Does the high-tech enterprise certification policy promote innovation in China?
This study investigates the impacts of the high-tech enterprise certification policy on corporate innovation in China, by analyzing a unique dataset of listed companies and their affiliates from 2006 to 2015. We exclude firms certified after year 2009 from the sample, because they may have engaged i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science & public policy 2020-10, Vol.47 (5), p.678-688 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 688 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 678 |
container_title | Science & public policy |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Liu, Huiling Xing, Fei Li, Bo Yakshtas, Kseniya |
description | This study investigates the impacts of the high-tech enterprise certification policy on corporate innovation in China, by analyzing a unique dataset of listed companies and their affiliates from 2006 to 2015. We exclude firms certified after year 2009 from the sample, because they may have engaged in R&D manipulation. The findings show that the high-tech enterprise certification can promote corporate innovation in China, especially the innovation captured by invention patents and the intensity of policy matters. The study also concludes that the high-tech enterprise certification can influence enterprise innovation through ‘physical’ and ‘tacit’ channels. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that private enterprises, enterprises in more competitive industries, and equity-inspired enterprises benefit most from high-tech enterprise certification. This article helps understand the validity of innovation policies and driving forces of innovation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/scipol/scaa050 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_scipol_scaa050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_scipol_scaa050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-e8fd00cce4a119d18453b498ef2355fce915cf40405f57fd9064700ede7a508e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1KxDAURoMoWGfcus4LZLxpEtusROovDMzGWZeY3tjITFKSIMzbW-mszuKDj8Mh5I7DhoMW99n6KR5mGAMKLkjFZcOZkgIuSQUCaiZk3VyTm5x_AKBuparI7jlipmVEOvrvkRW0I8VQME3JZ6QWU_HOW1N8DHS-9_ZEpxSPsSD1IcTfZfGBdqMP5nFNrpw5ZLw9c0X2ry-f3Tvb7t4-uqcts7XQhWHrBgBrURrO9cBnF_EldYuuFko5i5or6yRIUE41btDwIBsAHLAxCloUK7JZfm2KOSd0_Sx8NOnUc-j_c_RLjv6cQ_wBw5FXAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the high-tech enterprise certification policy promote innovation in China?</title><source>Oxford Journals</source><creator>Liu, Huiling ; Xing, Fei ; Li, Bo ; Yakshtas, Kseniya</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huiling ; Xing, Fei ; Li, Bo ; Yakshtas, Kseniya</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the impacts of the high-tech enterprise certification policy on corporate innovation in China, by analyzing a unique dataset of listed companies and their affiliates from 2006 to 2015. We exclude firms certified after year 2009 from the sample, because they may have engaged in R&D manipulation. The findings show that the high-tech enterprise certification can promote corporate innovation in China, especially the innovation captured by invention patents and the intensity of policy matters. The study also concludes that the high-tech enterprise certification can influence enterprise innovation through ‘physical’ and ‘tacit’ channels. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that private enterprises, enterprises in more competitive industries, and equity-inspired enterprises benefit most from high-tech enterprise certification. This article helps understand the validity of innovation policies and driving forces of innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-3427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scaa050</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Science & public policy, 2020-10, Vol.47 (5), p.678-688</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-e8fd00cce4a119d18453b498ef2355fce915cf40405f57fd9064700ede7a508e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-e8fd00cce4a119d18453b498ef2355fce915cf40405f57fd9064700ede7a508e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9481-8804</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakshtas, Kseniya</creatorcontrib><title>Does the high-tech enterprise certification policy promote innovation in China?</title><title>Science & public policy</title><description>This study investigates the impacts of the high-tech enterprise certification policy on corporate innovation in China, by analyzing a unique dataset of listed companies and their affiliates from 2006 to 2015. We exclude firms certified after year 2009 from the sample, because they may have engaged in R&D manipulation. The findings show that the high-tech enterprise certification can promote corporate innovation in China, especially the innovation captured by invention patents and the intensity of policy matters. The study also concludes that the high-tech enterprise certification can influence enterprise innovation through ‘physical’ and ‘tacit’ channels. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that private enterprises, enterprises in more competitive industries, and equity-inspired enterprises benefit most from high-tech enterprise certification. This article helps understand the validity of innovation policies and driving forces of innovation.</description><issn>0302-3427</issn><issn>1471-5430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1KxDAURoMoWGfcus4LZLxpEtusROovDMzGWZeY3tjITFKSIMzbW-mszuKDj8Mh5I7DhoMW99n6KR5mGAMKLkjFZcOZkgIuSQUCaiZk3VyTm5x_AKBuparI7jlipmVEOvrvkRW0I8VQME3JZ6QWU_HOW1N8DHS-9_ZEpxSPsSD1IcTfZfGBdqMP5nFNrpw5ZLw9c0X2ry-f3Tvb7t4-uqcts7XQhWHrBgBrURrO9cBnF_EldYuuFko5i5or6yRIUE41btDwIBsAHLAxCloUK7JZfm2KOSd0_Sx8NOnUc-j_c_RLjv6cQ_wBw5FXAw</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Liu, Huiling</creator><creator>Xing, Fei</creator><creator>Li, Bo</creator><creator>Yakshtas, Kseniya</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-8804</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Does the high-tech enterprise certification policy promote innovation in China?</title><author>Liu, Huiling ; Xing, Fei ; Li, Bo ; Yakshtas, Kseniya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-e8fd00cce4a119d18453b498ef2355fce915cf40405f57fd9064700ede7a508e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakshtas, Kseniya</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science & public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Huiling</au><au>Xing, Fei</au><au>Li, Bo</au><au>Yakshtas, Kseniya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the high-tech enterprise certification policy promote innovation in China?</atitle><jtitle>Science & public policy</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>688</epage><pages>678-688</pages><issn>0302-3427</issn><eissn>1471-5430</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the impacts of the high-tech enterprise certification policy on corporate innovation in China, by analyzing a unique dataset of listed companies and their affiliates from 2006 to 2015. We exclude firms certified after year 2009 from the sample, because they may have engaged in R&D manipulation. The findings show that the high-tech enterprise certification can promote corporate innovation in China, especially the innovation captured by invention patents and the intensity of policy matters. The study also concludes that the high-tech enterprise certification can influence enterprise innovation through ‘physical’ and ‘tacit’ channels. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that private enterprises, enterprises in more competitive industries, and equity-inspired enterprises benefit most from high-tech enterprise certification. This article helps understand the validity of innovation policies and driving forces of innovation.</abstract><doi>10.1093/scipol/scaa050</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-8804</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-3427 |
ispartof | Science & public policy, 2020-10, Vol.47 (5), p.678-688 |
issn | 0302-3427 1471-5430 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_scipol_scaa050 |
source | Oxford Journals |
title | Does the high-tech enterprise certification policy promote innovation in China? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A29%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20high-tech%20enterprise%20certification%20policy%20promote%20innovation%20in%20China?&rft.jtitle=Science%20&%20public%20policy&rft.au=Liu,%20Huiling&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=688&rft.pages=678-688&rft.issn=0302-3427&rft.eissn=1471-5430&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/scipol/scaa050&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_scipol_scaa050%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |