P14.23.B USE OF BIOPSY-DERIVED TUMOR ORGANOIDS FOR PERSONALIZED DRUG TESTING IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND To date, there are no systemic treatment options for patients suffering from recurrent glioblastoma with a proven efficacy. Furthermore, often surgical resection is not any more possible and patient tumors have acquired an increased chemo- and radioresistance. Patient-derived tum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2024-10, Vol.26 (Supplement_5), p.v83-v83
Hauptverfasser: Wöllner, A, Warta, R, Cao, J, Paul, A, Arquilla, M, Jungwirth, G, Wick, W, von Deimling, A, Krieg, S, Unterberg, A, Jakobs, M, Herold-Mende, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page v83
container_issue Supplement_5
container_start_page v83
container_title Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 26
creator Wöllner, A
Warta, R
Cao, J
Paul, A
Arquilla, M
Jungwirth, G
Wick, W
von Deimling, A
Krieg, S
Unterberg, A
Jakobs, M
Herold-Mende, C
description Abstract BACKGROUND To date, there are no systemic treatment options for patients suffering from recurrent glioblastoma with a proven efficacy. Furthermore, often surgical resection is not any more possible and patient tumors have acquired an increased chemo- and radioresistance. Patient-derived tumor organoids (TOs) provide a new exciting tool to test individual treatment responses. Aim of this study was to develop a protocol and to test the feasibility to perform personalized TO-based drug testing using the rare material from stereotactic biopsies. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patient-derived TOs were prepared based on single cell suspensions from tumor material obtained either from open glioblastoma resections serving as a reference data set (n=37) or from stereotactic biopsies of 8 patients. Drug response curves (6-9 dose points) were performed for nine selected drugs including temozolomide, lomustine, etoposide and temsirolimus, which are commonly used in clinical practice. Viability and metabolic activity were measured using CellTiterGlo (Promega). Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were calculated by GraphPad Prism software. Medical records were reviewed for survival and routine molecular information such as the MGMT promoter methylation status. RESULTS Drug testing performed on TOs derived from open resections allowed to adjust the concentration test range for each drug, as well as to determine the range of drug vulnerability. Additionally, we found a significant association between increased temozolomide sensitivity of TOs and both, MGMT methylation and increased survival. However, in 59% of the cases, no high sensitivity to any of the drugs was observed, and only 17% were highly sensitive to more than one drug. Subsequent drug testing on TOs derived from biopsies of recurrent glioblastoma revealed sensitivity in 3/8 cases against one (n=2) or two (n=1) of the drugs. However, sensitivity against drugs varied substantially in a patient-individual manner. CONCLUSION Taken together, we successfully developed a workflow to test drug sensitivity on glioblastoma-derived tumor organoids even from the low starting material obtained from stereotactic biopsies. Association of clinical outcome and MGMT methylation with temozolomide sensitivity corroborated the strength of this approach. Furthermore, patient-individual treatment responses strongly suggest for a future personalized drug testing.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/neuonc/noae144.274
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_neuonc_noae144_274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/neuonc/noae144.274</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/neuonc/noae144.274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c814-a1ce40637245955d0f3678f5542e5dae1531d715ec138d65d10c45f93221a0c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9KwzAUh4MoOKcv4FVeIFtO_rTdZbdmNdA1I00FvSmlTUHRdbTswrdfdXsAr87vwPc7cD6EnoEugK748uBP_aFZHvragxALFoobNAPJOJFRENz-ZUYiCeE9ehjHT0oZyABmqNvDhPPFGpeFwmaL19rsizeSKKtfVYJduTMWG5vGudFJgbfTtle2MHmc6fcJSGyZYqcKp_MU6xxbtSmtVbnDaabNOosLZ3bxI7rr6q_RP13nHLmtcpsXkplUb-KMNBEIUkPjBQ14yIRcSdnSjgdh1EkpmJft9Jrk0IYgfQM8agPZAm2E7FacMahpw_gcscvZZujHcfBddRw-vuvhpwJa_YqqLqKqq6hqEjWVyKXUn47_4c-cCGR1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>P14.23.B USE OF BIOPSY-DERIVED TUMOR ORGANOIDS FOR PERSONALIZED DRUG TESTING IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Wöllner, A ; Warta, R ; Cao, J ; Paul, A ; Arquilla, M ; Jungwirth, G ; Wick, W ; von Deimling, A ; Krieg, S ; Unterberg, A ; Jakobs, M ; Herold-Mende, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Wöllner, A ; Warta, R ; Cao, J ; Paul, A ; Arquilla, M ; Jungwirth, G ; Wick, W ; von Deimling, A ; Krieg, S ; Unterberg, A ; Jakobs, M ; Herold-Mende, C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract BACKGROUND To date, there are no systemic treatment options for patients suffering from recurrent glioblastoma with a proven efficacy. Furthermore, often surgical resection is not any more possible and patient tumors have acquired an increased chemo- and radioresistance. Patient-derived tumor organoids (TOs) provide a new exciting tool to test individual treatment responses. Aim of this study was to develop a protocol and to test the feasibility to perform personalized TO-based drug testing using the rare material from stereotactic biopsies. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patient-derived TOs were prepared based on single cell suspensions from tumor material obtained either from open glioblastoma resections serving as a reference data set (n=37) or from stereotactic biopsies of 8 patients. Drug response curves (6-9 dose points) were performed for nine selected drugs including temozolomide, lomustine, etoposide and temsirolimus, which are commonly used in clinical practice. Viability and metabolic activity were measured using CellTiterGlo (Promega). Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were calculated by GraphPad Prism software. Medical records were reviewed for survival and routine molecular information such as the MGMT promoter methylation status. RESULTS Drug testing performed on TOs derived from open resections allowed to adjust the concentration test range for each drug, as well as to determine the range of drug vulnerability. Additionally, we found a significant association between increased temozolomide sensitivity of TOs and both, MGMT methylation and increased survival. However, in 59% of the cases, no high sensitivity to any of the drugs was observed, and only 17% were highly sensitive to more than one drug. Subsequent drug testing on TOs derived from biopsies of recurrent glioblastoma revealed sensitivity in 3/8 cases against one (n=2) or two (n=1) of the drugs. However, sensitivity against drugs varied substantially in a patient-individual manner. CONCLUSION Taken together, we successfully developed a workflow to test drug sensitivity on glioblastoma-derived tumor organoids even from the low starting material obtained from stereotactic biopsies. Association of clinical outcome and MGMT methylation with temozolomide sensitivity corroborated the strength of this approach. Furthermore, patient-individual treatment responses strongly suggest for a future personalized drug testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-8517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-5866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae144.274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2024-10, Vol.26 (Supplement_5), p.v83-v83</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wöllner, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warta, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arquilla, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungwirth, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wick, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Deimling, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krieg, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unterberg, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herold-Mende, C</creatorcontrib><title>P14.23.B USE OF BIOPSY-DERIVED TUMOR ORGANOIDS FOR PERSONALIZED DRUG TESTING IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA</title><title>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>Abstract BACKGROUND To date, there are no systemic treatment options for patients suffering from recurrent glioblastoma with a proven efficacy. Furthermore, often surgical resection is not any more possible and patient tumors have acquired an increased chemo- and radioresistance. Patient-derived tumor organoids (TOs) provide a new exciting tool to test individual treatment responses. Aim of this study was to develop a protocol and to test the feasibility to perform personalized TO-based drug testing using the rare material from stereotactic biopsies. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patient-derived TOs were prepared based on single cell suspensions from tumor material obtained either from open glioblastoma resections serving as a reference data set (n=37) or from stereotactic biopsies of 8 patients. Drug response curves (6-9 dose points) were performed for nine selected drugs including temozolomide, lomustine, etoposide and temsirolimus, which are commonly used in clinical practice. Viability and metabolic activity were measured using CellTiterGlo (Promega). Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were calculated by GraphPad Prism software. Medical records were reviewed for survival and routine molecular information such as the MGMT promoter methylation status. RESULTS Drug testing performed on TOs derived from open resections allowed to adjust the concentration test range for each drug, as well as to determine the range of drug vulnerability. Additionally, we found a significant association between increased temozolomide sensitivity of TOs and both, MGMT methylation and increased survival. However, in 59% of the cases, no high sensitivity to any of the drugs was observed, and only 17% were highly sensitive to more than one drug. Subsequent drug testing on TOs derived from biopsies of recurrent glioblastoma revealed sensitivity in 3/8 cases against one (n=2) or two (n=1) of the drugs. However, sensitivity against drugs varied substantially in a patient-individual manner. CONCLUSION Taken together, we successfully developed a workflow to test drug sensitivity on glioblastoma-derived tumor organoids even from the low starting material obtained from stereotactic biopsies. Association of clinical outcome and MGMT methylation with temozolomide sensitivity corroborated the strength of this approach. Furthermore, patient-individual treatment responses strongly suggest for a future personalized drug testing.</description><issn>1522-8517</issn><issn>1523-5866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN9KwzAUh4MoOKcv4FVeIFtO_rTdZbdmNdA1I00FvSmlTUHRdbTswrdfdXsAr87vwPc7cD6EnoEugK748uBP_aFZHvragxALFoobNAPJOJFRENz-ZUYiCeE9ehjHT0oZyABmqNvDhPPFGpeFwmaL19rsizeSKKtfVYJduTMWG5vGudFJgbfTtle2MHmc6fcJSGyZYqcKp_MU6xxbtSmtVbnDaabNOosLZ3bxI7rr6q_RP13nHLmtcpsXkplUb-KMNBEIUkPjBQ14yIRcSdnSjgdh1EkpmJft9Jrk0IYgfQM8agPZAm2E7FacMahpw_gcscvZZujHcfBddRw-vuvhpwJa_YqqLqKqq6hqEjWVyKXUn47_4c-cCGR1</recordid><startdate>20241017</startdate><enddate>20241017</enddate><creator>Wöllner, A</creator><creator>Warta, R</creator><creator>Cao, J</creator><creator>Paul, A</creator><creator>Arquilla, M</creator><creator>Jungwirth, G</creator><creator>Wick, W</creator><creator>von Deimling, A</creator><creator>Krieg, S</creator><creator>Unterberg, A</creator><creator>Jakobs, M</creator><creator>Herold-Mende, C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241017</creationdate><title>P14.23.B USE OF BIOPSY-DERIVED TUMOR ORGANOIDS FOR PERSONALIZED DRUG TESTING IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA</title><author>Wöllner, A ; Warta, R ; Cao, J ; Paul, A ; Arquilla, M ; Jungwirth, G ; Wick, W ; von Deimling, A ; Krieg, S ; Unterberg, A ; Jakobs, M ; Herold-Mende, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c814-a1ce40637245955d0f3678f5542e5dae1531d715ec138d65d10c45f93221a0c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wöllner, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warta, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arquilla, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungwirth, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wick, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Deimling, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krieg, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unterberg, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herold-Mende, C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wöllner, A</au><au>Warta, R</au><au>Cao, J</au><au>Paul, A</au><au>Arquilla, M</au><au>Jungwirth, G</au><au>Wick, W</au><au>von Deimling, A</au><au>Krieg, S</au><au>Unterberg, A</au><au>Jakobs, M</au><au>Herold-Mende, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P14.23.B USE OF BIOPSY-DERIVED TUMOR ORGANOIDS FOR PERSONALIZED DRUG TESTING IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2024-10-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>Supplement_5</issue><spage>v83</spage><epage>v83</epage><pages>v83-v83</pages><issn>1522-8517</issn><eissn>1523-5866</eissn><abstract>Abstract BACKGROUND To date, there are no systemic treatment options for patients suffering from recurrent glioblastoma with a proven efficacy. Furthermore, often surgical resection is not any more possible and patient tumors have acquired an increased chemo- and radioresistance. Patient-derived tumor organoids (TOs) provide a new exciting tool to test individual treatment responses. Aim of this study was to develop a protocol and to test the feasibility to perform personalized TO-based drug testing using the rare material from stereotactic biopsies. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patient-derived TOs were prepared based on single cell suspensions from tumor material obtained either from open glioblastoma resections serving as a reference data set (n=37) or from stereotactic biopsies of 8 patients. Drug response curves (6-9 dose points) were performed for nine selected drugs including temozolomide, lomustine, etoposide and temsirolimus, which are commonly used in clinical practice. Viability and metabolic activity were measured using CellTiterGlo (Promega). Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were calculated by GraphPad Prism software. Medical records were reviewed for survival and routine molecular information such as the MGMT promoter methylation status. RESULTS Drug testing performed on TOs derived from open resections allowed to adjust the concentration test range for each drug, as well as to determine the range of drug vulnerability. Additionally, we found a significant association between increased temozolomide sensitivity of TOs and both, MGMT methylation and increased survival. However, in 59% of the cases, no high sensitivity to any of the drugs was observed, and only 17% were highly sensitive to more than one drug. Subsequent drug testing on TOs derived from biopsies of recurrent glioblastoma revealed sensitivity in 3/8 cases against one (n=2) or two (n=1) of the drugs. However, sensitivity against drugs varied substantially in a patient-individual manner. CONCLUSION Taken together, we successfully developed a workflow to test drug sensitivity on glioblastoma-derived tumor organoids even from the low starting material obtained from stereotactic biopsies. Association of clinical outcome and MGMT methylation with temozolomide sensitivity corroborated the strength of this approach. Furthermore, patient-individual treatment responses strongly suggest for a future personalized drug testing.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/neuonc/noae144.274</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-8517
ispartof Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2024-10, Vol.26 (Supplement_5), p.v83-v83
issn 1522-8517
1523-5866
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_neuonc_noae144_274
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title P14.23.B USE OF BIOPSY-DERIVED TUMOR ORGANOIDS FOR PERSONALIZED DRUG TESTING IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A55%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P14.23.B%20USE%20OF%20BIOPSY-DERIVED%20TUMOR%20ORGANOIDS%20FOR%20PERSONALIZED%20DRUG%20TESTING%20IN%20RECURRENT%20GLIOBLASTOMA&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=W%C3%B6llner,%20A&rft.date=2024-10-17&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=Supplement_5&rft.spage=v83&rft.epage=v83&rft.pages=v83-v83&rft.issn=1522-8517&rft.eissn=1523-5866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/neuonc/noae144.274&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/neuonc/noae144.274%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/neuonc/noae144.274&rfr_iscdi=true