Pipeline Risk in Leveraged Loan Syndication
What is the economic role played by arrangers of leveraged loans, and what are the risks they face? We provide evidence that arrangers solve a demand discovery problem. Investors have incentives to feign little interest in the loan to obtain better terms. To deter such behavior, arrangers underprice...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Review of financial studies 2020-12, Vol.33 (12), p.5660-5705 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5705 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 5660 |
container_title | The Review of financial studies |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Bruche, Max Malherbe, Frederic Meisenzahl, Ralf R. |
description | What is the economic role played by arrangers of leveraged loans, and what are the risks they face? We provide evidence that arrangers solve a demand discovery problem. Investors have incentives to feign little interest in the loan to obtain better terms. To deter such behavior, arrangers underprice hot deals and ration investors on cold deals. The risk associated with demand discovery is often shared between borrowers and arrangers. One implication is that to ration investors on cold deals, arrangers retain larger loan shares. This motive for retention is different from the monitoring incentive motive previously considered in the literature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rfs/hhaa029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rfs_hhaa029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48616938</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/rfs/hhaa029</oup_id><sourcerecordid>48616938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fb817753643e8b34733b57361f09c61c56d8f25910c33555cfcc63a168dd3f783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFz81LwzAYx_EgCtbpybOQk5dRl-zJ61GGU6Gg-HIuaZq4zNmUZAr776106NHTc_nw4_kidE7JFSUaZsnn2WplDJnrA1RQJngpQahDVBClodSMs2N0kvOaEEKBkQJNH0PvNqFz-Cnkdxw6XLkvl8yba3EVTYefd10brNmG2J2iI2822Z3t7wS9Lm9eFndl9XB7v7iuSssobEvfKColB8HAqQaYBGj48Ab1RFtBLRet8nOuKbEAnHPrrRVgqFBtC14qmKDpuGtTzDk5X_cpfJi0qympfzrrobPedw4aj9rZ2IX8ZyUDKrQQMJDLkcTP_p-tixGu8zamX8qUGJZAwTcEc2ZF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pipeline Risk in Leveraged Loan Syndication</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bruche, Max ; Malherbe, Frederic ; Meisenzahl, Ralf R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruche, Max ; Malherbe, Frederic ; Meisenzahl, Ralf R.</creatorcontrib><description>What is the economic role played by arrangers of leveraged loans, and what are the risks they face? We provide evidence that arrangers solve a demand discovery problem. Investors have incentives to feign little interest in the loan to obtain better terms. To deter such behavior, arrangers underprice hot deals and ration investors on cold deals. The risk associated with demand discovery is often shared between borrowers and arrangers. One implication is that to ration investors on cold deals, arrangers retain larger loan shares. This motive for retention is different from the monitoring incentive motive previously considered in the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-9454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhaa029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>1999-2015 ; Fremdkapital ; Institutioneller Investor ; Kreditgeschäft ; Kreditrisiko ; Unternehmenskooperation ; USA</subject><ispartof>The Review of financial studies, 2020-12, Vol.33 (12), p.5660-5705</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com . 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fb817753643e8b34733b57361f09c61c56d8f25910c33555cfcc63a168dd3f783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fb817753643e8b34733b57361f09c61c56d8f25910c33555cfcc63a168dd3f783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48616938$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48616938$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1578,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruche, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malherbe, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisenzahl, Ralf R.</creatorcontrib><title>Pipeline Risk in Leveraged Loan Syndication</title><title>The Review of financial studies</title><description>What is the economic role played by arrangers of leveraged loans, and what are the risks they face? We provide evidence that arrangers solve a demand discovery problem. Investors have incentives to feign little interest in the loan to obtain better terms. To deter such behavior, arrangers underprice hot deals and ration investors on cold deals. The risk associated with demand discovery is often shared between borrowers and arrangers. One implication is that to ration investors on cold deals, arrangers retain larger loan shares. This motive for retention is different from the monitoring incentive motive previously considered in the literature.</description><subject>1999-2015</subject><subject>Fremdkapital</subject><subject>Institutioneller Investor</subject><subject>Kreditgeschäft</subject><subject>Kreditrisiko</subject><subject>Unternehmenskooperation</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0893-9454</issn><issn>1465-7368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFz81LwzAYx_EgCtbpybOQk5dRl-zJ61GGU6Gg-HIuaZq4zNmUZAr776106NHTc_nw4_kidE7JFSUaZsnn2WplDJnrA1RQJngpQahDVBClodSMs2N0kvOaEEKBkQJNH0PvNqFz-Cnkdxw6XLkvl8yba3EVTYefd10brNmG2J2iI2822Z3t7wS9Lm9eFndl9XB7v7iuSssobEvfKColB8HAqQaYBGj48Ab1RFtBLRet8nOuKbEAnHPrrRVgqFBtC14qmKDpuGtTzDk5X_cpfJi0qympfzrrobPedw4aj9rZ2IX8ZyUDKrQQMJDLkcTP_p-tixGu8zamX8qUGJZAwTcEc2ZF</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Bruche, Max</creator><creator>Malherbe, Frederic</creator><creator>Meisenzahl, Ralf R.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Pipeline Risk in Leveraged Loan Syndication</title><author>Bruche, Max ; Malherbe, Frederic ; Meisenzahl, Ralf R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fb817753643e8b34733b57361f09c61c56d8f25910c33555cfcc63a168dd3f783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>1999-2015</topic><topic>Fremdkapital</topic><topic>Institutioneller Investor</topic><topic>Kreditgeschäft</topic><topic>Kreditrisiko</topic><topic>Unternehmenskooperation</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruche, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malherbe, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisenzahl, Ralf R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Review of financial studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruche, Max</au><au>Malherbe, Frederic</au><au>Meisenzahl, Ralf R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pipeline Risk in Leveraged Loan Syndication</atitle><jtitle>The Review of financial studies</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5660</spage><epage>5705</epage><pages>5660-5705</pages><issn>0893-9454</issn><eissn>1465-7368</eissn><abstract>What is the economic role played by arrangers of leveraged loans, and what are the risks they face? We provide evidence that arrangers solve a demand discovery problem. Investors have incentives to feign little interest in the loan to obtain better terms. To deter such behavior, arrangers underprice hot deals and ration investors on cold deals. The risk associated with demand discovery is often shared between borrowers and arrangers. One implication is that to ration investors on cold deals, arrangers retain larger loan shares. This motive for retention is different from the monitoring incentive motive previously considered in the literature.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/rfs/hhaa029</doi><tpages>46</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-9454 |
ispartof | The Review of financial studies, 2020-12, Vol.33 (12), p.5660-5705 |
issn | 0893-9454 1465-7368 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rfs_hhaa029 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Business Source Complete |
subjects | 1999-2015 Fremdkapital Institutioneller Investor Kreditgeschäft Kreditrisiko Unternehmenskooperation USA |
title | Pipeline Risk in Leveraged Loan Syndication |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A09%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pipeline%20Risk%20in%20Leveraged%20Loan%20Syndication&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20financial%20studies&rft.au=Bruche,%20Max&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5660&rft.epage=5705&rft.pages=5660-5705&rft.issn=0893-9454&rft.eissn=1465-7368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rfs/hhaa029&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E48616938%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48616938&rft_oup_id=10.1093/rfs/hhaa029&rfr_iscdi=true |