Remifentanil Versus Meperidine For Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Comparison Study in Older Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed outpatient procedures in the United States. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a remifentanil infusion would be superior to boluses of meperidine in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. One hundred ASA physical status...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2001-01, Vol.92 (1), p.80-84
Hauptverfasser: Greilich, Philip E., Virella, Cesar D., Rich, James M., Kurada, Mangala, Roberts, Kevin, Warren, James F., Harford, William V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 92
creator Greilich, Philip E.
Virella, Cesar D.
Rich, James M.
Kurada, Mangala
Roberts, Kevin
Warren, James F.
Harford, William V.
description Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed outpatient procedures in the United States. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a remifentanil infusion would be superior to boluses of meperidine in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. One hundred ASA physical status I-IV patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized in this double-blinded study to receive either remifentanil infusions (n = 49) or titrated boluses of meperidine (n = 51). Patient tolerance was assessed using physiologic variables and side effects associated with opioid analgesia. Verbal pain/anxiety and patient/operator satisfaction were also assessed. As a group, the physiologic characteristics demonstrated no significant differences in the response to the colonoscopy procedure. Although the patient and operator satisfaction surveys were similar between groups, the incidences of tachycardia, hypotension, and nausea were less and the adjusted verbal pain and anxiety scores were more in the Remifentanil group compared with the Meperidine group. This study demonstrates that remifentanil and meperidine were equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider. The differences in the pharmakinetics of remifentanil and meperidine most likely account for the differences noted between the two treatment groups. Remifentanil infusions and meperidine boluses are equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000539_200101000_00016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11133605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-c27531c716d4229574f9fd2afee1303fc89b96853e576dd8f619201f957faad13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v2yAYh9G0as2yfYUJaWev_LGx2S2Klq5Sq1Zts6tFzEtDi8ECW1Xu--AlS9aeCkKvQM_vd3hACFPygxJZn5H9qrgsGCE0b0KKfKj4gGa0YqKoK9l8RLP8xgsmpTxFn1N63COkEZ_QKaWUc0GqGfp7C7014EflrcN_IKYp4SsYIFptPeBViPgqeDuGCBovPKRxC8kqvFQRfuIFXoZ-UNGm4PHdOOkdth5fOw0R36jR5uKE1z5fH4L1D3jRbyanctkuB13wIXVh2H1BJ0a5BF-Pc47Wq1_3y9_F5fX5xXJxWXQlL0XRsbritKup0CVjsqpLI41mygBQTrjpGrmRoqk4VLXQujGCSkaoyaRRSlM-R82ht4shpQimHaLtVdy1lLR7se1_se2r2Paf2Bz9dogO06YH_RY8mszA9yOgUqecicp3Nr1yTckJk5kqD9RzcGOW_eSmZ4jtFpQbt-1738pfAPhwkQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remifentanil Versus Meperidine For Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Comparison Study in Older Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Colonoscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Greilich, Philip E. ; Virella, Cesar D. ; Rich, James M. ; Kurada, Mangala ; Roberts, Kevin ; Warren, James F. ; Harford, William V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greilich, Philip E. ; Virella, Cesar D. ; Rich, James M. ; Kurada, Mangala ; Roberts, Kevin ; Warren, James F. ; Harford, William V.</creatorcontrib><description>Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed outpatient procedures in the United States. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a remifentanil infusion would be superior to boluses of meperidine in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. One hundred ASA physical status I-IV patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized in this double-blinded study to receive either remifentanil infusions (n = 49) or titrated boluses of meperidine (n = 51). Patient tolerance was assessed using physiologic variables and side effects associated with opioid analgesia. Verbal pain/anxiety and patient/operator satisfaction were also assessed. As a group, the physiologic characteristics demonstrated no significant differences in the response to the colonoscopy procedure. Although the patient and operator satisfaction surveys were similar between groups, the incidences of tachycardia, hypotension, and nausea were less and the adjusted verbal pain and anxiety scores were more in the Remifentanil group compared with the Meperidine group. This study demonstrates that remifentanil and meperidine were equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider. The differences in the pharmakinetics of remifentanil and meperidine most likely account for the differences noted between the two treatment groups. Remifentanil infusions and meperidine boluses are equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11133605</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Adjuvants, Anesthesia - administration &amp; dosage ; Adjuvants, Anesthesia - adverse effects ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care ; Analgesics ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects ; Anxiety - drug therapy ; Anxiety - etiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonoscopy - adverse effects ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Injections, Intravenous ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Meperidine - administration &amp; dosage ; Meperidine - adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; Neuropharmacology ; Pain - drug therapy ; Pain - etiology ; Pain Measurement - drug effects ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage ; Piperidines - adverse effects ; Remifentanil</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2001-01, Vol.92 (1), p.80-84</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-c27531c716d4229574f9fd2afee1303fc89b96853e576dd8f619201f957faad13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-c27531c716d4229574f9fd2afee1303fc89b96853e576dd8f619201f957faad13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-200101000-00016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,4036,4037,4595,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65206</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=843029$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11133605$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greilich, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virella, Cesar D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurada, Mangala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harford, William V.</creatorcontrib><title>Remifentanil Versus Meperidine For Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Comparison Study in Older Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Colonoscopy</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed outpatient procedures in the United States. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a remifentanil infusion would be superior to boluses of meperidine in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. One hundred ASA physical status I-IV patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized in this double-blinded study to receive either remifentanil infusions (n = 49) or titrated boluses of meperidine (n = 51). Patient tolerance was assessed using physiologic variables and side effects associated with opioid analgesia. Verbal pain/anxiety and patient/operator satisfaction were also assessed. As a group, the physiologic characteristics demonstrated no significant differences in the response to the colonoscopy procedure. Although the patient and operator satisfaction surveys were similar between groups, the incidences of tachycardia, hypotension, and nausea were less and the adjusted verbal pain and anxiety scores were more in the Remifentanil group compared with the Meperidine group. This study demonstrates that remifentanil and meperidine were equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider. The differences in the pharmakinetics of remifentanil and meperidine most likely account for the differences noted between the two treatment groups. Remifentanil infusions and meperidine boluses are equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider.</description><subject>Adjuvants, Anesthesia - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Adjuvants, Anesthesia - adverse effects</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anxiety - drug therapy</subject><subject>Anxiety - etiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meperidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Meperidine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - drug effects</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Piperidines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Remifentanil</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v2yAYh9G0as2yfYUJaWev_LGx2S2Klq5Sq1Zts6tFzEtDi8ECW1Xu--AlS9aeCkKvQM_vd3hACFPygxJZn5H9qrgsGCE0b0KKfKj4gGa0YqKoK9l8RLP8xgsmpTxFn1N63COkEZ_QKaWUc0GqGfp7C7014EflrcN_IKYp4SsYIFptPeBViPgqeDuGCBovPKRxC8kqvFQRfuIFXoZ-UNGm4PHdOOkdth5fOw0R36jR5uKE1z5fH4L1D3jRbyanctkuB13wIXVh2H1BJ0a5BF-Pc47Wq1_3y9_F5fX5xXJxWXQlL0XRsbritKup0CVjsqpLI41mygBQTrjpGrmRoqk4VLXQujGCSkaoyaRRSlM-R82ht4shpQimHaLtVdy1lLR7se1_se2r2Paf2Bz9dogO06YH_RY8mszA9yOgUqecicp3Nr1yTckJk5kqD9RzcGOW_eSmZ4jtFpQbt-1738pfAPhwkQA</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Greilich, Philip E.</creator><creator>Virella, Cesar D.</creator><creator>Rich, James M.</creator><creator>Kurada, Mangala</creator><creator>Roberts, Kevin</creator><creator>Warren, James F.</creator><creator>Harford, William V.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Remifentanil Versus Meperidine For Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Comparison Study in Older Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Colonoscopy</title><author>Greilich, Philip E. ; Virella, Cesar D. ; Rich, James M. ; Kurada, Mangala ; Roberts, Kevin ; Warren, James F. ; Harford, William V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-c27531c716d4229574f9fd2afee1303fc89b96853e576dd8f619201f957faad13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adjuvants, Anesthesia - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Adjuvants, Anesthesia - adverse effects</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anxiety - drug therapy</topic><topic>Anxiety - etiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meperidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Meperidine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - drug effects</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Piperidines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Remifentanil</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greilich, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virella, Cesar D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurada, Mangala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harford, William V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greilich, Philip E.</au><au>Virella, Cesar D.</au><au>Rich, James M.</au><au>Kurada, Mangala</au><au>Roberts, Kevin</au><au>Warren, James F.</au><au>Harford, William V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remifentanil Versus Meperidine For Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Comparison Study in Older Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Colonoscopy</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>80-84</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed outpatient procedures in the United States. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a remifentanil infusion would be superior to boluses of meperidine in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. One hundred ASA physical status I-IV patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized in this double-blinded study to receive either remifentanil infusions (n = 49) or titrated boluses of meperidine (n = 51). Patient tolerance was assessed using physiologic variables and side effects associated with opioid analgesia. Verbal pain/anxiety and patient/operator satisfaction were also assessed. As a group, the physiologic characteristics demonstrated no significant differences in the response to the colonoscopy procedure. Although the patient and operator satisfaction surveys were similar between groups, the incidences of tachycardia, hypotension, and nausea were less and the adjusted verbal pain and anxiety scores were more in the Remifentanil group compared with the Meperidine group. This study demonstrates that remifentanil and meperidine were equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider. The differences in the pharmakinetics of remifentanil and meperidine most likely account for the differences noted between the two treatment groups. Remifentanil infusions and meperidine boluses are equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>11133605</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000539-200101000-00016</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2001-01, Vol.92 (1), p.80-84
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000539_200101000_00016
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adjuvants, Anesthesia - administration & dosage
Adjuvants, Anesthesia - adverse effects
Aged
Ambulatory Care
Analgesics
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects
Anxiety - drug therapy
Anxiety - etiology
Biological and medical sciences
Colonoscopy - adverse effects
Colonoscopy - methods
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Infusions, Intravenous
Injections, Intravenous
Male
Medical sciences
Meperidine - administration & dosage
Meperidine - adverse effects
Middle Aged
Neuropharmacology
Pain - drug therapy
Pain - etiology
Pain Measurement - drug effects
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Piperidines - administration & dosage
Piperidines - adverse effects
Remifentanil
title Remifentanil Versus Meperidine For Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Comparison Study in Older Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Colonoscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A33%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remifentanil%20Versus%20Meperidine%20For%20Monitored%20Anesthesia%20Care:%20A%20Comparison%20Study%20in%20Older%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Ambulatory%20Colonoscopy&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Greilich,%20Philip%20E.&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=80-84&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000539-200101000-00016&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E11133605%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/11133605&rfr_iscdi=true