Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy

A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of clinical oncology 1994-02, Vol.17 (1), p.14-18
Hauptverfasser: ADELSTEIN, D. J, RICE, T. W, BOYCE, G. A, SIVAK, M. V, VAN KIRK, M. A, KIRBY, T. J, VAN STOLK, R. U, BUKOWSKI, R. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14
container_title American journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 17
creator ADELSTEIN, D. J
RICE, T. W
BOYCE, G. A
SIVAK, M. V
VAN KIRK, M. A
KIRBY, T. J
VAN STOLK, R. U
BUKOWSKI, R. M
description A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemotherapy and again before surgery. Induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated with 10 of the 13 patients experiencing at least one episode of severe neutropenia. Two of the 13 patients refused the second course of treatment. A symptomatic response to chemotherapy, defined as a reduction in the presenting symptom, was noted in 10 of the 13 patients (77%). Endoscopic improvement occurred in 9 of the 13 patients (69%). Esophageal ultrasound evidence of a reduction in either T or N stage was noted in only 2 of the 13 patients (15%), however, and neither of these responses was confirmed pathologically. Clinical evidence of disease progression was noted in 4 patients during chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the relapse-free and overall survivals are 25% and 31%, respectively. Despite significant toxicity, our chemotherapy regimen would be considered successful if assessed by symptomatic or esophagoscopic improvement. Esophageal ultrasound, careful pathologic staging, and our disappointing survival rates, however, suggest limited, if any, value for this approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00000421-199402000-00004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000421_199402000_00004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8311001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-9ed67219ed2692cc04f0ade8da279bf6defdd1769f739f028994dc90d1241a7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUhesA34kcQ1u6riJVViAxK7yPWjcZXYkZ0s-gd8Nk4bOpvR3Ll3RjoAQIweMeLsCY2VE5xhznNE0pAdlQswxwVlWV7Qn0swR4SxjDJKrsFNjPvkKErEZmC2pBgjhOfgd6W081IEaZ1vBfQG9rWGOvquFrshQuEU3InYBz9pWjRwPzjZW-_gM5SNdVYmbTR2oq9943dWQhGjjrHVrh9vBh0776KGvYfWqeGUlrVufXoXRHe4BVdGNFHfTX0Bvl9fvtbv2ebz7WO92mSSFHmfca1KRnBqpORESpQbJJReKkEY35pSaaMUZiU3jHKDyDLxUZIjhUmOBdvSBVie7srgYwzaVF2wrQiHCqNqZFv9s63ObI9SnqL3p2g3bFutzsEJZto_THsRExEThJM2nm2UF6hEJf0Dqq6FIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>ADELSTEIN, D. J ; RICE, T. W ; BOYCE, G. A ; SIVAK, M. V ; VAN KIRK, M. A ; KIRBY, T. J ; VAN STOLK, R. U ; BUKOWSKI, R. M</creator><creatorcontrib>ADELSTEIN, D. J ; RICE, T. W ; BOYCE, G. A ; SIVAK, M. V ; VAN KIRK, M. A ; KIRBY, T. J ; VAN STOLK, R. U ; BUKOWSKI, R. M</creatorcontrib><description>A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemotherapy and again before surgery. Induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated with 10 of the 13 patients experiencing at least one episode of severe neutropenia. Two of the 13 patients refused the second course of treatment. A symptomatic response to chemotherapy, defined as a reduction in the presenting symptom, was noted in 10 of the 13 patients (77%). Endoscopic improvement occurred in 9 of the 13 patients (69%). Esophageal ultrasound evidence of a reduction in either T or N stage was noted in only 2 of the 13 patients (15%), however, and neither of these responses was confirmed pathologically. Clinical evidence of disease progression was noted in 4 patients during chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the relapse-free and overall survivals are 25% and 31%, respectively. Despite significant toxicity, our chemotherapy regimen would be considered successful if assessed by symptomatic or esophagoscopic improvement. Esophageal ultrasound, careful pathologic staging, and our disappointing survival rates, however, suggest limited, if any, value for this approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-3732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000421-199402000-00004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8311001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCODI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage ; Doxorubicin - administration &amp; dosage ; Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophagogastric Junction ; Etoposide - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pilot Projects ; Remission Induction ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American journal of clinical oncology, 1994-02, Vol.17 (1), p.14-18</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-9ed67219ed2692cc04f0ade8da279bf6defdd1769f739f028994dc90d1241a7b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3950606$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8311001$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ADELSTEIN, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICE, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOYCE, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIVAK, M. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN KIRK, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRBY, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN STOLK, R. U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUKOWSKI, R. M</creatorcontrib><title>Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy</title><title>American journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemotherapy and again before surgery. Induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated with 10 of the 13 patients experiencing at least one episode of severe neutropenia. Two of the 13 patients refused the second course of treatment. A symptomatic response to chemotherapy, defined as a reduction in the presenting symptom, was noted in 10 of the 13 patients (77%). Endoscopic improvement occurred in 9 of the 13 patients (69%). Esophageal ultrasound evidence of a reduction in either T or N stage was noted in only 2 of the 13 patients (15%), however, and neither of these responses was confirmed pathologically. Clinical evidence of disease progression was noted in 4 patients during chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the relapse-free and overall survivals are 25% and 31%, respectively. Despite significant toxicity, our chemotherapy regimen would be considered successful if assessed by symptomatic or esophagoscopic improvement. Esophageal ultrasound, careful pathologic staging, and our disappointing survival rates, however, suggest limited, if any, value for this approach.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Doxorubicin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophagogastric Junction</subject><subject>Etoposide - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0277-3732</issn><issn>1537-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUhesA34kcQ1u6riJVViAxK7yPWjcZXYkZ0s-gd8Nk4bOpvR3Ll3RjoAQIweMeLsCY2VE5xhznNE0pAdlQswxwVlWV7Qn0swR4SxjDJKrsFNjPvkKErEZmC2pBgjhOfgd6W081IEaZ1vBfQG9rWGOvquFrshQuEU3InYBz9pWjRwPzjZW-_gM5SNdVYmbTR2oq9943dWQhGjjrHVrh9vBh0776KGvYfWqeGUlrVufXoXRHe4BVdGNFHfTX0Bvl9fvtbv2ebz7WO92mSSFHmfca1KRnBqpORESpQbJJReKkEY35pSaaMUZiU3jHKDyDLxUZIjhUmOBdvSBVie7srgYwzaVF2wrQiHCqNqZFv9s63ObI9SnqL3p2g3bFutzsEJZto_THsRExEThJM2nm2UF6hEJf0Dqq6FIA</recordid><startdate>199402</startdate><enddate>199402</enddate><creator>ADELSTEIN, D. J</creator><creator>RICE, T. W</creator><creator>BOYCE, G. A</creator><creator>SIVAK, M. V</creator><creator>VAN KIRK, M. A</creator><creator>KIRBY, T. J</creator><creator>VAN STOLK, R. U</creator><creator>BUKOWSKI, R. M</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199402</creationdate><title>Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy</title><author>ADELSTEIN, D. J ; RICE, T. W ; BOYCE, G. A ; SIVAK, M. V ; VAN KIRK, M. A ; KIRBY, T. J ; VAN STOLK, R. U ; BUKOWSKI, R. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-9ed67219ed2692cc04f0ade8da279bf6defdd1769f739f028994dc90d1241a7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Doxorubicin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophagogastric Junction</topic><topic>Etoposide - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ADELSTEIN, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICE, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOYCE, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIVAK, M. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN KIRK, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRBY, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN STOLK, R. U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUKOWSKI, R. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ADELSTEIN, D. J</au><au>RICE, T. W</au><au>BOYCE, G. A</au><au>SIVAK, M. V</au><au>VAN KIRK, M. A</au><au>KIRBY, T. J</au><au>VAN STOLK, R. U</au><au>BUKOWSKI, R. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy</atitle><jtitle>American journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>1994-02</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>14-18</pages><issn>0277-3732</issn><eissn>1537-453X</eissn><coden>AJCODI</coden><abstract>A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemotherapy and again before surgery. Induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated with 10 of the 13 patients experiencing at least one episode of severe neutropenia. Two of the 13 patients refused the second course of treatment. A symptomatic response to chemotherapy, defined as a reduction in the presenting symptom, was noted in 10 of the 13 patients (77%). Endoscopic improvement occurred in 9 of the 13 patients (69%). Esophageal ultrasound evidence of a reduction in either T or N stage was noted in only 2 of the 13 patients (15%), however, and neither of these responses was confirmed pathologically. Clinical evidence of disease progression was noted in 4 patients during chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the relapse-free and overall survivals are 25% and 31%, respectively. Despite significant toxicity, our chemotherapy regimen would be considered successful if assessed by symptomatic or esophagoscopic improvement. Esophageal ultrasound, careful pathologic staging, and our disappointing survival rates, however, suggest limited, if any, value for this approach.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>8311001</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000421-199402000-00004</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-3732
ispartof American journal of clinical oncology, 1994-02, Vol.17 (1), p.14-18
issn 0277-3732
1537-453X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000421_199402000_00004
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Aged
Antineoplastic agents
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Chemotherapy
Cisplatin - administration & dosage
Doxorubicin - administration & dosage
Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophagogastric Junction
Etoposide - administration & dosage
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pilot Projects
Remission Induction
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction : clinical and pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A51%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adenocarcinoma%20of%20the%20esophagus%20and%20gastroesophageal%20junction%20:%20clinical%20and%20pathologic%20assessment%20of%20response%20to%20induction%20chemotherapy&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=ADELSTEIN,%20D.%20J&rft.date=1994-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=14-18&rft.issn=0277-3732&rft.eissn=1537-453X&rft.coden=AJCODI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000421-199402000-00004&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E8311001%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/8311001&rfr_iscdi=true