Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises

This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Review of Corporate Finance Studies 2019-09, Vol.8 (2), p.235-259
1. Verfasser: Vallée, Boris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 259
container_issue 2
container_start_page 235
container_title The Review of Corporate Finance Studies
container_volume 8
creator Vallée, Boris
description This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issuances. These exercises prove effective at improving bank capitalization levels. The market reaction to LMEs is positive and mostly accrues to debt holders. These findings strengthen the case for innovative liabilities securities as a tool to improve bank resilience. Received February 8, 2019; editorial decision May 16, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rcfs/cfz004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>econis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rcfs_cfz004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1675660956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b106aee4d5c2f0e1fb64c81ca4cbd1d25f0b26fa56dcc9d5868aa507b908bd993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj01LxDAURYMoOIyz8g8Ut1LnJW1ek6UUv2DAja5D8pKUytgOSTb6652hondz7-Jw4TB2zeGOg262iWLeUvwGaM_YSkCLteYNnv9toS7ZJucPOKbjApRcsZt-nso4DWEqFdnDWOy-KmkchpCqEGOgkq_YRbT7HDa_vWbvjw9v_XO9e3166e93NTUIpXYc0IbQekkiQuDRYUuKk23Jee6FjOAERivRE2kvFSprJXROg3Je62bNbpdfSnPOKURzSOOnTV-GgzkZmpOhWQyPdLXQgeZpzP8sdhIRtMTmB8q7T7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Vallée, Boris</creator><creatorcontrib>Vallée, Boris</creatorcontrib><description>This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issuances. These exercises prove effective at improving bank capitalization levels. The market reaction to LMEs is positive and mostly accrues to debt holders. These findings strengthen the case for innovative liabilities securities as a tool to improve bank resilience. Received February 8, 2019; editorial decision May 16, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-9128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-9136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rcfs/cfz004</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>2008-2016 ; Bankrisiko ; EU-Staaten ; Haftung ; Management ; Verbriefung</subject><ispartof>The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2019-09, Vol.8 (2), p.235-259</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b106aee4d5c2f0e1fb64c81ca4cbd1d25f0b26fa56dcc9d5868aa507b908bd993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b106aee4d5c2f0e1fb64c81ca4cbd1d25f0b26fa56dcc9d5868aa507b908bd993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vallée, Boris</creatorcontrib><title>Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises</title><title>The Review of Corporate Finance Studies</title><description>This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issuances. These exercises prove effective at improving bank capitalization levels. The market reaction to LMEs is positive and mostly accrues to debt holders. These findings strengthen the case for innovative liabilities securities as a tool to improve bank resilience. Received February 8, 2019; editorial decision May 16, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.</description><subject>2008-2016</subject><subject>Bankrisiko</subject><subject>EU-Staaten</subject><subject>Haftung</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Verbriefung</subject><issn>2046-9128</issn><issn>2046-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFj01LxDAURYMoOIyz8g8Ut1LnJW1ek6UUv2DAja5D8pKUytgOSTb6652hondz7-Jw4TB2zeGOg262iWLeUvwGaM_YSkCLteYNnv9toS7ZJucPOKbjApRcsZt-nso4DWEqFdnDWOy-KmkchpCqEGOgkq_YRbT7HDa_vWbvjw9v_XO9e3166e93NTUIpXYc0IbQekkiQuDRYUuKk23Jee6FjOAERivRE2kvFSprJXROg3Je62bNbpdfSnPOKURzSOOnTV-GgzkZmpOhWQyPdLXQgeZpzP8sdhIRtMTmB8q7T7w</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Vallée, Boris</creator><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Contingent capital trigger effects</title><author>Vallée, Boris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b106aee4d5c2f0e1fb64c81ca4cbd1d25f0b26fa56dcc9d5868aa507b908bd993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>2008-2016</topic><topic>Bankrisiko</topic><topic>EU-Staaten</topic><topic>Haftung</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Verbriefung</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vallée, Boris</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Review of Corporate Finance Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vallée, Boris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises</atitle><jtitle>The Review of Corporate Finance Studies</jtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>235-259</pages><issn>2046-9128</issn><eissn>2046-9136</eissn><abstract>This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issuances. These exercises prove effective at improving bank capitalization levels. The market reaction to LMEs is positive and mostly accrues to debt holders. These findings strengthen the case for innovative liabilities securities as a tool to improve bank resilience. Received February 8, 2019; editorial decision May 16, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.</abstract><doi>10.1093/rcfs/cfz004</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-9128
ispartof The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2019-09, Vol.8 (2), p.235-259
issn 2046-9128
2046-9136
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rcfs_cfz004
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Business Source Complete
subjects 2008-2016
Bankrisiko
EU-Staaten
Haftung
Management
Verbriefung
title Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A39%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-econis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contingent%20capital%20trigger%20effects:%20evidence%20from%20liability%20management%20exercises&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20Corporate%20Finance%20Studies&rft.au=Vall%C3%A9e,%20Boris&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=235-259&rft.issn=2046-9128&rft.eissn=2046-9136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rcfs/cfz004&rft_dat=%3Ceconis_cross%3E1675660956%3C/econis_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true