Tradition, Transformation, and Democratic Education

As Tocqueville saw almost 200 years ago, rituals sit uncomfortably with democratic people, who tend to see them as inegalitarian or unjust impositions of authority. Molly Farneth's new book, The Politics of Ritual, encourages American progressives to see ritual differently. Rituals, she says, c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political science quarterly 2024-02
1. Verfasser: Susan, McWilliams Barndt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Political science quarterly
container_volume
creator Susan, McWilliams Barndt
description As Tocqueville saw almost 200 years ago, rituals sit uncomfortably with democratic people, who tend to see them as inegalitarian or unjust impositions of authority. Molly Farneth's new book, The Politics of Ritual, encourages American progressives to see ritual differently. Rituals, she says, can be enacted in novel ways to serve democratic ends in the service of political and cultural transformation. But in emphasizing the transformative potential of rituals, Farneth may undersell the traditional value of rituals—a value that I think should be just as important to contemporary progressives. Against the serious antidemocratic forces arrayed in the United States today, most of which speak in terms of “transformation” and “disruption,” progressives would do well to think of themselves as the conservators and protectors of democracy—not just as radical innovators. In making this argument, I give special attention to the state of U.S. higher education.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/psquar/qqae021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_psquar_qqae021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_psquar_qqae021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c124t-1c4c8af77dad20314ae360ccd158ca9f54a1053b324a5efe28bca3cbe8acb1b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01Lw0AQhhdRMFavnvMD3HZnJ9skR6n1AwpeKngLs7O7EDFJs9se_PdG0_fyfgwMPELcg1qCqnF1SOOJ4mocySsNFyIDg5WEtfm8FJlSqCVCba7FTUpfalIJOhO4j-TaYzv0D_kU-xSG2NHcqXf5k-8GjtPA-dad-P9yK64CfSd_d_aF-Hje7jevcvf-8rZ53EkGXRwlcMEVhbJ05LRCKMjjWjE7MBVTHUxBoAxa1AUZH7yuLBOy9RWxBQu4EMv5L8chpehDc4htR_GnAdX8ITczcnNGxl-oSE2x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tradition, Transformation, and Democratic Education</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Columbia International Affairs Online Journals</source><creator>Susan, McWilliams Barndt</creator><creatorcontrib>Susan, McWilliams Barndt</creatorcontrib><description>As Tocqueville saw almost 200 years ago, rituals sit uncomfortably with democratic people, who tend to see them as inegalitarian or unjust impositions of authority. Molly Farneth's new book, The Politics of Ritual, encourages American progressives to see ritual differently. Rituals, she says, can be enacted in novel ways to serve democratic ends in the service of political and cultural transformation. But in emphasizing the transformative potential of rituals, Farneth may undersell the traditional value of rituals—a value that I think should be just as important to contemporary progressives. Against the serious antidemocratic forces arrayed in the United States today, most of which speak in terms of “transformation” and “disruption,” progressives would do well to think of themselves as the conservators and protectors of democracy—not just as radical innovators. In making this argument, I give special attention to the state of U.S. higher education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-165X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/psquar/qqae021</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Political science quarterly, 2024-02</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Susan, McWilliams Barndt</creatorcontrib><title>Tradition, Transformation, and Democratic Education</title><title>Political science quarterly</title><description>As Tocqueville saw almost 200 years ago, rituals sit uncomfortably with democratic people, who tend to see them as inegalitarian or unjust impositions of authority. Molly Farneth's new book, The Politics of Ritual, encourages American progressives to see ritual differently. Rituals, she says, can be enacted in novel ways to serve democratic ends in the service of political and cultural transformation. But in emphasizing the transformative potential of rituals, Farneth may undersell the traditional value of rituals—a value that I think should be just as important to contemporary progressives. Against the serious antidemocratic forces arrayed in the United States today, most of which speak in terms of “transformation” and “disruption,” progressives would do well to think of themselves as the conservators and protectors of democracy—not just as radical innovators. In making this argument, I give special attention to the state of U.S. higher education.</description><issn>0032-3195</issn><issn>1538-165X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj01Lw0AQhhdRMFavnvMD3HZnJ9skR6n1AwpeKngLs7O7EDFJs9se_PdG0_fyfgwMPELcg1qCqnF1SOOJ4mocySsNFyIDg5WEtfm8FJlSqCVCba7FTUpfalIJOhO4j-TaYzv0D_kU-xSG2NHcqXf5k-8GjtPA-dad-P9yK64CfSd_d_aF-Hje7jevcvf-8rZ53EkGXRwlcMEVhbJ05LRCKMjjWjE7MBVTHUxBoAxa1AUZH7yuLBOy9RWxBQu4EMv5L8chpehDc4htR_GnAdX8ITczcnNGxl-oSE2x</recordid><startdate>20240228</startdate><enddate>20240228</enddate><creator>Susan, McWilliams Barndt</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240228</creationdate><title>Tradition, Transformation, and Democratic Education</title><author>Susan, McWilliams Barndt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c124t-1c4c8af77dad20314ae360ccd158ca9f54a1053b324a5efe28bca3cbe8acb1b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Susan, McWilliams Barndt</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Political science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Susan, McWilliams Barndt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tradition, Transformation, and Democratic Education</atitle><jtitle>Political science quarterly</jtitle><date>2024-02-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0032-3195</issn><eissn>1538-165X</eissn><abstract>As Tocqueville saw almost 200 years ago, rituals sit uncomfortably with democratic people, who tend to see them as inegalitarian or unjust impositions of authority. Molly Farneth's new book, The Politics of Ritual, encourages American progressives to see ritual differently. Rituals, she says, can be enacted in novel ways to serve democratic ends in the service of political and cultural transformation. But in emphasizing the transformative potential of rituals, Farneth may undersell the traditional value of rituals—a value that I think should be just as important to contemporary progressives. Against the serious antidemocratic forces arrayed in the United States today, most of which speak in terms of “transformation” and “disruption,” progressives would do well to think of themselves as the conservators and protectors of democracy—not just as radical innovators. In making this argument, I give special attention to the state of U.S. higher education.</abstract><doi>10.1093/psquar/qqae021</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-3195
ispartof Political science quarterly, 2024-02
issn 0032-3195
1538-165X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_psquar_qqae021
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Columbia International Affairs Online Journals
title Tradition, Transformation, and Democratic Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A12%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tradition,%20Transformation,%20and%20Democratic%20Education&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=Susan,%20McWilliams%20Barndt&rft.date=2024-02-28&rft.issn=0032-3195&rft.eissn=1538-165X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/psquar/qqae021&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_psquar_qqae021%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true