An Assessment of American Indian Forestry Research, Information Needs, and Priorities

Native American and Alaska Native tribes manage millions of acres of land and are leaders in forestry and fire management practices despite inadequate and inequitable funding. Native American tribes are rarely considered as research partners due to historically poor relationships with non-native sci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forestry 2023-01, Vol.121 (1), p.49-63
Hauptverfasser: Dockry, Michael J, Hoagland, Serra J, Leighton, Adrian D, Durglo, James R, Pradhananga, Amit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
container_title Journal of forestry
container_volume 121
creator Dockry, Michael J
Hoagland, Serra J
Leighton, Adrian D
Durglo, James R
Pradhananga, Amit
description Native American and Alaska Native tribes manage millions of acres of land and are leaders in forestry and fire management practices despite inadequate and inequitable funding. Native American tribes are rarely considered as research partners due to historically poor relationships with non-native scientists, tribal mistrust of research, differences between Indigenous values and scientific methods, and low Indigenous representation at research institutions. Understanding tribal research needs is critical to foster successful research partnerships with underserved tribal communities. This study expands on a 2011 tribal research needs assessment with a survey to identify tribal natural resource professionals’ research needs, access to research findings, and interest in participating in research. Information needs identified in our survey includes forest health, water quality, culturally significant species, workforce and tribal youth development, cultural importance of water, and invasive species. Additionally, postfire response and valuation, resilience and long-term forestry, protecting and curating tribal data, and Indigenous burning were more important research needs for tribal members than for nontribal members. This study can inform forestry research planning efforts and establish ­research priorities and collaborations that are aligned with needs identified by tribal natural resource managers. Study Implications: There is a growing desire to broaden forestry research to support tribal forest management. This study shows that tribal research priorities include forest health, water quality, culturally significant species, workforce development/training, tribal youth development, cultural importance of water, and invasive species. Additionally, postfire response and valuation, resilience and long-term forestry, protecting and curating tribal data, and Indigenous burning were ranked of higher importance by tribal members than nontribal members. This study can inform federal research entities, universities, and natural resource management agencies in planning and establishing research priorities that are aligned with the needs identified by tribal resource managers.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jofore/fvac030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jofore_fvac030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_jofore_fvac030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-e5333bdacc0a67e101e96b87e65a662c2c13894e1509950b26cc8bc9ea39fad43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFFLwzAURoMoWKevPucHrNtN0qbNYxlOB0NF3HNJ0xvMsKnkFmH_3sr2dB4-OB8cxh4FrAQYtT6Ofky49r_WgYIrlgmj6lxVhb5mGYCUuZAgbtkd0REAaq2KjB2ayBsiJBowTnz0vBkwBWcj38U-zNjOUprSiX8goU3uazkv89NgpzBG_orY05Lb2PP3FMYUpoB0z268_SZ8uHDBDtunz81Lvn973m2afe5kZaYcS6VU11vnwOoKBQg0uqsr1KXVWjrphKpNgaIEY0ropHau7pxBq4y3faEWbHX2ujQSJfTtTwqDTadWQPsfpT1HaS9R1B9jmlh2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Assessment of American Indian Forestry Research, Information Needs, and Priorities</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Dockry, Michael J ; Hoagland, Serra J ; Leighton, Adrian D ; Durglo, James R ; Pradhananga, Amit</creator><creatorcontrib>Dockry, Michael J ; Hoagland, Serra J ; Leighton, Adrian D ; Durglo, James R ; Pradhananga, Amit</creatorcontrib><description>Native American and Alaska Native tribes manage millions of acres of land and are leaders in forestry and fire management practices despite inadequate and inequitable funding. Native American tribes are rarely considered as research partners due to historically poor relationships with non-native scientists, tribal mistrust of research, differences between Indigenous values and scientific methods, and low Indigenous representation at research institutions. Understanding tribal research needs is critical to foster successful research partnerships with underserved tribal communities. This study expands on a 2011 tribal research needs assessment with a survey to identify tribal natural resource professionals’ research needs, access to research findings, and interest in participating in research. Information needs identified in our survey includes forest health, water quality, culturally significant species, workforce and tribal youth development, cultural importance of water, and invasive species. Additionally, postfire response and valuation, resilience and long-term forestry, protecting and curating tribal data, and Indigenous burning were more important research needs for tribal members than for nontribal members. This study can inform forestry research planning efforts and establish ­research priorities and collaborations that are aligned with needs identified by tribal natural resource managers. Study Implications: There is a growing desire to broaden forestry research to support tribal forest management. This study shows that tribal research priorities include forest health, water quality, culturally significant species, workforce development/training, tribal youth development, cultural importance of water, and invasive species. Additionally, postfire response and valuation, resilience and long-term forestry, protecting and curating tribal data, and Indigenous burning were ranked of higher importance by tribal members than nontribal members. This study can inform federal research entities, universities, and natural resource management agencies in planning and establishing research priorities that are aligned with the needs identified by tribal resource managers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jofore/fvac030</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of forestry, 2023-01, Vol.121 (1), p.49-63</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-e5333bdacc0a67e101e96b87e65a662c2c13894e1509950b26cc8bc9ea39fad43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-e5333bdacc0a67e101e96b87e65a662c2c13894e1509950b26cc8bc9ea39fad43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4595-9624 ; 0000-0002-0395-0525</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dockry, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoagland, Serra J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, Adrian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durglo, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhananga, Amit</creatorcontrib><title>An Assessment of American Indian Forestry Research, Information Needs, and Priorities</title><title>Journal of forestry</title><description>Native American and Alaska Native tribes manage millions of acres of land and are leaders in forestry and fire management practices despite inadequate and inequitable funding. Native American tribes are rarely considered as research partners due to historically poor relationships with non-native scientists, tribal mistrust of research, differences between Indigenous values and scientific methods, and low Indigenous representation at research institutions. Understanding tribal research needs is critical to foster successful research partnerships with underserved tribal communities. This study expands on a 2011 tribal research needs assessment with a survey to identify tribal natural resource professionals’ research needs, access to research findings, and interest in participating in research. Information needs identified in our survey includes forest health, water quality, culturally significant species, workforce and tribal youth development, cultural importance of water, and invasive species. Additionally, postfire response and valuation, resilience and long-term forestry, protecting and curating tribal data, and Indigenous burning were more important research needs for tribal members than for nontribal members. This study can inform forestry research planning efforts and establish ­research priorities and collaborations that are aligned with needs identified by tribal natural resource managers. Study Implications: There is a growing desire to broaden forestry research to support tribal forest management. This study shows that tribal research priorities include forest health, water quality, culturally significant species, workforce development/training, tribal youth development, cultural importance of water, and invasive species. Additionally, postfire response and valuation, resilience and long-term forestry, protecting and curating tribal data, and Indigenous burning were ranked of higher importance by tribal members than nontribal members. This study can inform federal research entities, universities, and natural resource management agencies in planning and establishing research priorities that are aligned with the needs identified by tribal resource managers.</description><issn>0022-1201</issn><issn>1938-3746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkFFLwzAURoMoWKevPucHrNtN0qbNYxlOB0NF3HNJ0xvMsKnkFmH_3sr2dB4-OB8cxh4FrAQYtT6Ofky49r_WgYIrlgmj6lxVhb5mGYCUuZAgbtkd0REAaq2KjB2ayBsiJBowTnz0vBkwBWcj38U-zNjOUprSiX8goU3uazkv89NgpzBG_orY05Lb2PP3FMYUpoB0z268_SZ8uHDBDtunz81Lvn973m2afe5kZaYcS6VU11vnwOoKBQg0uqsr1KXVWjrphKpNgaIEY0ropHau7pxBq4y3faEWbHX2ujQSJfTtTwqDTadWQPsfpT1HaS9R1B9jmlh2</recordid><startdate>20230104</startdate><enddate>20230104</enddate><creator>Dockry, Michael J</creator><creator>Hoagland, Serra J</creator><creator>Leighton, Adrian D</creator><creator>Durglo, James R</creator><creator>Pradhananga, Amit</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-9624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0395-0525</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230104</creationdate><title>An Assessment of American Indian Forestry Research, Information Needs, and Priorities</title><author>Dockry, Michael J ; Hoagland, Serra J ; Leighton, Adrian D ; Durglo, James R ; Pradhananga, Amit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-e5333bdacc0a67e101e96b87e65a662c2c13894e1509950b26cc8bc9ea39fad43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dockry, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoagland, Serra J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, Adrian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durglo, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhananga, Amit</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dockry, Michael J</au><au>Hoagland, Serra J</au><au>Leighton, Adrian D</au><au>Durglo, James R</au><au>Pradhananga, Amit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Assessment of American Indian Forestry Research, Information Needs, and Priorities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle><date>2023-01-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>49-63</pages><issn>0022-1201</issn><eissn>1938-3746</eissn><abstract>Native American and Alaska Native tribes manage millions of acres of land and are leaders in forestry and fire management practices despite inadequate and inequitable funding. Native American tribes are rarely considered as research partners due to historically poor relationships with non-native scientists, tribal mistrust of research, differences between Indigenous values and scientific methods, and low Indigenous representation at research institutions. Understanding tribal research needs is critical to foster successful research partnerships with underserved tribal communities. This study expands on a 2011 tribal research needs assessment with a survey to identify tribal natural resource professionals’ research needs, access to research findings, and interest in participating in research. Information needs identified in our survey includes forest health, water quality, culturally significant species, workforce and tribal youth development, cultural importance of water, and invasive species. Additionally, postfire response and valuation, resilience and long-term forestry, protecting and curating tribal data, and Indigenous burning were more important research needs for tribal members than for nontribal members. This study can inform forestry research planning efforts and establish ­research priorities and collaborations that are aligned with needs identified by tribal natural resource managers. Study Implications: There is a growing desire to broaden forestry research to support tribal forest management. This study shows that tribal research priorities include forest health, water quality, culturally significant species, workforce development/training, tribal youth development, cultural importance of water, and invasive species. Additionally, postfire response and valuation, resilience and long-term forestry, protecting and curating tribal data, and Indigenous burning were ranked of higher importance by tribal members than nontribal members. This study can inform federal research entities, universities, and natural resource management agencies in planning and establishing research priorities that are aligned with the needs identified by tribal resource managers.</abstract><doi>10.1093/jofore/fvac030</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-9624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0395-0525</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1201
ispartof Journal of forestry, 2023-01, Vol.121 (1), p.49-63
issn 0022-1201
1938-3746
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jofore_fvac030
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title An Assessment of American Indian Forestry Research, Information Needs, and Priorities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T08%3A07%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Assessment%20of%20American%20Indian%20Forestry%20Research,%20Information%20Needs,%20and%20Priorities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forestry&rft.au=Dockry,%20Michael%20J&rft.date=2023-01-04&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=49-63&rft.issn=0022-1201&rft.eissn=1938-3746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jofore/fvac030&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_jofore_fvac030%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true