Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices
Abstract This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of international dispute settlement 2022-09, Vol.13 (3), p.510-531 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 531 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 510 |
container_title | Journal of international dispute settlement |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Zhou, Weihuan Qu, Xiaomeng |
description | Abstract
This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by government intervention. This review is undertaken in the context of the longstanding AD practices of some major WTO Members in treating China as a non-market economy (NME). It argues that while WTO tribunals have created flexibilities for AD authorities to address such distortions, they have left some critical issues open for future consideration. The flexibilities and loopholes in the case law can be used by all WTO Members and have been increasingly utilized by China in its own AD practices. Thus, the current law has arguably ‘multilateralized’ the NME treatment under the general framework of the WTO and may incentivize tit-for-tat use of AD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jnlids/idac007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jnlids_idac007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jnlids/idac007</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jnlids/idac007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c158t-c0d2dcf69da61c7ef614074c82d66aac52eaad40ff726354cdaec2e64cd042bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOAkEQnBhNJMrV81w9LMy-wRtZ8RUUYzAeN-08YHB3ZjMzS4InvsLo7_ElDoF4tS9d6a6qThdCFyHphWQY95eqksz2JQNKSH6EOhFJSBCnw_j4Dw_SU9S1dkl8xWGSkLyDvgqthNHKSTXHbsHxdvP9pFXwCOaDOzymWul6vd384Jnh4Gqu3BWeed54pavVTvSmTcX8FhjHUzMHJT_BSa3wQ2ukbUzLuKIc-8HIXwmu27rZyUAxXCykAu9t8Qun3hk_G6BOUm7P0YmAyvLuoZ-h15vxrLgLJtPb-2I0CWiYDlxACYsYFdmQQRbSnIss9F8ldBCxLAOgacQBWEKEyKMsThPKgNOIZx6QJHoX8Rnq7X2p0dYaLsrGyBrMugxJuQu23AdbHoL1gsu9QLfNf9xfnwGDIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><creator>Zhou, Weihuan ; Qu, Xiaomeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weihuan ; Qu, Xiaomeng</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by government intervention. This review is undertaken in the context of the longstanding AD practices of some major WTO Members in treating China as a non-market economy (NME). It argues that while WTO tribunals have created flexibilities for AD authorities to address such distortions, they have left some critical issues open for future consideration. The flexibilities and loopholes in the case law can be used by all WTO Members and have been increasingly utilized by China in its own AD practices. Thus, the current law has arguably ‘multilateralized’ the NME treatment under the general framework of the WTO and may incentivize tit-for-tat use of AD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-3585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-3593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jnlids/idac007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of international dispute settlement, 2022-09, Vol.13 (3), p.510-531</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3200-5271</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weihuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Xiaomeng</creatorcontrib><title>Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices</title><title>Journal of international dispute settlement</title><description>Abstract
This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by government intervention. This review is undertaken in the context of the longstanding AD practices of some major WTO Members in treating China as a non-market economy (NME). It argues that while WTO tribunals have created flexibilities for AD authorities to address such distortions, they have left some critical issues open for future consideration. The flexibilities and loopholes in the case law can be used by all WTO Members and have been increasingly utilized by China in its own AD practices. Thus, the current law has arguably ‘multilateralized’ the NME treatment under the general framework of the WTO and may incentivize tit-for-tat use of AD.</description><issn>2040-3585</issn><issn>2040-3593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtOAkEQnBhNJMrV81w9LMy-wRtZ8RUUYzAeN-08YHB3ZjMzS4InvsLo7_ElDoF4tS9d6a6qThdCFyHphWQY95eqksz2JQNKSH6EOhFJSBCnw_j4Dw_SU9S1dkl8xWGSkLyDvgqthNHKSTXHbsHxdvP9pFXwCOaDOzymWul6vd384Jnh4Gqu3BWeed54pavVTvSmTcX8FhjHUzMHJT_BSa3wQ2ukbUzLuKIc-8HIXwmu27rZyUAxXCykAu9t8Qun3hk_G6BOUm7P0YmAyvLuoZ-h15vxrLgLJtPb-2I0CWiYDlxACYsYFdmQQRbSnIss9F8ldBCxLAOgacQBWEKEyKMsThPKgNOIZx6QJHoX8Rnq7X2p0dYaLsrGyBrMugxJuQu23AdbHoL1gsu9QLfNf9xfnwGDIA</recordid><startdate>20220905</startdate><enddate>20220905</enddate><creator>Zhou, Weihuan</creator><creator>Qu, Xiaomeng</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-5271</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220905</creationdate><title>Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices</title><author>Zhou, Weihuan ; Qu, Xiaomeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c158t-c0d2dcf69da61c7ef614074c82d66aac52eaad40ff726354cdaec2e64cd042bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weihuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Xiaomeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of international dispute settlement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Weihuan</au><au>Qu, Xiaomeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international dispute settlement</jtitle><date>2022-09-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>510</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>510-531</pages><issn>2040-3585</issn><eissn>2040-3593</eissn><abstract>Abstract
This article offers one of the first comprehensive reviews of the evolution of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’s jurisprudence on anti-dumping (AD), focusing on the systemic issue of what flexibility the WTO AD Agreement provides for Member states to tackle market distortions caused by government intervention. This review is undertaken in the context of the longstanding AD practices of some major WTO Members in treating China as a non-market economy (NME). It argues that while WTO tribunals have created flexibilities for AD authorities to address such distortions, they have left some critical issues open for future consideration. The flexibilities and loopholes in the case law can be used by all WTO Members and have been increasingly utilized by China in its own AD practices. Thus, the current law has arguably ‘multilateralized’ the NME treatment under the general framework of the WTO and may incentivize tit-for-tat use of AD.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jnlids/idac007</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-5271</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2040-3585 |
ispartof | Journal of international dispute settlement, 2022-09, Vol.13 (3), p.510-531 |
issn | 2040-3585 2040-3593 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jnlids_idac007 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals |
title | Confronting the ‘Non-Market Economy’ Treatment: The Evolving World Trade Organization Jurisprudence on Anti-Dumping and China’s Recent Practices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confronting%20the%20%E2%80%98Non-Market%20Economy%E2%80%99%20Treatment:%20The%20Evolving%20World%20Trade%20Organization%20Jurisprudence%20on%20Anti-Dumping%20and%20China%E2%80%99s%20Recent%20Practices&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20dispute%20settlement&rft.au=Zhou,%20Weihuan&rft.date=2022-09-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=510&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=510-531&rft.issn=2040-3585&rft.eissn=2040-3593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jnlids/idac007&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jnlids/idac007%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jnlids/idac007&rfr_iscdi=true |