Wages and the Value of Nonemployment
Abstract Nonemployment is often posited as a worker’s outside option in wage-setting models such as bargaining and wage posting. The value of nonemployment is therefore a key determinant of wages. We measure the wage effect of changes in the value of nonemployment among initially employed workers. O...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Quarterly journal of economics 2020-11, Vol.135 (4), p.1905-1963 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1963 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1905 |
container_title | The Quarterly journal of economics |
container_volume | 135 |
creator | Jäger, Simon Schoefer, Benjamin Young, Samuel Zweimüller, Josef |
description | Abstract
Nonemployment is often posited as a worker’s outside option in wage-setting models such as bargaining and wage posting. The value of nonemployment is therefore a key determinant of wages. We measure the wage effect of changes in the value of nonemployment among initially employed workers. Our quasi-experimental variation in the value of nonemployment arises from four large reforms of unemployment insurance (UI) benefit levels in Austria. We document that wages are insensitive to UI benefit changes: point estimates imply a wage response of less than $0.01 per $1.00 UI benefit increase, and we can reject sensitivities larger than $0.03. The insensitivity holds even among workers with low wages and high predicted unemployment duration, and among job switchers hired out of unemployment. The insensitivity of wages to the nonemployment value presents a puzzle to the widely used Nash bargaining model, which predicts a sensitivity of $0.24–$0.48. Our evidence supports wage-setting models that insulate wages from the value of nonemployment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/qje/qjaa016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_qje_qjaa016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/qje/qjaa016</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/qje/qjaa016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-2cadbe922f0feb0833c6cf82b69f6b656b05e864ebf7b24e29660f41f2b31c593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9zz1PwzAQxnELgUQoTHyBDIgFBc4-241HVPEmVbDwMka2e4ZWSRzidOi3JyiV2BhOt_z0SH_GzjlcczB4872h8awFrg9YxhXyQmoFhywDQCyUQjxmJyltAICXXGbs4sN-Usptu8qHL8rfbb2lPIb8ObbUdHXcNdQOp-wo2DrR2f7P2Nv93evisVi-PDwtbpeFR8OHQni7cmSECBDIQYnotQ-lcNoE7bTSDhSVWpILcyckCaM1BMmDcMi9MjhjV9Ou72NKPYWq69eN7XcVh-o3sBoDq33gqPNJk4_tOv3ZuUQwUptyJJcTidvu360fiExbPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wages and the Value of Nonemployment</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Jäger, Simon ; Schoefer, Benjamin ; Young, Samuel ; Zweimüller, Josef</creator><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Simon ; Schoefer, Benjamin ; Young, Samuel ; Zweimüller, Josef</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Nonemployment is often posited as a worker’s outside option in wage-setting models such as bargaining and wage posting. The value of nonemployment is therefore a key determinant of wages. We measure the wage effect of changes in the value of nonemployment among initially employed workers. Our quasi-experimental variation in the value of nonemployment arises from four large reforms of unemployment insurance (UI) benefit levels in Austria. We document that wages are insensitive to UI benefit changes: point estimates imply a wage response of less than $0.01 per $1.00 UI benefit increase, and we can reject sensitivities larger than $0.03. The insensitivity holds even among workers with low wages and high predicted unemployment duration, and among job switchers hired out of unemployment. The insensitivity of wages to the nonemployment value presents a puzzle to the widely used Nash bargaining model, which predicts a sensitivity of $0.24–$0.48. Our evidence supports wage-setting models that insulate wages from the value of nonemployment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-5533</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjaa016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>1976-2001 ; Arbeitslosenversicherung ; Arbeitslosigkeit ; Experiment ; Lohn ; Österreich</subject><ispartof>The Quarterly journal of economics, 2020-11, Vol.135 (4), p.1905-1963</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the President and Fellows of Harvard College. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-2cadbe922f0feb0833c6cf82b69f6b656b05e864ebf7b24e29660f41f2b31c593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-2cadbe922f0feb0833c6cf82b69f6b656b05e864ebf7b24e29660f41f2b31c593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoefer, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zweimüller, Josef</creatorcontrib><title>Wages and the Value of Nonemployment</title><title>The Quarterly journal of economics</title><description>Abstract
Nonemployment is often posited as a worker’s outside option in wage-setting models such as bargaining and wage posting. The value of nonemployment is therefore a key determinant of wages. We measure the wage effect of changes in the value of nonemployment among initially employed workers. Our quasi-experimental variation in the value of nonemployment arises from four large reforms of unemployment insurance (UI) benefit levels in Austria. We document that wages are insensitive to UI benefit changes: point estimates imply a wage response of less than $0.01 per $1.00 UI benefit increase, and we can reject sensitivities larger than $0.03. The insensitivity holds even among workers with low wages and high predicted unemployment duration, and among job switchers hired out of unemployment. The insensitivity of wages to the nonemployment value presents a puzzle to the widely used Nash bargaining model, which predicts a sensitivity of $0.24–$0.48. Our evidence supports wage-setting models that insulate wages from the value of nonemployment.</description><subject>1976-2001</subject><subject>Arbeitslosenversicherung</subject><subject>Arbeitslosigkeit</subject><subject>Experiment</subject><subject>Lohn</subject><subject>Österreich</subject><issn>0033-5533</issn><issn>1531-4650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9zz1PwzAQxnELgUQoTHyBDIgFBc4-241HVPEmVbDwMka2e4ZWSRzidOi3JyiV2BhOt_z0SH_GzjlcczB4872h8awFrg9YxhXyQmoFhywDQCyUQjxmJyltAICXXGbs4sN-Usptu8qHL8rfbb2lPIb8ObbUdHXcNdQOp-wo2DrR2f7P2Nv93evisVi-PDwtbpeFR8OHQni7cmSECBDIQYnotQ-lcNoE7bTSDhSVWpILcyckCaM1BMmDcMi9MjhjV9Ou72NKPYWq69eN7XcVh-o3sBoDq33gqPNJk4_tOv3ZuUQwUptyJJcTidvu360fiExbPA</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Jäger, Simon</creator><creator>Schoefer, Benjamin</creator><creator>Young, Samuel</creator><creator>Zweimüller, Josef</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Wages and the Value of Nonemployment</title><author>Jäger, Simon ; Schoefer, Benjamin ; Young, Samuel ; Zweimüller, Josef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-2cadbe922f0feb0833c6cf82b69f6b656b05e864ebf7b24e29660f41f2b31c593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>1976-2001</topic><topic>Arbeitslosenversicherung</topic><topic>Arbeitslosigkeit</topic><topic>Experiment</topic><topic>Lohn</topic><topic>Österreich</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoefer, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zweimüller, Josef</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jäger, Simon</au><au>Schoefer, Benjamin</au><au>Young, Samuel</au><au>Zweimüller, Josef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wages and the Value of Nonemployment</atitle><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of economics</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1905</spage><epage>1963</epage><pages>1905-1963</pages><issn>0033-5533</issn><eissn>1531-4650</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Nonemployment is often posited as a worker’s outside option in wage-setting models such as bargaining and wage posting. The value of nonemployment is therefore a key determinant of wages. We measure the wage effect of changes in the value of nonemployment among initially employed workers. Our quasi-experimental variation in the value of nonemployment arises from four large reforms of unemployment insurance (UI) benefit levels in Austria. We document that wages are insensitive to UI benefit changes: point estimates imply a wage response of less than $0.01 per $1.00 UI benefit increase, and we can reject sensitivities larger than $0.03. The insensitivity holds even among workers with low wages and high predicted unemployment duration, and among job switchers hired out of unemployment. The insensitivity of wages to the nonemployment value presents a puzzle to the widely used Nash bargaining model, which predicts a sensitivity of $0.24–$0.48. Our evidence supports wage-setting models that insulate wages from the value of nonemployment.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/qje/qjaa016</doi><tpages>59</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-5533 |
ispartof | The Quarterly journal of economics, 2020-11, Vol.135 (4), p.1905-1963 |
issn | 0033-5533 1531-4650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_qje_qjaa016 |
source | Business Source Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | 1976-2001 Arbeitslosenversicherung Arbeitslosigkeit Experiment Lohn Österreich |
title | Wages and the Value of Nonemployment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T13%3A17%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wages%20and%20the%20Value%20of%20Nonemployment&rft.jtitle=The%20Quarterly%20journal%20of%20economics&rft.au=J%C3%A4ger,%20Simon&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1905&rft.epage=1963&rft.pages=1905-1963&rft.issn=0033-5533&rft.eissn=1531-4650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/qje/qjaa016&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/qje/qjaa016%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/qje/qjaa016&rfr_iscdi=true |