode) is effective in preventing relapse and recurrence. We present results from a 1-year, double-blind trial of paroxetine and imipramine in patients who successfully completed a 6-week acute course of therapy. A total of 717 outpatients were included in the 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study of paroxetine and imipramine conducted at six centers. At the end of the acute treatment phase, patients showing a therapeutic response were eligible to enter a long-term extension of the study in which they would continue to receive the same drug (or placebo) in double-blind fashion for up to 1 year. Of the 219 patients who entered the long-term phase, 94 received paroxetine, 79 received imipramine, and 46 received placebo. During the 1-year maintenance study, both paroxetine and imipramine were more effective than placebo in maintaining euthymia among patients who had responded to short-term treatment. However, approximately twice as many imipramine-treated patients dropped out of the study prematurely because of adverse experiences compared to paroxetine-treated patients, suggesting that paroxetine is more readily tolerated than imipramine during long-term treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-0749</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00004714-199312002-00004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8106652</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Depressive Disorder - drug therapy ; Depressive Disorder - psychology ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Imipramine - adverse effects ; Imipramine - therapeutic use ; Long-Term Care ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Paroxetine - adverse effects ; Paroxetine - therapeutic use ; Personality Inventory</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 1993-12, Vol.13 (6 Suppl 2), p.23S-27S</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-ad79689d37ae582f7f68e48547d4c22a40065f15a06fb808046958d4871691d03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8106652$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Claghorn, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feighner, J P</creatorcontrib><title>A double-blind comparison of paroxetine with imipramine in the long-term treatment of depression</title><title>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology</title><addtitle>J Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><description>The chronic and recurrent nature of major depression is well recognized, and recent data suggest that maintenance therapy with full-dose pharmacotherapy (i.e., the dose used to treat the index episode) is effective in preventing relapse and recurrence. We present results from a 1-year, double-blind trial of paroxetine and imipramine in patients who successfully completed a 6-week acute course of therapy. A total of 717 outpatients were included in the 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study of paroxetine and imipramine conducted at six centers. At the end of the acute treatment phase, patients showing a therapeutic response were eligible to enter a long-term extension of the study in which they would continue to receive the same drug (or placebo) in double-blind fashion for up to 1 year. Of the 219 patients who entered the long-term phase, 94 received paroxetine, 79 received imipramine, and 46 received placebo. During the 1-year maintenance study, both paroxetine and imipramine were more effective than placebo in maintaining euthymia among patients who had responded to short-term treatment. However, approximately twice as many imipramine-treated patients dropped out of the study prematurely because of adverse experiences compared to paroxetine-treated patients, suggesting that paroxetine is more readily tolerated than imipramine during long-term treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - drug therapy</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imipramine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Imipramine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Long-Term Care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Paroxetine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Paroxetine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Personality Inventory</subject><issn>0271-0749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRb0AlVL4BCT_gGHs-LmsKl5SJTawDk7sUKMkjmxXwN_T0tLZzNwrnVkchDCFWwpG3cFuuKKcUGMqygAY-avO0ByYogQUNxfoMudPAMoVEzM00xSkFGyO3pfYxW3Te9L0YXS4jcNkU8hxxLHDuzN--xJGj79C2eAwhCnZYZ_DiMvG4z6OH6T4NOCSvC2DH8sedH5KPucQxyt03tk---vjXqC3h_vX1RNZvzw-r5Zr0lYUCrFOGamNq5T1QrNOdVJ7rgVXjreMWQ4gRUeFBdk1GjRwaYR2XCsqDXVQLZA-_G1TzDn5rp5SGGz6qSnUe0_1v6f65OlQ7dCbAzptm8G7E3iUVP0CawVlXQ</recordid><startdate>19931201</startdate><enddate>19931201</enddate><creator>Claghorn, J L</creator><creator>Feighner, J P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931201</creationdate><title>A double-blind comparison of paroxetine with imipramine in the long-term treatment of depression</title><author>Claghorn, J L ; Feighner, J P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-ad79689d37ae582f7f68e48547d4c22a40065f15a06fb808046958d4871691d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - drug therapy</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imipramine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Imipramine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Long-Term Care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Paroxetine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Paroxetine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Personality Inventory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Claghorn, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feighner, J P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Claghorn, J L</au><au>Feighner, J P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A double-blind comparison of paroxetine with imipramine in the long-term treatment of depression</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><date>1993-12-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6 Suppl 2</issue><spage>23S</spage><epage>27S</epage><pages>23S-27S</pages><issn>0271-0749</issn><abstract>The chronic and recurrent nature of major depression is well recognized, and recent data suggest that maintenance therapy with full-dose pharmacotherapy (i.e., the dose used to treat the index episode) is effective in preventing relapse and recurrence. We present results from a 1-year, double-blind trial of paroxetine and imipramine in patients who successfully completed a 6-week acute course of therapy. A total of 717 outpatients were included in the 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study of paroxetine and imipramine conducted at six centers. At the end of the acute treatment phase, patients showing a therapeutic response were eligible to enter a long-term extension of the study in which they would continue to receive the same drug (or placebo) in double-blind fashion for up to 1 year. Of the 219 patients who entered the long-term phase, 94 received paroxetine, 79 received imipramine, and 46 received placebo. During the 1-year maintenance study, both paroxetine and imipramine were more effective than placebo in maintaining euthymia among patients who had responded to short-term treatment. However, approximately twice as many imipramine-treated patients dropped out of the study prematurely because of adverse experiences compared to paroxetine-treated patients, suggesting that paroxetine is more readily tolerated than imipramine during long-term treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>8106652</pmid><doi>10.1097/00004714-199312002-00004</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-0749
ispartof Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 1993-12, Vol.13 (6 Suppl 2), p.23S-27S
issn 0271-0749
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00004714_199312002_00004
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Depressive Disorder - drug therapy
Depressive Disorder - psychology
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Imipramine - adverse effects
Imipramine - therapeutic use
Long-Term Care
Male
Middle Aged
Paroxetine - adverse effects
Paroxetine - therapeutic use
Personality Inventory
title A double-blind comparison of paroxetine with imipramine in the long-term treatment of depression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T04%3A26%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20double-blind%20comparison%20of%20paroxetine%20with%20imipramine%20in%20the%20long-term%20treatment%20of%20depression&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20psychopharmacology&rft.au=Claghorn,%20J%20L&rft.date=1993-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6%20Suppl%202&rft.spage=23S&rft.epage=27S&rft.pages=23S-27S&rft.issn=0271-0749&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00004714-199312002-00004&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E8106652%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/8106652&rfr_iscdi=true