Hunter or hunted? Perceptions of risk and reward in a small mesopredator

Apex predators directly and indirectly influence prey and predators at lower trophic positions (mesopredators). The lethal effect of apex predators on mesopredators is well documented, but they also could affect mesopredators in non-lethal ways. We investigated foraging decisions and perceived risk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of mammalogy 2017-12, Vol.98 (6), p.1531-1537
Hauptverfasser: Welch, Rebecca J., Périquet, Stéphanie, Petelle, Matthew B., le Roux, Aliza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1537
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1531
container_title Journal of mammalogy
container_volume 98
creator Welch, Rebecca J.
Périquet, Stéphanie
Petelle, Matthew B.
le Roux, Aliza
description Apex predators directly and indirectly influence prey and predators at lower trophic positions (mesopredators). The lethal effect of apex predators on mesopredators is well documented, but they also could affect mesopredators in non-lethal ways. We investigated foraging decisions and perceived risk in the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), a small canid that is often killed by larger terrestrial carnivores and birds of prey. We used giving-up-density (GUD) experiments and observations of vigilance behavior to assess the influence of temporal, spatial, and anthropogenic factors on perceived risk in a population of bat-eared foxes at the Kuruman River Reserve, Northern Cape, South Africa. GUDs were higher during periods around the new moon and lower in the presence of researchers, suggesting that foxes are warier in darker conditions, but perceive an increase in relative safety in the presence of humans. Vigilance, however, did not vary with these same factors. Observational data revealed foraging success outside the experimental context did not differ with lunar period, implying that higher GUDs associated with new moons were not due to higher missed opportunity costs associated with foraging at patches. These results suggest that GUDs may be capable of detecting more subtle differences in perceived risk when compared to vigilance rates. We highlight the important considerations of using GUDs to examine perceived risk for a predatory species and emphasize that future studies using GUDs should quantify predators’ risk-related decisions by documenting missed opportunity costs to determine the implications behind patch-use behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jmammal/gyx100
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyx100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26497304</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/jmammal/gyx100</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26497304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-61f3d5cfd6446ca95abad4cc47eea91563e0314b5b2bdca53b8c498936c04f653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqGwsiF5ZUh7_kwzIVQBQaoEA8zRxXYgpYkjOxX035MqFSvL3Q3Pe6d7CLlmMGeQi8WmxbbF7eJj_8MATkjClFTpWPgpSQA4T7nI-Dm5iHEDACrjkJCi2HWDC9QH-nmY7B19dcG4fmh8F6mvaWjiF8XO0uC-MVjadBRpHA9taeui74OzOPhwSc5q3EZ3dewz8v748LYq0vXL0_Pqfp0aIdSQalYLq0xttZTaYK6wQiuNkZlzmDOlhQPBZKUqXlmDSlRLI_NlLrQBWWslZmQ-7TXBxxhcXfahaTHsSwblwUN59FBOHsbA7RTwu_5_9mZiN3F86Y_mWuaZACl-AYWsbCo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hunter or hunted? Perceptions of risk and reward in a small mesopredator</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Welch, Rebecca J. ; Périquet, Stéphanie ; Petelle, Matthew B. ; le Roux, Aliza</creator><creatorcontrib>Welch, Rebecca J. ; Périquet, Stéphanie ; Petelle, Matthew B. ; le Roux, Aliza</creatorcontrib><description>Apex predators directly and indirectly influence prey and predators at lower trophic positions (mesopredators). The lethal effect of apex predators on mesopredators is well documented, but they also could affect mesopredators in non-lethal ways. We investigated foraging decisions and perceived risk in the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), a small canid that is often killed by larger terrestrial carnivores and birds of prey. We used giving-up-density (GUD) experiments and observations of vigilance behavior to assess the influence of temporal, spatial, and anthropogenic factors on perceived risk in a population of bat-eared foxes at the Kuruman River Reserve, Northern Cape, South Africa. GUDs were higher during periods around the new moon and lower in the presence of researchers, suggesting that foxes are warier in darker conditions, but perceive an increase in relative safety in the presence of humans. Vigilance, however, did not vary with these same factors. Observational data revealed foraging success outside the experimental context did not differ with lunar period, implying that higher GUDs associated with new moons were not due to higher missed opportunity costs associated with foraging at patches. These results suggest that GUDs may be capable of detecting more subtle differences in perceived risk when compared to vigilance rates. We highlight the important considerations of using GUDs to examine perceived risk for a predatory species and emphasize that future studies using GUDs should quantify predators’ risk-related decisions by documenting missed opportunity costs to determine the implications behind patch-use behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Feature Articles</subject><ispartof>Journal of mammalogy, 2017-12, Vol.98 (6), p.1531-1537</ispartof><rights>2017 American Society of Mammalogists</rights><rights>2017 American Society of Mammalogists, www.mammalogy.org 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-61f3d5cfd6446ca95abad4cc47eea91563e0314b5b2bdca53b8c498936c04f653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-61f3d5cfd6446ca95abad4cc47eea91563e0314b5b2bdca53b8c498936c04f653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26497304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26497304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1580,27906,27907,57999,58232</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Welch, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Périquet, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petelle, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>le Roux, Aliza</creatorcontrib><title>Hunter or hunted? Perceptions of risk and reward in a small mesopredator</title><title>Journal of mammalogy</title><description>Apex predators directly and indirectly influence prey and predators at lower trophic positions (mesopredators). The lethal effect of apex predators on mesopredators is well documented, but they also could affect mesopredators in non-lethal ways. We investigated foraging decisions and perceived risk in the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), a small canid that is often killed by larger terrestrial carnivores and birds of prey. We used giving-up-density (GUD) experiments and observations of vigilance behavior to assess the influence of temporal, spatial, and anthropogenic factors on perceived risk in a population of bat-eared foxes at the Kuruman River Reserve, Northern Cape, South Africa. GUDs were higher during periods around the new moon and lower in the presence of researchers, suggesting that foxes are warier in darker conditions, but perceive an increase in relative safety in the presence of humans. Vigilance, however, did not vary with these same factors. Observational data revealed foraging success outside the experimental context did not differ with lunar period, implying that higher GUDs associated with new moons were not due to higher missed opportunity costs associated with foraging at patches. These results suggest that GUDs may be capable of detecting more subtle differences in perceived risk when compared to vigilance rates. We highlight the important considerations of using GUDs to examine perceived risk for a predatory species and emphasize that future studies using GUDs should quantify predators’ risk-related decisions by documenting missed opportunity costs to determine the implications behind patch-use behavior.</description><subject>Feature Articles</subject><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqGwsiF5ZUh7_kwzIVQBQaoEA8zRxXYgpYkjOxX035MqFSvL3Q3Pe6d7CLlmMGeQi8WmxbbF7eJj_8MATkjClFTpWPgpSQA4T7nI-Dm5iHEDACrjkJCi2HWDC9QH-nmY7B19dcG4fmh8F6mvaWjiF8XO0uC-MVjadBRpHA9taeui74OzOPhwSc5q3EZ3dewz8v748LYq0vXL0_Pqfp0aIdSQalYLq0xttZTaYK6wQiuNkZlzmDOlhQPBZKUqXlmDSlRLI_NlLrQBWWslZmQ-7TXBxxhcXfahaTHsSwblwUN59FBOHsbA7RTwu_5_9mZiN3F86Y_mWuaZACl-AYWsbCo</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Welch, Rebecca J.</creator><creator>Périquet, Stéphanie</creator><creator>Petelle, Matthew B.</creator><creator>le Roux, Aliza</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Hunter or hunted? Perceptions of risk and reward in a small mesopredator</title><author>Welch, Rebecca J. ; Périquet, Stéphanie ; Petelle, Matthew B. ; le Roux, Aliza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-61f3d5cfd6446ca95abad4cc47eea91563e0314b5b2bdca53b8c498936c04f653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Feature Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Welch, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Périquet, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petelle, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>le Roux, Aliza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Welch, Rebecca J.</au><au>Périquet, Stéphanie</au><au>Petelle, Matthew B.</au><au>le Roux, Aliza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hunter or hunted? Perceptions of risk and reward in a small mesopredator</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1531</spage><epage>1537</epage><pages>1531-1537</pages><issn>0022-2372</issn><eissn>1545-1542</eissn><abstract>Apex predators directly and indirectly influence prey and predators at lower trophic positions (mesopredators). The lethal effect of apex predators on mesopredators is well documented, but they also could affect mesopredators in non-lethal ways. We investigated foraging decisions and perceived risk in the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), a small canid that is often killed by larger terrestrial carnivores and birds of prey. We used giving-up-density (GUD) experiments and observations of vigilance behavior to assess the influence of temporal, spatial, and anthropogenic factors on perceived risk in a population of bat-eared foxes at the Kuruman River Reserve, Northern Cape, South Africa. GUDs were higher during periods around the new moon and lower in the presence of researchers, suggesting that foxes are warier in darker conditions, but perceive an increase in relative safety in the presence of humans. Vigilance, however, did not vary with these same factors. Observational data revealed foraging success outside the experimental context did not differ with lunar period, implying that higher GUDs associated with new moons were not due to higher missed opportunity costs associated with foraging at patches. These results suggest that GUDs may be capable of detecting more subtle differences in perceived risk when compared to vigilance rates. We highlight the important considerations of using GUDs to examine perceived risk for a predatory species and emphasize that future studies using GUDs should quantify predators’ risk-related decisions by documenting missed opportunity costs to determine the implications behind patch-use behavior.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jmammal/gyx100</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2372
ispartof Journal of mammalogy, 2017-12, Vol.98 (6), p.1531-1537
issn 0022-2372
1545-1542
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyx100
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Feature Articles
title Hunter or hunted? Perceptions of risk and reward in a small mesopredator
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hunter%20or%20hunted?%20Perceptions%20of%20risk%20and%20reward%20in%20a%20small%20mesopredator&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mammalogy&rft.au=Welch,%20Rebecca%20J.&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1531&rft.epage=1537&rft.pages=1531-1537&rft.issn=0022-2372&rft.eissn=1545-1542&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jmammal/gyx100&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26497304%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26497304&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jmammal/gyx100&rfr_iscdi=true