Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia

Intrathecal sufentanil provides approximately 2 h of excellent labor analgesia with minimal motor blockade. Epidural sufentanil has received less scrutiny but may provide the same benefits as intrathecal sufentanil. In this study, we compared epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine with an e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 1998-08, Vol.87 (2), p.331-335
Hauptverfasser: DUNN, S. M, CONNELLY, N. R, STEINBERG, R. B, LEWIS, T. J, BAZZELL, C. M, KLATT, J. L, PARKER, R. K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 335
container_issue 2
container_start_page 331
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 87
creator DUNN, S. M
CONNELLY, N. R
STEINBERG, R. B
LEWIS, T. J
BAZZELL, C. M
KLATT, J. L
PARKER, R. K
description Intrathecal sufentanil provides approximately 2 h of excellent labor analgesia with minimal motor blockade. Epidural sufentanil has received less scrutiny but may provide the same benefits as intrathecal sufentanil. In this study, we compared epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine with an epinephrine test dose with intrathecal (i.t.) sufentanil 10 microg with respect to onset and duration of analgesia, degree of motor block, side effect profile, and mode of delivery. Seventy ASA physical status I or II parturients in early labor (< or = 4 cm cervical dilation) were randomized to receive either i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with a combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) or epidural sufentanil 40 microg (e.p.) after epidural catheter placement and testing with 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine (15 microg). After the administration of analgesia, pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, and every 30 min thereafter, by an observer blinded to the technique used. The study period was completed when the patients requested additional analgesia. All patients, except one, achieved adequate analgesia with the initial study dose and satisfactorily completed the study. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Pain relief was rapid for all patients; pain scores were significantly lower at 5 and 10 min in the i.t. group versus the e.p. group. The mean duration of analgesia was similar between the e.p. group (127 +/- 40 min) and the i.t. group (110 +/- 48 min). No patient experienced any motor block. Side effects were similar between the two groups, except for pruritus-both the incidence and severity were significantly more profound at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min in the i.t. group. There was no difference in time from analgesic to delivery, incidence of operative or assisted delivery, or cervical dilation at the time of redose. For early laboring patients, epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine test dose provides analgesia comparable to that of i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with less pruritus. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal sufentanil with epidural sufentanil with a local anesthetic test dose for analgesia during labor. Analgesia was equally good, although the intrathecal group experienced more itching.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00000539-199808000-00018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000539_199808000_00018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9706926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-560af38e152e27c77ff07f634555dc0463c3c5a3e1f87f9e3c0e71560c384013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoc05_gtALb6tJ03xdyvBjMPBm9-UsPXEZXVeSVtm_N3VzGAg5ec95AnkIyRh9ZNSoJzouwU3OjNFUp0ueNtMXZMpEIXMljL4k05TxvDDGXJObGLfjCNVyQiZGUWkKOSXbRdsH6Ddoocni4LDtofVN9oUhDjHDztdDSK3G13sLvsXs2_ebMW-x24QxgLb-T7p9yBBCc8gaWKcaWmg-MXq4JVcOmoh3p3NGVq8vq_l7vvx4W8yfl7nl2vS5kBQc15j-gYWySjlHlZO8FELUlpaSW24FcGROK2eQW4qKJSrhJWV8RvTxWRv2MQZ0VRf8DsKhYrQa5VV_8qqzvOpXXkLvj2g3rHdYn8GTrdR_OPUhJl8uQGt9PI8VJTVcMv4DVh14sA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>DUNN, S. M ; CONNELLY, N. R ; STEINBERG, R. B ; LEWIS, T. J ; BAZZELL, C. M ; KLATT, J. L ; PARKER, R. K</creator><creatorcontrib>DUNN, S. M ; CONNELLY, N. R ; STEINBERG, R. B ; LEWIS, T. J ; BAZZELL, C. M ; KLATT, J. L ; PARKER, R. K</creatorcontrib><description>Intrathecal sufentanil provides approximately 2 h of excellent labor analgesia with minimal motor blockade. Epidural sufentanil has received less scrutiny but may provide the same benefits as intrathecal sufentanil. In this study, we compared epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine with an epinephrine test dose with intrathecal (i.t.) sufentanil 10 microg with respect to onset and duration of analgesia, degree of motor block, side effect profile, and mode of delivery. Seventy ASA physical status I or II parturients in early labor (&lt; or = 4 cm cervical dilation) were randomized to receive either i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with a combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) or epidural sufentanil 40 microg (e.p.) after epidural catheter placement and testing with 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine (15 microg). After the administration of analgesia, pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, and every 30 min thereafter, by an observer blinded to the technique used. The study period was completed when the patients requested additional analgesia. All patients, except one, achieved adequate analgesia with the initial study dose and satisfactorily completed the study. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Pain relief was rapid for all patients; pain scores were significantly lower at 5 and 10 min in the i.t. group versus the e.p. group. The mean duration of analgesia was similar between the e.p. group (127 +/- 40 min) and the i.t. group (110 +/- 48 min). No patient experienced any motor block. Side effects were similar between the two groups, except for pruritus-both the incidence and severity were significantly more profound at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min in the i.t. group. There was no difference in time from analgesic to delivery, incidence of operative or assisted delivery, or cervical dilation at the time of redose. For early laboring patients, epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine test dose provides analgesia comparable to that of i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with less pruritus. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal sufentanil with epidural sufentanil with a local anesthetic test dose for analgesia during labor. Analgesia was equally good, although the intrathecal group experienced more itching.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199808000-00018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9706926</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesia, Epidural ; Analgesia, Obstetrical ; Analgesics ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Double-Blind Method ; Epinephrine - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage ; Lidocaine - adverse effects ; Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment) ; Medical sciences ; Neuropharmacology ; Pain Measurement ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pregnancy ; Sufentanil - administration &amp; dosage ; Sufentanil - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 1998-08, Vol.87 (2), p.331-335</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-560af38e152e27c77ff07f634555dc0463c3c5a3e1f87f9e3c0e71560c384013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-560af38e152e27c77ff07f634555dc0463c3c5a3e1f87f9e3c0e71560c384013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2409361$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9706926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DUNN, S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONNELLY, N. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEINBERG, R. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWIS, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAZZELL, C. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLATT, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARKER, R. K</creatorcontrib><title>Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>Intrathecal sufentanil provides approximately 2 h of excellent labor analgesia with minimal motor blockade. Epidural sufentanil has received less scrutiny but may provide the same benefits as intrathecal sufentanil. In this study, we compared epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine with an epinephrine test dose with intrathecal (i.t.) sufentanil 10 microg with respect to onset and duration of analgesia, degree of motor block, side effect profile, and mode of delivery. Seventy ASA physical status I or II parturients in early labor (&lt; or = 4 cm cervical dilation) were randomized to receive either i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with a combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) or epidural sufentanil 40 microg (e.p.) after epidural catheter placement and testing with 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine (15 microg). After the administration of analgesia, pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, and every 30 min thereafter, by an observer blinded to the technique used. The study period was completed when the patients requested additional analgesia. All patients, except one, achieved adequate analgesia with the initial study dose and satisfactorily completed the study. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Pain relief was rapid for all patients; pain scores were significantly lower at 5 and 10 min in the i.t. group versus the e.p. group. The mean duration of analgesia was similar between the e.p. group (127 +/- 40 min) and the i.t. group (110 +/- 48 min). No patient experienced any motor block. Side effects were similar between the two groups, except for pruritus-both the incidence and severity were significantly more profound at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min in the i.t. group. There was no difference in time from analgesic to delivery, incidence of operative or assisted delivery, or cervical dilation at the time of redose. For early laboring patients, epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine test dose provides analgesia comparable to that of i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with less pruritus. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal sufentanil with epidural sufentanil with a local anesthetic test dose for analgesia during labor. Analgesia was equally good, although the intrathecal group experienced more itching.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Epinephrine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Spinal</subject><subject>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Lidocaine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Sufentanil - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Sufentanil - adverse effects</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoc05_gtALb6tJ03xdyvBjMPBm9-UsPXEZXVeSVtm_N3VzGAg5ec95AnkIyRh9ZNSoJzouwU3OjNFUp0ueNtMXZMpEIXMljL4k05TxvDDGXJObGLfjCNVyQiZGUWkKOSXbRdsH6Ddoocni4LDtofVN9oUhDjHDztdDSK3G13sLvsXs2_ebMW-x24QxgLb-T7p9yBBCc8gaWKcaWmg-MXq4JVcOmoh3p3NGVq8vq_l7vvx4W8yfl7nl2vS5kBQc15j-gYWySjlHlZO8FELUlpaSW24FcGROK2eQW4qKJSrhJWV8RvTxWRv2MQZ0VRf8DsKhYrQa5VV_8qqzvOpXXkLvj2g3rHdYn8GTrdR_OPUhJl8uQGt9PI8VJTVcMv4DVh14sA</recordid><startdate>19980801</startdate><enddate>19980801</enddate><creator>DUNN, S. M</creator><creator>CONNELLY, N. R</creator><creator>STEINBERG, R. B</creator><creator>LEWIS, T. J</creator><creator>BAZZELL, C. M</creator><creator>KLATT, J. L</creator><creator>PARKER, R. K</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980801</creationdate><title>Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia</title><author>DUNN, S. M ; CONNELLY, N. R ; STEINBERG, R. B ; LEWIS, T. J ; BAZZELL, C. M ; KLATT, J. L ; PARKER, R. K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-560af38e152e27c77ff07f634555dc0463c3c5a3e1f87f9e3c0e71560c384013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Epinephrine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Spinal</topic><topic>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Lidocaine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Sufentanil - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Sufentanil - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DUNN, S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONNELLY, N. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEINBERG, R. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWIS, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAZZELL, C. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLATT, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARKER, R. K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DUNN, S. M</au><au>CONNELLY, N. R</au><au>STEINBERG, R. B</au><au>LEWIS, T. J</au><au>BAZZELL, C. M</au><au>KLATT, J. L</au><au>PARKER, R. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>1998-08-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>331-335</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>Intrathecal sufentanil provides approximately 2 h of excellent labor analgesia with minimal motor blockade. Epidural sufentanil has received less scrutiny but may provide the same benefits as intrathecal sufentanil. In this study, we compared epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine with an epinephrine test dose with intrathecal (i.t.) sufentanil 10 microg with respect to onset and duration of analgesia, degree of motor block, side effect profile, and mode of delivery. Seventy ASA physical status I or II parturients in early labor (&lt; or = 4 cm cervical dilation) were randomized to receive either i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with a combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) or epidural sufentanil 40 microg (e.p.) after epidural catheter placement and testing with 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine (15 microg). After the administration of analgesia, pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, and every 30 min thereafter, by an observer blinded to the technique used. The study period was completed when the patients requested additional analgesia. All patients, except one, achieved adequate analgesia with the initial study dose and satisfactorily completed the study. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Pain relief was rapid for all patients; pain scores were significantly lower at 5 and 10 min in the i.t. group versus the e.p. group. The mean duration of analgesia was similar between the e.p. group (127 +/- 40 min) and the i.t. group (110 +/- 48 min). No patient experienced any motor block. Side effects were similar between the two groups, except for pruritus-both the incidence and severity were significantly more profound at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min in the i.t. group. There was no difference in time from analgesic to delivery, incidence of operative or assisted delivery, or cervical dilation at the time of redose. For early laboring patients, epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine test dose provides analgesia comparable to that of i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with less pruritus. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal sufentanil with epidural sufentanil with a local anesthetic test dose for analgesia during labor. Analgesia was equally good, although the intrathecal group experienced more itching.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>9706926</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000539-199808000-00018</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 1998-08, Vol.87 (2), p.331-335
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000539_199808000_00018
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Analgesia, Epidural
Analgesia, Obstetrical
Analgesics
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects
Biological and medical sciences
Double-Blind Method
Epinephrine - administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Injections, Spinal
Lidocaine - administration & dosage
Lidocaine - adverse effects
Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)
Medical sciences
Neuropharmacology
Pain Measurement
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pregnancy
Sufentanil - administration & dosage
Sufentanil - adverse effects
title Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A10%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrathecal%20sufentanil%20versus%20epidural%20lidocaine%20with%20epinephrine%20and%20sufentanil%20for%20early%20labor%20analgesia&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=DUNN,%20S.%20M&rft.date=1998-08-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=331-335&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000539-199808000-00018&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E9706926%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9706926&rfr_iscdi=true