A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis
The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anti-cancer drugs 2006-02, Vol.17 (2), p.217-224 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 224 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 217 |
container_title | Anti-cancer drugs |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Bethune-Volters, Anne Chidiac, Jean Bensaoula, Okba Delgado, Antonio Di Palma, Mario |
description | The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Two hundred patients were evaluated for efficacy103 patients received metopimazine (7.5 mg×2 t.i.d.) and 97 received ondansetron (8 mg b.i.d.) for 5 days. Patients were asked to report episodes of nausea and emesis in a diary, and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Functional Living Index – Emesis questionnaire. The incidence of complete response (defined as no nausea and emesis for 5 days) did not differ between the two treatment arms (53.4% for metopimazine versus 49.5% for ondansetron; P=0.58). No significant difference was found for the incidence of emesis (23.3% for metopimazine versus 30.9% for ondansetron) or QoL. Tolerance was as expected for both drugs and comparable, except for the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, which was significantly lower in the metopimazine group (19.4 versus 32.7%; P=0.03). We conclude that metopimazine is an alternative to ondansetron that is better tolerated for the prevention of delayed emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00001813-200602000-00014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00001813_200602000_00014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16428941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3584-b5c9b5a74119df3aba7fb468bf009e24bd685e5c657e465dd21860ddf210c5863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctO3TAQhi1EBQfaV0B-AFzsxM5liRC0lZC6oevIlzExOHFkJ4LwQrxmfc7hsmIWM9Kv_xtrfiOEGf3JaFtf0FysYSUpKK1obpRsFX6ANozXJRE1Z4doQ1vREt7W5TE6SekhW7JeHqFjVvGiaTnboNdLHOVowuBewJxjExblgSjvRoPn6KTHMiVIyY33eO4Bg7VOS73iDOEkLcwrDhanZYvcL9k_wBwmN8gXN8LOFUYjxwRzDCN2427LFMPUr14-u7SldQ9DyHqU00ryy4sGgw14ueYJAySXvqNvVvoEP97mKfp3c3139Zvc_v315-ryluhSNJwooVslZD6TtcaWUsnaKl41ylLaQsGVqRoBQleiBl4JYwrWVNQYWzCqRVOVp6jZ79UxpBTBdlPMx8S1Y7TbZt-9Z999ZN_tss_o2R6dFjWA-QTfws4Gvjc8BT9DTI9-eYLY9SD93Hdf_Wn5Hz6vk1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Bethune-Volters, Anne ; Chidiac, Jean ; Bensaoula, Okba ; Delgado, Antonio ; Di Palma, Mario</creator><creatorcontrib>Bethune-Volters, Anne ; Chidiac, Jean ; Bensaoula, Okba ; Delgado, Antonio ; Di Palma, Mario</creatorcontrib><description>The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Two hundred patients were evaluated for efficacy103 patients received metopimazine (7.5 mg×2 t.i.d.) and 97 received ondansetron (8 mg b.i.d.) for 5 days. Patients were asked to report episodes of nausea and emesis in a diary, and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Functional Living Index – Emesis questionnaire. The incidence of complete response (defined as no nausea and emesis for 5 days) did not differ between the two treatment arms (53.4% for metopimazine versus 49.5% for ondansetron; P=0.58). No significant difference was found for the incidence of emesis (23.3% for metopimazine versus 30.9% for ondansetron) or QoL. Tolerance was as expected for both drugs and comparable, except for the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, which was significantly lower in the metopimazine group (19.4 versus 32.7%; P=0.03). We conclude that metopimazine is an alternative to ondansetron that is better tolerated for the prevention of delayed emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-5741</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200602000-00014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16428941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Sublingual ; Antiemetics - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Isonipecotic Acids - therapeutic use ; Male ; Maximum Tolerated Dose ; Middle Aged ; Nausea - chemically induced ; Nausea - drug therapy ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Ondansetron - therapeutic use ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vomiting - chemically induced ; Vomiting - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>Anti-cancer drugs, 2006-02, Vol.17 (2), p.217-224</ispartof><rights>2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3584-b5c9b5a74119df3aba7fb468bf009e24bd685e5c657e465dd21860ddf210c5863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3584-b5c9b5a74119df3aba7fb468bf009e24bd685e5c657e465dd21860ddf210c5863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16428941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bethune-Volters, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chidiac, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensaoula, Okba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, Mario</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis</title><title>Anti-cancer drugs</title><addtitle>Anticancer Drugs</addtitle><description>The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Two hundred patients were evaluated for efficacy103 patients received metopimazine (7.5 mg×2 t.i.d.) and 97 received ondansetron (8 mg b.i.d.) for 5 days. Patients were asked to report episodes of nausea and emesis in a diary, and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Functional Living Index – Emesis questionnaire. The incidence of complete response (defined as no nausea and emesis for 5 days) did not differ between the two treatment arms (53.4% for metopimazine versus 49.5% for ondansetron; P=0.58). No significant difference was found for the incidence of emesis (23.3% for metopimazine versus 30.9% for ondansetron) or QoL. Tolerance was as expected for both drugs and comparable, except for the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, which was significantly lower in the metopimazine group (19.4 versus 32.7%; P=0.03). We conclude that metopimazine is an alternative to ondansetron that is better tolerated for the prevention of delayed emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy.</description><subject>Administration, Sublingual</subject><subject>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isonipecotic Acids - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum Tolerated Dose</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nausea - chemically induced</subject><subject>Nausea - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vomiting - chemically induced</subject><subject>Vomiting - drug therapy</subject><issn>0959-4973</issn><issn>1473-5741</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctO3TAQhi1EBQfaV0B-AFzsxM5liRC0lZC6oevIlzExOHFkJ4LwQrxmfc7hsmIWM9Kv_xtrfiOEGf3JaFtf0FysYSUpKK1obpRsFX6ANozXJRE1Z4doQ1vREt7W5TE6SekhW7JeHqFjVvGiaTnboNdLHOVowuBewJxjExblgSjvRoPn6KTHMiVIyY33eO4Bg7VOS73iDOEkLcwrDhanZYvcL9k_wBwmN8gXN8LOFUYjxwRzDCN2427LFMPUr14-u7SldQ9DyHqU00ryy4sGgw14ueYJAySXvqNvVvoEP97mKfp3c3139Zvc_v315-ryluhSNJwooVslZD6TtcaWUsnaKl41ylLaQsGVqRoBQleiBl4JYwrWVNQYWzCqRVOVp6jZ79UxpBTBdlPMx8S1Y7TbZt-9Z999ZN_tss_o2R6dFjWA-QTfws4Gvjc8BT9DTI9-eYLY9SD93Hdf_Wn5Hz6vk1E</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Bethune-Volters, Anne</creator><creator>Chidiac, Jean</creator><creator>Bensaoula, Okba</creator><creator>Delgado, Antonio</creator><creator>Di Palma, Mario</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis</title><author>Bethune-Volters, Anne ; Chidiac, Jean ; Bensaoula, Okba ; Delgado, Antonio ; Di Palma, Mario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3584-b5c9b5a74119df3aba7fb468bf009e24bd685e5c657e465dd21860ddf210c5863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Administration, Sublingual</topic><topic>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isonipecotic Acids - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum Tolerated Dose</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nausea - chemically induced</topic><topic>Nausea - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vomiting - chemically induced</topic><topic>Vomiting - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bethune-Volters, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chidiac, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensaoula, Okba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, Mario</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anti-cancer drugs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bethune-Volters, Anne</au><au>Chidiac, Jean</au><au>Bensaoula, Okba</au><au>Delgado, Antonio</au><au>Di Palma, Mario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis</atitle><jtitle>Anti-cancer drugs</jtitle><addtitle>Anticancer Drugs</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>217-224</pages><issn>0959-4973</issn><eissn>1473-5741</eissn><abstract>The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Two hundred patients were evaluated for efficacy103 patients received metopimazine (7.5 mg×2 t.i.d.) and 97 received ondansetron (8 mg b.i.d.) for 5 days. Patients were asked to report episodes of nausea and emesis in a diary, and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Functional Living Index – Emesis questionnaire. The incidence of complete response (defined as no nausea and emesis for 5 days) did not differ between the two treatment arms (53.4% for metopimazine versus 49.5% for ondansetron; P=0.58). No significant difference was found for the incidence of emesis (23.3% for metopimazine versus 30.9% for ondansetron) or QoL. Tolerance was as expected for both drugs and comparable, except for the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, which was significantly lower in the metopimazine group (19.4 versus 32.7%; P=0.03). We conclude that metopimazine is an alternative to ondansetron that is better tolerated for the prevention of delayed emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16428941</pmid><doi>10.1097/00001813-200602000-00014</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-4973 |
ispartof | Anti-cancer drugs, 2006-02, Vol.17 (2), p.217-224 |
issn | 0959-4973 1473-5741 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00001813_200602000_00014 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Administration, Sublingual Antiemetics - therapeutic use Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects Double-Blind Method Drug Therapy, Combination Female Humans Isonipecotic Acids - therapeutic use Male Maximum Tolerated Dose Middle Aged Nausea - chemically induced Nausea - drug therapy Neoplasms - drug therapy Ondansetron - therapeutic use Quality of Life Surveys and Questionnaires Vomiting - chemically induced Vomiting - drug therapy |
title | A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T23%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized,%20double-blind%20trial%20assessing%20the%20efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20sublingual%20metopimazine%20and%20ondansetron%20in%20the%20prophylaxis%20of%20chemotherapy-induced%20delayed%20emesis&rft.jtitle=Anti-cancer%20drugs&rft.au=Bethune-Volters,%20Anne&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=217-224&rft.issn=0959-4973&rft.eissn=1473-5741&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00001813-200602000-00014&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E16428941%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/16428941&rfr_iscdi=true |