Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act, 2017': CBR Matrix for inclusive implementation
India has witnessed a major shift from the predominant seclusion in the Indian 'Lunacy Act 1912', when there was no effectiveness in the treatment provided, to the 'Mental Health Act 1987', when the focus was on the treatment and care of mentally ill patients along with some effo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Statute law review 2021-02, Vol.42 (1), p.88-100 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 100 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 88 |
| container_title | Statute law review |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Sethi, Deepa |
| description | India has witnessed a major shift from the predominant seclusion in the Indian 'Lunacy Act 1912', when there was no effectiveness in the treatment provided, to the 'Mental Health Act 1987', when the focus was on the treatment and care of mentally ill patients along with some efforts to de-stigmatize and ensure human rights, to the recent Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act 2017' (IMHA), which primarily focuses on the human rights of people with mental illness. This article analyses the IMHA, which was passed on 7 April 2017. The IMHA is a welcome Act after its predecessor 'Mental Health Act 1987'; however, it is not the ultimate solution. This article highlights the impediments in the IMHA implementation and suggests a win-win model for its implementation. A tailored version of the CBR matrix is proposed for the inclusive implementation of the IMHA. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/slr/hmy016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>rmit_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_slr_hmy016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20210422045120</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/agispt.20210422045120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-ecdc1dbaefa2c582d22a6ee22c661a33c98a2340285e6f4c74adacfbc6c644043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv_oK9FcTY2Y9sE29a1BZaBNHzMp1s2pV8lN0o9t-bUD3Ny_C8A_Mwdi3gTkCuprEK0119AGFO2EhooxOVGXXKRiB0n9NcnbOLGD8BQGe5GrH1sik8Nnyydk2HFV84rLodYXD8gbpbLkHMJvd8_vjG19gF_8PLNnDfUPUV_bfjvt5Xrh66nW-bS3ZWYhXd1d8cs4_np_f5Ilm9viznD6uElFBd4qggUWzQlSgpzWQhJRrnpCRjBCpFeYZSaZBZ6kypaaaxQCo3ZMhoDVqN2c3xLoU2xuBKuw--xnCwAuwgwvYi7FFEDy-OcKh9Z3Hr476z0WGgnfVN_86wbsPWFq0f-koJ849JkAK0lKBTIUH9Aj74al0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act, 2017': CBR Matrix for inclusive implementation</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Sethi, Deepa</creator><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Deepa</creatorcontrib><description>India has witnessed a major shift from the predominant seclusion in the Indian 'Lunacy Act 1912', when there was no effectiveness in the treatment provided, to the 'Mental Health Act 1987', when the focus was on the treatment and care of mentally ill patients along with some efforts to de-stigmatize and ensure human rights, to the recent Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act 2017' (IMHA), which primarily focuses on the human rights of people with mental illness. This article analyses the IMHA, which was passed on 7 April 2017. The IMHA is a welcome Act after its predecessor 'Mental Health Act 1987'; however, it is not the ultimate solution. This article highlights the impediments in the IMHA implementation and suggests a win-win model for its implementation. A tailored version of the CBR matrix is proposed for the inclusive implementation of the IMHA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3593</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/slr/hmy016</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Care ; Civil rights ; Insanity (Law) ; Interpretation and construction ; Law ; Mental health laws ; Mental illness ; Mentally ill ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Statute law review, 2021-02, Vol.42 (1), p.88-100</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-9709-0908</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Deepa</creatorcontrib><title>Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act, 2017': CBR Matrix for inclusive implementation</title><title>Statute law review</title><description>India has witnessed a major shift from the predominant seclusion in the Indian 'Lunacy Act 1912', when there was no effectiveness in the treatment provided, to the 'Mental Health Act 1987', when the focus was on the treatment and care of mentally ill patients along with some efforts to de-stigmatize and ensure human rights, to the recent Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act 2017' (IMHA), which primarily focuses on the human rights of people with mental illness. This article analyses the IMHA, which was passed on 7 April 2017. The IMHA is a welcome Act after its predecessor 'Mental Health Act 1987'; however, it is not the ultimate solution. This article highlights the impediments in the IMHA implementation and suggests a win-win model for its implementation. A tailored version of the CBR matrix is proposed for the inclusive implementation of the IMHA.</description><subject>Care</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Insanity (Law)</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Mental health laws</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Mentally ill</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>0144-3593</issn><issn>1464-3863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv_oK9FcTY2Y9sE29a1BZaBNHzMp1s2pV8lN0o9t-bUD3Ny_C8A_Mwdi3gTkCuprEK0119AGFO2EhooxOVGXXKRiB0n9NcnbOLGD8BQGe5GrH1sik8Nnyydk2HFV84rLodYXD8gbpbLkHMJvd8_vjG19gF_8PLNnDfUPUV_bfjvt5Xrh66nW-bS3ZWYhXd1d8cs4_np_f5Ilm9viznD6uElFBd4qggUWzQlSgpzWQhJRrnpCRjBCpFeYZSaZBZ6kypaaaxQCo3ZMhoDVqN2c3xLoU2xuBKuw--xnCwAuwgwvYi7FFEDy-OcKh9Z3Hr476z0WGgnfVN_86wbsPWFq0f-koJ849JkAK0lKBTIUH9Aj74al0</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Sethi, Deepa</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9709-0908</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act, 2017': CBR Matrix for inclusive implementation</title><author>Sethi, Deepa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-ecdc1dbaefa2c582d22a6ee22c661a33c98a2340285e6f4c74adacfbc6c644043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Care</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Insanity (Law)</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Mental health laws</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Mentally ill</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Deepa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Statute law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sethi, Deepa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act, 2017': CBR Matrix for inclusive implementation</atitle><jtitle>Statute law review</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>88-100</pages><issn>0144-3593</issn><eissn>1464-3863</eissn><abstract>India has witnessed a major shift from the predominant seclusion in the Indian 'Lunacy Act 1912', when there was no effectiveness in the treatment provided, to the 'Mental Health Act 1987', when the focus was on the treatment and care of mentally ill patients along with some efforts to de-stigmatize and ensure human rights, to the recent Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act 2017' (IMHA), which primarily focuses on the human rights of people with mental illness. This article analyses the IMHA, which was passed on 7 April 2017. The IMHA is a welcome Act after its predecessor 'Mental Health Act 1987'; however, it is not the ultimate solution. This article highlights the impediments in the IMHA implementation and suggests a win-win model for its implementation. A tailored version of the CBR matrix is proposed for the inclusive implementation of the IMHA.</abstract><doi>10.1093/slr/hmy016</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9709-0908</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-3593 |
| ispartof | Statute law review, 2021-02, Vol.42 (1), p.88-100 |
| issn | 0144-3593 1464-3863 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_slr_hmy016 |
| source | EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Care Civil rights Insanity (Law) Interpretation and construction Law Mental health laws Mental illness Mentally ill Treatment |
| title | Indian 'Mental Healthcare Act, 2017': CBR Matrix for inclusive implementation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A30%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indian%20'Mental%20Healthcare%20Act,%202017':%20CBR%20Matrix%20for%20inclusive%20implementation&rft.jtitle=Statute%20law%20review&rft.au=Sethi,%20Deepa&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=88-100&rft.issn=0144-3593&rft.eissn=1464-3863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/slr/hmy016&rft_dat=%3Crmit_cross%3E10.3316/agispt.20210422045120%3C/rmit_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20210422045120&rfr_iscdi=true |