Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices

Abstract This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of international dispute settlement 2022-09, Vol.13 (3), p.510-531
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, Weihuan, Qu, Xiaomeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 531
container_issue 3
container_start_page 510
container_title Journal of international dispute settlement
container_volume 13
creator Zhou, Weihuan
Qu, Xiaomeng
description Abstract This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by government intervention. This review is undertaken in the context of the longstanding AD practices of some major WTO Members in treating China as a non-market economy (NME). It argues that while WTO tribunals have created flexibilities for AD authorities to address such distortions, they have left some critical issues open for future consideration. The flexibilities and loopholes in the case law can be used by all WTO Members and have been increasingly utilized by China in its own AD practices. Thus, the current law has arguably ‘multilateralized’ the NME treatment under the general framework of the WTO and may incentivize tit-for-tat use of AD.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jnlids/idac007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jnlids_idac007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jnlids/idac007</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jnlids/idac007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c158t-c0d2dcf69da61c7ef614074c82d66aac52eaad40ff726354cdaec2e64cd042bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOAkEQnBhNJMrV81w9LMy-wRtZ8RUUYzAeN-08YHB3ZjMzS4InvsLo7_ElDoF4tS9d6a6qThdCFyHphWQY95eqksz2JQNKSH6EOhFJSBCnw_j4Dw_SU9S1dkl8xWGSkLyDvgqthNHKSTXHbsHxdvP9pFXwCOaDOzymWul6vd384Jnh4Gqu3BWeed54pavVTvSmTcX8FhjHUzMHJT_BSa3wQ2ukbUzLuKIc-8HIXwmu27rZyUAxXCykAu9t8Qun3hk_G6BOUm7P0YmAyvLuoZ-h15vxrLgLJtPb-2I0CWiYDlxACYsYFdmQQRbSnIss9F8ldBCxLAOgacQBWEKEyKMsThPKgNOIZx6QJHoX8Rnq7X2p0dYaLsrGyBrMugxJuQu23AdbHoL1gsu9QLfNf9xfnwGDIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><creator>Zhou, Weihuan ; Qu, Xiaomeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weihuan ; Qu, Xiaomeng</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by government intervention. This review is undertaken in the context of the longstanding AD practices of some major WTO Members in treating China as a non-market economy (NME). It argues that while WTO tribunals have created flexibilities for AD authorities to address such distortions, they have left some critical issues open for future consideration. The flexibilities and loopholes in the case law can be used by all WTO Members and have been increasingly utilized by China in its own AD practices. Thus, the current law has arguably ‘multilateralized’ the NME treatment under the general framework of the WTO and may incentivize tit-for-tat use of AD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-3585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-3593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jnlids/idac007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of international dispute settlement, 2022-09, Vol.13 (3), p.510-531</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3200-5271</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weihuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Xiaomeng</creatorcontrib><title>Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices</title><title>Journal of international dispute settlement</title><description>Abstract This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by government intervention. This review is undertaken in the context of the longstanding AD practices of some major WTO Members in treating China as a non-market economy (NME). It argues that while WTO tribunals have created flexibilities for AD authorities to address such distortions, they have left some critical issues open for future consideration. The flexibilities and loopholes in the case law can be used by all WTO Members and have been increasingly utilized by China in its own AD practices. Thus, the current law has arguably ‘multilateralized’ the NME treatment under the general framework of the WTO and may incentivize tit-for-tat use of AD.</description><issn>2040-3585</issn><issn>2040-3593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtOAkEQnBhNJMrV81w9LMy-wRtZ8RUUYzAeN-08YHB3ZjMzS4InvsLo7_ElDoF4tS9d6a6qThdCFyHphWQY95eqksz2JQNKSH6EOhFJSBCnw_j4Dw_SU9S1dkl8xWGSkLyDvgqthNHKSTXHbsHxdvP9pFXwCOaDOzymWul6vd384Jnh4Gqu3BWeed54pavVTvSmTcX8FhjHUzMHJT_BSa3wQ2ukbUzLuKIc-8HIXwmu27rZyUAxXCykAu9t8Qun3hk_G6BOUm7P0YmAyvLuoZ-h15vxrLgLJtPb-2I0CWiYDlxACYsYFdmQQRbSnIss9F8ldBCxLAOgacQBWEKEyKMsThPKgNOIZx6QJHoX8Rnq7X2p0dYaLsrGyBrMugxJuQu23AdbHoL1gsu9QLfNf9xfnwGDIA</recordid><startdate>20220905</startdate><enddate>20220905</enddate><creator>Zhou, Weihuan</creator><creator>Qu, Xiaomeng</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-5271</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220905</creationdate><title>Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices</title><author>Zhou, Weihuan ; Qu, Xiaomeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c158t-c0d2dcf69da61c7ef614074c82d66aac52eaad40ff726354cdaec2e64cd042bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weihuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Xiaomeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of international dispute settlement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Weihuan</au><au>Qu, Xiaomeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international dispute settlement</jtitle><date>2022-09-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>510</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>510-531</pages><issn>2040-3585</issn><eissn>2040-3593</eissn><abstract>Abstract This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by government intervention. This review is undertaken in the context of the longstanding AD practices of some major WTO Members in treating China as a non-market economy (NME). It argues that while WTO tribunals have created flexibilities for AD authorities to address such distortions, they have left some critical issues open for future consideration. The flexibilities and loopholes in the case law can be used by all WTO Members and have been increasingly utilized by China in its own AD practices. Thus, the current law has arguably ‘multilateralized’ the NME treatment under the general framework of the WTO and may incentivize tit-for-tat use of AD.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jnlids/idac007</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-5271</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2040-3585
ispartof Journal of international dispute settlement, 2022-09, Vol.13 (3), p.510-531
issn 2040-3585
2040-3593
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jnlids_idac007
source Oxford University Press Journals
title Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confronting%20the%20%E2%80%98Non-Market%20Economy%E2%80%99%20Treatment:%20The%20Evolving%20World%20Trade%20Organization%20Jurisprudence%20on%20Anti-Dumping%20and%20China%E2%80%99s%20Recent%20Practices&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20dispute%20settlement&rft.au=Zhou,%20Weihuan&rft.date=2022-09-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=510&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=510-531&rft.issn=2040-3585&rft.eissn=2040-3593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jnlids/idac007&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jnlids/idac007%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jnlids/idac007&rfr_iscdi=true