P018 Functional impairment in enthesitis related arthritis patients

Abstract Background Enthesitis related arthritis (ERA) is a subgroup of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. It is characterized by the presence of enthesitis and predominately lower limb arthritis and can affect sacroiliac joint and spine. Recent studies showed that ERA is associated with worse physical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2021-11, Vol.60 (Supplement_5)
Hauptverfasser: Ferjani, Hanene, Bettaieb, Hiba, Ben Ammar, Lobna, Maatallah, Kaouther, Ben Nessib, Dorra, Triki, Wafa, Kaffal, Dhia, Hamdi, Wafa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Enthesitis related arthritis (ERA) is a subgroup of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. It is characterized by the presence of enthesitis and predominately lower limb arthritis and can affect sacroiliac joint and spine. Recent studies showed that ERA is associated with worse physical status and poorer quality of life (1). The main objective of this study was to compare the aspects of functional status in patients (ERA) and patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods A retrospective monocentric study was carried out on patients with ERA (ILAR criteria) or SpA (ASAS Criteria). Demographic data and clinical characteristics were obtained from medical records. Disease activity was evaluated by: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein rate (CRP) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Functional impairment was evaluated by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of life Questionnaire (ASQoL). Global well-being was assessed by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Index (BASGI). Population was divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) stands for ERA patients and group 2 (G2) stands for SpA patients. P 60 min) was reported by 37.5% of G1 and 49.3%. G1 patients had longer morning stiffness than G2 (61 [0–90] min vs 30 [0–240] min; P = 0.58). Multiple nocturnal awakenings were reported by 45% of G1 patients and 58.2% of G2 patients. Median BASDAI score was 4.9 [1–44] in G1 and 4.5 in G2 [0–10] (P = 0.48). Median BASGI score was 6 [1.5–9.5] in G1 and 6 [0–10] in G2 (P = 0.58). Median ESR was 35 mm/h [8–90] in G1 and 35 mm/h [2–125] in G2. Median CRP was 18.2 mg/l [1–70] in G1 and 13 mg/l [3–180] in G2. The assessment of functional status revealed that G1 patients had higher BASFI scores than G2 patients (5.2 vs 4.5). The association between G1 and BASFI was statistically significant (P = 0.05). Median ASQoL was 12 [2–17] in G1 and 9 [0–18] in G2. No link was noted between G1 and ASQoL score (P = 0.152). Conclusion Our study showed that ERA was associated with higher BASFI scores in comparison with SpA. Treat-to target strategies are mandatory in order to optimize the functional status of children with ERA
ISSN:1462-0324
1462-0332
DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keab722.010