IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary

The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Refugee survey quarterly 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.79-96
1. Verfasser: Willner-Reid, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 4
container_start_page 79
container_title Refugee survey quarterly
container_volume 35
creator Willner-Reid, Matthew
description The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is that of Internally Displaced Persons. In Afghanistan, the current president has pledged to stem future displacement and provide durable solutions to existing internally displaced persons, and thus to “remove the term ‘IDPs’from our national glossary”. However, there is currently remarkably little clarity regarding the usage of this term within the country. Drawing on interviews with current and former policy-makers and practitioners in Afghanistan, this article seeks to explore the complexities and limitations of the internally displaced persons label and differences in how it is understood by these actors.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rsq/hdw013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rsq_hdw013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48503297</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48503297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-fbb8842df8375d73363ba9b5fd2f271bc8a47949778512a1927ca756eb5970423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8FKAzEURYMoWKsbXQtdC7EveUlesiy1aqGgCwV3IZmZ2Ck61WRA_HtHRlzduzgcOIydC7gW4HCey-d8W3-BwAM2EYoEN06_HA4fJHAFho7ZSSk7ACCDbsIu1jePZdZ2s0V63YauLX3oTtlRCm-lOfvbKXu-XT0t7_nm4W69XGx4JZXseYrRWiXrZJF0TYgGY3BRp1omSSJWNihyyhFZLWQQTlIVSJsmakegJE7Z1eit8r6U3CT_kdv3kL-9AP-b44ccP-YM8OUI70q_z_-kshpQOsIfDzZFsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is that of Internally Displaced Persons. In Afghanistan, the current president has pledged to stem future displacement and provide durable solutions to existing internally displaced persons, and thus to “remove the term ‘IDPs’from our national glossary”. However, there is currently remarkably little clarity regarding the usage of this term within the country. Drawing on interviews with current and former policy-makers and practitioners in Afghanistan, this article seeks to explore the complexities and limitations of the internally displaced persons label and differences in how it is understood by these actors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1020-4067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rsq/hdw013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Refugee survey quarterly, 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.79-96</ispartof><rights>Author(s) [2016]</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48503297$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48503297$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary</title><title>Refugee survey quarterly</title><description>The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is that of Internally Displaced Persons. In Afghanistan, the current president has pledged to stem future displacement and provide durable solutions to existing internally displaced persons, and thus to “remove the term ‘IDPs’from our national glossary”. However, there is currently remarkably little clarity regarding the usage of this term within the country. Drawing on interviews with current and former policy-makers and practitioners in Afghanistan, this article seeks to explore the complexities and limitations of the internally displaced persons label and differences in how it is understood by these actors.</description><issn>1020-4067</issn><issn>1471-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8FKAzEURYMoWKsbXQtdC7EveUlesiy1aqGgCwV3IZmZ2Ck61WRA_HtHRlzduzgcOIydC7gW4HCey-d8W3-BwAM2EYoEN06_HA4fJHAFho7ZSSk7ACCDbsIu1jePZdZ2s0V63YauLX3oTtlRCm-lOfvbKXu-XT0t7_nm4W69XGx4JZXseYrRWiXrZJF0TYgGY3BRp1omSSJWNihyyhFZLWQQTlIVSJsmakegJE7Z1eit8r6U3CT_kdv3kL-9AP-b44ccP-YM8OUI70q_z_-kshpQOsIfDzZFsQ</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>IDPs in Afghanistan</title><author>Willner-Reid, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-fbb8842df8375d73363ba9b5fd2f271bc8a47949778512a1927ca756eb5970423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Willner-Reid, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Refugee survey quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Willner-Reid, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary</atitle><jtitle>Refugee survey quarterly</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>79-96</pages><issn>1020-4067</issn><eissn>1471-695X</eissn><abstract>The labelling of distinct categories of people in need is a necessary, though sometimes controversial and often overlooked, element of almost all bureaucratic assistance programmes. One of the labels that has been the subject of consistent debate in the humanitarian literature in recent years is that of Internally Displaced Persons. In Afghanistan, the current president has pledged to stem future displacement and provide durable solutions to existing internally displaced persons, and thus to “remove the term ‘IDPs’from our national glossary”. However, there is currently remarkably little clarity regarding the usage of this term within the country. Drawing on interviews with current and former policy-makers and practitioners in Afghanistan, this article seeks to explore the complexities and limitations of the internally displaced persons label and differences in how it is understood by these actors.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/rsq/hdw013</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1020-4067
ispartof Refugee survey quarterly, 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.79-96
issn 1020-4067
1471-695X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rsq_hdw013
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title IDPs in Afghanistan: A Confused National Glossary
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T03%3A24%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IDPs%20in%20Afghanistan:%20A%20Confused%20National%20Glossary&rft.jtitle=Refugee%20survey%20quarterly&rft.au=Willner-Reid,%20Matthew&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=79-96&rft.issn=1020-4067&rft.eissn=1471-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rsq/hdw013&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E48503297%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48503297&rfr_iscdi=true