Viral Vectors: The Road to Reducing Genotoxicity
Viral vector use in gene therapy has highlighted several safety concerns, including genotoxic events. Generally, vector-mediated genotoxicity results from upregulation of cellular proto-oncogenes via promoter insertion, promoter activation, or gene transcript truncation, with enhancer-mediated activ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Toxicological sciences 2017-02, Vol.155 (2), p.315-325 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 325 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 315 |
container_title | Toxicological sciences |
container_volume | 155 |
creator | David, Rhiannon M Doherty, Ann T |
description | Viral vector use in gene therapy has highlighted several safety concerns, including genotoxic events. Generally, vector-mediated genotoxicity results from upregulation of cellular proto-oncogenes via promoter insertion, promoter activation, or gene transcript truncation, with enhancer-mediated activation of nearby genes the primary mechanism reported in gene therapy trials. Vector-mediated genotoxicity can be influenced by virus type, integration target site, and target cell type; different vectors have distinct integration profiles which are cell-specific. Non-viral factors, including patient age, disease, and dose can also influence genotoxic potential, thus the choice of test models and clinical trial populations is important to ensure they are indicative of efficacy and safety. Efforts have been made to develop viral vectors with less risk of insertional mutagenesis, including self-inactivating (SIN) vectors, enhancer-blocking insulators, and microRNA targeting of vectors, although insertional mutagenesis is not completely abrogated. Here we provide an overview of the current understanding of viral vector-mediated genotoxicity risk from factors contributing to viral vector-mediated genotoxicity to efforts made to reduce genotoxicity, and testing strategies required to adequately assess the risk of insertional mutagenesis. It is clear that there is not a 'one size fits all' approach to vector modification for reducing genotoxicity, and addressing these challenges will be a key step in the development of therapies such as CRISPR-Cas9 and delivery of future gene-editing technologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/toxsci/kfw220 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfw220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27803388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c86ac7ad87ece7661acbba8c9d31f58f6c415c3bcc32755a42e095f792b809733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j01LAzEURYMotlaXbiV_YOxL0smHOylahYJQardD5k2i0bYpyRTtv3dkqqt3eRzu5RByzeCWgRHjNn5nDONP_8U5nJBh95QFGG5Oj1mChgG5yPkDgDEJ5pwMuNIghNZDAquQ7JquHLYx5Tu6fHd0EW1D20gXrtlj2L7RmdvGbidgaA-X5MzbdXZXxzsir48Py-lTMX-ZPU_v5wUKo9sCtbSobKOVQ6ekZBbr2mo0jWC-1F7ihJUoakTBVVnaCXdgSq8MrzUYJcSIFH0vpphzcr7apbCx6VAxqH7Nq9686s07_qbnd_t645p_-k9V_ADnflY4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viral Vectors: The Road to Reducing Genotoxicity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>David, Rhiannon M ; Doherty, Ann T</creator><creatorcontrib>David, Rhiannon M ; Doherty, Ann T</creatorcontrib><description>Viral vector use in gene therapy has highlighted several safety concerns, including genotoxic events. Generally, vector-mediated genotoxicity results from upregulation of cellular proto-oncogenes via promoter insertion, promoter activation, or gene transcript truncation, with enhancer-mediated activation of nearby genes the primary mechanism reported in gene therapy trials. Vector-mediated genotoxicity can be influenced by virus type, integration target site, and target cell type; different vectors have distinct integration profiles which are cell-specific. Non-viral factors, including patient age, disease, and dose can also influence genotoxic potential, thus the choice of test models and clinical trial populations is important to ensure they are indicative of efficacy and safety. Efforts have been made to develop viral vectors with less risk of insertional mutagenesis, including self-inactivating (SIN) vectors, enhancer-blocking insulators, and microRNA targeting of vectors, although insertional mutagenesis is not completely abrogated. Here we provide an overview of the current understanding of viral vector-mediated genotoxicity risk from factors contributing to viral vector-mediated genotoxicity to efforts made to reduce genotoxicity, and testing strategies required to adequately assess the risk of insertional mutagenesis. It is clear that there is not a 'one size fits all' approach to vector modification for reducing genotoxicity, and addressing these challenges will be a key step in the development of therapies such as CRISPR-Cas9 and delivery of future gene-editing technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-6080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0929</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw220</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27803388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; CRISPR-Cas Systems ; DNA Damage ; Genetic Therapy - adverse effects ; Genetic Vectors - adverse effects ; Humans ; Mutagenesis, Insertional ; Mutagenicity Tests ; Viruses - genetics</subject><ispartof>Toxicological sciences, 2017-02, Vol.155 (2), p.315-325</ispartof><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c86ac7ad87ece7661acbba8c9d31f58f6c415c3bcc32755a42e095f792b809733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c86ac7ad87ece7661acbba8c9d31f58f6c415c3bcc32755a42e095f792b809733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27803388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>David, Rhiannon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Ann T</creatorcontrib><title>Viral Vectors: The Road to Reducing Genotoxicity</title><title>Toxicological sciences</title><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><description>Viral vector use in gene therapy has highlighted several safety concerns, including genotoxic events. Generally, vector-mediated genotoxicity results from upregulation of cellular proto-oncogenes via promoter insertion, promoter activation, or gene transcript truncation, with enhancer-mediated activation of nearby genes the primary mechanism reported in gene therapy trials. Vector-mediated genotoxicity can be influenced by virus type, integration target site, and target cell type; different vectors have distinct integration profiles which are cell-specific. Non-viral factors, including patient age, disease, and dose can also influence genotoxic potential, thus the choice of test models and clinical trial populations is important to ensure they are indicative of efficacy and safety. Efforts have been made to develop viral vectors with less risk of insertional mutagenesis, including self-inactivating (SIN) vectors, enhancer-blocking insulators, and microRNA targeting of vectors, although insertional mutagenesis is not completely abrogated. Here we provide an overview of the current understanding of viral vector-mediated genotoxicity risk from factors contributing to viral vector-mediated genotoxicity to efforts made to reduce genotoxicity, and testing strategies required to adequately assess the risk of insertional mutagenesis. It is clear that there is not a 'one size fits all' approach to vector modification for reducing genotoxicity, and addressing these challenges will be a key step in the development of therapies such as CRISPR-Cas9 and delivery of future gene-editing technologies.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>CRISPR-Cas Systems</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>Genetic Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Genetic Vectors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mutagenesis, Insertional</subject><subject>Mutagenicity Tests</subject><subject>Viruses - genetics</subject><issn>1096-6080</issn><issn>1096-0929</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j01LAzEURYMotlaXbiV_YOxL0smHOylahYJQardD5k2i0bYpyRTtv3dkqqt3eRzu5RByzeCWgRHjNn5nDONP_8U5nJBh95QFGG5Oj1mChgG5yPkDgDEJ5pwMuNIghNZDAquQ7JquHLYx5Tu6fHd0EW1D20gXrtlj2L7RmdvGbidgaA-X5MzbdXZXxzsir48Py-lTMX-ZPU_v5wUKo9sCtbSobKOVQ6ekZBbr2mo0jWC-1F7ihJUoakTBVVnaCXdgSq8MrzUYJcSIFH0vpphzcr7apbCx6VAxqH7Nq9686s07_qbnd_t645p_-k9V_ADnflY4</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>David, Rhiannon M</creator><creator>Doherty, Ann T</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Viral Vectors: The Road to Reducing Genotoxicity</title><author>David, Rhiannon M ; Doherty, Ann T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c86ac7ad87ece7661acbba8c9d31f58f6c415c3bcc32755a42e095f792b809733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>CRISPR-Cas Systems</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>Genetic Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Genetic Vectors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mutagenesis, Insertional</topic><topic>Mutagenicity Tests</topic><topic>Viruses - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>David, Rhiannon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Ann T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Toxicological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>David, Rhiannon M</au><au>Doherty, Ann T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viral Vectors: The Road to Reducing Genotoxicity</atitle><jtitle>Toxicological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>155</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>315-325</pages><issn>1096-6080</issn><eissn>1096-0929</eissn><abstract>Viral vector use in gene therapy has highlighted several safety concerns, including genotoxic events. Generally, vector-mediated genotoxicity results from upregulation of cellular proto-oncogenes via promoter insertion, promoter activation, or gene transcript truncation, with enhancer-mediated activation of nearby genes the primary mechanism reported in gene therapy trials. Vector-mediated genotoxicity can be influenced by virus type, integration target site, and target cell type; different vectors have distinct integration profiles which are cell-specific. Non-viral factors, including patient age, disease, and dose can also influence genotoxic potential, thus the choice of test models and clinical trial populations is important to ensure they are indicative of efficacy and safety. Efforts have been made to develop viral vectors with less risk of insertional mutagenesis, including self-inactivating (SIN) vectors, enhancer-blocking insulators, and microRNA targeting of vectors, although insertional mutagenesis is not completely abrogated. Here we provide an overview of the current understanding of viral vector-mediated genotoxicity risk from factors contributing to viral vector-mediated genotoxicity to efforts made to reduce genotoxicity, and testing strategies required to adequately assess the risk of insertional mutagenesis. It is clear that there is not a 'one size fits all' approach to vector modification for reducing genotoxicity, and addressing these challenges will be a key step in the development of therapies such as CRISPR-Cas9 and delivery of future gene-editing technologies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>27803388</pmid><doi>10.1093/toxsci/kfw220</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1096-6080 |
ispartof | Toxicological sciences, 2017-02, Vol.155 (2), p.315-325 |
issn | 1096-6080 1096-0929 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfw220 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Animals CRISPR-Cas Systems DNA Damage Genetic Therapy - adverse effects Genetic Vectors - adverse effects Humans Mutagenesis, Insertional Mutagenicity Tests Viruses - genetics |
title | Viral Vectors: The Road to Reducing Genotoxicity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A11%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viral%20Vectors:%20The%20Road%20to%20Reducing%20Genotoxicity&rft.jtitle=Toxicological%20sciences&rft.au=David,%20Rhiannon%20M&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=315-325&rft.issn=1096-6080&rft.eissn=1096-0929&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/toxsci/kfw220&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E27803388%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/27803388&rfr_iscdi=true |