Individual Criminal Responsibility in Article 25 ICC Statute

The collective nature of crimes under international law does not absolve us of the need to determine individual responsibility. Article 25 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) now contains a detailed regulation of individual criminal responsibility. While discussing the elements...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of international criminal justice 2007-09, Vol.5 (4), p.953-975
1. Verfasser: Werle, Gerhard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 975
container_issue 4
container_start_page 953
container_title Journal of international criminal justice
container_volume 5
creator Werle, Gerhard
description The collective nature of crimes under international law does not absolve us of the need to determine individual responsibility. Article 25 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) now contains a detailed regulation of individual criminal responsibility. While discussing the elements of various modes of individual criminal responsibility, this essay shows that the most important difference between prior legal frameworks and Article 25(3) ICC Statute lies not in the redefinition of the scope of individual responsibility in international criminal law, but in the systematization of modes of participation. The case is made that Article 25(3) is best construed as a differentiation model with four levels of participation. In this model, modes of participation should be understood as indicative of the degree of individual guilt, and thus as helpful guidelines in sentencing matters. With particular reference to joint commission, the author shows that this concept also leads to a coherent interpretation of the various modes of participation.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jicj/mqm059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jicj_mqm059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jicj/mqm059</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jicj/mqm059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2629-546d9a6cca1e0c98a7e802f21831ab369d217312781a5ee7326fcae0593e698c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j0tLxDAUhYMoOI6u_ANZuZE6uUmbB7gZio-BAcHHumTSW0jpy6YV5t_bUtGdq3sWH-fcj5BrYHfAjNiU3pWb-rNmiTkhK4iVjkCY5PQ3a3VOLkIoGeOSx_GK3O-a3H_5fLQVTXtf-2YKrxi6tgn-4Cs_HKlv6LYfvKuQ8oTu0pS-DXYYB7wkZ4WtAl793DX5eHx4T5-j_cvTLt3uIzetmCiJZW6sdM4CMme0VagZLzhoAfYgpMk5KAFcabAJohJcFs7iJCFQGu3Emtwuva5vQ-ixyLrpVdsfM2DZLJ7N4tkiPtF0odG1jQ9_bMIlCIjFjNwsSDt2_3Z9A3hLYwc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual Criminal Responsibility in Article 25 ICC Statute</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Werle, Gerhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Werle, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><description>The collective nature of crimes under international law does not absolve us of the need to determine individual responsibility. Article 25 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) now contains a detailed regulation of individual criminal responsibility. While discussing the elements of various modes of individual criminal responsibility, this essay shows that the most important difference between prior legal frameworks and Article 25(3) ICC Statute lies not in the redefinition of the scope of individual responsibility in international criminal law, but in the systematization of modes of participation. The case is made that Article 25(3) is best construed as a differentiation model with four levels of participation. In this model, modes of participation should be understood as indicative of the degree of individual guilt, and thus as helpful guidelines in sentencing matters. With particular reference to joint commission, the author shows that this concept also leads to a coherent interpretation of the various modes of participation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-1387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-1395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jicj/mqm059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of international criminal justice, 2007-09, Vol.5 (4), p.953-975</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press, 2007, All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2629-546d9a6cca1e0c98a7e802f21831ab369d217312781a5ee7326fcae0593e698c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1581,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Werle, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><title>Individual Criminal Responsibility in Article 25 ICC Statute</title><title>Journal of international criminal justice</title><description>The collective nature of crimes under international law does not absolve us of the need to determine individual responsibility. Article 25 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) now contains a detailed regulation of individual criminal responsibility. While discussing the elements of various modes of individual criminal responsibility, this essay shows that the most important difference between prior legal frameworks and Article 25(3) ICC Statute lies not in the redefinition of the scope of individual responsibility in international criminal law, but in the systematization of modes of participation. The case is made that Article 25(3) is best construed as a differentiation model with four levels of participation. In this model, modes of participation should be understood as indicative of the degree of individual guilt, and thus as helpful guidelines in sentencing matters. With particular reference to joint commission, the author shows that this concept also leads to a coherent interpretation of the various modes of participation.</description><issn>1478-1387</issn><issn>1478-1395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j0tLxDAUhYMoOI6u_ANZuZE6uUmbB7gZio-BAcHHumTSW0jpy6YV5t_bUtGdq3sWH-fcj5BrYHfAjNiU3pWb-rNmiTkhK4iVjkCY5PQ3a3VOLkIoGeOSx_GK3O-a3H_5fLQVTXtf-2YKrxi6tgn-4Cs_HKlv6LYfvKuQ8oTu0pS-DXYYB7wkZ4WtAl793DX5eHx4T5-j_cvTLt3uIzetmCiJZW6sdM4CMme0VagZLzhoAfYgpMk5KAFcabAJohJcFs7iJCFQGu3Emtwuva5vQ-ixyLrpVdsfM2DZLJ7N4tkiPtF0odG1jQ9_bMIlCIjFjNwsSDt2_3Z9A3hLYwc</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Werle, Gerhard</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>SSRN</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>Individual Criminal Responsibility in Article 25 ICC Statute</title><author>Werle, Gerhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2629-546d9a6cca1e0c98a7e802f21831ab369d217312781a5ee7326fcae0593e698c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Werle, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of international criminal justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Werle, Gerhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individual Criminal Responsibility in Article 25 ICC Statute</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international criminal justice</jtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>953</spage><epage>975</epage><pages>953-975</pages><issn>1478-1387</issn><eissn>1478-1395</eissn><abstract>The collective nature of crimes under international law does not absolve us of the need to determine individual responsibility. Article 25 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) now contains a detailed regulation of individual criminal responsibility. While discussing the elements of various modes of individual criminal responsibility, this essay shows that the most important difference between prior legal frameworks and Article 25(3) ICC Statute lies not in the redefinition of the scope of individual responsibility in international criminal law, but in the systematization of modes of participation. The case is made that Article 25(3) is best construed as a differentiation model with four levels of participation. In this model, modes of participation should be understood as indicative of the degree of individual guilt, and thus as helpful guidelines in sentencing matters. With particular reference to joint commission, the author shows that this concept also leads to a coherent interpretation of the various modes of participation.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jicj/mqm059</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1478-1387
ispartof Journal of international criminal justice, 2007-09, Vol.5 (4), p.953-975
issn 1478-1387
1478-1395
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jicj_mqm059
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Individual Criminal Responsibility in Article 25 ICC Statute
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A34%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20Criminal%20Responsibility%20in%20Article%2025%20ICC%20Statute&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20criminal%20justice&rft.au=Werle,%20Gerhard&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=953&rft.epage=975&rft.pages=953-975&rft.issn=1478-1387&rft.eissn=1478-1395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jicj/mqm059&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jicj/mqm059%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jicj/mqm059&rfr_iscdi=true