Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy
A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of clinical oncology 1994-02, Vol.17 (1), p.14-18 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 14 |
container_title | American journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | ADELSTEIN, D. J RICE, T. W BOYCE, G. A SIVAK, M. V VAN KIRK, M. A KIRBY, T. J VAN STOLK, R. U BUKOWSKI, R. M |
description | A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemotherapy and again before surgery. Induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated with 10 of the 13 patients experiencing at least one episode of severe neutropenia. Two of the 13 patients refused the second course of treatment. A symptomatic response to chemotherapy, defined as a reduction in the presenting symptom, was noted in 10 of the 13 patients (77%). Endoscopic improvement occurred in 9 of the 13 patients (69%). Esophageal ultrasound evidence of a reduction in either T or N stage was noted in only 2 of the 13 patients (15%), however, and neither of these responses was confirmed pathologically. Clinical evidence of disease progression was noted in 4 patients during chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the relapse-free and overall survivals are 25% and 31%, respectively. Despite significant toxicity, our chemotherapy regimen would be considered successful if assessed by symptomatic or esophagoscopic improvement. Esophageal ultrasound, careful pathologic staging, and our disappointing survival rates, however, suggest limited, if any, value for this approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00000421-199402000-00004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000421_199402000_00004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8311001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-9ed67219ed2692cc04f0ade8da279bf6defdd1769f739f028994dc90d1241a7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUhesA34kcQ1u6riJVViAxK7yPWjcZXYkZ0s-gd8Nk4bOpvR3Ll3RjoAQIweMeLsCY2VE5xhznNE0pAdlQswxwVlWV7Qn0swR4SxjDJKrsFNjPvkKErEZmC2pBgjhOfgd6W081IEaZ1vBfQG9rWGOvquFrshQuEU3InYBz9pWjRwPzjZW-_gM5SNdVYmbTR2oq9943dWQhGjjrHVrh9vBh0776KGvYfWqeGUlrVufXoXRHe4BVdGNFHfTX0Bvl9fvtbv2ebz7WO92mSSFHmfca1KRnBqpORESpQbJJReKkEY35pSaaMUZiU3jHKDyDLxUZIjhUmOBdvSBVie7srgYwzaVF2wrQiHCqNqZFv9s63ObI9SnqL3p2g3bFutzsEJZto_THsRExEThJM2nm2UF6hEJf0Dqq6FIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>ADELSTEIN, D. J ; RICE, T. W ; BOYCE, G. A ; SIVAK, M. V ; VAN KIRK, M. A ; KIRBY, T. J ; VAN STOLK, R. U ; BUKOWSKI, R. M</creator><creatorcontrib>ADELSTEIN, D. J ; RICE, T. W ; BOYCE, G. A ; SIVAK, M. V ; VAN KIRK, M. A ; KIRBY, T. J ; VAN STOLK, R. U ; BUKOWSKI, R. M</creatorcontrib><description>A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemotherapy and again before surgery. Induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated with 10 of the 13 patients experiencing at least one episode of severe neutropenia. Two of the 13 patients refused the second course of treatment. A symptomatic response to chemotherapy, defined as a reduction in the presenting symptom, was noted in 10 of the 13 patients (77%). Endoscopic improvement occurred in 9 of the 13 patients (69%). Esophageal ultrasound evidence of a reduction in either T or N stage was noted in only 2 of the 13 patients (15%), however, and neither of these responses was confirmed pathologically. Clinical evidence of disease progression was noted in 4 patients during chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the relapse-free and overall survivals are 25% and 31%, respectively. Despite significant toxicity, our chemotherapy regimen would be considered successful if assessed by symptomatic or esophagoscopic improvement. Esophageal ultrasound, careful pathologic staging, and our disappointing survival rates, however, suggest limited, if any, value for this approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-3732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000421-199402000-00004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8311001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCODI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin - administration & dosage ; Doxorubicin - administration & dosage ; Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophagogastric Junction ; Etoposide - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pilot Projects ; Remission Induction ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American journal of clinical oncology, 1994-02, Vol.17 (1), p.14-18</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-9ed67219ed2692cc04f0ade8da279bf6defdd1769f739f028994dc90d1241a7b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3950606$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8311001$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ADELSTEIN, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICE, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOYCE, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIVAK, M. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN KIRK, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRBY, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN STOLK, R. U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUKOWSKI, R. M</creatorcontrib><title>Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy</title><title>American journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemotherapy and again before surgery. Induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated with 10 of the 13 patients experiencing at least one episode of severe neutropenia. Two of the 13 patients refused the second course of treatment. A symptomatic response to chemotherapy, defined as a reduction in the presenting symptom, was noted in 10 of the 13 patients (77%). Endoscopic improvement occurred in 9 of the 13 patients (69%). Esophageal ultrasound evidence of a reduction in either T or N stage was noted in only 2 of the 13 patients (15%), however, and neither of these responses was confirmed pathologically. Clinical evidence of disease progression was noted in 4 patients during chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the relapse-free and overall survivals are 25% and 31%, respectively. Despite significant toxicity, our chemotherapy regimen would be considered successful if assessed by symptomatic or esophagoscopic improvement. Esophageal ultrasound, careful pathologic staging, and our disappointing survival rates, however, suggest limited, if any, value for this approach.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Doxorubicin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophagogastric Junction</subject><subject>Etoposide - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0277-3732</issn><issn>1537-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUhesA34kcQ1u6riJVViAxK7yPWjcZXYkZ0s-gd8Nk4bOpvR3Ll3RjoAQIweMeLsCY2VE5xhznNE0pAdlQswxwVlWV7Qn0swR4SxjDJKrsFNjPvkKErEZmC2pBgjhOfgd6W081IEaZ1vBfQG9rWGOvquFrshQuEU3InYBz9pWjRwPzjZW-_gM5SNdVYmbTR2oq9943dWQhGjjrHVrh9vBh0776KGvYfWqeGUlrVufXoXRHe4BVdGNFHfTX0Bvl9fvtbv2ebz7WO92mSSFHmfca1KRnBqpORESpQbJJReKkEY35pSaaMUZiU3jHKDyDLxUZIjhUmOBdvSBVie7srgYwzaVF2wrQiHCqNqZFv9s63ObI9SnqL3p2g3bFutzsEJZto_THsRExEThJM2nm2UF6hEJf0Dqq6FIA</recordid><startdate>199402</startdate><enddate>199402</enddate><creator>ADELSTEIN, D. J</creator><creator>RICE, T. W</creator><creator>BOYCE, G. A</creator><creator>SIVAK, M. V</creator><creator>VAN KIRK, M. A</creator><creator>KIRBY, T. J</creator><creator>VAN STOLK, R. U</creator><creator>BUKOWSKI, R. M</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199402</creationdate><title>Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy</title><author>ADELSTEIN, D. J ; RICE, T. W ; BOYCE, G. A ; SIVAK, M. V ; VAN KIRK, M. A ; KIRBY, T. J ; VAN STOLK, R. U ; BUKOWSKI, R. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-9ed67219ed2692cc04f0ade8da279bf6defdd1769f739f028994dc90d1241a7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Doxorubicin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophagogastric Junction</topic><topic>Etoposide - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ADELSTEIN, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICE, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOYCE, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIVAK, M. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN KIRK, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRBY, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN STOLK, R. U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUKOWSKI, R. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ADELSTEIN, D. J</au><au>RICE, T. W</au><au>BOYCE, G. A</au><au>SIVAK, M. V</au><au>VAN KIRK, M. A</au><au>KIRBY, T. J</au><au>VAN STOLK, R. U</au><au>BUKOWSKI, R. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy</atitle><jtitle>American journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>1994-02</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>14-18</pages><issn>0277-3732</issn><eissn>1537-453X</eissn><coden>AJCODI</coden><abstract>A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemotherapy and again before surgery. Induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated with 10 of the 13 patients experiencing at least one episode of severe neutropenia. Two of the 13 patients refused the second course of treatment. A symptomatic response to chemotherapy, defined as a reduction in the presenting symptom, was noted in 10 of the 13 patients (77%). Endoscopic improvement occurred in 9 of the 13 patients (69%). Esophageal ultrasound evidence of a reduction in either T or N stage was noted in only 2 of the 13 patients (15%), however, and neither of these responses was confirmed pathologically. Clinical evidence of disease progression was noted in 4 patients during chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the relapse-free and overall survivals are 25% and 31%, respectively. Despite significant toxicity, our chemotherapy regimen would be considered successful if assessed by symptomatic or esophagoscopic improvement. Esophageal ultrasound, careful pathologic staging, and our disappointing survival rates, however, suggest limited, if any, value for this approach.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>8311001</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000421-199402000-00004</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-3732 |
ispartof | American journal of clinical oncology, 1994-02, Vol.17 (1), p.14-18 |
issn | 0277-3732 1537-453X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000421_199402000_00004 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy Adenocarcinoma - pathology Aged Antineoplastic agents Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Chemotherapy Cisplatin - administration & dosage Doxorubicin - administration & dosage Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Esophagogastric Junction Etoposide - administration & dosage Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Pharmacology. Drug treatments Pilot Projects Remission Induction Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A51%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adenocarcinoma%20of%20the%20esophagus%20and%20gastroesophageal%20junction%20:%20clinical%20and%20pathologic%20assessment%20of%20response%20to%20induction%20chemotherapy&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=ADELSTEIN,%20D.%20J&rft.date=1994-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=14-18&rft.issn=0277-3732&rft.eissn=1537-453X&rft.coden=AJCODI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000421-199402000-00004&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E8311001%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/8311001&rfr_iscdi=true |