Sources and Resources John Bradmore and the Case of the Bitten Man: A Tantalising Link Between Three Medieval Surgical Manuscripts

Summary This article examines three English surgical treatises compiled between the late fourteenth and mid-fifteenth centuries. The earliest, a Middle English treatise dated 1392, appears to have been compiled by a surgeon practising in London (MS Wellcome 564). Near contemporary with this is a Lat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social history of medicine : the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine 2021-08, Vol.34 (3), p.723-741
1. Verfasser: Lang, S. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 741
container_issue 3
container_start_page 723
container_title Social history of medicine : the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine
container_volume 34
creator Lang, S. J.
description Summary This article examines three English surgical treatises compiled between the late fourteenth and mid-fifteenth centuries. The earliest, a Middle English treatise dated 1392, appears to have been compiled by a surgeon practising in London (MS Wellcome 564). Near contemporary with this is a Latin treatise, Philomena, compiled by London surgeon John Bradmore in the first decade of the fifteenth century (BL MS Sloane 2272). The latest of the three, dated 1446, represents a translation/adaptation of Bradmore’s Philomena into Middle English (BL MS Harley 1736). All three treatises contain anecdotes of surgical cases, and just one of these anecdotes is common to all three manuscripts. Close analysis of this story is used to explore aspects of the practice and regulation of surgery in late medieval London, and also to examine the relationship of the three treatises and the implications this has for the sharing of texts and information among surgeons.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/shm/hkaa014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_shm_hkaa014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/shm/hkaa014</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/shm/hkaa014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-1ea3e23762a32f50eb45fbbcb27119eca0565edb2b2eb05c648d138a988b38df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOw0AQRVcIJEKg4ge2okEm-_CTLol4yhESCRKdNbsex0sSO9pdg2j5ckySmmru6J6Z4hByydkNZ5kcuXozqlcAjIdHZMDDJAnCOI6PyYBlEQ9iyd9PyZlzH4yxMJPZgPzM285qdBSakr6iO2zPbd3QiYVy01rcdb5GOgWHtK12eWK8x4bOoLmlY7qAxsPaONMsaW6aFZ2g_8K-X9QWkc6wNPgJazrv7NLoPvR3ndPWbL07JycVrB1eHOaQvN3fLaaPQf7y8DQd54EWQviAI0gUMokFSFFFDFUYVUppJRLOM9TAojjCUgklULFIx2FacplClqZKpmUlh-R6_1fb1jmLVbG1ZgP2u-Cs-NNX9PqKg76evtrTbbf9F_wFxFlzBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sources and Resources John Bradmore and the Case of the Bitten Man: A Tantalising Link Between Three Medieval Surgical Manuscripts</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lang, S. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lang, S. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary This article examines three English surgical treatises compiled between the late fourteenth and mid-fifteenth centuries. The earliest, a Middle English treatise dated 1392, appears to have been compiled by a surgeon practising in London (MS Wellcome 564). Near contemporary with this is a Latin treatise, Philomena, compiled by London surgeon John Bradmore in the first decade of the fifteenth century (BL MS Sloane 2272). The latest of the three, dated 1446, represents a translation/adaptation of Bradmore’s Philomena into Middle English (BL MS Harley 1736). All three treatises contain anecdotes of surgical cases, and just one of these anecdotes is common to all three manuscripts. Close analysis of this story is used to explore aspects of the practice and regulation of surgery in late medieval London, and also to examine the relationship of the three treatises and the implications this has for the sharing of texts and information among surgeons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-631X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/shm/hkaa014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Social history of medicine : the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine, 2021-08, Vol.34 (3), p.723-741</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Social History of Medicine. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lang, S. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Sources and Resources John Bradmore and the Case of the Bitten Man: A Tantalising Link Between Three Medieval Surgical Manuscripts</title><title>Social history of medicine : the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine</title><description>Summary This article examines three English surgical treatises compiled between the late fourteenth and mid-fifteenth centuries. The earliest, a Middle English treatise dated 1392, appears to have been compiled by a surgeon practising in London (MS Wellcome 564). Near contemporary with this is a Latin treatise, Philomena, compiled by London surgeon John Bradmore in the first decade of the fifteenth century (BL MS Sloane 2272). The latest of the three, dated 1446, represents a translation/adaptation of Bradmore’s Philomena into Middle English (BL MS Harley 1736). All three treatises contain anecdotes of surgical cases, and just one of these anecdotes is common to all three manuscripts. Close analysis of this story is used to explore aspects of the practice and regulation of surgery in late medieval London, and also to examine the relationship of the three treatises and the implications this has for the sharing of texts and information among surgeons.</description><issn>0951-631X</issn><issn>1477-4666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLtOw0AQRVcIJEKg4ge2okEm-_CTLol4yhESCRKdNbsex0sSO9pdg2j5ckySmmru6J6Z4hByydkNZ5kcuXozqlcAjIdHZMDDJAnCOI6PyYBlEQ9iyd9PyZlzH4yxMJPZgPzM285qdBSakr6iO2zPbd3QiYVy01rcdb5GOgWHtK12eWK8x4bOoLmlY7qAxsPaONMsaW6aFZ2g_8K-X9QWkc6wNPgJazrv7NLoPvR3ndPWbL07JycVrB1eHOaQvN3fLaaPQf7y8DQd54EWQviAI0gUMokFSFFFDFUYVUppJRLOM9TAojjCUgklULFIx2FacplClqZKpmUlh-R6_1fb1jmLVbG1ZgP2u-Cs-NNX9PqKg76evtrTbbf9F_wFxFlzBg</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Lang, S. J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Sources and Resources John Bradmore and the Case of the Bitten Man: A Tantalising Link Between Three Medieval Surgical Manuscripts</title><author>Lang, S. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-1ea3e23762a32f50eb45fbbcb27119eca0565edb2b2eb05c648d138a988b38df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lang, S. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Social history of medicine : the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lang, S. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sources and Resources John Bradmore and the Case of the Bitten Man: A Tantalising Link Between Three Medieval Surgical Manuscripts</atitle><jtitle>Social history of medicine : the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>723</spage><epage>741</epage><pages>723-741</pages><issn>0951-631X</issn><eissn>1477-4666</eissn><abstract>Summary This article examines three English surgical treatises compiled between the late fourteenth and mid-fifteenth centuries. The earliest, a Middle English treatise dated 1392, appears to have been compiled by a surgeon practising in London (MS Wellcome 564). Near contemporary with this is a Latin treatise, Philomena, compiled by London surgeon John Bradmore in the first decade of the fifteenth century (BL MS Sloane 2272). The latest of the three, dated 1446, represents a translation/adaptation of Bradmore’s Philomena into Middle English (BL MS Harley 1736). All three treatises contain anecdotes of surgical cases, and just one of these anecdotes is common to all three manuscripts. Close analysis of this story is used to explore aspects of the practice and regulation of surgery in late medieval London, and also to examine the relationship of the three treatises and the implications this has for the sharing of texts and information among surgeons.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/shm/hkaa014</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-631X
ispartof Social history of medicine : the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine, 2021-08, Vol.34 (3), p.723-741
issn 0951-631X
1477-4666
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_shm_hkaa014
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Sources and Resources John Bradmore and the Case of the Bitten Man: A Tantalising Link Between Three Medieval Surgical Manuscripts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A25%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sources%20and%20Resources%20John%20Bradmore%20and%20the%20Case%20of%20the%20Bitten%20Man:%20A%20Tantalising%20Link%20Between%20Three%20Medieval%20Surgical%20Manuscripts&rft.jtitle=Social%20history%20of%20medicine%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20Society%20for%20the%20Social%20History%20of%20Medicine&rft.au=Lang,%20S.%20J.&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=741&rft.pages=723-741&rft.issn=0951-631X&rft.eissn=1477-4666&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/shm/hkaa014&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/shm/hkaa014%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/shm/hkaa014&rfr_iscdi=true