Authorial Intention, Readers’ Creation, and Reference Shift

Authorial Intention, Readers’ Creation, and Reference Shift

Abstract This paper deals with the identity problems of fictional objects, focusing on Anthony Everett's and Stuart Brock's leading criticisms against fictional creationism, the view that fictional objects are abstract objects created by our acts involving literary practices. My primary ai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Philosophical quarterly 2022-03, Vol.72 (2), p.381-401
1. Verfasser: Lee, Jeonggyu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 401
container_issue 2
container_start_page 381
container_title The Philosophical quarterly
container_volume 72
creator Lee, Jeonggyu
description Abstract This paper deals with the identity problems of fictional objects, focusing on Anthony Everett's and Stuart Brock's leading criticisms against fictional creationism, the view that fictional objects are abstract objects created by our acts involving literary practices. My primary aim is to argue that creationism based on referentialism has enough resources to individuate fictional objects and hence can address the alleged identity problems: every alleged problematic case regarding the identity of fictional objects is well explained in terms of the notions of authorial intention, gappy proposition, inadvertent creation, and reference shift.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/pq/pqab041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_pq_pqab041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/pq/pqab041</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/pq/pqab041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-ee9ca23a35371b7a37c3a26bbe7029776edfb46012cdaa1eca9e19a57fe1fa143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j89KxDAQh4MoWFcvPkEvXsRqJmkbc_CwlFUXFgT_nMMknbCVte0m3YM3X8PX80msdM8OAwO_38fAx9g58GvgWt7023HR8hwOWAJ5qTItQB6yhHMJ2S3X-TE7ifGdj1MolbC7-W5Yd6HBTbpsB2qHpmuv0mfCmkL8-fpOq0A4hdjWY-EpUOsofVk3fjhlRx43kc72d8be7hev1WO2enpYVvNV5kQJQ0akHQqJspAKrEKpnERRWkuKC61USbW3eclBuBoRyKEm0FgoT-ARcjljl9NfF7oYA3nTh-YDw6cBbv7ETb81e_ERvpjgbtf_x_0CZDlaVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Authorial Intention, Readers’ Creation, and Reference Shift</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Lee, Jeonggyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeonggyu</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This paper deals with the identity problems of fictional objects, focusing on Anthony Everett's and Stuart Brock's leading criticisms against fictional creationism, the view that fictional objects are abstract objects created by our acts involving literary practices. My primary aim is to argue that creationism based on referentialism has enough resources to individuate fictional objects and hence can address the alleged identity problems: every alleged problematic case regarding the identity of fictional objects is well explained in terms of the notions of authorial intention, gappy proposition, inadvertent creation, and reference shift.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8094</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pq/pqab041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>The Philosophical quarterly, 2022-03, Vol.72 (2), p.381-401</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Scots Philosophical Association and the University of St Andrews. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-ee9ca23a35371b7a37c3a26bbe7029776edfb46012cdaa1eca9e19a57fe1fa143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-ee9ca23a35371b7a37c3a26bbe7029776edfb46012cdaa1eca9e19a57fe1fa143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeonggyu</creatorcontrib><title>Authorial Intention, Readers’ Creation, and Reference Shift</title><title>The Philosophical quarterly</title><description>Abstract This paper deals with the identity problems of fictional objects, focusing on Anthony Everett's and Stuart Brock's leading criticisms against fictional creationism, the view that fictional objects are abstract objects created by our acts involving literary practices. My primary aim is to argue that creationism based on referentialism has enough resources to individuate fictional objects and hence can address the alleged identity problems: every alleged problematic case regarding the identity of fictional objects is well explained in terms of the notions of authorial intention, gappy proposition, inadvertent creation, and reference shift.</description><issn>0031-8094</issn><issn>1467-9213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j89KxDAQh4MoWFcvPkEvXsRqJmkbc_CwlFUXFgT_nMMknbCVte0m3YM3X8PX80msdM8OAwO_38fAx9g58GvgWt7023HR8hwOWAJ5qTItQB6yhHMJ2S3X-TE7ifGdj1MolbC7-W5Yd6HBTbpsB2qHpmuv0mfCmkL8-fpOq0A4hdjWY-EpUOsofVk3fjhlRx43kc72d8be7hev1WO2enpYVvNV5kQJQ0akHQqJspAKrEKpnERRWkuKC61USbW3eclBuBoRyKEm0FgoT-ARcjljl9NfF7oYA3nTh-YDw6cBbv7ETb81e_ERvpjgbtf_x_0CZDlaVw</recordid><startdate>20220331</startdate><enddate>20220331</enddate><creator>Lee, Jeonggyu</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220331</creationdate><title>Authorial Intention, Readers’ Creation, and Reference Shift</title><author>Lee, Jeonggyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-ee9ca23a35371b7a37c3a26bbe7029776edfb46012cdaa1eca9e19a57fe1fa143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeonggyu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Philosophical quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jeonggyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Authorial Intention, Readers’ Creation, and Reference Shift</atitle><jtitle>The Philosophical quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-03-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>401</epage><pages>381-401</pages><issn>0031-8094</issn><eissn>1467-9213</eissn><abstract>Abstract This paper deals with the identity problems of fictional objects, focusing on Anthony Everett's and Stuart Brock's leading criticisms against fictional creationism, the view that fictional objects are abstract objects created by our acts involving literary practices. My primary aim is to argue that creationism based on referentialism has enough resources to individuate fictional objects and hence can address the alleged identity problems: every alleged problematic case regarding the identity of fictional objects is well explained in terms of the notions of authorial intention, gappy proposition, inadvertent creation, and reference shift.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/pq/pqab041</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8094
ispartof The Philosophical quarterly, 2022-03, Vol.72 (2), p.381-401
issn 0031-8094
1467-9213
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_pq_pqab041
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Authorial Intention, Readers’ Creation, and Reference Shift
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A25%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Authorial%20Intention,%20Readers%E2%80%99%20Creation,%20and%20Reference%20Shift&rft.jtitle=The%20Philosophical%20quarterly&rft.au=Lee,%20Jeonggyu&rft.date=2022-03-31&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=401&rft.pages=381-401&rft.issn=0031-8094&rft.eissn=1467-9213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pq/pqab041&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/pq/pqab041%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/pq/pqab041&rfr_iscdi=true