Policing Intimate Partner Violence: The ‘Golden Thread’ of Discretion

This paper offers a critical appreciation of pro-arrest-positive policing policies towards intimate partner violence (IPV). It examines the extent to which such policies, and the research associated with them, have operated within a partial understanding of discretion, which has paid detailed attent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Policing : a journal of policy and practice 2020-06, Vol.14 (2), p.404-413
Hauptverfasser: Barlow, Charlotte, Walklate, Sandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 413
container_issue 2
container_start_page 404
container_title Policing : a journal of policy and practice
container_volume 14
creator Barlow, Charlotte
Walklate, Sandra
description This paper offers a critical appreciation of pro-arrest-positive policing policies towards intimate partner violence (IPV). It examines the extent to which such policies, and the research associated with them, have operated within a partial understanding of discretion, which has paid detailed attention to the response of the front-line officer and how that response might be changed either by improved training and/or by rule tightening. Such approaches assume that policing IPV is separate and separable from policing other forms of violence(s) and fail to recognize the wider context of the policing task. This paper makes the case for a more holistic understanding of discretion (to include senior officers) as a way of promoting improved responses to IPV. This also means directing attention to policies and practices in relation to IPV to include police engagement with broader agency and societal responses to IPV. This is the point at which a holistic ‘golden thread’ of discretion can be found.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/police/pay001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_police_pay001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_police_pay001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-252f475abdcf88c3f0b169eed05a21d6ed3c8ba5c1227890a8184291348e07fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLFOwzAYhC0EEqUwsvsFQn_bceywoQKlUiU6FNbIsX-DUYgjJ0u3Pga8Xp-krYKY7m640-kj5JbBHYNSzLrYBIuzzmwB2BmZMCV5lksO5_-e8Uty1fdfAAXkSk_Icn0qhfaDLtshfJsB6dqkocVE30NssLV4TzefSPe7n0VsHLbHlNC4_e6XRk8fQ28TDiG21-TCm6bHmz-dkrfnp838JVu9Lpbzh1VmuSqGjEvucyVN7azX2goPNStKRAfScOYKdMLq2kjLOFe6BKOZznnJRK4RlK_FlGTjrk2x7xP6qkvH42lbMahOHKqRQzVyEAdE-FTT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policing Intimate Partner Violence: The ‘Golden Thread’ of Discretion</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Barlow, Charlotte ; Walklate, Sandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Barlow, Charlotte ; Walklate, Sandra</creatorcontrib><description>This paper offers a critical appreciation of pro-arrest-positive policing policies towards intimate partner violence (IPV). It examines the extent to which such policies, and the research associated with them, have operated within a partial understanding of discretion, which has paid detailed attention to the response of the front-line officer and how that response might be changed either by improved training and/or by rule tightening. Such approaches assume that policing IPV is separate and separable from policing other forms of violence(s) and fail to recognize the wider context of the policing task. This paper makes the case for a more holistic understanding of discretion (to include senior officers) as a way of promoting improved responses to IPV. This also means directing attention to policies and practices in relation to IPV to include police engagement with broader agency and societal responses to IPV. This is the point at which a holistic ‘golden thread’ of discretion can be found.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-4512</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-4520</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/police/pay001</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Policing : a journal of policy and practice, 2020-06, Vol.14 (2), p.404-413</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-252f475abdcf88c3f0b169eed05a21d6ed3c8ba5c1227890a8184291348e07fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-252f475abdcf88c3f0b169eed05a21d6ed3c8ba5c1227890a8184291348e07fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barlow, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walklate, Sandra</creatorcontrib><title>Policing Intimate Partner Violence: The ‘Golden Thread’ of Discretion</title><title>Policing : a journal of policy and practice</title><description>This paper offers a critical appreciation of pro-arrest-positive policing policies towards intimate partner violence (IPV). It examines the extent to which such policies, and the research associated with them, have operated within a partial understanding of discretion, which has paid detailed attention to the response of the front-line officer and how that response might be changed either by improved training and/or by rule tightening. Such approaches assume that policing IPV is separate and separable from policing other forms of violence(s) and fail to recognize the wider context of the policing task. This paper makes the case for a more holistic understanding of discretion (to include senior officers) as a way of promoting improved responses to IPV. This also means directing attention to policies and practices in relation to IPV to include police engagement with broader agency and societal responses to IPV. This is the point at which a holistic ‘golden thread’ of discretion can be found.</description><issn>1752-4512</issn><issn>1752-4520</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kLFOwzAYhC0EEqUwsvsFQn_bceywoQKlUiU6FNbIsX-DUYgjJ0u3Pga8Xp-krYKY7m640-kj5JbBHYNSzLrYBIuzzmwB2BmZMCV5lksO5_-e8Uty1fdfAAXkSk_Icn0qhfaDLtshfJsB6dqkocVE30NssLV4TzefSPe7n0VsHLbHlNC4_e6XRk8fQ28TDiG21-TCm6bHmz-dkrfnp838JVu9Lpbzh1VmuSqGjEvucyVN7azX2goPNStKRAfScOYKdMLq2kjLOFe6BKOZznnJRK4RlK_FlGTjrk2x7xP6qkvH42lbMahOHKqRQzVyEAdE-FTT</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Barlow, Charlotte</creator><creator>Walklate, Sandra</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Policing Intimate Partner Violence: The ‘Golden Thread’ of Discretion</title><author>Barlow, Charlotte ; Walklate, Sandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-252f475abdcf88c3f0b169eed05a21d6ed3c8ba5c1227890a8184291348e07fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barlow, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walklate, Sandra</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Policing : a journal of policy and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barlow, Charlotte</au><au>Walklate, Sandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policing Intimate Partner Violence: The ‘Golden Thread’ of Discretion</atitle><jtitle>Policing : a journal of policy and practice</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>404</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>404-413</pages><issn>1752-4512</issn><eissn>1752-4520</eissn><abstract>This paper offers a critical appreciation of pro-arrest-positive policing policies towards intimate partner violence (IPV). It examines the extent to which such policies, and the research associated with them, have operated within a partial understanding of discretion, which has paid detailed attention to the response of the front-line officer and how that response might be changed either by improved training and/or by rule tightening. Such approaches assume that policing IPV is separate and separable from policing other forms of violence(s) and fail to recognize the wider context of the policing task. This paper makes the case for a more holistic understanding of discretion (to include senior officers) as a way of promoting improved responses to IPV. This also means directing attention to policies and practices in relation to IPV to include police engagement with broader agency and societal responses to IPV. This is the point at which a holistic ‘golden thread’ of discretion can be found.</abstract><doi>10.1093/police/pay001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-4512
ispartof Policing : a journal of policy and practice, 2020-06, Vol.14 (2), p.404-413
issn 1752-4512
1752-4520
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_police_pay001
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Policing Intimate Partner Violence: The ‘Golden Thread’ of Discretion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policing%20Intimate%20Partner%20Violence:%20The%20%E2%80%98Golden%20Thread%E2%80%99%20of%20Discretion&rft.jtitle=Policing%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20policy%20and%20practice&rft.au=Barlow,%20Charlotte&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=404&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=404-413&rft.issn=1752-4512&rft.eissn=1752-4520&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/police/pay001&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_police_pay001%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true