MO694: Analysis of Mechanical Complications in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an excellent, but underutilized dialysis technique. Thus, its implementation might depend on the chance to offer this modality of treatment to late referral patients. This approach has been recently named ‘urgent-start peritoneal dialysis’ (UP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2022-05, Vol.37 (Supplement_3)
Hauptverfasser: Nardelli, Luca, Scalamogna, Antonio, Cicero, Elisa, Tripodi, Federica, Castellano, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_3
container_start_page
container_title Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation
container_volume 37
creator Nardelli, Luca
Scalamogna, Antonio
Cicero, Elisa
Tripodi, Federica
Castellano, Giuseppe
description Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an excellent, but underutilized dialysis technique. Thus, its implementation might depend on the chance to offer this modality of treatment to late referral patients. This approach has been recently named ‘urgent-start peritoneal dialysis’ (UPD). The major barrier to this practice is represented by the belief that peritoneal exchanges can be safely started at least 2 weeks after catheter insertion, due to the concern of early mechanical complications. The study investigated the efficacy and safety of an UPD approach in our PD program. METHOD Between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 all prevalent patients needing UPD at our institution were included in the study. During this period, 242 peritoneal catheters were inserted in 222 patients (Table 1). One hundred forty-eight catheters were positioned semi-surgically, while 94 were inserted surgically. In all patients, an anti-leakage/dislocation suture was made. PD was started within 24 h from catheter placement and peritoneal exchange scheme characterized by progressively increasing volume was used; early and late mechanical complications were also analysed. Finally,  all the causes of PD technique and catheter failure were reported. Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 222 PD patients RESULTS The early incidence of leakages, catheter dislocations, omental wrappings, bleeding, peritonitis and exit-site infections was 11/242 (4.5%), 5/242 (2%), 3/242 (1.2%), 2/242 (0.8%), 6/242 (2.5%) and 4/242 (1.6%), respectively (Table 2). No bowel perforations were observed. The long-term leakage rate and catheter dislocation were 0.016 and 0.019 episodes/patient-year, respectively (Table 3). The survival of the catheter at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months was 93.6, 91.2, 84.8, 77.4, 65.5 and 59.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). The technique survival at 3, 6, 12, 24,  36 and 48 months was 97.2, 94.9, 87.6, 78.9, 66.6 and 60.0%, respectively (Fig. 2). The main cause of PD dropout was represented by infectious complications (nearly 40%) and mechanical complications (17.5%) leading to catheter failure (Fig. 3). No significant difference in the first catheter survival among the semi-surgical and the surgical arm was observed (HR 0.88 [CI 0.54–1.45], P = 0.62 [Fig. 4]). FIGURE 1: Probability of catheter survival. No. = number and Cat = catheters. FIGURE 2: Probability of technique survival in patients enrolled in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis program. No = number and pt = pa
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ndt/gfac078.031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfac078_031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ndt/gfac078.031</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ndt/gfac078.031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c751-642b1a73944cdddeb889942f73d7ffde3dd2189a923454362574e5aff868cb833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEqEws3pGSuNXYputKhSQWgWJMkeOH8UodSI7DP33BKU7073DOd9wALjHaImRpEUwY3FwSiMulojiC5BhVqGcUFFegmwicI5KJK_BTUrfCCFJOM9AvasryR7hKqjulHyCvYM7q79U8Fp1cN0fh276Rt-HBH2An_Fgw5h_jCqO8N1GP_bBTuCTn_1bcOVUl-zd-S7AfvO8X7_m2_rlbb3a5pqXOK8YabHiVDKmjTG2FUJKRhynhjtnLDWGYCGVJJSVjFak5MyWyjlRCd0KShegmGd17FOK1jVD9EcVTw1GzV-OZsrRnHM0U47JeJiN_mf4F_4FOJRiXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>MO694: Analysis of Mechanical Complications in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nardelli, Luca ; Scalamogna, Antonio ; Cicero, Elisa ; Tripodi, Federica ; Castellano, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Nardelli, Luca ; Scalamogna, Antonio ; Cicero, Elisa ; Tripodi, Federica ; Castellano, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an excellent, but underutilized dialysis technique. Thus, its implementation might depend on the chance to offer this modality of treatment to late referral patients. This approach has been recently named ‘urgent-start peritoneal dialysis’ (UPD). The major barrier to this practice is represented by the belief that peritoneal exchanges can be safely started at least 2 weeks after catheter insertion, due to the concern of early mechanical complications. The study investigated the efficacy and safety of an UPD approach in our PD program. METHOD Between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 all prevalent patients needing UPD at our institution were included in the study. During this period, 242 peritoneal catheters were inserted in 222 patients (Table 1). One hundred forty-eight catheters were positioned semi-surgically, while 94 were inserted surgically. In all patients, an anti-leakage/dislocation suture was made. PD was started within 24 h from catheter placement and peritoneal exchange scheme characterized by progressively increasing volume was used; early and late mechanical complications were also analysed. Finally,  all the causes of PD technique and catheter failure were reported. Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 222 PD patients RESULTS The early incidence of leakages, catheter dislocations, omental wrappings, bleeding, peritonitis and exit-site infections was 11/242 (4.5%), 5/242 (2%), 3/242 (1.2%), 2/242 (0.8%), 6/242 (2.5%) and 4/242 (1.6%), respectively (Table 2). No bowel perforations were observed. The long-term leakage rate and catheter dislocation were 0.016 and 0.019 episodes/patient-year, respectively (Table 3). The survival of the catheter at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months was 93.6, 91.2, 84.8, 77.4, 65.5 and 59.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). The technique survival at 3, 6, 12, 24,  36 and 48 months was 97.2, 94.9, 87.6, 78.9, 66.6 and 60.0%, respectively (Fig. 2). The main cause of PD dropout was represented by infectious complications (nearly 40%) and mechanical complications (17.5%) leading to catheter failure (Fig. 3). No significant difference in the first catheter survival among the semi-surgical and the surgical arm was observed (HR 0.88 [CI 0.54–1.45], P = 0.62 [Fig. 4]). FIGURE 1: Probability of catheter survival. No. = number and Cat = catheters. FIGURE 2: Probability of technique survival in patients enrolled in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis program. No = number and pt = patients. FIGURE 3: Causes of technique failure with and without considering death non-catheter-related and kidney transplantation. TX = kidney transplantation; PERIT = peritonitis; ULF/DI = ultrafiltration failure/dialytic inadequacy; INAB = loss of ability to perform peritoneal exchanges; HT = hydrothorax; HC = hydrocele; L/D = leakage/displacement and TI = tunnel infection. FIGURE 4: Probability of catheter survival placed by semi-surgical procedure VS catheter survival inserted by surgical procedure. No = number; Cat = catheters; HR = hazard ratio and IC = interval of confidence. Table 2. Incidence of catheter-related complications during the first month following peritoneal catheter insertion Table 3. Rate of long-term mechanical catheter complications CONCLUSION A tight seal between deep cuff and surrounding tissue (double-purse string technique) with a low-volume exchange scheme allows starting UPD soon after catheter insertion minimizing mechanical complications. In patients without previous abdominal interventions semi-surgical technique is as effective as the surgical procedure in preventing early mechanical complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-0509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac078.031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2022-05, Vol.37 (Supplement_3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nardelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalamogna, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicero, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripodi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellano, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>MO694: Analysis of Mechanical Complications in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis</title><title>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</title><description>Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an excellent, but underutilized dialysis technique. Thus, its implementation might depend on the chance to offer this modality of treatment to late referral patients. This approach has been recently named ‘urgent-start peritoneal dialysis’ (UPD). The major barrier to this practice is represented by the belief that peritoneal exchanges can be safely started at least 2 weeks after catheter insertion, due to the concern of early mechanical complications. The study investigated the efficacy and safety of an UPD approach in our PD program. METHOD Between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 all prevalent patients needing UPD at our institution were included in the study. During this period, 242 peritoneal catheters were inserted in 222 patients (Table 1). One hundred forty-eight catheters were positioned semi-surgically, while 94 were inserted surgically. In all patients, an anti-leakage/dislocation suture was made. PD was started within 24 h from catheter placement and peritoneal exchange scheme characterized by progressively increasing volume was used; early and late mechanical complications were also analysed. Finally,  all the causes of PD technique and catheter failure were reported. Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 222 PD patients RESULTS The early incidence of leakages, catheter dislocations, omental wrappings, bleeding, peritonitis and exit-site infections was 11/242 (4.5%), 5/242 (2%), 3/242 (1.2%), 2/242 (0.8%), 6/242 (2.5%) and 4/242 (1.6%), respectively (Table 2). No bowel perforations were observed. The long-term leakage rate and catheter dislocation were 0.016 and 0.019 episodes/patient-year, respectively (Table 3). The survival of the catheter at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months was 93.6, 91.2, 84.8, 77.4, 65.5 and 59.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). The technique survival at 3, 6, 12, 24,  36 and 48 months was 97.2, 94.9, 87.6, 78.9, 66.6 and 60.0%, respectively (Fig. 2). The main cause of PD dropout was represented by infectious complications (nearly 40%) and mechanical complications (17.5%) leading to catheter failure (Fig. 3). No significant difference in the first catheter survival among the semi-surgical and the surgical arm was observed (HR 0.88 [CI 0.54–1.45], P = 0.62 [Fig. 4]). FIGURE 1: Probability of catheter survival. No. = number and Cat = catheters. FIGURE 2: Probability of technique survival in patients enrolled in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis program. No = number and pt = patients. FIGURE 3: Causes of technique failure with and without considering death non-catheter-related and kidney transplantation. TX = kidney transplantation; PERIT = peritonitis; ULF/DI = ultrafiltration failure/dialytic inadequacy; INAB = loss of ability to perform peritoneal exchanges; HT = hydrothorax; HC = hydrocele; L/D = leakage/displacement and TI = tunnel infection. FIGURE 4: Probability of catheter survival placed by semi-surgical procedure VS catheter survival inserted by surgical procedure. No = number; Cat = catheters; HR = hazard ratio and IC = interval of confidence. Table 2. Incidence of catheter-related complications during the first month following peritoneal catheter insertion Table 3. Rate of long-term mechanical catheter complications CONCLUSION A tight seal between deep cuff and surrounding tissue (double-purse string technique) with a low-volume exchange scheme allows starting UPD soon after catheter insertion minimizing mechanical complications. In patients without previous abdominal interventions semi-surgical technique is as effective as the surgical procedure in preventing early mechanical complications.</description><issn>0931-0509</issn><issn>1460-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEqEws3pGSuNXYputKhSQWgWJMkeOH8UodSI7DP33BKU7073DOd9wALjHaImRpEUwY3FwSiMulojiC5BhVqGcUFFegmwicI5KJK_BTUrfCCFJOM9AvasryR7hKqjulHyCvYM7q79U8Fp1cN0fh276Rt-HBH2An_Fgw5h_jCqO8N1GP_bBTuCTn_1bcOVUl-zd-S7AfvO8X7_m2_rlbb3a5pqXOK8YabHiVDKmjTG2FUJKRhynhjtnLDWGYCGVJJSVjFak5MyWyjlRCd0KShegmGd17FOK1jVD9EcVTw1GzV-OZsrRnHM0U47JeJiN_mf4F_4FOJRiXA</recordid><startdate>20220503</startdate><enddate>20220503</enddate><creator>Nardelli, Luca</creator><creator>Scalamogna, Antonio</creator><creator>Cicero, Elisa</creator><creator>Tripodi, Federica</creator><creator>Castellano, Giuseppe</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220503</creationdate><title>MO694: Analysis of Mechanical Complications in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis</title><author>Nardelli, Luca ; Scalamogna, Antonio ; Cicero, Elisa ; Tripodi, Federica ; Castellano, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c751-642b1a73944cdddeb889942f73d7ffde3dd2189a923454362574e5aff868cb833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nardelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalamogna, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicero, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripodi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellano, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nardelli, Luca</au><au>Scalamogna, Antonio</au><au>Cicero, Elisa</au><au>Tripodi, Federica</au><au>Castellano, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MO694: Analysis of Mechanical Complications in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis</atitle><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle><date>2022-05-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><issn>0931-0509</issn><eissn>1460-2385</eissn><abstract>Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an excellent, but underutilized dialysis technique. Thus, its implementation might depend on the chance to offer this modality of treatment to late referral patients. This approach has been recently named ‘urgent-start peritoneal dialysis’ (UPD). The major barrier to this practice is represented by the belief that peritoneal exchanges can be safely started at least 2 weeks after catheter insertion, due to the concern of early mechanical complications. The study investigated the efficacy and safety of an UPD approach in our PD program. METHOD Between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 all prevalent patients needing UPD at our institution were included in the study. During this period, 242 peritoneal catheters were inserted in 222 patients (Table 1). One hundred forty-eight catheters were positioned semi-surgically, while 94 were inserted surgically. In all patients, an anti-leakage/dislocation suture was made. PD was started within 24 h from catheter placement and peritoneal exchange scheme characterized by progressively increasing volume was used; early and late mechanical complications were also analysed. Finally,  all the causes of PD technique and catheter failure were reported. Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 222 PD patients RESULTS The early incidence of leakages, catheter dislocations, omental wrappings, bleeding, peritonitis and exit-site infections was 11/242 (4.5%), 5/242 (2%), 3/242 (1.2%), 2/242 (0.8%), 6/242 (2.5%) and 4/242 (1.6%), respectively (Table 2). No bowel perforations were observed. The long-term leakage rate and catheter dislocation were 0.016 and 0.019 episodes/patient-year, respectively (Table 3). The survival of the catheter at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months was 93.6, 91.2, 84.8, 77.4, 65.5 and 59.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). The technique survival at 3, 6, 12, 24,  36 and 48 months was 97.2, 94.9, 87.6, 78.9, 66.6 and 60.0%, respectively (Fig. 2). The main cause of PD dropout was represented by infectious complications (nearly 40%) and mechanical complications (17.5%) leading to catheter failure (Fig. 3). No significant difference in the first catheter survival among the semi-surgical and the surgical arm was observed (HR 0.88 [CI 0.54–1.45], P = 0.62 [Fig. 4]). FIGURE 1: Probability of catheter survival. No. = number and Cat = catheters. FIGURE 2: Probability of technique survival in patients enrolled in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis program. No = number and pt = patients. FIGURE 3: Causes of technique failure with and without considering death non-catheter-related and kidney transplantation. TX = kidney transplantation; PERIT = peritonitis; ULF/DI = ultrafiltration failure/dialytic inadequacy; INAB = loss of ability to perform peritoneal exchanges; HT = hydrothorax; HC = hydrocele; L/D = leakage/displacement and TI = tunnel infection. FIGURE 4: Probability of catheter survival placed by semi-surgical procedure VS catheter survival inserted by surgical procedure. No = number; Cat = catheters; HR = hazard ratio and IC = interval of confidence. Table 2. Incidence of catheter-related complications during the first month following peritoneal catheter insertion Table 3. Rate of long-term mechanical catheter complications CONCLUSION A tight seal between deep cuff and surrounding tissue (double-purse string technique) with a low-volume exchange scheme allows starting UPD soon after catheter insertion minimizing mechanical complications. In patients without previous abdominal interventions semi-surgical technique is as effective as the surgical procedure in preventing early mechanical complications.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ndt/gfac078.031</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-0509
ispartof Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2022-05, Vol.37 (Supplement_3)
issn 0931-0509
1460-2385
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfac078_031
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title MO694: Analysis of Mechanical Complications in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A07%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MO694:%20Analysis%20of%20Mechanical%20Complications%20in%20Urgent-Start%20Peritoneal%20Dialysis&rft.jtitle=Nephrology,%20dialysis,%20transplantation&rft.au=Nardelli,%20Luca&rft.date=2022-05-03&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.issn=0931-0509&rft.eissn=1460-2385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ndt/gfac078.031&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ndt/gfac078.031%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ndt/gfac078.031&rfr_iscdi=true