A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis

The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anti-cancer drugs 2006-02, Vol.17 (2), p.217-224
Hauptverfasser: Bethune-Volters, Anne, Chidiac, Jean, Bensaoula, Okba, Delgado, Antonio, Di Palma, Mario
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 224
container_issue 2
container_start_page 217
container_title Anti-cancer drugs
container_volume 17
creator Bethune-Volters, Anne
Chidiac, Jean
Bensaoula, Okba
Delgado, Antonio
Di Palma, Mario
description The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Two hundred patients were evaluated for efficacy103 patients received metopimazine (7.5 mg×2 t.i.d.) and 97 received ondansetron (8 mg b.i.d.) for 5 days. Patients were asked to report episodes of nausea and emesis in a diary, and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Functional Living Index – Emesis questionnaire. The incidence of complete response (defined as no nausea and emesis for 5 days) did not differ between the two treatment arms (53.4% for metopimazine versus 49.5% for ondansetron; P=0.58). No significant difference was found for the incidence of emesis (23.3% for metopimazine versus 30.9% for ondansetron) or QoL. Tolerance was as expected for both drugs and comparable, except for the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, which was significantly lower in the metopimazine group (19.4 versus 32.7%; P=0.03). We conclude that metopimazine is an alternative to ondansetron that is better tolerated for the prevention of delayed emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00001813-200602000-00014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00001813_200602000_00014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16428941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3584-b5c9b5a74119df3aba7fb468bf009e24bd685e5c657e465dd21860ddf210c5863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctO3TAQhi1EBQfaV0B-AFzsxM5liRC0lZC6oevIlzExOHFkJ4LwQrxmfc7hsmIWM9Kv_xtrfiOEGf3JaFtf0FysYSUpKK1obpRsFX6ANozXJRE1Z4doQ1vREt7W5TE6SekhW7JeHqFjVvGiaTnboNdLHOVowuBewJxjExblgSjvRoPn6KTHMiVIyY33eO4Bg7VOS73iDOEkLcwrDhanZYvcL9k_wBwmN8gXN8LOFUYjxwRzDCN2427LFMPUr14-u7SldQ9DyHqU00ryy4sGgw14ueYJAySXvqNvVvoEP97mKfp3c3139Zvc_v315-ryluhSNJwooVslZD6TtcaWUsnaKl41ylLaQsGVqRoBQleiBl4JYwrWVNQYWzCqRVOVp6jZ79UxpBTBdlPMx8S1Y7TbZt-9Z999ZN_tss_o2R6dFjWA-QTfws4Gvjc8BT9DTI9-eYLY9SD93Hdf_Wn5Hz6vk1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Bethune-Volters, Anne ; Chidiac, Jean ; Bensaoula, Okba ; Delgado, Antonio ; Di Palma, Mario</creator><creatorcontrib>Bethune-Volters, Anne ; Chidiac, Jean ; Bensaoula, Okba ; Delgado, Antonio ; Di Palma, Mario</creatorcontrib><description>The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Two hundred patients were evaluated for efficacy103 patients received metopimazine (7.5 mg×2 t.i.d.) and 97 received ondansetron (8 mg b.i.d.) for 5 days. Patients were asked to report episodes of nausea and emesis in a diary, and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Functional Living Index – Emesis questionnaire. The incidence of complete response (defined as no nausea and emesis for 5 days) did not differ between the two treatment arms (53.4% for metopimazine versus 49.5% for ondansetron; P=0.58). No significant difference was found for the incidence of emesis (23.3% for metopimazine versus 30.9% for ondansetron) or QoL. Tolerance was as expected for both drugs and comparable, except for the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, which was significantly lower in the metopimazine group (19.4 versus 32.7%; P=0.03). We conclude that metopimazine is an alternative to ondansetron that is better tolerated for the prevention of delayed emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-5741</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200602000-00014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16428941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Sublingual ; Antiemetics - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Isonipecotic Acids - therapeutic use ; Male ; Maximum Tolerated Dose ; Middle Aged ; Nausea - chemically induced ; Nausea - drug therapy ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Ondansetron - therapeutic use ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vomiting - chemically induced ; Vomiting - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>Anti-cancer drugs, 2006-02, Vol.17 (2), p.217-224</ispartof><rights>2006 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3584-b5c9b5a74119df3aba7fb468bf009e24bd685e5c657e465dd21860ddf210c5863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3584-b5c9b5a74119df3aba7fb468bf009e24bd685e5c657e465dd21860ddf210c5863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16428941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bethune-Volters, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chidiac, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensaoula, Okba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, Mario</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis</title><title>Anti-cancer drugs</title><addtitle>Anticancer Drugs</addtitle><description>The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Two hundred patients were evaluated for efficacy103 patients received metopimazine (7.5 mg×2 t.i.d.) and 97 received ondansetron (8 mg b.i.d.) for 5 days. Patients were asked to report episodes of nausea and emesis in a diary, and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Functional Living Index – Emesis questionnaire. The incidence of complete response (defined as no nausea and emesis for 5 days) did not differ between the two treatment arms (53.4% for metopimazine versus 49.5% for ondansetron; P=0.58). No significant difference was found for the incidence of emesis (23.3% for metopimazine versus 30.9% for ondansetron) or QoL. Tolerance was as expected for both drugs and comparable, except for the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, which was significantly lower in the metopimazine group (19.4 versus 32.7%; P=0.03). We conclude that metopimazine is an alternative to ondansetron that is better tolerated for the prevention of delayed emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy.</description><subject>Administration, Sublingual</subject><subject>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isonipecotic Acids - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum Tolerated Dose</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nausea - chemically induced</subject><subject>Nausea - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vomiting - chemically induced</subject><subject>Vomiting - drug therapy</subject><issn>0959-4973</issn><issn>1473-5741</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctO3TAQhi1EBQfaV0B-AFzsxM5liRC0lZC6oevIlzExOHFkJ4LwQrxmfc7hsmIWM9Kv_xtrfiOEGf3JaFtf0FysYSUpKK1obpRsFX6ANozXJRE1Z4doQ1vREt7W5TE6SekhW7JeHqFjVvGiaTnboNdLHOVowuBewJxjExblgSjvRoPn6KTHMiVIyY33eO4Bg7VOS73iDOEkLcwrDhanZYvcL9k_wBwmN8gXN8LOFUYjxwRzDCN2427LFMPUr14-u7SldQ9DyHqU00ryy4sGgw14ueYJAySXvqNvVvoEP97mKfp3c3139Zvc_v315-ryluhSNJwooVslZD6TtcaWUsnaKl41ylLaQsGVqRoBQleiBl4JYwrWVNQYWzCqRVOVp6jZ79UxpBTBdlPMx8S1Y7TbZt-9Z999ZN_tss_o2R6dFjWA-QTfws4Gvjc8BT9DTI9-eYLY9SD93Hdf_Wn5Hz6vk1E</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Bethune-Volters, Anne</creator><creator>Chidiac, Jean</creator><creator>Bensaoula, Okba</creator><creator>Delgado, Antonio</creator><creator>Di Palma, Mario</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis</title><author>Bethune-Volters, Anne ; Chidiac, Jean ; Bensaoula, Okba ; Delgado, Antonio ; Di Palma, Mario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3584-b5c9b5a74119df3aba7fb468bf009e24bd685e5c657e465dd21860ddf210c5863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Administration, Sublingual</topic><topic>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isonipecotic Acids - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum Tolerated Dose</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nausea - chemically induced</topic><topic>Nausea - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vomiting - chemically induced</topic><topic>Vomiting - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bethune-Volters, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chidiac, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensaoula, Okba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, Mario</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anti-cancer drugs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bethune-Volters, Anne</au><au>Chidiac, Jean</au><au>Bensaoula, Okba</au><au>Delgado, Antonio</au><au>Di Palma, Mario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis</atitle><jtitle>Anti-cancer drugs</jtitle><addtitle>Anticancer Drugs</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>217-224</pages><issn>0959-4973</issn><eissn>1473-5741</eissn><abstract>The prevention of delayed emesis following chemotherapy remains an important challenge. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of metopimazine and ondansetron at preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Two hundred patients were evaluated for efficacy103 patients received metopimazine (7.5 mg×2 t.i.d.) and 97 received ondansetron (8 mg b.i.d.) for 5 days. Patients were asked to report episodes of nausea and emesis in a diary, and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Functional Living Index – Emesis questionnaire. The incidence of complete response (defined as no nausea and emesis for 5 days) did not differ between the two treatment arms (53.4% for metopimazine versus 49.5% for ondansetron; P=0.58). No significant difference was found for the incidence of emesis (23.3% for metopimazine versus 30.9% for ondansetron) or QoL. Tolerance was as expected for both drugs and comparable, except for the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, which was significantly lower in the metopimazine group (19.4 versus 32.7%; P=0.03). We conclude that metopimazine is an alternative to ondansetron that is better tolerated for the prevention of delayed emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16428941</pmid><doi>10.1097/00001813-200602000-00014</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-4973
ispartof Anti-cancer drugs, 2006-02, Vol.17 (2), p.217-224
issn 0959-4973
1473-5741
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00001813_200602000_00014
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Administration, Sublingual
Antiemetics - therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Isonipecotic Acids - therapeutic use
Male
Maximum Tolerated Dose
Middle Aged
Nausea - chemically induced
Nausea - drug therapy
Neoplasms - drug therapy
Ondansetron - therapeutic use
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vomiting - chemically induced
Vomiting - drug therapy
title A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sublingual metopimazine and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T23%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized,%20double-blind%20trial%20assessing%20the%20efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20sublingual%20metopimazine%20and%20ondansetron%20in%20the%20prophylaxis%20of%20chemotherapy-induced%20delayed%20emesis&rft.jtitle=Anti-cancer%20drugs&rft.au=Bethune-Volters,%20Anne&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=217-224&rft.issn=0959-4973&rft.eissn=1473-5741&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00001813-200602000-00014&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E16428941%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/16428941&rfr_iscdi=true