IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary
The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Refugee survey quarterly 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.79-96 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 96 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Refugee survey quarterly |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Willner-Reid, Matthew |
description | The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is that of Internally Displaced Persons. In Afghanistan, the current president has pledged to stem future displacement and provide durable solutions to existing internally displaced persons, and thus to “remove the term ‘IDPs’from our national glossary”. However, there is currently remarkably little clarity regarding the usage of this term within the country. Drawing on interviews with current and former policy-makers and practitioners in Afghanistan, this article seeks to explore the complexities and limitations of the internally displaced persons label and differences in how it is understood by these actors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rsq/hdw013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rsq_hdw013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48503297</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48503297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-fbb8842df8375d73363ba9b5fd2f271bc8a47949778512a1927ca756eb5970423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8FKAzEURYMoWKsbXQtdC7EveUlesiy1aqGgCwV3IZmZ2Ck61WRA_HtHRlzduzgcOIydC7gW4HCey-d8W3-BwAM2EYoEN06_HA4fJHAFho7ZSSk7ACCDbsIu1jePZdZ2s0V63YauLX3oTtlRCm-lOfvbKXu-XT0t7_nm4W69XGx4JZXseYrRWiXrZJF0TYgGY3BRp1omSSJWNihyyhFZLWQQTlIVSJsmakegJE7Z1eit8r6U3CT_kdv3kL-9AP-b44ccP-YM8OUI70q_z_-kshpQOsIfDzZFsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is that of Internally Displaced Persons. In Afghanistan, the current president has pledged to stem future displacement and provide durable solutions to existing internally displaced persons, and thus to “remove the term ‘IDPs’from our national glossary”. However, there is currently remarkably little clarity regarding the usage of this term within the country. Drawing on interviews with current and former policy-makers and practitioners in Afghanistan, this article seeks to explore the complexities and limitations of the internally displaced persons label and differences in how it is understood by these actors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1020-4067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rsq/hdw013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Refugee survey quarterly, 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.79-96</ispartof><rights>Author(s) [2016]</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48503297$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48503297$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary</title><title>Refugee survey quarterly</title><description>The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is that of Internally Displaced Persons. In Afghanistan, the current president has pledged to stem future displacement and provide durable solutions to existing internally displaced persons, and thus to “remove the term ‘IDPs’from our national glossary”. However, there is currently remarkably little clarity regarding the usage of this term within the country. Drawing on interviews with current and former policy-makers and practitioners in Afghanistan, this article seeks to explore the complexities and limitations of the internally displaced persons label and differences in how it is understood by these actors.</description><issn>1020-4067</issn><issn>1471-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8FKAzEURYMoWKsbXQtdC7EveUlesiy1aqGgCwV3IZmZ2Ck61WRA_HtHRlzduzgcOIydC7gW4HCey-d8W3-BwAM2EYoEN06_HA4fJHAFho7ZSSk7ACCDbsIu1jePZdZ2s0V63YauLX3oTtlRCm-lOfvbKXu-XT0t7_nm4W69XGx4JZXseYrRWiXrZJF0TYgGY3BRp1omSSJWNihyyhFZLWQQTlIVSJsmakegJE7Z1eit8r6U3CT_kdv3kL-9AP-b44ccP-YM8OUI70q_z_-kshpQOsIfDzZFsQ</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>IDPs in Afghanistan</title><author>Willner-Reid, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-fbb8842df8375d73363ba9b5fd2f271bc8a47949778512a1927ca756eb5970423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Refugee survey quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Willner-Reid, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary</atitle><jtitle>Refugee survey quarterly</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>79-96</pages><issn>1020-4067</issn><eissn>1471-695X</eissn><abstract>The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is that of Internally Displaced Persons. In Afghanistan, the current president has pledged to stem future displacement and provide durable solutions to existing internally displaced persons, and thus to “remove the term ‘IDPs’from our national glossary”. However, there is currently remarkably little clarity regarding the usage of this term within the country. Drawing on interviews with current and former policy-makers and practitioners in Afghanistan, this article seeks to explore the complexities and limitations of the internally displaced persons label and differences in how it is understood by these actors.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/rsq/hdw013</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1020-4067 |
ispartof | Refugee survey quarterly, 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.79-96 |
issn | 1020-4067 1471-695X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rsq_hdw013 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T03%3A24%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IDPs%20in%20Afghanistan:%20A%20Confused%20National%20Glossary&rft.jtitle=Refugee%20survey%20quarterly&rft.au=Willner-Reid,%20Matthew&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=79-96&rft.issn=1020-4067&rft.eissn=1471-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rsq/hdw013&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E48503297%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48503297&rfr_iscdi=true |