BIOS-04. THERAPIES FOR LEPTOMENINGEAL DISEASE: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Abstract INTRODUCTION Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) has limited head-to-head comparison of available therapies, including systemic chemotherapy (SysCT), intrathecal (IT) or intraventricular therapy (ITV), whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), or cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI). No network meta-analysis (N...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2024-11, Vol.26 (Supplement_8), p.viii39-viii39
Hauptverfasser: Suresh, Vinay, Panchawagh, Suhrud, Muneer, Muneeb, Mansouri, Alireza, Ozair, Ahmad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page viii39
container_issue Supplement_8
container_start_page viii39
container_title Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 26
creator Suresh, Vinay
Panchawagh, Suhrud
Muneer, Muneeb
Mansouri, Alireza
Ozair, Ahmad
description Abstract INTRODUCTION Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) has limited head-to-head comparison of available therapies, including systemic chemotherapy (SysCT), intrathecal (IT) or intraventricular therapy (ITV), whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), or cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI). No network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LMD has been reported so far. METHODS NMA was conducted using published LMD RCTs and reported following PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Primary outcome was survival, assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Survival times were converted to HRs under exponential distribution assumption. LogHR standard errors were calculated using deaths per RCT arm. P-scores were used to estimate probability of treatment being superior. Analysis was performed in R using frequentist approach, followed by back-transforming logHRs for indirect and direct comparisons. Incremental effects of individual treatment components were estimated using additive model. Heterogeneity and inconsistency were assessed using tau-squared (τ²), I-squared (I²), and Q-statistics. Analyses were performed separately for main subnetwork with disconnected subnetworks accommodated in additive model. RESULTS Seven studies were included, incorporating 7 pairwise comparisons and 9 treatments. 3 subnetworks were identified. Primary subnetwork analysis included 5 studies. Compared to SysCT±RT (reference), logHRs (95%CI) under random effects model were: IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT -0.094(-0.468,0.281); IT/ITV methotrexate(MTX)±cytarabine(AraC)±SysCT±RT 0.8567(0.066,1.647). IT/ITV MTX±SysCT±RT 0.318(-0.163,0.798); ITV Thiotepa±SysCT±RT 0.438(-0.294,1.169). Heterogeneity and inconsistency were not detected (τ²=0,I²=0%,Q-statistic=0.57,P=0.45). P-scores were highest for IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT (0.894), followed by SysCT±RT (0.769). Disconnected-component-NMA demonstrated incremental logHR: AraC 0.539(-0.347,1.425); IT/ITV DepoCyt 0.052(-0.566,0.670); IT/ITV MTX 0.179(-0.484,0.840); ITV thiotepa 0.298(-0.767,1.362); proton CSI -0.250(-0.726,0.225). No component demonstrated statistically significant incremental benefit, with moderate heterogeneity and adequate fit present (τ²=0.1017,I²=57%,Q-statistic=4.65,P=0.098). CONCLUSIONS IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT and SysCT±RT were found most effective. Lack of significant incremental benefit warrants evaluating older therapies in contemporary RCTs.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0152
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_neuonc_noae165_0152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0152</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c832-f4f05d8bfc7bcef707d12d3762d17caba12f4920251d228b689ce628b21cf5c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFOgzAYhRujiXP6BN70Bcr6F1rAuzrLRmSwQBPjVQOFJhodC2QXvr1M9gDenHNuvnPxIfQI1AMa-6tDd-oPdnXo6w4E9yhwdoUWU_qER0Jc_21GIg7hLbobx09KGXABC5Q8p0VFaOBhvVWl3KeqwklR4kztdbFTeZpvlMzwS1opWaknLHGu9FtRvuKd0pLIXGbvVVrdoxtXf43dw6WXSCdKr7ckKzbpWmbERj4jLnCUt1HjbNjYzoU0bIG1fihYC6GtmxqYC2JGGYeWsagRUWw7MQ0G1nHL_SXy51s79OM4dM4ch4_vevgxQM3ZhJlNmIsJczYxUd5M9afjv4BfkiBdbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>BIOS-04. THERAPIES FOR LEPTOMENINGEAL DISEASE: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Suresh, Vinay ; Panchawagh, Suhrud ; Muneer, Muneeb ; Mansouri, Alireza ; Ozair, Ahmad</creator><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Vinay ; Panchawagh, Suhrud ; Muneer, Muneeb ; Mansouri, Alireza ; Ozair, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract INTRODUCTION Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) has limited head-to-head comparison of available therapies, including systemic chemotherapy (SysCT), intrathecal (IT) or intraventricular therapy (ITV), whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), or cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI). No network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LMD has been reported so far. METHODS NMA was conducted using published LMD RCTs and reported following PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Primary outcome was survival, assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Survival times were converted to HRs under exponential distribution assumption. LogHR standard errors were calculated using deaths per RCT arm. P-scores were used to estimate probability of treatment being superior. Analysis was performed in R using frequentist approach, followed by back-transforming logHRs for indirect and direct comparisons. Incremental effects of individual treatment components were estimated using additive model. Heterogeneity and inconsistency were assessed using tau-squared (τ²), I-squared (I²), and Q-statistics. Analyses were performed separately for main subnetwork with disconnected subnetworks accommodated in additive model. RESULTS Seven studies were included, incorporating 7 pairwise comparisons and 9 treatments. 3 subnetworks were identified. Primary subnetwork analysis included 5 studies. Compared to SysCT±RT (reference), logHRs (95%CI) under random effects model were: IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT -0.094(-0.468,0.281); IT/ITV methotrexate(MTX)±cytarabine(AraC)±SysCT±RT 0.8567(0.066,1.647). IT/ITV MTX±SysCT±RT 0.318(-0.163,0.798); ITV Thiotepa±SysCT±RT 0.438(-0.294,1.169). Heterogeneity and inconsistency were not detected (τ²=0,I²=0%,Q-statistic=0.57,P=0.45). P-scores were highest for IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT (0.894), followed by SysCT±RT (0.769). Disconnected-component-NMA demonstrated incremental logHR: AraC 0.539(-0.347,1.425); IT/ITV DepoCyt 0.052(-0.566,0.670); IT/ITV MTX 0.179(-0.484,0.840); ITV thiotepa 0.298(-0.767,1.362); proton CSI -0.250(-0.726,0.225). No component demonstrated statistically significant incremental benefit, with moderate heterogeneity and adequate fit present (τ²=0.1017,I²=57%,Q-statistic=4.65,P=0.098). CONCLUSIONS IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT and SysCT±RT were found most effective. Lack of significant incremental benefit warrants evaluating older therapies in contemporary RCTs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-8517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-5866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2024-11, Vol.26 (Supplement_8), p.viii39-viii39</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panchawagh, Suhrud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muneer, Muneeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansouri, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozair, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><title>BIOS-04. THERAPIES FOR LEPTOMENINGEAL DISEASE: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS</title><title>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>Abstract INTRODUCTION Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) has limited head-to-head comparison of available therapies, including systemic chemotherapy (SysCT), intrathecal (IT) or intraventricular therapy (ITV), whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), or cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI). No network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LMD has been reported so far. METHODS NMA was conducted using published LMD RCTs and reported following PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Primary outcome was survival, assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Survival times were converted to HRs under exponential distribution assumption. LogHR standard errors were calculated using deaths per RCT arm. P-scores were used to estimate probability of treatment being superior. Analysis was performed in R using frequentist approach, followed by back-transforming logHRs for indirect and direct comparisons. Incremental effects of individual treatment components were estimated using additive model. Heterogeneity and inconsistency were assessed using tau-squared (τ²), I-squared (I²), and Q-statistics. Analyses were performed separately for main subnetwork with disconnected subnetworks accommodated in additive model. RESULTS Seven studies were included, incorporating 7 pairwise comparisons and 9 treatments. 3 subnetworks were identified. Primary subnetwork analysis included 5 studies. Compared to SysCT±RT (reference), logHRs (95%CI) under random effects model were: IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT -0.094(-0.468,0.281); IT/ITV methotrexate(MTX)±cytarabine(AraC)±SysCT±RT 0.8567(0.066,1.647). IT/ITV MTX±SysCT±RT 0.318(-0.163,0.798); ITV Thiotepa±SysCT±RT 0.438(-0.294,1.169). Heterogeneity and inconsistency were not detected (τ²=0,I²=0%,Q-statistic=0.57,P=0.45). P-scores were highest for IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT (0.894), followed by SysCT±RT (0.769). Disconnected-component-NMA demonstrated incremental logHR: AraC 0.539(-0.347,1.425); IT/ITV DepoCyt 0.052(-0.566,0.670); IT/ITV MTX 0.179(-0.484,0.840); ITV thiotepa 0.298(-0.767,1.362); proton CSI -0.250(-0.726,0.225). No component demonstrated statistically significant incremental benefit, with moderate heterogeneity and adequate fit present (τ²=0.1017,I²=57%,Q-statistic=4.65,P=0.098). CONCLUSIONS IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT and SysCT±RT were found most effective. Lack of significant incremental benefit warrants evaluating older therapies in contemporary RCTs.</description><issn>1522-8517</issn><issn>1523-5866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNFOgzAYhRujiXP6BN70Bcr6F1rAuzrLRmSwQBPjVQOFJhodC2QXvr1M9gDenHNuvnPxIfQI1AMa-6tDd-oPdnXo6w4E9yhwdoUWU_qER0Jc_21GIg7hLbobx09KGXABC5Q8p0VFaOBhvVWl3KeqwklR4kztdbFTeZpvlMzwS1opWaknLHGu9FtRvuKd0pLIXGbvVVrdoxtXf43dw6WXSCdKr7ckKzbpWmbERj4jLnCUt1HjbNjYzoU0bIG1fihYC6GtmxqYC2JGGYeWsagRUWw7MQ0G1nHL_SXy51s79OM4dM4ch4_vevgxQM3ZhJlNmIsJczYxUd5M9afjv4BfkiBdbw</recordid><startdate>20241111</startdate><enddate>20241111</enddate><creator>Suresh, Vinay</creator><creator>Panchawagh, Suhrud</creator><creator>Muneer, Muneeb</creator><creator>Mansouri, Alireza</creator><creator>Ozair, Ahmad</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241111</creationdate><title>BIOS-04. THERAPIES FOR LEPTOMENINGEAL DISEASE: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS</title><author>Suresh, Vinay ; Panchawagh, Suhrud ; Muneer, Muneeb ; Mansouri, Alireza ; Ozair, Ahmad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c832-f4f05d8bfc7bcef707d12d3762d17caba12f4920251d228b689ce628b21cf5c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panchawagh, Suhrud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muneer, Muneeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansouri, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozair, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suresh, Vinay</au><au>Panchawagh, Suhrud</au><au>Muneer, Muneeb</au><au>Mansouri, Alireza</au><au>Ozair, Ahmad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>BIOS-04. THERAPIES FOR LEPTOMENINGEAL DISEASE: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2024-11-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>Supplement_8</issue><spage>viii39</spage><epage>viii39</epage><pages>viii39-viii39</pages><issn>1522-8517</issn><eissn>1523-5866</eissn><abstract>Abstract INTRODUCTION Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) has limited head-to-head comparison of available therapies, including systemic chemotherapy (SysCT), intrathecal (IT) or intraventricular therapy (ITV), whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), or cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI). No network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LMD has been reported so far. METHODS NMA was conducted using published LMD RCTs and reported following PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Primary outcome was survival, assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Survival times were converted to HRs under exponential distribution assumption. LogHR standard errors were calculated using deaths per RCT arm. P-scores were used to estimate probability of treatment being superior. Analysis was performed in R using frequentist approach, followed by back-transforming logHRs for indirect and direct comparisons. Incremental effects of individual treatment components were estimated using additive model. Heterogeneity and inconsistency were assessed using tau-squared (τ²), I-squared (I²), and Q-statistics. Analyses were performed separately for main subnetwork with disconnected subnetworks accommodated in additive model. RESULTS Seven studies were included, incorporating 7 pairwise comparisons and 9 treatments. 3 subnetworks were identified. Primary subnetwork analysis included 5 studies. Compared to SysCT±RT (reference), logHRs (95%CI) under random effects model were: IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT -0.094(-0.468,0.281); IT/ITV methotrexate(MTX)±cytarabine(AraC)±SysCT±RT 0.8567(0.066,1.647). IT/ITV MTX±SysCT±RT 0.318(-0.163,0.798); ITV Thiotepa±SysCT±RT 0.438(-0.294,1.169). Heterogeneity and inconsistency were not detected (τ²=0,I²=0%,Q-statistic=0.57,P=0.45). P-scores were highest for IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT (0.894), followed by SysCT±RT (0.769). Disconnected-component-NMA demonstrated incremental logHR: AraC 0.539(-0.347,1.425); IT/ITV DepoCyt 0.052(-0.566,0.670); IT/ITV MTX 0.179(-0.484,0.840); ITV thiotepa 0.298(-0.767,1.362); proton CSI -0.250(-0.726,0.225). No component demonstrated statistically significant incremental benefit, with moderate heterogeneity and adequate fit present (τ²=0.1017,I²=57%,Q-statistic=4.65,P=0.098). CONCLUSIONS IT/ITV DepoCyt±SysCT±RT and SysCT±RT were found most effective. Lack of significant incremental benefit warrants evaluating older therapies in contemporary RCTs.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0152</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-8517
ispartof Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2024-11, Vol.26 (Supplement_8), p.viii39-viii39
issn 1522-8517
1523-5866
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_neuonc_noae165_0152
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title BIOS-04. THERAPIES FOR LEPTOMENINGEAL DISEASE: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=BIOS-04.%20THERAPIES%20FOR%20LEPTOMENINGEAL%20DISEASE:%20A%20NETWORK%20META-ANALYSIS&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Suresh,%20Vinay&rft.date=2024-11-11&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=Supplement_8&rft.spage=viii39&rft.epage=viii39&rft.pages=viii39-viii39&rft.issn=1522-8517&rft.eissn=1523-5866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0152&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0152%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0152&rfr_iscdi=true