Light curve and hardness tests for millilensing in GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A

ABSTRACT Analyses are given on four recent gravitational millilensing claims on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs): GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A. Two tests, a light curve similarity test and a hardness similarity test, compare different temporal sections of a single GRB to see if they...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Letters 2023-12, Vol.529 (1), p.L83-L87
Hauptverfasser: Mukherjee, Oindabi, Nemiroff, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page L87
container_issue 1
container_start_page L83
container_title Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Letters
container_volume 529
creator Mukherjee, Oindabi
Nemiroff, Robert
description ABSTRACT Analyses are given on four recent gravitational millilensing claims on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs): GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A. Two tests, a light curve similarity test and a hardness similarity test, compare different temporal sections of a single GRB to see if they are statistically similar. The hardness similarity test shows that the ratio between the second and the first emission episodes in each energy channel differed from the same ratio averaged over all energy channels at above 90 per cent confidence level in GRB 081122A. Additionally, the light curve similarity test applied to GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, and GRB 110517B separately indicated a high likelihood that the two emission episodes in each GRB were not from the same parent emission episode. This conclusion was reached with confidence levels of 4.8σ for GRB 081122A, 3.08σ for GRB 081126A, and 8.45σ for GRB 110517B. However, these tests did not detect a significant difference between the pulses of GRB 210812A. Consequently, our results suggest that while GRB 210812A could not be conclusively ruled out, the other three GRBs do not show clear evidence of millilensing.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/mnrasl/slad202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_mnrasl_slad202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/mnrasl/slad202</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/mnrasl/slad202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1582-1f3e5d594f4fb8cd26ccb5bfbf39b10ad35008df1d47960380698e2583d13a593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXz7kK3XYm2ewmx22xVSgIouclu0nayH6UpBX8723tokdPM-_NvHf4EXKPMEVQfNZ2QcdmFhttGLALMsI8FQlXnF_-7kxck5sYPwB4LnM5In7tN9s9rQ_h01LdGbrVwXQ2Rrq3cR-p6wNtfdP4xnbRdxvqO7p6nVOQiIwVkz-RDQIRBObzyU_byWB4vLPillw53UR7N8wxeV8-vi2ekvXL6nlRrJMahWQJOm6FESp1qatkbVhW15WoXOW4qhC04QJAGocmzVUGXEKmpGVCcoNcC8XHZHrurUMfY7Cu3AXf6vBVIpQnUOUZVDmAOgYezoH-sPvv9xvyk2ZR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Light curve and hardness tests for millilensing in GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mukherjee, Oindabi ; Nemiroff, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Oindabi ; Nemiroff, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Analyses are given on four recent gravitational millilensing claims on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs): GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A. Two tests, a light curve similarity test and a hardness similarity test, compare different temporal sections of a single GRB to see if they are statistically similar. The hardness similarity test shows that the ratio between the second and the first emission episodes in each energy channel differed from the same ratio averaged over all energy channels at above 90 per cent confidence level in GRB 081122A. Additionally, the light curve similarity test applied to GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, and GRB 110517B separately indicated a high likelihood that the two emission episodes in each GRB were not from the same parent emission episode. This conclusion was reached with confidence levels of 4.8σ for GRB 081122A, 3.08σ for GRB 081126A, and 8.45σ for GRB 110517B. However, these tests did not detect a significant difference between the pulses of GRB 210812A. Consequently, our results suggest that while GRB 210812A could not be conclusively ruled out, the other three GRBs do not show clear evidence of millilensing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-3925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3933</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Letters, 2023-12, Vol.529 (1), p.L83-L87</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society. 2023</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1582-1f3e5d594f4fb8cd26ccb5bfbf39b10ad35008df1d47960380698e2583d13a593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1582-1f3e5d594f4fb8cd26ccb5bfbf39b10ad35008df1d47960380698e2583d13a593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Oindabi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemiroff, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Light curve and hardness tests for millilensing in GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A</title><title>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Letters</title><description>ABSTRACT Analyses are given on four recent gravitational millilensing claims on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs): GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A. Two tests, a light curve similarity test and a hardness similarity test, compare different temporal sections of a single GRB to see if they are statistically similar. The hardness similarity test shows that the ratio between the second and the first emission episodes in each energy channel differed from the same ratio averaged over all energy channels at above 90 per cent confidence level in GRB 081122A. Additionally, the light curve similarity test applied to GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, and GRB 110517B separately indicated a high likelihood that the two emission episodes in each GRB were not from the same parent emission episode. This conclusion was reached with confidence levels of 4.8σ for GRB 081122A, 3.08σ for GRB 081126A, and 8.45σ for GRB 110517B. However, these tests did not detect a significant difference between the pulses of GRB 210812A. Consequently, our results suggest that while GRB 210812A could not be conclusively ruled out, the other three GRBs do not show clear evidence of millilensing.</description><issn>1745-3925</issn><issn>1745-3933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXz7kK3XYm2ewmx22xVSgIouclu0nayH6UpBX8723tokdPM-_NvHf4EXKPMEVQfNZ2QcdmFhttGLALMsI8FQlXnF_-7kxck5sYPwB4LnM5In7tN9s9rQ_h01LdGbrVwXQ2Rrq3cR-p6wNtfdP4xnbRdxvqO7p6nVOQiIwVkz-RDQIRBObzyU_byWB4vLPillw53UR7N8wxeV8-vi2ekvXL6nlRrJMahWQJOm6FESp1qatkbVhW15WoXOW4qhC04QJAGocmzVUGXEKmpGVCcoNcC8XHZHrurUMfY7Cu3AXf6vBVIpQnUOUZVDmAOgYezoH-sPvv9xvyk2ZR</recordid><startdate>20231227</startdate><enddate>20231227</enddate><creator>Mukherjee, Oindabi</creator><creator>Nemiroff, Robert</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231227</creationdate><title>Light curve and hardness tests for millilensing in GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A</title><author>Mukherjee, Oindabi ; Nemiroff, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1582-1f3e5d594f4fb8cd26ccb5bfbf39b10ad35008df1d47960380698e2583d13a593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Oindabi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemiroff, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mukherjee, Oindabi</au><au>Nemiroff, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Light curve and hardness tests for millilensing in GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A</atitle><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Letters</jtitle><date>2023-12-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>529</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>L83</spage><epage>L87</epage><pages>L83-L87</pages><issn>1745-3925</issn><eissn>1745-3933</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Analyses are given on four recent gravitational millilensing claims on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs): GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A. Two tests, a light curve similarity test and a hardness similarity test, compare different temporal sections of a single GRB to see if they are statistically similar. The hardness similarity test shows that the ratio between the second and the first emission episodes in each energy channel differed from the same ratio averaged over all energy channels at above 90 per cent confidence level in GRB 081122A. Additionally, the light curve similarity test applied to GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, and GRB 110517B separately indicated a high likelihood that the two emission episodes in each GRB were not from the same parent emission episode. This conclusion was reached with confidence levels of 4.8σ for GRB 081122A, 3.08σ for GRB 081126A, and 8.45σ for GRB 110517B. However, these tests did not detect a significant difference between the pulses of GRB 210812A. Consequently, our results suggest that while GRB 210812A could not be conclusively ruled out, the other three GRBs do not show clear evidence of millilensing.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/mnrasl/slad202</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1745-3925
ispartof Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Letters, 2023-12, Vol.529 (1), p.L83-L87
issn 1745-3925
1745-3933
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_mnrasl_slad202
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Light curve and hardness tests for millilensing in GRB 081122A, GRB 081126A, GRB 110517B, and GRB 210812A
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A36%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Light%20curve%20and%20hardness%20tests%20for%20millilensing%20in%20GRB%20081122A,%20GRB%20081126A,%20GRB%20110517B,%20and%20GRB%20210812A&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20notices%20of%20the%20Royal%20Astronomical%20Society.%20Letters&rft.au=Mukherjee,%20Oindabi&rft.date=2023-12-27&rft.volume=529&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=L83&rft.epage=L87&rft.pages=L83-L87&rft.issn=1745-3925&rft.eissn=1745-3933&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/mnrasl/slad202&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/mnrasl/slad202%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/mnrasl/slad202&rfr_iscdi=true