Quantitative Risk Analysis for N-Methyl Pyrrolidone Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Benchmark Dose Modeling

Establishing an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) is important due to its widespread use as a solvent. Based on studies in rodents, the most sensitive toxic end point is a decrease in fetal/pup body weights observed after oral, dermal, and inhalation exposures of dams...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicological sciences 2010-02, Vol.113 (2), p.468-482
Hauptverfasser: Poet, Torka S., Kirman, Chris R., Bader, Michael, van Thriel, Christoph, Gargas, Michael L., Hinderliter, Paul M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 482
container_issue 2
container_start_page 468
container_title Toxicological sciences
container_volume 113
creator Poet, Torka S.
Kirman, Chris R.
Bader, Michael
van Thriel, Christoph
Gargas, Michael L.
Hinderliter, Paul M.
description Establishing an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) is important due to its widespread use as a solvent. Based on studies in rodents, the most sensitive toxic end point is a decrease in fetal/pup body weights observed after oral, dermal, and inhalation exposures of dams to NMP. Evidence indicates that the parent compound is the causative agent. To reduce the uncertainty in rat to human extrapolations, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of NMP in both species. Since in utero exposures are of concern, the models considered major physiological changes occurring in the dam or mother over the course of gestation. The rat PBPK model was used to determine the relationship between NMP concentrations in maternal blood and decrements in fetal/pup body weights following exposures to NMP vapor. Body weight decrements seen after vapor exposures occurred at lower NMP blood levels than those observed after oral and dermal exposures. Benchmark dose modeling was used to better define a point of departure (POD) for fetal/pup body weight changes based on dose-response information from two inhalation studies in rats. The POD and human PBPK model were then used to estimate the human equivalent concentrations (HECs) that could be used to derive an OEL value for NMP. The geometric mean of the PODs derived from the rat studies was estimated to be 350 mg h/l (expressed in terms of internal dose), a value which corresponds to an HEC of 480 ppm (occupational exposure of 8 h/day, 5 days/week). The HEC is much higher than recently developed internationally recognized OELs for NMP of 10–20 ppm, suggesting that these OELs adequately protect workers exposed to NMP vapor.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/toxsci/kfp264
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfp264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/toxsci/kfp264</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/toxsci/kfp264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-c2f42af641371e21ce7d9412bb3c23053d22ab90ba8318d7571c6414a8350fdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwjAYhxujEUSPXk2PXib92OcRUMEEFA0kxEvTtR1Uxrqsw7D4z1szokdP70ee_N43DwDXGN1hlNB-bQ5W6P42K0non4CuW4YeSkhyeuxDFKMOuLD2AyGMQ5Scgw5O4igIY9QFX697XtS65rX-VPBN2y0cFDxvrLYwMxV89maq3jQ5nDdVZXItTaHg0upiDecbR5ncrLXged7AIbdKui2vdlyYrS5UrQXkhYRDVYjNjldbeG-sgjMjVe4SLsFZxnOrro61B5aPD4vRxJu-jJ9Gg6kn_DCuPUEyn_As9DGNsCJYqEgmPiZpSgWhKKCSEJ4mKOUxxbGMgggLB_tuDFAmBe0Br80VlbG2UhkrK-3eaRhG7EciayWyVqLjb1q-3Kc7Jf_oozUH3LaA2Zf_Zh1va1urwy_sXLAwolHAJqt3NlpMp9HkecxW9BvERo8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Risk Analysis for N-Methyl Pyrrolidone Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Benchmark Dose Modeling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Poet, Torka S. ; Kirman, Chris R. ; Bader, Michael ; van Thriel, Christoph ; Gargas, Michael L. ; Hinderliter, Paul M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poet, Torka S. ; Kirman, Chris R. ; Bader, Michael ; van Thriel, Christoph ; Gargas, Michael L. ; Hinderliter, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><description>Establishing an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) is important due to its widespread use as a solvent. Based on studies in rodents, the most sensitive toxic end point is a decrease in fetal/pup body weights observed after oral, dermal, and inhalation exposures of dams to NMP. Evidence indicates that the parent compound is the causative agent. To reduce the uncertainty in rat to human extrapolations, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of NMP in both species. Since in utero exposures are of concern, the models considered major physiological changes occurring in the dam or mother over the course of gestation. The rat PBPK model was used to determine the relationship between NMP concentrations in maternal blood and decrements in fetal/pup body weights following exposures to NMP vapor. Body weight decrements seen after vapor exposures occurred at lower NMP blood levels than those observed after oral and dermal exposures. Benchmark dose modeling was used to better define a point of departure (POD) for fetal/pup body weight changes based on dose-response information from two inhalation studies in rats. The POD and human PBPK model were then used to estimate the human equivalent concentrations (HECs) that could be used to derive an OEL value for NMP. The geometric mean of the PODs derived from the rat studies was estimated to be 350 mg h/l (expressed in terms of internal dose), a value which corresponds to an HEC of 480 ppm (occupational exposure of 8 h/day, 5 days/week). The HEC is much higher than recently developed internationally recognized OELs for NMP of 10–20 ppm, suggesting that these OELs adequately protect workers exposed to NMP vapor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-6080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0929</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp264</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19875680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; benchmark dose ; Benchmarking ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Environmental Exposure - analysis ; Environmental Exposure - standards ; exposure assessment ; Female ; human equivalent concentration ; Humans ; Male ; Mice ; Models, Animal ; Models, Chemical ; PBPK ; Pregnancy ; Pyrrolidinones - blood ; Pyrrolidinones - pharmacokinetics ; Pyrrolidinones - toxicity ; Rats ; Risk Assessment ; Stress, Physiological ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Toxicological sciences, 2010-02, Vol.113 (2), p.468-482</ispartof><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-c2f42af641371e21ce7d9412bb3c23053d22ab90ba8318d7571c6414a8350fdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-c2f42af641371e21ce7d9412bb3c23053d22ab90ba8318d7571c6414a8350fdc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19875680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poet, Torka S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirman, Chris R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bader, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Thriel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargas, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinderliter, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Risk Analysis for N-Methyl Pyrrolidone Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Benchmark Dose Modeling</title><title>Toxicological sciences</title><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><description>Establishing an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) is important due to its widespread use as a solvent. Based on studies in rodents, the most sensitive toxic end point is a decrease in fetal/pup body weights observed after oral, dermal, and inhalation exposures of dams to NMP. Evidence indicates that the parent compound is the causative agent. To reduce the uncertainty in rat to human extrapolations, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of NMP in both species. Since in utero exposures are of concern, the models considered major physiological changes occurring in the dam or mother over the course of gestation. The rat PBPK model was used to determine the relationship between NMP concentrations in maternal blood and decrements in fetal/pup body weights following exposures to NMP vapor. Body weight decrements seen after vapor exposures occurred at lower NMP blood levels than those observed after oral and dermal exposures. Benchmark dose modeling was used to better define a point of departure (POD) for fetal/pup body weight changes based on dose-response information from two inhalation studies in rats. The POD and human PBPK model were then used to estimate the human equivalent concentrations (HECs) that could be used to derive an OEL value for NMP. The geometric mean of the PODs derived from the rat studies was estimated to be 350 mg h/l (expressed in terms of internal dose), a value which corresponds to an HEC of 480 ppm (occupational exposure of 8 h/day, 5 days/week). The HEC is much higher than recently developed internationally recognized OELs for NMP of 10–20 ppm, suggesting that these OELs adequately protect workers exposed to NMP vapor.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>benchmark dose</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - standards</subject><subject>exposure assessment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>human equivalent concentration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Models, Chemical</subject><subject>PBPK</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pyrrolidinones - blood</subject><subject>Pyrrolidinones - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pyrrolidinones - toxicity</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1096-6080</issn><issn>1096-0929</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1PwjAYhxujEUSPXk2PXib92OcRUMEEFA0kxEvTtR1Uxrqsw7D4z1szokdP70ee_N43DwDXGN1hlNB-bQ5W6P42K0non4CuW4YeSkhyeuxDFKMOuLD2AyGMQ5Scgw5O4igIY9QFX697XtS65rX-VPBN2y0cFDxvrLYwMxV89maq3jQ5nDdVZXItTaHg0upiDecbR5ncrLXged7AIbdKui2vdlyYrS5UrQXkhYRDVYjNjldbeG-sgjMjVe4SLsFZxnOrro61B5aPD4vRxJu-jJ9Gg6kn_DCuPUEyn_As9DGNsCJYqEgmPiZpSgWhKKCSEJ4mKOUxxbGMgggLB_tuDFAmBe0Br80VlbG2UhkrK-3eaRhG7EciayWyVqLjb1q-3Kc7Jf_oozUH3LaA2Zf_Zh1va1urwy_sXLAwolHAJqt3NlpMp9HkecxW9BvERo8Q</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Poet, Torka S.</creator><creator>Kirman, Chris R.</creator><creator>Bader, Michael</creator><creator>van Thriel, Christoph</creator><creator>Gargas, Michael L.</creator><creator>Hinderliter, Paul M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Quantitative Risk Analysis for N-Methyl Pyrrolidone Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Benchmark Dose Modeling</title><author>Poet, Torka S. ; Kirman, Chris R. ; Bader, Michael ; van Thriel, Christoph ; Gargas, Michael L. ; Hinderliter, Paul M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-c2f42af641371e21ce7d9412bb3c23053d22ab90ba8318d7571c6414a8350fdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>benchmark dose</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - standards</topic><topic>exposure assessment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>human equivalent concentration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Models, Chemical</topic><topic>PBPK</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pyrrolidinones - blood</topic><topic>Pyrrolidinones - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pyrrolidinones - toxicity</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poet, Torka S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirman, Chris R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bader, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Thriel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargas, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinderliter, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Toxicological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poet, Torka S.</au><au>Kirman, Chris R.</au><au>Bader, Michael</au><au>van Thriel, Christoph</au><au>Gargas, Michael L.</au><au>Hinderliter, Paul M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Risk Analysis for N-Methyl Pyrrolidone Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Benchmark Dose Modeling</atitle><jtitle>Toxicological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>468</spage><epage>482</epage><pages>468-482</pages><issn>1096-6080</issn><eissn>1096-0929</eissn><abstract>Establishing an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) is important due to its widespread use as a solvent. Based on studies in rodents, the most sensitive toxic end point is a decrease in fetal/pup body weights observed after oral, dermal, and inhalation exposures of dams to NMP. Evidence indicates that the parent compound is the causative agent. To reduce the uncertainty in rat to human extrapolations, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of NMP in both species. Since in utero exposures are of concern, the models considered major physiological changes occurring in the dam or mother over the course of gestation. The rat PBPK model was used to determine the relationship between NMP concentrations in maternal blood and decrements in fetal/pup body weights following exposures to NMP vapor. Body weight decrements seen after vapor exposures occurred at lower NMP blood levels than those observed after oral and dermal exposures. Benchmark dose modeling was used to better define a point of departure (POD) for fetal/pup body weight changes based on dose-response information from two inhalation studies in rats. The POD and human PBPK model were then used to estimate the human equivalent concentrations (HECs) that could be used to derive an OEL value for NMP. The geometric mean of the PODs derived from the rat studies was estimated to be 350 mg h/l (expressed in terms of internal dose), a value which corresponds to an HEC of 480 ppm (occupational exposure of 8 h/day, 5 days/week). The HEC is much higher than recently developed internationally recognized OELs for NMP of 10–20 ppm, suggesting that these OELs adequately protect workers exposed to NMP vapor.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>19875680</pmid><doi>10.1093/toxsci/kfp264</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1096-6080
ispartof Toxicological sciences, 2010-02, Vol.113 (2), p.468-482
issn 1096-6080
1096-0929
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfp264
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Animals
benchmark dose
Benchmarking
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Environmental Exposure - analysis
Environmental Exposure - standards
exposure assessment
Female
human equivalent concentration
Humans
Male
Mice
Models, Animal
Models, Chemical
PBPK
Pregnancy
Pyrrolidinones - blood
Pyrrolidinones - pharmacokinetics
Pyrrolidinones - toxicity
Rats
Risk Assessment
Stress, Physiological
Young Adult
title Quantitative Risk Analysis for N-Methyl Pyrrolidone Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Benchmark Dose Modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A06%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Risk%20Analysis%20for%20N-Methyl%20Pyrrolidone%20Using%20Physiologically%20Based%20Pharmacokinetic%20and%20Benchmark%20Dose%20Modeling&rft.jtitle=Toxicological%20sciences&rft.au=Poet,%20Torka%20S.&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=468&rft.epage=482&rft.pages=468-482&rft.issn=1096-6080&rft.eissn=1096-0929&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/toxsci/kfp264&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/toxsci/kfp264%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/19875680&rft_oup_id=10.1093/toxsci/kfp264&rfr_iscdi=true