2628 A haemodialysis patient-centred model of care with a multidisciplinary programme: what is its clinical and health efficiency impact?

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) constitutes a public health concern due to its notable morbidity & mortality and associated costs. The Patient Care Coordination program (PCC) provides comprehensive and personalized care to haemodialysis (HD) patients. This study evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2024-05, Vol.39 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Martínez-Vaquera, Shaira, Sorribes, MaPaz, Martínez-Sánchez, Teresa, de León, Ignacio Ponce, Martínez-Pérez, Oscar, Díaz-Cuervo, Helena, Cuervo, Jesús, Macário, Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page
container_title Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation
container_volume 39
creator Martínez-Vaquera, Shaira
Sorribes, MaPaz
Martínez-Sánchez, Teresa
de León, Ignacio Ponce
Martínez-Pérez, Oscar
Díaz-Cuervo, Helena
Cuervo, Jesús
Macário, Fernando
description Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) constitutes a public health concern due to its notable morbidity & mortality and associated costs. The Patient Care Coordination program (PCC) provides comprehensive and personalized care to haemodialysis (HD) patients. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PCC compared to standard of care (SoC). Method The study included patients in 9 HD clinics (5 PCC, 4 SoC) in Catalonia, Spain, in 2020-2021. A comparative effectiveness evaluation was conducted to compare change in Individual Patient Performance Score (IPPS, score 0-100, evaluates parameters such as vascular access, adequacy of HD, anaemia, mineral bone disease, arterial hypertension, nutrition/hydration status) and number of hospitalisations of PCC patients vs SoC during the first year in the program. Instrumental variables (IV) regression analysis was performed to address potential confounding; number of interactions with program specialists was a valid IV to estimate degree of PCC use. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis (iCEA) through microsimulation was performed using the effectiveness data from the previous step, population data from the renal patient registry of Catalonia, and the cost of hospitalisations obtained from the Public Health System. Results 127 patients in PCC and 363 patients in SoC were included. The degree of PCC use had a positive impact on IPPS variation during the first year of the program (p = 0.012). In the iCEA the PCC program resulted in a mean gain of 3.4 additional IPPS points, a reduction of 0.2 hospitalisations per patient, and reduced mean costs of €1,265 per patient in the first year compared to SoC, resulting to be a dominant alternative (Fig. 1). Conclusion The holistic and interdisciplinary approach to the patient has further highlighted the relevance of programme use and not only belonging to the programme in achieving clinical goals. The PCC program represents thus a dominant alternative, with greater effectiveness and total cost savings that could sum up to €5.5 million per year in the region due to reduced hospitalizations. This approach may be an alternative to address the challenges of CKD and optimise the allocation of healthcare resources.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ndt/gfae069.816
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfae069_816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ndt/gfae069.816</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ndt/gfae069.816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1166-add4f82a1254592aa43ffb3837155cfcd040a481abaea6db014d007d880bbe853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AQxxdRsFbPXucspJ3Nc-NFSvEFBS96DpN9NCtJE3a3lH4Ev7Ur7d3LzOH_mOHH2D3HBcc6W-5UWG4NaSzrheDlBZvxvMQkzURxyWbRwRMssL5mN95_I2KdVtWM_aRlKmAFHelhVJb6o7ceJgpW70Ii43BaQZR0D6MBSU7DwYYOCIZ9H6yyXtqptztyR5jcuHU0DPoRDh0FiE02eJBRtpJ6oJ2CTlMf49oYK-MNeQQ7TCTD0y27MtR7fXfec_b18vy5fks2H6_v69UmkZyXZUJK5UakxNMiL-qUKM-MaTORVbwopJEKc6RccGpJU6la5LlCrJQQ2LZaFNmcLU-90o3eO22aydkhvt9wbP5INpFkcybZRJIx8XBKjPvpX_Mv2dx49g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>2628 A haemodialysis patient-centred model of care with a multidisciplinary programme: what is its clinical and health efficiency impact?</title><source>Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>Martínez-Vaquera, Shaira ; Sorribes, MaPaz ; Martínez-Sánchez, Teresa ; de León, Ignacio Ponce ; Martínez-Pérez, Oscar ; Díaz-Cuervo, Helena ; Cuervo, Jesús ; Macário, Fernando</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Vaquera, Shaira ; Sorribes, MaPaz ; Martínez-Sánchez, Teresa ; de León, Ignacio Ponce ; Martínez-Pérez, Oscar ; Díaz-Cuervo, Helena ; Cuervo, Jesús ; Macário, Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) constitutes a public health concern due to its notable morbidity &amp; mortality and associated costs. The Patient Care Coordination program (PCC) provides comprehensive and personalized care to haemodialysis (HD) patients. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PCC compared to standard of care (SoC). Method The study included patients in 9 HD clinics (5 PCC, 4 SoC) in Catalonia, Spain, in 2020-2021. A comparative effectiveness evaluation was conducted to compare change in Individual Patient Performance Score (IPPS, score 0-100, evaluates parameters such as vascular access, adequacy of HD, anaemia, mineral bone disease, arterial hypertension, nutrition/hydration status) and number of hospitalisations of PCC patients vs SoC during the first year in the program. Instrumental variables (IV) regression analysis was performed to address potential confounding; number of interactions with program specialists was a valid IV to estimate degree of PCC use. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis (iCEA) through microsimulation was performed using the effectiveness data from the previous step, population data from the renal patient registry of Catalonia, and the cost of hospitalisations obtained from the Public Health System. Results 127 patients in PCC and 363 patients in SoC were included. The degree of PCC use had a positive impact on IPPS variation during the first year of the program (p = 0.012). In the iCEA the PCC program resulted in a mean gain of 3.4 additional IPPS points, a reduction of 0.2 hospitalisations per patient, and reduced mean costs of €1,265 per patient in the first year compared to SoC, resulting to be a dominant alternative (Fig. 1). Conclusion The holistic and interdisciplinary approach to the patient has further highlighted the relevance of programme use and not only belonging to the programme in achieving clinical goals. The PCC program represents thus a dominant alternative, with greater effectiveness and total cost savings that could sum up to €5.5 million per year in the region due to reduced hospitalizations. This approach may be an alternative to address the challenges of CKD and optimise the allocation of healthcare resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-0509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfae069.816</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2024-05, Vol.39 (Supplement_1)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Vaquera, Shaira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorribes, MaPaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Sánchez, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de León, Ignacio Ponce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Pérez, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Cuervo, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuervo, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macário, Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>2628 A haemodialysis patient-centred model of care with a multidisciplinary programme: what is its clinical and health efficiency impact?</title><title>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</title><description>Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) constitutes a public health concern due to its notable morbidity &amp; mortality and associated costs. The Patient Care Coordination program (PCC) provides comprehensive and personalized care to haemodialysis (HD) patients. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PCC compared to standard of care (SoC). Method The study included patients in 9 HD clinics (5 PCC, 4 SoC) in Catalonia, Spain, in 2020-2021. A comparative effectiveness evaluation was conducted to compare change in Individual Patient Performance Score (IPPS, score 0-100, evaluates parameters such as vascular access, adequacy of HD, anaemia, mineral bone disease, arterial hypertension, nutrition/hydration status) and number of hospitalisations of PCC patients vs SoC during the first year in the program. Instrumental variables (IV) regression analysis was performed to address potential confounding; number of interactions with program specialists was a valid IV to estimate degree of PCC use. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis (iCEA) through microsimulation was performed using the effectiveness data from the previous step, population data from the renal patient registry of Catalonia, and the cost of hospitalisations obtained from the Public Health System. Results 127 patients in PCC and 363 patients in SoC were included. The degree of PCC use had a positive impact on IPPS variation during the first year of the program (p = 0.012). In the iCEA the PCC program resulted in a mean gain of 3.4 additional IPPS points, a reduction of 0.2 hospitalisations per patient, and reduced mean costs of €1,265 per patient in the first year compared to SoC, resulting to be a dominant alternative (Fig. 1). Conclusion The holistic and interdisciplinary approach to the patient has further highlighted the relevance of programme use and not only belonging to the programme in achieving clinical goals. The PCC program represents thus a dominant alternative, with greater effectiveness and total cost savings that could sum up to €5.5 million per year in the region due to reduced hospitalizations. This approach may be an alternative to address the challenges of CKD and optimise the allocation of healthcare resources.</description><issn>0931-0509</issn><issn>1460-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AQxxdRsFbPXucspJ3Nc-NFSvEFBS96DpN9NCtJE3a3lH4Ev7Ur7d3LzOH_mOHH2D3HBcc6W-5UWG4NaSzrheDlBZvxvMQkzURxyWbRwRMssL5mN95_I2KdVtWM_aRlKmAFHelhVJb6o7ceJgpW70Ii43BaQZR0D6MBSU7DwYYOCIZ9H6yyXtqptztyR5jcuHU0DPoRDh0FiE02eJBRtpJ6oJ2CTlMf49oYK-MNeQQ7TCTD0y27MtR7fXfec_b18vy5fks2H6_v69UmkZyXZUJK5UakxNMiL-qUKM-MaTORVbwopJEKc6RccGpJU6la5LlCrJQQ2LZaFNmcLU-90o3eO22aydkhvt9wbP5INpFkcybZRJIx8XBKjPvpX_Mv2dx49g</recordid><startdate>20240523</startdate><enddate>20240523</enddate><creator>Martínez-Vaquera, Shaira</creator><creator>Sorribes, MaPaz</creator><creator>Martínez-Sánchez, Teresa</creator><creator>de León, Ignacio Ponce</creator><creator>Martínez-Pérez, Oscar</creator><creator>Díaz-Cuervo, Helena</creator><creator>Cuervo, Jesús</creator><creator>Macário, Fernando</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240523</creationdate><title>2628 A haemodialysis patient-centred model of care with a multidisciplinary programme: what is its clinical and health efficiency impact?</title><author>Martínez-Vaquera, Shaira ; Sorribes, MaPaz ; Martínez-Sánchez, Teresa ; de León, Ignacio Ponce ; Martínez-Pérez, Oscar ; Díaz-Cuervo, Helena ; Cuervo, Jesús ; Macário, Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1166-add4f82a1254592aa43ffb3837155cfcd040a481abaea6db014d007d880bbe853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Vaquera, Shaira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorribes, MaPaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Sánchez, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de León, Ignacio Ponce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Pérez, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Cuervo, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuervo, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macário, Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez-Vaquera, Shaira</au><au>Sorribes, MaPaz</au><au>Martínez-Sánchez, Teresa</au><au>de León, Ignacio Ponce</au><au>Martínez-Pérez, Oscar</au><au>Díaz-Cuervo, Helena</au><au>Cuervo, Jesús</au><au>Macário, Fernando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2628 A haemodialysis patient-centred model of care with a multidisciplinary programme: what is its clinical and health efficiency impact?</atitle><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle><date>2024-05-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><issn>0931-0509</issn><eissn>1460-2385</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) constitutes a public health concern due to its notable morbidity &amp; mortality and associated costs. The Patient Care Coordination program (PCC) provides comprehensive and personalized care to haemodialysis (HD) patients. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PCC compared to standard of care (SoC). Method The study included patients in 9 HD clinics (5 PCC, 4 SoC) in Catalonia, Spain, in 2020-2021. A comparative effectiveness evaluation was conducted to compare change in Individual Patient Performance Score (IPPS, score 0-100, evaluates parameters such as vascular access, adequacy of HD, anaemia, mineral bone disease, arterial hypertension, nutrition/hydration status) and number of hospitalisations of PCC patients vs SoC during the first year in the program. Instrumental variables (IV) regression analysis was performed to address potential confounding; number of interactions with program specialists was a valid IV to estimate degree of PCC use. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis (iCEA) through microsimulation was performed using the effectiveness data from the previous step, population data from the renal patient registry of Catalonia, and the cost of hospitalisations obtained from the Public Health System. Results 127 patients in PCC and 363 patients in SoC were included. The degree of PCC use had a positive impact on IPPS variation during the first year of the program (p = 0.012). In the iCEA the PCC program resulted in a mean gain of 3.4 additional IPPS points, a reduction of 0.2 hospitalisations per patient, and reduced mean costs of €1,265 per patient in the first year compared to SoC, resulting to be a dominant alternative (Fig. 1). Conclusion The holistic and interdisciplinary approach to the patient has further highlighted the relevance of programme use and not only belonging to the programme in achieving clinical goals. The PCC program represents thus a dominant alternative, with greater effectiveness and total cost savings that could sum up to €5.5 million per year in the region due to reduced hospitalizations. This approach may be an alternative to address the challenges of CKD and optimise the allocation of healthcare resources.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ndt/gfae069.816</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-0509
ispartof Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2024-05, Vol.39 (Supplement_1)
issn 0931-0509
1460-2385
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfae069_816
source Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access
title 2628 A haemodialysis patient-centred model of care with a multidisciplinary programme: what is its clinical and health efficiency impact?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A03%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2628%20A%20haemodialysis%20patient-centred%20model%20of%20care%20with%20a%20multidisciplinary%20programme:%20what%20is%20its%20clinical%20and%20health%20efficiency%20impact?&rft.jtitle=Nephrology,%20dialysis,%20transplantation&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez-Vaquera,%20Shaira&rft.date=2024-05-23&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.issn=0931-0509&rft.eissn=1460-2385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ndt/gfae069.816&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ndt/gfae069.816%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ndt/gfae069.816&rfr_iscdi=true