Interpretation in Police Stations: Lawyers’ Perspectives on Rights and Realities
Abstract Limited attention has been paid to the realization of the right to interpretation in the police station. What has been done often focuses on the police or the interpreter experience. We seek to address this lacuna by focusing on the extent to which the right to interpretation is realized in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of human rights practice 2022-04, Vol.13 (3), p.606-628 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 628 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 606 |
container_title | Journal of human rights practice |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Conway, Vicky Daly, Yvonne McEvoy, Gearóidín |
description | Abstract
Limited attention has been paid to the realization of the right to interpretation in the police station. What has been done often focuses on the police or the interpreter experience. We seek to address this lacuna by focusing on the extent to which the right to interpretation is realized in Ireland. We start by outlining the nature of the right at international and European levels, and exploring the reasons why the right is so important. We consider how this has been implemented in Ireland, and note how even on paper there are significant, fundamental concerns as to how the effectiveness of the right is achieved. We then present findings from semi-structured interviews with over 40 criminal defence solicitors in Ireland, with experience of attending police interviews. The findings show that solicitors have concerns about the process of securing interpreters, the quality of the work, their independence, their understanding of their role, the overall impact on the process and the urgent need for training. It is abundantly clear that the right cannot be effectively realized under the current system in Ireland, despite the Directive on Interpretation being in effect there. Further, we note that solicitors are often uncertain and unclear on the extent of the right and what they can ask for. This means that those who are defending the rights of the detainee are unlikely to challenge breaches as they occur. The right to interpretation is clearly deeply neglected and ineffective in Ireland. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jhuman/huab035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jhuman_huab035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jhuman/huab035</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jhuman/huab035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-a1a5ed8addaa2eaf375bfc01e19f665abf2c68470d57acb4199314bb40b3a6483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFOwzAYhC0EEqWwMntlSGvHcZywoQpKpUpUAebot_OHumqTyHZB3XgNXo8nISgd2JjudLq74SPkmrMJZ7mYbtb7HTTT9R40E_KEjLiSKsrTWJ3-8efkwvsNY6mUIhuRYtEEdJ3DAMG2DbUNXbVba5A-D4m_pUv4OKDz359fdNVrhybYd_S0rxf2bR08haaiBcLWBov-kpzVsPV4ddQxeX24f5k9Rsun-WJ2t4xMrESIgIPEKoOqAogRaqGkrg3jyPM6TSXoOjZplihWSQVGJzzPBU-0TpgWkCaZGJPJ8Gtc673Duuyc3YE7lJyVv0TKgUh5JNIPboZBu-_-6_4AzeloEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interpretation in Police Stations: Lawyers’ Perspectives on Rights and Realities</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Conway, Vicky ; Daly, Yvonne ; McEvoy, Gearóidín</creator><creatorcontrib>Conway, Vicky ; Daly, Yvonne ; McEvoy, Gearóidín</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Limited attention has been paid to the realization of the right to interpretation in the police station. What has been done often focuses on the police or the interpreter experience. We seek to address this lacuna by focusing on the extent to which the right to interpretation is realized in Ireland. We start by outlining the nature of the right at international and European levels, and exploring the reasons why the right is so important. We consider how this has been implemented in Ireland, and note how even on paper there are significant, fundamental concerns as to how the effectiveness of the right is achieved. We then present findings from semi-structured interviews with over 40 criminal defence solicitors in Ireland, with experience of attending police interviews. The findings show that solicitors have concerns about the process of securing interpreters, the quality of the work, their independence, their understanding of their role, the overall impact on the process and the urgent need for training. It is abundantly clear that the right cannot be effectively realized under the current system in Ireland, despite the Directive on Interpretation being in effect there. Further, we note that solicitors are often uncertain and unclear on the extent of the right and what they can ask for. This means that those who are defending the rights of the detainee are unlikely to challenge breaches as they occur. The right to interpretation is clearly deeply neglected and ineffective in Ireland.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-9627</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-9627</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huab035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of human rights practice, 2022-04, Vol.13 (3), p.606-628</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-a1a5ed8addaa2eaf375bfc01e19f665abf2c68470d57acb4199314bb40b3a6483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-a1a5ed8addaa2eaf375bfc01e19f665abf2c68470d57acb4199314bb40b3a6483</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6640-3780</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1583,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conway, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEvoy, Gearóidín</creatorcontrib><title>Interpretation in Police Stations: Lawyers’ Perspectives on Rights and Realities</title><title>Journal of human rights practice</title><description>Abstract
Limited attention has been paid to the realization of the right to interpretation in the police station. What has been done often focuses on the police or the interpreter experience. We seek to address this lacuna by focusing on the extent to which the right to interpretation is realized in Ireland. We start by outlining the nature of the right at international and European levels, and exploring the reasons why the right is so important. We consider how this has been implemented in Ireland, and note how even on paper there are significant, fundamental concerns as to how the effectiveness of the right is achieved. We then present findings from semi-structured interviews with over 40 criminal defence solicitors in Ireland, with experience of attending police interviews. The findings show that solicitors have concerns about the process of securing interpreters, the quality of the work, their independence, their understanding of their role, the overall impact on the process and the urgent need for training. It is abundantly clear that the right cannot be effectively realized under the current system in Ireland, despite the Directive on Interpretation being in effect there. Further, we note that solicitors are often uncertain and unclear on the extent of the right and what they can ask for. This means that those who are defending the rights of the detainee are unlikely to challenge breaches as they occur. The right to interpretation is clearly deeply neglected and ineffective in Ireland.</description><issn>1757-9627</issn><issn>1757-9627</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFOwzAYhC0EEqWwMntlSGvHcZywoQpKpUpUAebot_OHumqTyHZB3XgNXo8nISgd2JjudLq74SPkmrMJZ7mYbtb7HTTT9R40E_KEjLiSKsrTWJ3-8efkwvsNY6mUIhuRYtEEdJ3DAMG2DbUNXbVba5A-D4m_pUv4OKDz359fdNVrhybYd_S0rxf2bR08haaiBcLWBov-kpzVsPV4ddQxeX24f5k9Rsun-WJ2t4xMrESIgIPEKoOqAogRaqGkrg3jyPM6TSXoOjZplihWSQVGJzzPBU-0TpgWkCaZGJPJ8Gtc673Duuyc3YE7lJyVv0TKgUh5JNIPboZBu-_-6_4AzeloEA</recordid><startdate>20220405</startdate><enddate>20220405</enddate><creator>Conway, Vicky</creator><creator>Daly, Yvonne</creator><creator>McEvoy, Gearóidín</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6640-3780</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220405</creationdate><title>Interpretation in Police Stations: Lawyers’ Perspectives on Rights and Realities</title><author>Conway, Vicky ; Daly, Yvonne ; McEvoy, Gearóidín</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-a1a5ed8addaa2eaf375bfc01e19f665abf2c68470d57acb4199314bb40b3a6483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conway, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEvoy, Gearóidín</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of human rights practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conway, Vicky</au><au>Daly, Yvonne</au><au>McEvoy, Gearóidín</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interpretation in Police Stations: Lawyers’ Perspectives on Rights and Realities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human rights practice</jtitle><date>2022-04-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>606</spage><epage>628</epage><pages>606-628</pages><issn>1757-9627</issn><eissn>1757-9627</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Limited attention has been paid to the realization of the right to interpretation in the police station. What has been done often focuses on the police or the interpreter experience. We seek to address this lacuna by focusing on the extent to which the right to interpretation is realized in Ireland. We start by outlining the nature of the right at international and European levels, and exploring the reasons why the right is so important. We consider how this has been implemented in Ireland, and note how even on paper there are significant, fundamental concerns as to how the effectiveness of the right is achieved. We then present findings from semi-structured interviews with over 40 criminal defence solicitors in Ireland, with experience of attending police interviews. The findings show that solicitors have concerns about the process of securing interpreters, the quality of the work, their independence, their understanding of their role, the overall impact on the process and the urgent need for training. It is abundantly clear that the right cannot be effectively realized under the current system in Ireland, despite the Directive on Interpretation being in effect there. Further, we note that solicitors are often uncertain and unclear on the extent of the right and what they can ask for. This means that those who are defending the rights of the detainee are unlikely to challenge breaches as they occur. The right to interpretation is clearly deeply neglected and ineffective in Ireland.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jhuman/huab035</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6640-3780</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1757-9627 |
ispartof | Journal of human rights practice, 2022-04, Vol.13 (3), p.606-628 |
issn | 1757-9627 1757-9627 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jhuman_huab035 |
source | EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | Interpretation in Police Stations: Lawyers’ Perspectives on Rights and Realities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T13%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interpretation%20in%20Police%20Stations:%20Lawyers%E2%80%99%20Perspectives%20on%20Rights%20and%20Realities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20rights%20practice&rft.au=Conway,%20Vicky&rft.date=2022-04-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=606&rft.epage=628&rft.pages=606-628&rft.issn=1757-9627&rft.eissn=1757-9627&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jhuman/huab035&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jhuman/huab035%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jhuman/huab035&rfr_iscdi=true |