Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Games When Players’ Beliefs Are Not in Equilibrium

This article deals with the identification and estimation of dynamic games when players’ beliefs about other players’ actions are biased, that is, beliefs do not represent the probability distribution of the actual behaviour of other players conditional on the information available. First, we show t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Review of economic studies 2020-03, Vol.87 (2 (313)), p.582-625
Hauptverfasser: AGUIRREGABIRIA, VICTOR, MAGESAN, ARVIND
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 625
container_issue 2 (313)
container_start_page 582
container_title The Review of economic studies
container_volume 87
creator AGUIRREGABIRIA, VICTOR
MAGESAN, ARVIND
description This article deals with the identification and estimation of dynamic games when players’ beliefs about other players’ actions are biased, that is, beliefs do not represent the probability distribution of the actual behaviour of other players conditional on the information available. First, we show that an exclusion restriction, typically used to identify empirical games, provides testable non-parametric restrictions of the null hypothesis of equilibrium beliefs in dynamic games with either finite or infinite horizon. We use this result to construct a simple Likelihood Ratio test of equilibrium beliefs. Second, we prove that this exclusion restriction, together with consistent estimates of beliefs at two points in the support of the variable involved in the exclusion restriction, is sufficient for non-parametric point-identification of players’ belief functions as well as useful functions of payoffs. Third, we propose a simple two-step estimation method. We illustrate our model and methods using both Monte Carlo experiments and an empirical application of a dynamic game of store location by retail chains. The key conditions for the identification of beliefs and payoffs in our application are the following: (1) the previous year’s network of stores of the competitor does not have a direct effect on the profit of a firm, but the firm’s own network of stores at previous year does affect its profit because the existence of sunk entry costs and economies of density in these costs; and (2) firms’ beliefs are unbiased in those markets that are close, in a geographic sense, to the opponent’s network of stores, though beliefs are unrestricted, and potentially biased, for unexplored markets which are farther away from the competitors’ network. Our estimates show significant evidence of biased beliefs. Furthermore, imposing the restriction of unbiased beliefs generates a substantial attenuation bias in the estimate of competition effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/restud/rdz013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_restud_rdz013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26934204</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/restud/rdz013</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26934204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-2dfffb45ad3c22ed9fc0ffaac6a78431ad012e63fe5b1ff93b24230a7e2d04543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M1Kw0AQwPFFFKzVo0dhj15iZz-SNMeqtRaKelD0ImGzO4tb8lF3k0M9-Rq-nk9iJKJHT8PAj4H5E3LM4IxBJiYeQ9uZiTdvwMQOGTGZpFEm0qddMgIQMkpinu6TgxDWAMCm03REnpcG69ZZp1Xrmpqq2tB5aF01rI2ll9taVU7Thaow0McXrOldqbbow-f7Bz3H0qENdOaR3jQtdTWdv3audIV3XXVI9qwqAx79zDF5uJrfX1xHq9vF8mK2irTkrI24sdYWMlZGaM7RZFaDtUrpRKVTKZgywDgmwmJcMGszUXDJBagUuQEZSzEm0XBX-yYEjzbf-P4Fv80Z5N9t8qFNPrTpPR086qZ24U8nmRR9GuA9OR1I023-vXYy0HVoG_-LeZIJyUGKL1GpflU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Games When Players’ Beliefs Are Not in Equilibrium</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>AGUIRREGABIRIA, VICTOR ; MAGESAN, ARVIND</creator><creatorcontrib>AGUIRREGABIRIA, VICTOR ; MAGESAN, ARVIND</creatorcontrib><description>This article deals with the identification and estimation of dynamic games when players’ beliefs about other players’ actions are biased, that is, beliefs do not represent the probability distribution of the actual behaviour of other players conditional on the information available. First, we show that an exclusion restriction, typically used to identify empirical games, provides testable non-parametric restrictions of the null hypothesis of equilibrium beliefs in dynamic games with either finite or infinite horizon. We use this result to construct a simple Likelihood Ratio test of equilibrium beliefs. Second, we prove that this exclusion restriction, together with consistent estimates of beliefs at two points in the support of the variable involved in the exclusion restriction, is sufficient for non-parametric point-identification of players’ belief functions as well as useful functions of payoffs. Third, we propose a simple two-step estimation method. We illustrate our model and methods using both Monte Carlo experiments and an empirical application of a dynamic game of store location by retail chains. The key conditions for the identification of beliefs and payoffs in our application are the following: (1) the previous year’s network of stores of the competitor does not have a direct effect on the profit of a firm, but the firm’s own network of stores at previous year does affect its profit because the existence of sunk entry costs and economies of density in these costs; and (2) firms’ beliefs are unbiased in those markets that are close, in a geographic sense, to the opponent’s network of stores, though beliefs are unrestricted, and potentially biased, for unexplored markets which are farther away from the competitors’ network. Our estimates show significant evidence of biased beliefs. Furthermore, imposing the restriction of unbiased beliefs generates a substantial attenuation bias in the estimate of competition effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-937X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdz013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>The Review of economic studies, 2020-03, Vol.87 (2 (313)), p.582-625</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Review of Economic Studies Limited. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-2dfffb45ad3c22ed9fc0ffaac6a78431ad012e63fe5b1ff93b24230a7e2d04543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-2dfffb45ad3c22ed9fc0ffaac6a78431ad012e63fe5b1ff93b24230a7e2d04543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26934204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26934204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1583,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>AGUIRREGABIRIA, VICTOR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAGESAN, ARVIND</creatorcontrib><title>Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Games When Players’ Beliefs Are Not in Equilibrium</title><title>The Review of economic studies</title><description>This article deals with the identification and estimation of dynamic games when players’ beliefs about other players’ actions are biased, that is, beliefs do not represent the probability distribution of the actual behaviour of other players conditional on the information available. First, we show that an exclusion restriction, typically used to identify empirical games, provides testable non-parametric restrictions of the null hypothesis of equilibrium beliefs in dynamic games with either finite or infinite horizon. We use this result to construct a simple Likelihood Ratio test of equilibrium beliefs. Second, we prove that this exclusion restriction, together with consistent estimates of beliefs at two points in the support of the variable involved in the exclusion restriction, is sufficient for non-parametric point-identification of players’ belief functions as well as useful functions of payoffs. Third, we propose a simple two-step estimation method. We illustrate our model and methods using both Monte Carlo experiments and an empirical application of a dynamic game of store location by retail chains. The key conditions for the identification of beliefs and payoffs in our application are the following: (1) the previous year’s network of stores of the competitor does not have a direct effect on the profit of a firm, but the firm’s own network of stores at previous year does affect its profit because the existence of sunk entry costs and economies of density in these costs; and (2) firms’ beliefs are unbiased in those markets that are close, in a geographic sense, to the opponent’s network of stores, though beliefs are unrestricted, and potentially biased, for unexplored markets which are farther away from the competitors’ network. Our estimates show significant evidence of biased beliefs. Furthermore, imposing the restriction of unbiased beliefs generates a substantial attenuation bias in the estimate of competition effects.</description><issn>0034-6527</issn><issn>1467-937X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0M1Kw0AQwPFFFKzVo0dhj15iZz-SNMeqtRaKelD0ImGzO4tb8lF3k0M9-Rq-nk9iJKJHT8PAj4H5E3LM4IxBJiYeQ9uZiTdvwMQOGTGZpFEm0qddMgIQMkpinu6TgxDWAMCm03REnpcG69ZZp1Xrmpqq2tB5aF01rI2ll9taVU7Thaow0McXrOldqbbow-f7Bz3H0qENdOaR3jQtdTWdv3audIV3XXVI9qwqAx79zDF5uJrfX1xHq9vF8mK2irTkrI24sdYWMlZGaM7RZFaDtUrpRKVTKZgywDgmwmJcMGszUXDJBagUuQEZSzEm0XBX-yYEjzbf-P4Fv80Z5N9t8qFNPrTpPR086qZ24U8nmRR9GuA9OR1I023-vXYy0HVoG_-LeZIJyUGKL1GpflU</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>AGUIRREGABIRIA, VICTOR</creator><creator>MAGESAN, ARVIND</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Games When Players’ Beliefs Are Not in Equilibrium</title><author>AGUIRREGABIRIA, VICTOR ; MAGESAN, ARVIND</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-2dfffb45ad3c22ed9fc0ffaac6a78431ad012e63fe5b1ff93b24230a7e2d04543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AGUIRREGABIRIA, VICTOR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAGESAN, ARVIND</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Review of economic studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AGUIRREGABIRIA, VICTOR</au><au>MAGESAN, ARVIND</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Games When Players’ Beliefs Are Not in Equilibrium</atitle><jtitle>The Review of economic studies</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2 (313)</issue><spage>582</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>582-625</pages><issn>0034-6527</issn><eissn>1467-937X</eissn><abstract>This article deals with the identification and estimation of dynamic games when players’ beliefs about other players’ actions are biased, that is, beliefs do not represent the probability distribution of the actual behaviour of other players conditional on the information available. First, we show that an exclusion restriction, typically used to identify empirical games, provides testable non-parametric restrictions of the null hypothesis of equilibrium beliefs in dynamic games with either finite or infinite horizon. We use this result to construct a simple Likelihood Ratio test of equilibrium beliefs. Second, we prove that this exclusion restriction, together with consistent estimates of beliefs at two points in the support of the variable involved in the exclusion restriction, is sufficient for non-parametric point-identification of players’ belief functions as well as useful functions of payoffs. Third, we propose a simple two-step estimation method. We illustrate our model and methods using both Monte Carlo experiments and an empirical application of a dynamic game of store location by retail chains. The key conditions for the identification of beliefs and payoffs in our application are the following: (1) the previous year’s network of stores of the competitor does not have a direct effect on the profit of a firm, but the firm’s own network of stores at previous year does affect its profit because the existence of sunk entry costs and economies of density in these costs; and (2) firms’ beliefs are unbiased in those markets that are close, in a geographic sense, to the opponent’s network of stores, though beliefs are unrestricted, and potentially biased, for unexplored markets which are farther away from the competitors’ network. Our estimates show significant evidence of biased beliefs. Furthermore, imposing the restriction of unbiased beliefs generates a substantial attenuation bias in the estimate of competition effects.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/restud/rdz013</doi><tpages>44</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6527
ispartof The Review of economic studies, 2020-03, Vol.87 (2 (313)), p.582-625
issn 0034-6527
1467-937X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_restud_rdz013
source Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Games When Players’ Beliefs Are Not in Equilibrium
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A40%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20and%20Estimation%20of%20Dynamic%20Games%20When%20Players%E2%80%99%20Beliefs%20Are%20Not%20in%20Equilibrium&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20economic%20studies&rft.au=AGUIRREGABIRIA,%20VICTOR&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2%20(313)&rft.spage=582&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=582-625&rft.issn=0034-6527&rft.eissn=1467-937X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/restud/rdz013&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26934204%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26934204&rft_oup_id=10.1093/restud/rdz013&rfr_iscdi=true