Value fluidity and value anchoring: race, intermediaries and valuation in two housing markets

This article argues that analysts should examine how individuals perceive and construct value in order to understand persistent forms of inequality. Drawing on years of ethnographic observations of real estate professionals and homeseekers across various segments of the housing markets in Houston, T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Socio-economic review 2023-03, Vol.21 (1), p.79-98
1. Verfasser: Besbris, Max
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 98
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title Socio-economic review
container_volume 21
creator Besbris, Max
description This article argues that analysts should examine how individuals perceive and construct value in order to understand persistent forms of inequality. Drawing on years of ethnographic observations of real estate professionals and homeseekers across various segments of the housing markets in Houston, TX and New York, NY, this article develops the concepts of value fluidity and value anchoring to describe how valuation occurs and to better theorize how valuation itself reproduces racial–spatial inequality in housing. It shows that consumers’ valuation criteria can be quite malleable and highly influenced by intermediaries and experts. At the same time, valuation is patterned in reference to existing hierarchies. The article concludes by arguing for the importance of theorizing valuation through observation of market interactions and by showing why investigations of the housing market must focus on intermediaries.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ser/mwac012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>econis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ser_mwac012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1854341871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-eacd09d4dec315c44781a517aa6946a3101d7670c9e6986a82ee37479f79fb0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj01LAzEQhoMoWKsn_8DiVdZmNt9HKX5BwYuKtzAmsxrZ7krSKv33rrYoDO8Mw8MLD2OnwC-AOzErlGfLLwwcmj02AWlUPcbz_t-t4ZAdlfLOeWOkdRN29oTdmqq2W6eYVpsK-1h9_r6wD29DTv3rMTtosSt0sttT9nh99TC_rRf3N3fzy0UdGiVWNWGI3EUZKQhQQUpjARUYRO2kRgEcotGGB0faWY22IRJGGteO88JRTNn5tjfkoZRMrf_IaYl544H7Hz0_6vmd3khXW5rC0Kfyz1olhQRrQHwDk7BN2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value fluidity and value anchoring: race, intermediaries and valuation in two housing markets</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Besbris, Max</creator><creatorcontrib>Besbris, Max</creatorcontrib><description>This article argues that analysts should examine how individuals perceive and construct value in order to understand persistent forms of inequality. Drawing on years of ethnographic observations of real estate professionals and homeseekers across various segments of the housing markets in Houston, TX and New York, NY, this article develops the concepts of value fluidity and value anchoring to describe how valuation occurs and to better theorize how valuation itself reproduces racial–spatial inequality in housing. It shows that consumers’ valuation criteria can be quite malleable and highly influenced by intermediaries and experts. At the same time, valuation is patterned in reference to existing hierarchies. The article concludes by arguing for the importance of theorizing valuation through observation of market interactions and by showing why investigations of the housing market must focus on intermediaries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-1461</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-147X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwac012</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Socio-economic review, 2023-03, Vol.21 (1), p.79-98</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-eacd09d4dec315c44781a517aa6946a3101d7670c9e6986a82ee37479f79fb0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-eacd09d4dec315c44781a517aa6946a3101d7670c9e6986a82ee37479f79fb0a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2166-0345</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Besbris, Max</creatorcontrib><title>Value fluidity and value anchoring: race, intermediaries and valuation in two housing markets</title><title>Socio-economic review</title><description>This article argues that analysts should examine how individuals perceive and construct value in order to understand persistent forms of inequality. Drawing on years of ethnographic observations of real estate professionals and homeseekers across various segments of the housing markets in Houston, TX and New York, NY, this article develops the concepts of value fluidity and value anchoring to describe how valuation occurs and to better theorize how valuation itself reproduces racial–spatial inequality in housing. It shows that consumers’ valuation criteria can be quite malleable and highly influenced by intermediaries and experts. At the same time, valuation is patterned in reference to existing hierarchies. The article concludes by arguing for the importance of theorizing valuation through observation of market interactions and by showing why investigations of the housing market must focus on intermediaries.</description><issn>1475-1461</issn><issn>1475-147X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFj01LAzEQhoMoWKsn_8DiVdZmNt9HKX5BwYuKtzAmsxrZ7krSKv33rrYoDO8Mw8MLD2OnwC-AOzErlGfLLwwcmj02AWlUPcbz_t-t4ZAdlfLOeWOkdRN29oTdmqq2W6eYVpsK-1h9_r6wD29DTv3rMTtosSt0sttT9nh99TC_rRf3N3fzy0UdGiVWNWGI3EUZKQhQQUpjARUYRO2kRgEcotGGB0faWY22IRJGGteO88JRTNn5tjfkoZRMrf_IaYl544H7Hz0_6vmd3khXW5rC0Kfyz1olhQRrQHwDk7BN2w</recordid><startdate>20230317</startdate><enddate>20230317</enddate><creator>Besbris, Max</creator><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-0345</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230317</creationdate><title>Value fluidity and value anchoring</title><author>Besbris, Max</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-eacd09d4dec315c44781a517aa6946a3101d7670c9e6986a82ee37479f79fb0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Besbris, Max</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Socio-economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Besbris, Max</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value fluidity and value anchoring: race, intermediaries and valuation in two housing markets</atitle><jtitle>Socio-economic review</jtitle><date>2023-03-17</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>79-98</pages><issn>1475-1461</issn><eissn>1475-147X</eissn><abstract>This article argues that analysts should examine how individuals perceive and construct value in order to understand persistent forms of inequality. Drawing on years of ethnographic observations of real estate professionals and homeseekers across various segments of the housing markets in Houston, TX and New York, NY, this article develops the concepts of value fluidity and value anchoring to describe how valuation occurs and to better theorize how valuation itself reproduces racial–spatial inequality in housing. It shows that consumers’ valuation criteria can be quite malleable and highly influenced by intermediaries and experts. At the same time, valuation is patterned in reference to existing hierarchies. The article concludes by arguing for the importance of theorizing valuation through observation of market interactions and by showing why investigations of the housing market must focus on intermediaries.</abstract><doi>10.1093/ser/mwac012</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-0345</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-1461
ispartof Socio-economic review, 2023-03, Vol.21 (1), p.79-98
issn 1475-1461
1475-147X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ser_mwac012
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Value fluidity and value anchoring: race, intermediaries and valuation in two housing markets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T03%3A22%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-econis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20fluidity%20and%20value%20anchoring:%20race,%20intermediaries%20and%20valuation%20in%20two%20housing%20markets&rft.jtitle=Socio-economic%20review&rft.au=Besbris,%20Max&rft.date=2023-03-17&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=79-98&rft.issn=1475-1461&rft.eissn=1475-147X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ser/mwac012&rft_dat=%3Ceconis_cross%3E1854341871%3C/econis_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true