Feasibility and Utility of Wearable Bluetooth and RFID Sensors to Measure Care Interactions

Abstract Clinical care interactions influence important health outcomes in older adults such as nosocomial infections, falls, and care satisfaction. However, traditional measurements of interactions are often time-consuming, costly, biased, or they interfere with normal clinical care. Wearable senso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Work, aging and retirement aging and retirement, 2024-01, Vol.10 (1), p.46-50
Hauptverfasser: Wei, Sijia, Wright-Freeman, Kayla, McConnell, Eleanor S, Caves, Kevin, Corazzini, Kirsten N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title Work, aging and retirement
container_volume 10
creator Wei, Sijia
Wright-Freeman, Kayla
McConnell, Eleanor S
Caves, Kevin
Corazzini, Kirsten N
description Abstract Clinical care interactions influence important health outcomes in older adults such as nosocomial infections, falls, and care satisfaction. However, traditional measurements of interactions are often time-consuming, costly, biased, or they interfere with normal clinical care. Wearable sensors measure interpersonal contact with a high degree of spatial and temporal detail and accuracy when applied to examining the spread of infection. This study aims to test the feasibility of implementing two types of commercially available wearable sensors to collect spatial and temporal data for measuring care interactions in health care settings. EMBC02 (Bluetooth) and OpenBeacon (RFID) sensors were tested in a simulation laboratory. Five nursing students wore the sensors along with name tags and enacted a scenario of a fallen nursing home resident. Sensor data were plotted in Python and compared with video recordings of the simulated care interaction to determine sensor usability, accuracy, and precision. EMBC02 and OpenBeacon detected multiple wearers and provided spatial and temporal data. OpenBeacon showed better usability and validity than EMBC02 for using proximity data collected by sensors to infer care interactions. Both OpenBeacon and EMCB02 showed some limitations in accuracy and precision, such as increased data missingness due to idling function and high data noise. Bluetooth and RFID sensors measure different aspects of proximity. OpenBeacon outperformed EMBC02 for measuring care interactions. Combining Bluetooth with RFID may provide richer information for measuring and understanding care interactions. Simulation laboratories can be leveraged to test health technology before use in clinical research.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/workar/waac030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_workar_waac030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/workar/waac030</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/workar/waac030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-d692e97e0e69a9a65137f3dbcf782e9c5a4c4397c7c34f2521c8f82260b43d913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EElXpyuyVIa1feXiEQEqkIiSgYmCIbhxbBEJc2Y6q_nsC6cDGcu-RzmP4ELqkZEmJ5Ku9dZ_gVnsARTg5QTNGYhGJJCanf_Q5Wnj_QQihMU8FZTP0Vmjwbd12bThg6Bu8DZO2Br9qcFB3Gt90gw7WhvffxFNR3uJn3XvrPA4WP4wLg9M4h_GUfdAOVGht7y_QmYHO68Xxz9G2uHvJ76PN47rMrzeRYiwLUZNIpmWqiU4kSEhiylPDm1qZNBsNFYNQgstUpYoLw2JGVWYyxhJSC95IyudoOe0qZ7132lQ7136BO1SUVD90qolOdaQzFq6mgh12_2W_AUrYaPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and Utility of Wearable Bluetooth and RFID Sensors to Measure Care Interactions</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Wei, Sijia ; Wright-Freeman, Kayla ; McConnell, Eleanor S ; Caves, Kevin ; Corazzini, Kirsten N</creator><contributor>Xie, Bo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wei, Sijia ; Wright-Freeman, Kayla ; McConnell, Eleanor S ; Caves, Kevin ; Corazzini, Kirsten N ; Xie, Bo</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Clinical care interactions influence important health outcomes in older adults such as nosocomial infections, falls, and care satisfaction. However, traditional measurements of interactions are often time-consuming, costly, biased, or they interfere with normal clinical care. Wearable sensors measure interpersonal contact with a high degree of spatial and temporal detail and accuracy when applied to examining the spread of infection. This study aims to test the feasibility of implementing two types of commercially available wearable sensors to collect spatial and temporal data for measuring care interactions in health care settings. EMBC02 (Bluetooth) and OpenBeacon (RFID) sensors were tested in a simulation laboratory. Five nursing students wore the sensors along with name tags and enacted a scenario of a fallen nursing home resident. Sensor data were plotted in Python and compared with video recordings of the simulated care interaction to determine sensor usability, accuracy, and precision. EMBC02 and OpenBeacon detected multiple wearers and provided spatial and temporal data. OpenBeacon showed better usability and validity than EMBC02 for using proximity data collected by sensors to infer care interactions. Both OpenBeacon and EMCB02 showed some limitations in accuracy and precision, such as increased data missingness due to idling function and high data noise. Bluetooth and RFID sensors measure different aspects of proximity. OpenBeacon outperformed EMBC02 for measuring care interactions. Combining Bluetooth with RFID may provide richer information for measuring and understanding care interactions. Simulation laboratories can be leveraged to test health technology before use in clinical research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2054-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-4650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/workar/waac030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Work, aging and retirement, 2024-01, Vol.10 (1), p.46-50</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. For permissions please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-d692e97e0e69a9a65137f3dbcf782e9c5a4c4397c7c34f2521c8f82260b43d913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2667-464X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Xie, Bo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wei, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright-Freeman, Kayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Eleanor S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caves, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corazzini, Kirsten N</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and Utility of Wearable Bluetooth and RFID Sensors to Measure Care Interactions</title><title>Work, aging and retirement</title><description>Abstract Clinical care interactions influence important health outcomes in older adults such as nosocomial infections, falls, and care satisfaction. However, traditional measurements of interactions are often time-consuming, costly, biased, or they interfere with normal clinical care. Wearable sensors measure interpersonal contact with a high degree of spatial and temporal detail and accuracy when applied to examining the spread of infection. This study aims to test the feasibility of implementing two types of commercially available wearable sensors to collect spatial and temporal data for measuring care interactions in health care settings. EMBC02 (Bluetooth) and OpenBeacon (RFID) sensors were tested in a simulation laboratory. Five nursing students wore the sensors along with name tags and enacted a scenario of a fallen nursing home resident. Sensor data were plotted in Python and compared with video recordings of the simulated care interaction to determine sensor usability, accuracy, and precision. EMBC02 and OpenBeacon detected multiple wearers and provided spatial and temporal data. OpenBeacon showed better usability and validity than EMBC02 for using proximity data collected by sensors to infer care interactions. Both OpenBeacon and EMCB02 showed some limitations in accuracy and precision, such as increased data missingness due to idling function and high data noise. Bluetooth and RFID sensors measure different aspects of proximity. OpenBeacon outperformed EMBC02 for measuring care interactions. Combining Bluetooth with RFID may provide richer information for measuring and understanding care interactions. Simulation laboratories can be leveraged to test health technology before use in clinical research.</description><issn>2054-4650</issn><issn>2054-4650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EElXpyuyVIa1feXiEQEqkIiSgYmCIbhxbBEJc2Y6q_nsC6cDGcu-RzmP4ELqkZEmJ5Ku9dZ_gVnsARTg5QTNGYhGJJCanf_Q5Wnj_QQihMU8FZTP0Vmjwbd12bThg6Bu8DZO2Br9qcFB3Gt90gw7WhvffxFNR3uJn3XvrPA4WP4wLg9M4h_GUfdAOVGht7y_QmYHO68Xxz9G2uHvJ76PN47rMrzeRYiwLUZNIpmWqiU4kSEhiylPDm1qZNBsNFYNQgstUpYoLw2JGVWYyxhJSC95IyudoOe0qZ7132lQ7136BO1SUVD90qolOdaQzFq6mgh12_2W_AUrYaPk</recordid><startdate>20240108</startdate><enddate>20240108</enddate><creator>Wei, Sijia</creator><creator>Wright-Freeman, Kayla</creator><creator>McConnell, Eleanor S</creator><creator>Caves, Kevin</creator><creator>Corazzini, Kirsten N</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-464X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240108</creationdate><title>Feasibility and Utility of Wearable Bluetooth and RFID Sensors to Measure Care Interactions</title><author>Wei, Sijia ; Wright-Freeman, Kayla ; McConnell, Eleanor S ; Caves, Kevin ; Corazzini, Kirsten N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-d692e97e0e69a9a65137f3dbcf782e9c5a4c4397c7c34f2521c8f82260b43d913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright-Freeman, Kayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Eleanor S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caves, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corazzini, Kirsten N</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Work, aging and retirement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Sijia</au><au>Wright-Freeman, Kayla</au><au>McConnell, Eleanor S</au><au>Caves, Kevin</au><au>Corazzini, Kirsten N</au><au>Xie, Bo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and Utility of Wearable Bluetooth and RFID Sensors to Measure Care Interactions</atitle><jtitle>Work, aging and retirement</jtitle><date>2024-01-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>46-50</pages><issn>2054-4650</issn><eissn>2054-4650</eissn><abstract>Abstract Clinical care interactions influence important health outcomes in older adults such as nosocomial infections, falls, and care satisfaction. However, traditional measurements of interactions are often time-consuming, costly, biased, or they interfere with normal clinical care. Wearable sensors measure interpersonal contact with a high degree of spatial and temporal detail and accuracy when applied to examining the spread of infection. This study aims to test the feasibility of implementing two types of commercially available wearable sensors to collect spatial and temporal data for measuring care interactions in health care settings. EMBC02 (Bluetooth) and OpenBeacon (RFID) sensors were tested in a simulation laboratory. Five nursing students wore the sensors along with name tags and enacted a scenario of a fallen nursing home resident. Sensor data were plotted in Python and compared with video recordings of the simulated care interaction to determine sensor usability, accuracy, and precision. EMBC02 and OpenBeacon detected multiple wearers and provided spatial and temporal data. OpenBeacon showed better usability and validity than EMBC02 for using proximity data collected by sensors to infer care interactions. Both OpenBeacon and EMCB02 showed some limitations in accuracy and precision, such as increased data missingness due to idling function and high data noise. Bluetooth and RFID sensors measure different aspects of proximity. OpenBeacon outperformed EMBC02 for measuring care interactions. Combining Bluetooth with RFID may provide richer information for measuring and understanding care interactions. Simulation laboratories can be leveraged to test health technology before use in clinical research.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/workar/waac030</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-464X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2054-4650
ispartof Work, aging and retirement, 2024-01, Vol.10 (1), p.46-50
issn 2054-4650
2054-4650
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_workar_waac030
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Feasibility and Utility of Wearable Bluetooth and RFID Sensors to Measure Care Interactions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A30%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20Utility%20of%20Wearable%20Bluetooth%20and%20RFID%20Sensors%20to%20Measure%20Care%20Interactions&rft.jtitle=Work,%20aging%20and%20retirement&rft.au=Wei,%20Sijia&rft.date=2024-01-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=46-50&rft.issn=2054-4650&rft.eissn=2054-4650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/workar/waac030&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/workar/waac030%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/workar/waac030&rfr_iscdi=true