A comparison of skyshine computational methods

A variety of methods employing radiation transport and point-kernel codes have been used to model two skyshine problems. The first problem is a 1 MeV point source of photons on the surface of the earth inside a 2 m tall and 1 m radius silo having black walls. The skyshine radiation downfield from th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2005-12, Vol.116 (1-4), p.525-533
Hauptverfasser: Hertel, Nolan E., Sweezy, Jeremy E., Shultis, J. Kenneth, Warkentin, J. Karl, Rose, Zachary J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 533
container_issue 1-4
container_start_page 525
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 116
creator Hertel, Nolan E.
Sweezy, Jeremy E.
Shultis, J. Kenneth
Warkentin, J. Karl
Rose, Zachary J.
description A variety of methods employing radiation transport and point-kernel codes have been used to model two skyshine problems. The first problem is a 1 MeV point source of photons on the surface of the earth inside a 2 m tall and 1 m radius silo having black walls. The skyshine radiation downfield from the point source was estimated with and without a 30-cm-thick concrete lid on the silo. The second benchmark problem is to estimate the skyshine radiation downfield from 12 cylindrical canisters emplaced in a low-level radioactive waste trench. The canisters are filled with ion-exchange resin with a representative radionuclide loading, largely 60Co, 134Cs and 137Cs. The solution methods include use of the MCNP code to solve the problem by directly employing variance reduction techniques, the single-scatter point kernel code GGG-GP, the QADMOD-GP point kernel code, the COHORT Monte Carlo code, the NAC International version of the SKYSHINE-III code, the KSU hybrid method and the associated KSU skyshine codes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rpd/nci274
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_nci274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_HXZ_T2J112JH_S</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-99c5ad0871675440a010a0737a5dd2fd586258f337e02a9837ff07dfb83de8423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj01Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AGSs5B29js5lqLGUvBgBfGybLO7NLbJht0U7L83mqKHYWDeh-F9ELrFMMWQ01lozawpKyLZGRpjyUhKGYhzNAbMWJoxAiN0FeMnAJE5Z5dohIUAJnIyRtN5Uvq61aGKvkm8S-LuGLdVY3_Ph053lW_0Pqltt_UmXqMLp_fR3pz2BL09PqwXRbp6eXpezFdpSQnt0jwvuTaQSSwkZww04H4klZobQ5zhmSA8c5RKC0TnGZXOgTRuk1Fj-8J0gu6Hv2XwMQbrVBuqWoejwqB-pFUvrQbpHr4b4Pawqa35R0-WPZAOQBU7-_WX67BToi_FVfH-odZkiTFZFuqVfgNm_WFr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of skyshine computational methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Hertel, Nolan E. ; Sweezy, Jeremy E. ; Shultis, J. Kenneth ; Warkentin, J. Karl ; Rose, Zachary J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hertel, Nolan E. ; Sweezy, Jeremy E. ; Shultis, J. Kenneth ; Warkentin, J. Karl ; Rose, Zachary J.</creatorcontrib><description>A variety of methods employing radiation transport and point-kernel codes have been used to model two skyshine problems. The first problem is a 1 MeV point source of photons on the surface of the earth inside a 2 m tall and 1 m radius silo having black walls. The skyshine radiation downfield from the point source was estimated with and without a 30-cm-thick concrete lid on the silo. The second benchmark problem is to estimate the skyshine radiation downfield from 12 cylindrical canisters emplaced in a low-level radioactive waste trench. The canisters are filled with ion-exchange resin with a representative radionuclide loading, largely 60Co, 134Cs and 137Cs. The solution methods include use of the MCNP code to solve the problem by directly employing variance reduction techniques, the single-scatter point kernel code GGG-GP, the QADMOD-GP point kernel code, the COHORT Monte Carlo code, the NAC International version of the SKYSHINE-III code, the KSU hybrid method and the associated KSU skyshine codes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci274</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16604692</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Air ; Algorithms ; Computer Simulation ; Gamma Rays ; Models, Statistical ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Protection - methods ; Radiometry - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scattering, Radiation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Software ; Software Validation</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2005-12, Vol.116 (1-4), p.525-533</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-99c5ad0871675440a010a0737a5dd2fd586258f337e02a9837ff07dfb83de8423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-99c5ad0871675440a010a0737a5dd2fd586258f337e02a9837ff07dfb83de8423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16604692$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hertel, Nolan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweezy, Jeremy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shultis, J. Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warkentin, J. Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Zachary J.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of skyshine computational methods</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>A variety of methods employing radiation transport and point-kernel codes have been used to model two skyshine problems. The first problem is a 1 MeV point source of photons on the surface of the earth inside a 2 m tall and 1 m radius silo having black walls. The skyshine radiation downfield from the point source was estimated with and without a 30-cm-thick concrete lid on the silo. The second benchmark problem is to estimate the skyshine radiation downfield from 12 cylindrical canisters emplaced in a low-level radioactive waste trench. The canisters are filled with ion-exchange resin with a representative radionuclide loading, largely 60Co, 134Cs and 137Cs. The solution methods include use of the MCNP code to solve the problem by directly employing variance reduction techniques, the single-scatter point kernel code GGG-GP, the QADMOD-GP point kernel code, the COHORT Monte Carlo code, the NAC International version of the SKYSHINE-III code, the KSU hybrid method and the associated KSU skyshine codes.</description><subject>Air</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - methods</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software Validation</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFj01Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AGSs5B29js5lqLGUvBgBfGybLO7NLbJht0U7L83mqKHYWDeh-F9ELrFMMWQ01lozawpKyLZGRpjyUhKGYhzNAbMWJoxAiN0FeMnAJE5Z5dohIUAJnIyRtN5Uvq61aGKvkm8S-LuGLdVY3_Ph053lW_0Pqltt_UmXqMLp_fR3pz2BL09PqwXRbp6eXpezFdpSQnt0jwvuTaQSSwkZww04H4klZobQ5zhmSA8c5RKC0TnGZXOgTRuk1Fj-8J0gu6Hv2XwMQbrVBuqWoejwqB-pFUvrQbpHr4b4Pawqa35R0-WPZAOQBU7-_WX67BToi_FVfH-odZkiTFZFuqVfgNm_WFr</recordid><startdate>20051220</startdate><enddate>20051220</enddate><creator>Hertel, Nolan E.</creator><creator>Sweezy, Jeremy E.</creator><creator>Shultis, J. Kenneth</creator><creator>Warkentin, J. Karl</creator><creator>Rose, Zachary J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051220</creationdate><title>A comparison of skyshine computational methods</title><author>Hertel, Nolan E. ; Sweezy, Jeremy E. ; Shultis, J. Kenneth ; Warkentin, J. Karl ; Rose, Zachary J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-99c5ad0871675440a010a0737a5dd2fd586258f337e02a9837ff07dfb83de8423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Air</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - methods</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hertel, Nolan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweezy, Jeremy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shultis, J. Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warkentin, J. Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Zachary J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hertel, Nolan E.</au><au>Sweezy, Jeremy E.</au><au>Shultis, J. Kenneth</au><au>Warkentin, J. Karl</au><au>Rose, Zachary J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of skyshine computational methods</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2005-12-20</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>533</epage><pages>525-533</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>A variety of methods employing radiation transport and point-kernel codes have been used to model two skyshine problems. The first problem is a 1 MeV point source of photons on the surface of the earth inside a 2 m tall and 1 m radius silo having black walls. The skyshine radiation downfield from the point source was estimated with and without a 30-cm-thick concrete lid on the silo. The second benchmark problem is to estimate the skyshine radiation downfield from 12 cylindrical canisters emplaced in a low-level radioactive waste trench. The canisters are filled with ion-exchange resin with a representative radionuclide loading, largely 60Co, 134Cs and 137Cs. The solution methods include use of the MCNP code to solve the problem by directly employing variance reduction techniques, the single-scatter point kernel code GGG-GP, the QADMOD-GP point kernel code, the COHORT Monte Carlo code, the NAC International version of the SKYSHINE-III code, the KSU hybrid method and the associated KSU skyshine codes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16604692</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/nci274</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2005-12, Vol.116 (1-4), p.525-533
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_nci274
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Air
Algorithms
Computer Simulation
Gamma Rays
Models, Statistical
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Protection - methods
Radiometry - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Scattering, Radiation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software
Software Validation
title A comparison of skyshine computational methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A50%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20skyshine%20computational%20methods&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Hertel,%20Nolan%20E.&rft.date=2005-12-20&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=533&rft.pages=525-533&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/nci274&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_HXZ_T2J112JH_S%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/16604692&rfr_iscdi=true