1157 Body mass and fluid balance in dialysis: global profiles in Apollo Dial DB

Abstract Background and Aims Fluid management is a fundamental component of dialysis care. Achieving euvolemia and avoiding fluid overload can be challenging in dialysis. Apollo Dial DB, an anonymised dialysis database from a global kidney care network, was used to gain deeper insights in patterns o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2024-05, Vol.39 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Croft, Kaitlyn, Wolf, Melanie, Jiao, Yue, Winter, Anke, Nikam, Milind, Stuard, Stefano, Guinsburg, Adrian, Koulechov, Kirill, Mcguigan, Stuart, Usvyat, Len, Larkin, John, Maddux, Frank
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background and Aims Fluid management is a fundamental component of dialysis care. Achieving euvolemia and avoiding fluid overload can be challenging in dialysis. Apollo Dial DB, an anonymised dialysis database from a global kidney care network, was used to gain deeper insights in patterns of patient body mass and fluid balance during dialysis treatments worldwide. Method Apollo Dial DB, a global anonymised dialysis database, contains real-world data from patients in 40 countries beginning January 2018 throughout March 2021. Parameters include demographics, diagnoses, laboratories, medications, treatments, quality of life, and outcomes. This analysis assessed body mass and fluid status parameters on patients in Asia-Pacific (AP), Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA), Latin America (LA), Northern America (NA). In addition, bioimpedance for body compositions of patients was assessed as it was available in AP, EMEA, and LA. Results The first version of the Apollo Dial DB includes data on 543, 169 patients, with 4.6% from AP, 13.9% from EMEA, 7.0% from LA, and 74.5% from NA countries. EMEA and NA have a higher proportion of patients in the bigger height categories versus the AP and LA regions (Table 1). There is a difference in mean body weight post dialysis of more than 10 kg between regions; the highest weights were observed in EMEA and NA in contrast to the AP and LA regions. Average albumin levels were consistent in all global regions. Intradialytic weight gain is lowest in EMEA at 1.8 kg and highest in NA at 2.2 kg between treatments. While ultrafiltration volume ranged from 2.0 L to 2.4 L, being the highest in AP and NA. Bioimpedance measures defining body compositions were available for the majority of patients in AP (59.3%), EMEA (86.9%), and LA (90.7%). Patient averages in EMEA are slightly higher for ATM, FTM, LTM, TBW than for LA and AP; this is somewhat explained by the differences in body weight between the cohorts (Fig. 1). Conclusion A descriptive analysis of the body mass and fluid status across minor and major regions bring to light key profiles and differences in the characteristics of dialysis patients across the world and fluid management practices in dialysis care. Differences in intradialytic weight gain may deserve further analysis considering the impact of dialysis modality on fluid balance, such as potential influences of convective therapies. These findings act as benchmarks for the nephrology community. Apollo Dial DB offer
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfae069.068