Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises
This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Review of Corporate Finance Studies 2019-09, Vol.8 (2), p.235-259 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 259 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | The Review of Corporate Finance Studies |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Vallée, Boris |
description | This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issuances. These exercises prove effective at improving bank capitalization levels. The market reaction to LMEs is positive and mostly accrues to debt holders. These findings strengthen the case for innovative liabilities securities as a tool to improve bank resilience.
Received February 8, 2019; editorial decision May 16, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rcfs/cfz004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>econis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rcfs_cfz004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1675660956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b106aee4d5c2f0e1fb64c81ca4cbd1d25f0b26fa56dcc9d5868aa507b908bd993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj01LxDAURYMoOIyz8g8Ut1LnJW1ek6UUv2DAja5D8pKUytgOSTb6652hondz7-Jw4TB2zeGOg262iWLeUvwGaM_YSkCLteYNnv9toS7ZJucPOKbjApRcsZt-nso4DWEqFdnDWOy-KmkchpCqEGOgkq_YRbT7HDa_vWbvjw9v_XO9e3166e93NTUIpXYc0IbQekkiQuDRYUuKk23Jee6FjOAERivRE2kvFSprJXROg3Je62bNbpdfSnPOKURzSOOnTV-GgzkZmpOhWQyPdLXQgeZpzP8sdhIRtMTmB8q7T7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Vallée, Boris</creator><creatorcontrib>Vallée, Boris</creatorcontrib><description>This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issuances. These exercises prove effective at improving bank capitalization levels. The market reaction to LMEs is positive and mostly accrues to debt holders. These findings strengthen the case for innovative liabilities securities as a tool to improve bank resilience.
Received February 8, 2019; editorial decision May 16, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-9128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-9136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rcfs/cfz004</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>2008-2016 ; Bankrisiko ; EU-Staaten ; Haftung ; Management ; Verbriefung</subject><ispartof>The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2019-09, Vol.8 (2), p.235-259</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b106aee4d5c2f0e1fb64c81ca4cbd1d25f0b26fa56dcc9d5868aa507b908bd993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b106aee4d5c2f0e1fb64c81ca4cbd1d25f0b26fa56dcc9d5868aa507b908bd993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vallée, Boris</creatorcontrib><title>Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises</title><title>The Review of Corporate Finance Studies</title><description>This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issuances. These exercises prove effective at improving bank capitalization levels. The market reaction to LMEs is positive and mostly accrues to debt holders. These findings strengthen the case for innovative liabilities securities as a tool to improve bank resilience.
Received February 8, 2019; editorial decision May 16, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.</description><subject>2008-2016</subject><subject>Bankrisiko</subject><subject>EU-Staaten</subject><subject>Haftung</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Verbriefung</subject><issn>2046-9128</issn><issn>2046-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFj01LxDAURYMoOIyz8g8Ut1LnJW1ek6UUv2DAja5D8pKUytgOSTb6652hondz7-Jw4TB2zeGOg262iWLeUvwGaM_YSkCLteYNnv9toS7ZJucPOKbjApRcsZt-nso4DWEqFdnDWOy-KmkchpCqEGOgkq_YRbT7HDa_vWbvjw9v_XO9e3166e93NTUIpXYc0IbQekkiQuDRYUuKk23Jee6FjOAERivRE2kvFSprJXROg3Je62bNbpdfSnPOKURzSOOnTV-GgzkZmpOhWQyPdLXQgeZpzP8sdhIRtMTmB8q7T7w</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Vallée, Boris</creator><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Contingent capital trigger effects</title><author>Vallée, Boris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b106aee4d5c2f0e1fb64c81ca4cbd1d25f0b26fa56dcc9d5868aa507b908bd993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>2008-2016</topic><topic>Bankrisiko</topic><topic>EU-Staaten</topic><topic>Haftung</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Verbriefung</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vallée, Boris</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Review of Corporate Finance Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vallée, Boris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises</atitle><jtitle>The Review of Corporate Finance Studies</jtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>235-259</pages><issn>2046-9128</issn><eissn>2046-9136</eissn><abstract>This paper studies liability management exercises (LME) by banks, which have comparable regulatory capital effects than contingent capital triggers. LMEs are concentrated on low capitalization situations, both in the cross-section and in the time series and are frequently associated with equity issuances. These exercises prove effective at improving bank capitalization levels. The market reaction to LMEs is positive and mostly accrues to debt holders. These findings strengthen the case for innovative liabilities securities as a tool to improve bank resilience.
Received February 8, 2019; editorial decision May 16, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.</abstract><doi>10.1093/rcfs/cfz004</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2046-9128 |
ispartof | The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2019-09, Vol.8 (2), p.235-259 |
issn | 2046-9128 2046-9136 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rcfs_cfz004 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Business Source Complete |
subjects | 2008-2016 Bankrisiko EU-Staaten Haftung Management Verbriefung |
title | Contingent capital trigger effects: evidence from liability management exercises |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A39%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-econis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contingent%20capital%20trigger%20effects:%20evidence%20from%20liability%20management%20exercises&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20Corporate%20Finance%20Studies&rft.au=Vall%C3%A9e,%20Boris&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=235-259&rft.issn=2046-9128&rft.eissn=2046-9136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rcfs/cfz004&rft_dat=%3Ceconis_cross%3E1675660956%3C/econis_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |